To address 340i vs stinger: 340 HAS A STICK OPTION!!! STINGER DOESN’T!!!
also a bit of a bmw fanboy tho
stinger looks better from the front, but looks deformed in the back
-911. More sporty than the 488. And I think that is a better quality product. And the 4.0 NA H6, if course.
-MR2. I love the MX5, bit sorry, Lotus chassis.
-F150. I prefer Ford than FCA.
-Stinger GT. Sporty design, mainly.
-RX7: I’m a rotary fanboy, plus that I’m restoring 3 FC’s, and that’s an extra point.
-
Ferrari 488 because of the badge
-
Toyota MR2 because of the mid-engine layout. If I’m going to buy an Miata, it’s gotta be NA. If I’m going to buy an NB, it’s gotta be the factory turbocharged MazdaSPEED version.
-
Dodge Ram because of the styling.
-
BMW 340i because of the available manual gearbox.
-
RX-7 because triangle power.
Porsche 911. I’m a sucker for 911s, and that’s the best of the lot.
MX5. Probably a better driving car than the MR2 (which can be scary at the limit, whereas the Miata isn’t), and I just love the look of the NB.
F150. Better engine options than the RAM, plus it wasn’t built by idiots and I won’t look like an illiterate sisterfucker owning one.
Stinger. Because I am so done with BMW these days.
Porsche 944. Because they’re surprisingly bulletproof, great to drive and they don’t get fuel economy more akin to a V12-powered supercar.
My choices:
911 GT3 RS (991.2) - Naturally aspirated performance cars are a dying breed these days; if this is the last non-turbo 911 then it’s a wonderful way to go out.
MX-5 NB - Unlike the MR2 Spyder, it was offered in turbocharged form in some markets, and is much more practical to boot.
Ram 1500 - It’s a newer truck, and looks better to boot (at least in my opinion).
Stinger GT - Feels less anesthetized and more like a Euro sports sedan than its rivals, despite being South Korean.
RX-7 FC - Makes a 944 feel somewhat conventional by comparison. Nobody else was (or will ever be) able to fully exploit the potential of a rotary engine like Mazda did.
1 Like
For the MX5, it’s an NBFL 1.8 (or 1.6 whatever, on the photo it’s an 1.8), not a Mazdaspeed which costs more, then the dilemma doesn’t have sense anymore 
Sporty Midsize Sedan for ~$30,000 USD
2018 Honda Accord Sport 2.0T
2018 Chevy Malibu Premier 2.0T
2018 Mazda 6 Grand Touring 2.5T
2018 VW Passat V6 GT
2018 Hyundai Sonata Limited 2.0T
- 2018 Honda Accord
- 2018 Chevy Malibu
- 2018 Mazda 6
- 2018 VW Passat
- 2018 Hyundai Sonata
0 voters
2 Likes
Definitely the updated 6. It drives as good as it looks, as has been the case before; however, the new turbo engine adds a welcome dose of thrust when you need it the most.
Hmm…I really don’t get the huge chrome neanderthal brow on newer Accords 
1 Like
I have to go with the Accord actually. As much as I like the 6 the turbo motor doesn’t come with a manual transmission while the Accord does. And it has more power, it has more tuning potential, and no one would expect an Accord to be fast.
2 more horsepower is still more horsepower. And don’t forget it’s basically a Type R motor which already has a lot of aftermarket improvements available.
@Fayeding_Spray did you intentionally mix up the 944 and the FC to see if you could confuse anyone? 
2 Likes
nooooooooooooo
I’d go with a Fusion/Mondeo instead of a Passat. Six years after its debut, the Fusion still looks nice, while the Passat seems a little staid in comparison.
A Mondeo ST-Line 
@Holts Wait why does the Passat look like that in the US if it’s looked like this in Europe since like three years ago
US spec:
EU spec:
3 Likes
-Mazda 6: it looks awesome, and the MY19 update, it improves a lot the interior. And is very nice to drive.
-Ford Fusion (Mondeo in Europe). I hate VW.
Mazda 6 because of how amazing the thing is built, the engine and the looks, and better reliability and handling.
VW Passat because V6… I would rather have a slower V6 over a 4-cylinder Turbo because of the sound, reliability and feel.
Also how is it decided when we can make a poll?
