9/10 Car feels a bit ‘unreal’ at the front.
1 Like
7/10
Weird three corner vignette effect, I have never seen green-tinted headlights in my life, text on plate not realistic, background too confusing (too much going on, lines and logos and windows and stuff)
1 Like
Clio
1 Like
Do I need to keep rating all of this? Come on… I don’t think others who take photography and stuff seriously will be happy about this 
make another thread?
1 Like
Tried to lol
No you haven’t. 7.5/10
All round good shot, lots possibility to make it great. Perspective needs a little work, colors on point, I don’t know what is under the car. That being said, pretty good, yeah.
The focus is the Aqueduct and the separation of man and nature.
Edit: Also this is not the Photoshop thread.
2 Likes
I think it’s rather nice, at least a 8.5+
To elaborate: the lighting is perfect making for great contrast, you can clearly see the stars while highlights from the artificial lights in the city aren’t washed out. We can even see the mountain sides. Of course, +1 for long exposure. Good framing, great composition, and colors are on point.
I would say 9/10, something I could see being sold on a canvas and being hung in a modern living room
‘Don’t anger the beast’
1 Like
@JACsterandOlibob please read the rules of the first post. They must be PHOTOGRAPHS that you have taken. Photoshops are not photos you have taken.
I’m going 8/10, love it but feels like there’s something extra that’s missing. Also if it’s moving at any speed the photographer is gonna have a bad time.
One from my “Autoshite of Gran Turismo” collection:
1 Like
Seriously why do you hate on volvos so much lol
1 Like