Adenine Automotive [1978 Vindicator]

FROM CRISIS TO OPPORTUNITY: 1975 Adenine Valence

In the early 70s, Martin Penrose was looking to expand Adenine’s share of the US automotive industry. Adenine had covered the key markets - it had a full-size sedan (the Veranda), a pickup (the Reverence), and a performance car (the Vindicator). But Japanese and European companies were growing their US market share even faster than Adenine. Their strategy was effective - the imports almost exclusively targeted the budget compact sector. Cars such as the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, and Volkswagen Beetle could walk all over the American companies who had little to no presence of their own in this segment.

Penrose knew that he could not compete with the imports directly. These companies were already well-established in their home countries and could produce high volumes of inexpensive cars in their factories. Adenine had made a decent amount of money in its first decade of existence, but it hardly had the resources to compete in the budget sector.

But Penrose realized that there was still a gap in the market. In order to drive down prices as low as possible, the import cars had tiny engines and barebones interiors. These cars were simply basic transportation, not something to be proud of owning. Penrose had an idea: what if Adenine built a small, compact car, but gave it the same level of comfort and performance expected of larger sedans?

Concept design and prototyping for the new car, which would be called the Valence, began midway through 1972. The challenge early on was designing an engine that would be small enough to fit in a compact chassis but powerful enough to outperform existing cars on the market. Penrose figured that a more advanced overhead cam design, coupled with multiple carburetors and a rich fuel mix, would be enough to do the job. But when the oil crisis hit in 1973, everything changed.

While Penrose was devastated at first, he soon realized that the crisis could actually be a golden opportunity for Adenine - and the new car would be the perfect way to seize the opportunity. Immediately, fuel economy became a top priority for the new car. But this became a problem: in order to improve economy, performance had to be sacrificed. With a lean fuel mix and small carbs, plus the power-sapping advent of catalytic converters, the small engine could only muster a measly 65hp - hardly any better than existing engines on the market. Penrose was stumped. But in the back of his mind, he remembered that there was one other thing he could try - and he knew just who to talk to about it.

Inline Designs was founded in 1965 in Philadelphia, PA by two young mechanical engineers with a love for engines. Much like Adenine’s early roots, they began as a humble car repair and tuning shop and worked on engines for their friends and neighbors. As the company grew, they began to design bespoke engines, especially for performance and racing cars. Unlike other American companies who simply made their engines bigger, Inline Designs had a different philosophy: Do more with less. Smaller, OHC inline engines could perform better at a much lower weight than the traditional V8 pushrod engines of the day.

There was one innovation that Inline Designs was particularly fascinated with: turbocharging. They were quick to recognize the enormous potential of this technology, as huge power outputs could be made from very small engines. In the early 70s, an Adenine Vindicator fitted with an experimental turbocharged engine came to dominate Pennsylvanian racing leagues - when it wasn’t blowing up on the track.

When Penrose heard about the wondrous things coming from the company in Philly, he invited Inline Designs to show off some of their work. The young engineers had already spent many years trying to work out the issues of turbocharging, especially reliability and turbo lag. Penrose was very impressed. He realized that Inline Designs might just be able to provide the solution that Adenine needed. Thus, a lasting partnership was born.

Inline Designs did not have a lot of experience designing engines for economy, but they knew that their more-with-less philosophy could achieve excellent performance with much better efficiency than standard engines of the day. The engine that Inline Designs came up with was radical in many ways. The 1.6L inline four engine used a single overhead cam with four valves per cylinder, mechanical fuel injection, and a novel turbocharger design. Unlike the large, slow-spooling turbos that came before, Inline Designs went with a small turbine and compressor and a very modest boost pressure of 0.45 bar. This increased efficiency and reduced turbo lag, making the engine surprisingly drivable at low speeds. Inline Designs also included their prototype intercooler technology, which reduced knocking and greatly improved reliability. Mechanical injection was too complex and expensive for mass production, so it was replaced with a two-barrel eco carburetor in the later stages of development.

With Inline Designs’s turbocharging expertise, the finalized engine was able to meet all three requirements: excellent fuel economy, good performance, and compact dimensions. It produced 80hp at 5000RPM and a constant 95 lb-ft of torque from 2400 to 4000RPM. The 1.6L engine produced comparable performance to the 2.3L Ford Pinto and Chevy Vega engines, with lower weight, considerably smaller size, and greater efficiency.

For the rest of the car, Adenine engineers had to balance a premium, high-class feel with affordability and manufacturability. To maximize trunk space, a torsion-beam rear suspension was selected. Standard features included front disc brakes, power steering, a good interior, a radio and tape player, seat belts, and airbags. The emphasis on safety proved prescient, as competitors such as the Ford Pinto soon developed a reputation for poor safety while the Valence was regarded highly despite its size. A premium, upscale interior and a luxurious tape player were also options.


The combination of out-of-the-box thinking from both Adenine and Inline Designs proved to be a winning formula. The Valence was able to achieve 30mpg in a car that was comfortable, safe, and surprisingly quick. It could accelerate from 0-62 in as fast as 11.6 seconds with the 5-speed manual, which was several seconds faster than its competitors. Even when fitted with the 4-speed auto and fully loaded, the Valence could still make the run in 12.7 seconds - faster than most other cars in its class. Pricing began at a very reasonable $9600 (+20%) and rose to $14000 (+40%) for a fully loaded version. The car was described as a bargain for the amount of quality and comfort it delivered.


The Inline Designs 1.6L I4 was the first successful turbocharged engine used in a non-sports car. Drivers found the engine to be unlike anything they had driven before. Turbo lag was much improved from 60s turbo cars, but with the slow eco carbs, the throttle response was still very poor. Certainly, drivers would have preferred a more conventional naturally aspirated engine, but it was impossible to argue with the remarkable fuel economy. Perhaps even more impressive was the refinement of the engine. The muffling effect of the turbo made the engine whisper-quiet, with only a light turbo whine giving away its operation. And while the turbo lag was bad for darting in and out of traffic, the slow and steady buildup of boost made accelerating from a standstill incredibly smooth.

In an era of soaring gas prices and long lines at the pump, the Valence’s class-leading efficiency and its unique position in the market made it a smashing success. Full-sized American sedans were hopelessly inefficient, and more and more people turned to smaller, more efficient vehicles. While the import cars satisfied the budget crowd, the Valence was perfectly positioned to capture the market of people who wanted a car with both high class and high efficiency. As gas prices reached a peak in 1979, the Valence broke all sales records and became one of the best-selling cars in America.

The success of the Valence rocketed Adenine - and Inline Designs - into the spotlight as innovative, forward-thinking automotive companies. While the Big Three flustered, Adenine gained market share as quickly as the Japanese imports. With the Adenine Valence, American customers had a car that was comfortable, affordable, and all-American - but also achieved excellent fuel economy. In addition, the Valence was highly influential and pioneered technology that was ahead of its time. It was an innovative, well-designed car, that launched at the perfect time.

Now that he had built his masterpiece and turned his startup company into a huge success, Penrose felt very satisfied with his career. Within a few decades, he had grown his small Pittsburgh car shop into a huge, nationally visible juggernaut. His innovation and willingness to embrace new ideas had set a strong precedent for the company, and made a noticeable impact on the US auto industry. But Adenine was now a far-reaching corporation, and in his old age he found it more and more difficult to oversee all the different aspects of the company. In 1980, he retired at the age of 61.


The full Valence series:
Overview
1975 - 1985 - 1997 - 2007 - 2017
Stats

11 Likes

By the look of things, the Valence could not have gotten off to a better start; it was ahead of its time mechanically and thus served the needs of the average motorist well. I can’t wait for the later Valence models to be shown!

Awesome stuff dude. Nice to see a proper ‘turbo origins’ style car, plus you’ve actually managed to make chrome work on that body!

As for the 0.4 sportines…:grin:

4 Likes

Just wait until I get around to the Reverence pickup series, 0 sportiness through 1995 :smile:

4 Likes

OOH YEAH, get me on that no-feedback steering right away!

##A NEW CLASS OF CAR: 1985 Adenine Valence

In the 1980s, times were changing quickly for the American automotive industry. After a rough decade, Ford and GM came back from the brink with strong, well-designed cars. Japanese and European automakers continued to excel in the American market. With gas prices back to pre-crisis levels, Adenine faced tough competition from all directions. By the time the 80s came around, the Valence was still riding on the same basic chassis from 1975 and it was getting outdated. While it was still as comfortable and efficient as ever, customers wanted something new. Adenine was ready to rise up to the challenge, and as the second-generation Valence neared the end of its production run, Adenine engineers got to work designing a brand new Valence.

From the beginning, Adenine wanted to stick the same formula that made the first Valence so successful. That meant a sedan with plenty of comfort, good performance, and excellent fuel economy - all at an affordable price. Despite falling gas prices, Adenine wanted the maintain the Valence’s identity as the smart, efficient vehicle of the future. While other automakers built cars that barely met minimum economy standards, Adenine pushed forward in developing efficient technology.

However, with low gas prices, there was plenty of room for growth between the small first-gen Valence and the full-size Veranda. While the first-gen Valence had been perfectly sized for the 70s, the market was shifting quickly. The latest front-drive imports like the Honda Accord and Volkswagen Golf were no longer bargain basement econoboxes, but excellent vehicles in their own right. To differentiate itself from them, Adenine aimed to bring the Valence formula to the midsize segment.

Now that Adenine had the money to build more factories, the new Valence could be powered by a selection of engines, instead of just one. The existing 1.6L four-cylinder would return to power the base trim. A new 2.2L turbo four would be used to power the premium trim and the new sport trim. All of the new engines received new ball bearings, freer-flowing 3-way cats, and the latest in electronic fuel injection technology. With the new additions, the output of the 1.6L engine rose to 93hp, competitive with the base engines of competitors like the Taurus and the Accord. The 2.2L engine had two variants. The more common variant produced 141hp and was targeted at mainstream or premium consumers. The sport variant used more aggressive cams, higher boost, and a richer fuel mix to produce an impressive 175hp.



<img src="/uploads/default/original/4X/b/5/9/b59b6ae0d589a16db4e636f9a1ea2723a229b93a.jpg" width=“500"”>

During the process of designing the body of the new Valence, Adenine designers were heavily influenced by the recently-launched Audi 100 (C3), which had a remarkable drag coefficient of 0.30. Its rounded lines and flush windows were a big step forward in aerodynamics, and gave the car a look that was different from any other sedan of the time. In comparison, all of Adenine’s cars looked boxy and outdated. So, for the new Valence, Adenine designers came up with a new body with sleek, flowing lines and a clean, ultra-modern appearance. In addition, some of the body panels would be constructed of aluminum to reduce weight.


When it was released in 1985, the Valence was once again a game changer. The aerodynamic design, fuel-injected turbo engine, and lightweight construction allowed it to achieve a class-leading 35mpg. Competitors in the midsize sedan segment were well behind at around 24mpg. The Valence could match or exceed the economy of cars a full size class lower, such as the Honda Civic or even the previous Valence. With a starting price of $11500 (+20%), the new, larger Valence was quite a bit more expensive than its predecessor. But the Valence’s solid interior fittings, excellent ride quality, and quiet engine gave it a level of refinement that punched above its class.

Performance was also quite reasonable. With a 0-62 time of 11.5 seconds, the 1.6T-powered Valence wasn’t any faster than its predecessor, but it was still 1-2 seconds faster than its American competition. However, smaller Japanese sedans like the Accord and Camry could out-accelerate the base engine.


The Premium trim of the Valence came with the more powerful 2.2T engine, disc brakes all around, and an upscale interior and cassette player. 0-62 time was 9.4 seconds with the 4-speed automatic, quick enough to outpace both the four-cylinder Japanese sedans and V6-powered American sedans. With luxurious fittings and capable performance, the Valence Premium was soon being cross-shopped with higher-class executive cars such as the BMW 5-series (E28) and Mercedes E-Class (W124). The Valence certainly couldn’t match the prestige of the European juggernauts, but its lower price of $18000 (+40%) and exceptional economy made it an interesting choice.


For the first time, the Valence was also offered in a high-performance Sport trim, starting at $14300 (+30%). Fitted with larger 205mm tires, a geared LSD, and a 5-speed manual, the Valence Sport could accelerate from 0-62 in just 7.1 seconds. This was unprecedented performance for a four-cylinder, front-wheel drive car - in fact, with a quarter mile time of 15.4 seconds, the Valence Sport was only half a second behind the 5.0L, 210hp Mustang GT. And it was still capable of 24mpg.

Similar to the Ford Taurus SHO which came after it, the Sport variant of the Valence hid legitimate performance in a family car body. With retuned suspension and a small wing to counter lift, the Sport variant could corner at over 1g. The Sport proved to be the sleeper hit of the era, giving the otherwise prim-and-proper Valence a muscular underside.

All in all, the new Valence improved on the original in nearly every way. The larger dimensions gave it mainstream appeal, and the high output option expanded the market to the performance crowd. However, the novelty of the turbocharger had worn off, and despite Inline Designs’s best efforts, drivers still did not like the feeling of turbo lag. In the 1980s, gas prices were cheap and the remarkable power-to-efficiency ratio of the Valence went unappreciated. Still, the Valence offered solid performance, a comfortable ride, and stylish looks for a small price premium over the stiff competition. While it wasn’t the smashing success of the first-generation Valence, the new model was capable and appealing, and allowed Adenine to grow over the decade.


The full Valence series:
Overview
1975 - 1985 - 1997 - 2007 - 2017
Stats

9 Likes

The '85 Valence is clearly an improvement over its predecessor, but why does it use a standard steel unibody instead of a corrosion-resistant one? I suspect it may be down to company lore.

Corrosion resistance wasn’t a key design goal for the '85 Valence. At the time, the use of corrosion resistant steel was more common on premium cars than mainstream cars.

3 Likes

I wish I could writte the story of my cars like you do :’(

Damn! What a story. Really like the level of detail you’re going into. How much research did you do into similar cars from the time for this?

4 Likes

Each car takes a couple hours of research or so. I really enjoy learning about what everyday cars were like in each decade. I didn’t grow up in the 70s and 80s so there’s plenty of historical context to learn about! It really gives a nice sense of perspective. People remember the sports cars and the supercars, but I feel that it’s the boring everyday cars that truly capture what living in a certain time period was like.

I’m using Automobile-Catalog for my performance data and fueleconomy.gov for mileage. I’m not sure how comparable they are to Automation, but at least they are consistent.

As for the actual historical context, I’m a big fan of Curbside Classic. The level of writing in these articles is simply fantastic, and far beyond anything I can match. Here’s a couple of articles about 80s cars to get you in the mood:
1982 Audi 100
1986 Honda Accord
1986 Ford Taurus 1
1986 Ford Taurus 2

5 Likes

Wow, thanks for sharing those links! I need to spend some time on Automobile Catalogue I think, seriously helpful tool by the looks of it.

And you are so right, it is the boring every day cars that define the period. It’s why I love the Mk II Cortina so much, because they were so popular.

2 Likes

ON THE CUTTING EDGE: 1997 Adenine Valence

In the early-to-mid 1990s, there was a R&D fervor going on behind the scenes at Adenine and Inline Designs. Not content with simply maintaining the status quo, Adenine invested billions of dollars in hopes of blowing away the competition with superior engineering. New technologies were being developed left and right, and Adenine was keen on delivering a new Valence that could be as innovative and revolutionary as the original.

Leading the charge was Inline Designs’s all-new 2.0L DOHC I4 engine, featuring lightweight AlSi construction and the second-generation ATP variable valve system. The first generation had been capable of VVT only, but the addition of VVL allowed a huge leap forward in both efficiency and drivability. The cam profiles were optimized for performance at the low and high ends, with the turbocharger providing the mid-range grunt. While the problem of turbo lag was not fully solved, the engine was more capable before the turbo spooled, and the power delivery felt much closer to a naturally aspirated engine - all thanks to the incredible versatility of VVL.

Another important development was the new low friction cast pistons, which promised exceptional fuel economy. The downside was that the pistons were much weaker than the forged pistons Inline Designs was familiar with, necessitating a lower redline and an oversquare design. On the other hand, with the oversquare design and fitted with forged pistons, the Sport variant of the engine could rev up to 7500RPM and produce an impressive 227hp.



<img src="/uploads/default/original/4X/b/1/3/b13dbe54ab8bf2ce6c6e0511c8b2e9097ce88877.jpg" width=“500"”>

The car’s chassis was also completely reengineered for 1997, bearing almost no resemblance to its predecessors. Adenine took advantage of advances in materials, with new high strength steel alloys improving safety, stiffness, and corrosion resistance. All-new, fully independent suspension was a major selling point, as rear double wishbones replaced the venerable torsion beam. Furthermore, the sway bars were hydraulically actuated, allowing the stiffness to be changed dynamically to match road conditions. On higher trim levels, the Valence also offered semi-active dampers for even better adjustability.

The exterior design of the car was significantly updated for 1997. By now, the checkered grille introduced with the 1985 Valence had become Adenine’s corporate face. The car’s appearance was certainly influenced by the rounded, blobby styling that was popular in the day. However, its steeply raked front and rear windshields and very short front overhang made it stand out. On the inside, the Valence offered a basic cassette player and advanced safety as standard, with an upgraded premium interior and a luxurious CD player as options.


The combination of new technologies delivered some truly impressive results. The base trim’s fuel economy rose to 38mpg while power rose to 165hp. Both figures were able to blow away all the other cars in the segment, which started around 25mpg and 150hp. 0-62 could be achieved in a peppy 9.1 seconds, a full two seconds faster than its predecessor. The new chassis and suspension made the car lightweight and nimble, with accurate handling and excellent ride quality. Pricing started at $13500 (+20%) which was a bargain for the sheer amount of technology included.


In the Premium trim, the same 2.0L four-cylinder could produce 216hp and do 0-62 in 8.7 seconds, easily outclassing the V6s that other cars offered. With a base price of $22000 (+40%), the Valence Premium had the comfort and technology expected of a top-tier luxury sedan at an incredible price.


The Sport trim of the Valence perhaps benefited the most from the new technology. The semi-active dampers and sway bars gave it remarkable handling for a front-wheel drive car. Incredibly light, and blessed with a powerful 227hp engine, the Sport trim could make the 0-62 run in just 6.8 seconds and corner at 1.1g. The car now had more power and less weight than a Mustang GT, and could beat it in a quarter mile with a good launch. All with 27mpg and a price of $17000 (+30%).

The new Valence was launched in 1997 with considerable fanfare. Advertisements crowed about the unmatched fuel economy, the cutting edge technology, and the advanced suspension. Adenine was confident that the new Valence would be a success. It would have to be - developing all of the new technology had come at a steep cost.

And it was, to some extent. By all accounts, the 1997 Adenine Valence was an excellent sedan for its time. Reviewers consistently put it at the top of the family sedan class and praised it as an innovative, well-designed refinement of the Valence formula. The problem was that the Valence formula was not in demand anymore. In the 90s, gas-guzzling SUVs and trucks were all the rage, and Adenine failed to deliver on this front. While Adenine did have the Reverence pickup truck, it had no family-oriented SUV that could compete with the Explorers and RAV4s that swept the market. Expecting that the wagon variant of the Valence would satisfy the need, Adenine could only sit back helplessly and watch as sales figures plummeted. With low gas prices, the high fuel economy was completely ignored by customers, and the small size was looked down upon by the rest of the market. Even worse, with light truck sales booming, other manufacturers were able to lower the price of their sedans. Since Adenine was dependent on its sedans and coupes for profit, its prices were significantly undercut.

The late 1990s and early 2000s were difficult times for Adenine. While other automakers flourished, Adenine saw heavy losses. All the money that had been poured into developing new technology failed to produce results. What was intended to be a game changer turned out to be terribly behind the curve. The Valence, regarded as a crowning achievement by its engineers, was a flop.


The full Valence series:
Overview
1975 - 1985 - 1997 - 2007 - 2017
Stats

8 Likes

That rear light design is to die for. Shame that this car failed though, 70+ drivability for this period is magnificent. That sports trim also looks to be incredible value for money too.

3 Likes

A great idea ruined by bad timing. So will you build a real crossover to fill the void in the Adenine range, just because of market trends?

@szafirowy01 you have hit the nail on the head - by exporting the Valence to Europe, Adenine would have recouped the company’s investment, and proven that their faith in small turbo engines was, in fact, not misplaced.

1 Like

Adenine should have exported it to Europe - the Valence would fit perfectly here :wink:

3 Likes

They have to face the Znopresk Zenit in Europe :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
That’s the problem

1 Like

I haven’t really put a lot of thought into how global Adenine is at this point. Yes, the Valence would make a ton of sense in Europe, but it doesn’t make for a good story, haha. I like the idea of thinking, “how would a Swedish/Japanese-inspired eco turbo car do in the US market through the decades?” It’s a fascinating thought experiment. :slight_smile:

2 Likes

A RISK WORTH TAKING: 2007 Adenine Valence

The 90s had been a very difficult decade for Adenine. After investing billions of dollars into research and development, the company had been caught off guard by the sudden boom of SUVs and minivans. Adenine had always been a highly engineering-focused company, and there was no question that it could design and engineer some of the most advanced vehicles on the market. But innovative engineering was only a part of the reason for Adenine’s early successes in the 60s and 70s. Perhaps more important was a strong understanding of market forces and demands. Penrose had understood this ever since his original Advent failed in the 1960s while the Veranda became a success. He understood it when he commissioned development of the ‘75 Valence, which turned out to be perfect for 70s oil crisis America. But after Penrose retired in 1980, the company had been hesitant to deviate from its established image and slow to adapt to changing markets.

Still reeling from heavy losses throughout the 90s, the discontinuation of several nameplates, and the death of Penrose, Adenine underwent significant changes around the turn of the new millennia. The new market-focused leadership rushed development of a unibody crossover SUV, which would be introduced in 2001. The Ambience was able to capture enough of the SUV craze to keep the company afloat, but Adenine’s SUV lineup was still far behind almost every other automaker. Change would be slow: Adenine had invested a lot of money in developing efficient technology in the past decade, and going back on that would mean admitting that the money had been wasted.

When it came time to plan the next-generation Valence in 2004, there was a lot of discussion as to where Adenine should put its focus. Should they let the existing generation soldier on, and invest more money into SUVs? Or should they stick to the Valence’s roots, and once again bet against the US automotive industry?

Maybe the answer was obvious, maybe it wasn’t. More and more SUVs were flying off dealer lots each year, and it seemed like Adenine was just digging itself into a deeper and deeper hole. But there were signs of change. The September 11 terrorist attacks and the resulting War on Terror showed that there was still a lot of instability in the Middle East. Slowly, almost imperceptibly at first, gas prices started rising in 2004. Perhaps almost out of a sense of deja vu, Adenine eventually decided to go all-in on developing a new Valence. It was a risky decision, one that was questioned by many industry insiders. If it went wrong, Adenine would be at risk of a hostile takeover. The Big Three were all too eager to get their hands on Adenine’s technology.

Adenine didn’t have a whole lot of money to spend on the new car, so the primary design philosophy was “small changes that make a big impact.” The basic engine and chassis were carried over from the old car, but a few key technological advancements pushed the Valence to new heights.



The most important of these was lean-burn direct injection, which offered tremendous benefits to both economy and performance. Under low-load conditions, the injectors could inject a stratified charge, allowing for stoichiometric combustion at the spark plug while having a very low AFR overall. Meanwhile, the cooling effect of direct injection allowed for better-optimized ignition timing and more compression, leading to greater power output. The base engine could produce a sprightly 195hp, and the sport version could produce over 250hp.


On the outside, the biggest change was the striking new roofline. The beautifully raked fastback design allowed the Valence to achieve an impressively low CdA of 0.623 sq m. Although a short-trunked sedan version was kept to appease conservative buyers, Adenine pushed the new 5-door liftback as the primary body style. Its all-around practicality and sporty coupe-like appearance made it stand out from the very conventionally-styled sedans of the day.


Another new addition was a six-speed automated manual transmission, with the regular automatic relegated to higher trim levels. The electrohydraulic controls could be added quite easily to the existing manual, and the resulting gearbox was efficient and reliable while offering the ease of use that most Americans expected.


As the Valence neared completion, Adenine engineers were ecstatic. Fuel prices were on the rise, SUV sales were declining, and it was clear that the market was on the verge of a tipping point. They had guessed right, and their years developing advanced, highly efficient technology would finally pay off. But they had not anticipated just how right they would be…

The Valence finally arrived in 2007, just in time for the biggest shock to the automotive industry since the 1970s. The economy crashed, fuel prices skyrocketed, and demand for the once-beloved SUVs disappeared overnight. Customers flocked to buy the new Valence. Its outstanding 43mpg fuel economy easily outclassed everything that wasn’t a Prius, and it could deliver much better handling and performance than any hybrid. It could go 0-62 in 8.5 seconds for the base trim, 7.9 for the premium trim, and 6.5 for the sport trim. Comfortable, stylish, and exceedingly efficient, the 2007 Valence recaptured the glory of the original 1975 version and catapulted Adenine into the lead once again.

It wasn’t all fun and joy for Adenine, though. While the Valence was almost constantly in a shortage, Adenine’s SUVs and trucks languished on lots, unsold. Car sales on the whole were down, and Adenine had to suffer losses and close down factories. Still, Adenine was far better prepared for the crisis than any of its American competitors. By the time the dust had settled, GM and Chrysler had gone bankrupt and Ford had come close to the brink. In the ensuing fallout, many pointed to Adenine as proof that American automakers could be fuel-efficient and technologically advanced.

Ultimately, GM and Chrysler were bailed out by the US government, so Adenine was back to competing with the Big Three again. But by developing for efficiency early on - and learning some painful lessons in the 90s - Adenine had gotten a significant head start over the opposition. The markets and the engineering were now aligned once again, and Adenine was poised to lead the US automotive industry out of the hole it had fallen into.

Special thanks to @partario for the sexy liftback! :smile:


The full Valence series:
Overview
1975 - 1985 - 1997 - 2007 - 2017
Stats

11 Likes

Now this time the Valence was launched at the right time, so would this generation of Valence have been successful in other markets such as Europe?