[quote=“Vri404”]A car with worse fuel economy then mine!?
BLASPHEMY![/quote]
Mine also has a tendency to explode or at least get engulfed in flames on a random basis. So yeah, my Keimola is totally cooler than your cars 
[quote=“Vri404”]A car with worse fuel economy then mine!?
BLASPHEMY![/quote]
It’s hard to make a car that is worse than yours XDD
[quote=“Oskiinus”]
[quote=“Vri404”]A car with worse fuel economy then mine!?
BLASPHEMY![/quote]
It’s hard to make a car that is worse than yours XDD[/quote]
I somewhat pride myself with making shitty cars. I’ve probably collected as many wooden spoons as Bogliq by now 
I love the design and layouts of your magazine. Excellent work!
Very impressive, I like that the presentation is consistent with the time period. Reviews have come a long way on this forum!
Cooler…or hotter? 
Thanks, I actually spend quite a bit in the layout (even tho is quite simple)
Thank you, coming from the first automation magazine editor in chief that means a lot 
Now, onto the comparision… I was supposed to post it last sunday, but I haven’t be particularly motivated these last days, I spend all this time re-watching Game of Thrones instead. Anyways, here it is
EDIT: I forgot to add the links
Erin Motor Company automationhub.net/company-ca … ompany/273
Airborne Automotive automationgame.com/phpBB3/viewto … =35&t=5895
Vector Automotive (ConeDodger240) youtube.com/ConeDodger240
Fantastic review and fantastic pictures! I love it!
Thank you so much for reviewing my car. You have done an exceedingly good job at writing this up.
Thanks for review!
Mercury with it’s high price tag in late 70s and practically whole 80s was flagship supercar from my company. I’m surprised that it wasn’t classified like if would be Vri’s car.
Would you want something in 80s magazines? XD
Keep up the good work!
Im wondering why there is such a big price difference between cars - the most expensive costs 8x more than the cheapest. Isn’t that like comparing a 458 with a gt86, unless you were comparing cars with similar capabilities regardless of price eg 911 turbo s vs gt-r
It’s all about usage; as Vector and Erin are supposed to give unleaded fun cheaply, Airborne is just a supercar without two cylinders (after terrifying result from Hades project) and actually was going cheaper and cheaper throughout the years. My car was made as pinnacle of prestige in company for late 70s and to mid 80s. All about idea bruh
Well, yes, in terms of prize there is no direct comparision, but the cars have some-what similar performance. What is interesting, is to see 3 different approaches into a single goal, in that time those were the sportier cars in their company line-up, and each has a different style, the maximum performance out of cheaper arrangements (combat), quality materials and construction in a british car (Erin) and expensive-prestigious design (Mercury).
Truth to be told, those were the first cars I found from that era in the forum xD . I actually didnt recive that many entries, I looked for them and then ask if I can review them, that’s why they have different price ranges and style. Must of the cars in the magazine were designed previously, instead of being specifically built for a comparision in certain category or a review.
Really impressive work. I’m truly enjoying reading these articles and the photo work is so good that I actually always look forward to what exciting shots will be on the next page - just like I would with a “real” car magazine.
Well, it seems the latests post weren’t imported, so I’m (re)posting the next close encounter article.
°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~°~
1 Like
3 Likes
Great guide! Nicely written and well formatted, definitely looks like it could come from an actual magazine!
I have never been able to find any success with low A/R ratios, however. The torque curve always peaks early and then drops, and horsepower suffers as a result. I have no idea how you were able to achieve identical torque curves with two different A/Rs, haha.
Do you think you post your engine with a few different variants for us to play around with?
Different turbocharger sizes on both compressor and turbine.
That is right. With the first two examples, the first one uses an AR ratio of 0.82 a compressor size of 50 and a turbine size of 50.5 with a medium intercooler. The second one uses an AR of 1.04 a compressor of 50.5 and a turbine of 40.5 with a large intercooler.
Remember, with an AR ratio lower than 1 you need a larger turbine and a smaller compressor. The disvantage of using a lower AR ratio is that the boost will fade out quickly in comparision to a larger AR ratio.
Here are the engines used in the article for you to take a look.
Sillyworld - Meliora Engine Example.zip (171.9 KB)
My small turbine/high AR version of the Eco engine:
Gets slightly better performance with 19.8% efficiency vs. the original 17.6%. The turbo spools quicker at 2100RPM vs 2300RPM and boost lasts longer through the torque curve. Costs are lower because I switched from throttle per cylinder to single throttle.
41mm compressor - 32.3mm turbine - 1.16 AR Ratio - 0.47bar boost
