Young Norwegian Car Enthusiast Challenge(reviews published)

Fun fact before the reviews: The average time around Green Hell for all participants is actually just 0,8 seconds away from optimal time. Benchmark time was 11,12,55 and optimal time for max points without overshooting would be 9.57,55, while average time was 9,56,75

[size=150]3rd: Revera EC (Asdren), 669,29[/size]

[size=120]
The second runner up is the first car I’ll be taking a proper close look at as well as a full day of test driving, but before this I want to take a look at some stats. Mainly because there is only one category the Revera EC stands out, which is displacement. The 1,1L turbocharged inline 4 producing 116hp is only one of three enginges in the entire competition below 1,4L which is actually a bit surprising, but apparently quite efficient. Other than this, the Revera EC is pretty much just better than average most of the categories. Aroud Green Hell it is just 9 seconds slower than average, but fuel economy(5,28l/100km) and emissions(53,6) are way better which proves more efficient for the competition. Combined with low running costs(1761) and 111,57 bonus points it is very close to the top. However, only 29.850$ of the 33.000$ budget was spent, leaving a 10% margin for further improvement, which could possibly have been enough to take either 2nd or even 1st place in the competition. Such a shame.

So let us move on to the car itself, and aesthetics. I approach the car from the rear and I’m glad I did, because it is definitely the best angle for this car. The taillights and additional brakelights in the fender are well aligned and suited for the early 2002 market. Clean lines along with enough details to please the eye is the forte of this design. Unfortunately I can not say that I love the front end of the Revera EC. It is not for lack of attention to detail, on the contrary, the design is well laid out and aligned, but it feels rather dated. It reminds me somewhat of a combination between an Omega and Maxima from the early 90’s. It works, but I’m not in love. From the side the duality continues, with rounded shaped and prettier lines to the rear than the front. I do like the rims though, as the give at least some impression of excitement.

Time to take it out on the road. Initially I travel through the city to get out on some curvy roads. The tine engine is suprisingly smooth with a porper throttle response, something I did not expect from this turbocharger. The gearing is rather tight, and I’m halfway through 3rd before reaching 100km/h but it only takes just below 10 seconds (9,9) which is good enough, With good quality on the transmission and driveline. Its a 6 speed manual, although 6th gear is just a cruising gear/overdrive as top speed is reached already in 5th @203km/h. The seats are bog standard with a cheap feel, but hey, they do the job decently. I also have all driver assists as well as advanced safety, which should be a big plus when getting insurance. After an hour I reach the twisty mountain roads and can really get a feel for the handling of the car. And I am pretty impressed, considering the Revera EC only has MacPherson in the front and Torsion Beams in the rear. On the larger turns I am able to achieve 1,02G, but unfortunately only 0,94G in the tighter corners.

To summarize, the Revera EC is a good piece of engineering that will keep you entertained enough while still being able to do all the other things you want as well. It might not be the prettiest, but you will probably grow to like it. If only they had spent the last money to make it even better

GH Time: 10.05.98
[/size]

[size=150]2nd:Dragotec Venture (Dragawn), 669,79[/size]

[size=120]The first runner up is the Dragotec Venture, barely scratching ahead of the Revera EC with 0,5 points. So, let us begin by looking at some of the stats for the Venture. It is also a car that is mainly above average in most areas, but to areas stand out. The Venture is top of the class in both safety(55,9) and emissions(52). Going for a 1,9L inline 4 with 5 valves per cylinder and a turbocharger it produces 164 hp and 245nm. This makes it 20 seconds faster than average around Green Hell and it actually overshoots maximum possible bonus points for track time. Still it got 120 bonus points which is the most handed out to any participant (although it was handed out to several others as well). The acceleration is great with 0-100km/h done in 7,6 seconds, which also contributes to the great score in sportiness, where it got a well above average score, and still maintaining a great fuel economy at only 5,49 L7100km…

Over to the looks of the car. Approaching this car from the fromt, I am once again struck by the somewhat dated design. Not very bad, but still slightly dated. It reminds me of the late 90’s Hondas, so more up to date than the Revera. With simple elegant lines it emitts a feeling of efficiency, no extra fuzz. From the side it looks like a regular estate, nothing special to comment on. The rear is also rather clean, but this looks special. Not a lot of details but it has a vibe like the TVR, yet not as flamboyant. Which is kind of sad, because that design expression needs to be flamboyant, over the edge crazy. This is nice, but not quite brilliant. Overall, it looks good and that pretty much sums it up.

Roadtest is next, and I’m taking the same route as earlier. on the city roads it behaves well and the ride is slightly more comfortable than earlier. The engine feels good and has even better response than the tiny engine in the Revera, although at the cost of some smoothness. After winning a redlight race with an optimistic Pug, I finally arrive at the twisty roads. And after a couple of turns I really notice the difference between suspension setups. The Venture has Double Wishbone in the front and Multilink in the rear, and this makes a lot of difference Although it has the same G rate on high speed corners as the Revera, it really excels at the thight corners with up to 1.06G obtained. The extra power combined with shorter braking distance and better turn-ins on the tight hairpins leaves me with a big smile on my face. As I turn off the road onto the final path up to my cabin I decide to test it on one last thing. With 4x4 and manual locking diffs it should get through the muddy parts of the shortcut i like to take. Full throttle, mud splashing and I make it across, but only barely

To sum up the Venture, it is really good. It has the power to feel really sporty and the capability to get you there off the beaten track as well. It is not as nimble in the city as the Revera, and also has a bit of a dated look, but choosing between these two is just a matter of preference, both having their strengths and weaknesses. However, the Venture did not make it all the way to the top.

Gh Time: 9.36.61[/size]

[size=200]1st: Tiara Mega (Koolkei), 687,81[/size]

[size=120]Finally we have made it to the king of the hill, the cream of the crop, the unrivaled champion. The Tiara Mega is the future benchmark for cars in this class, so let us begin by diving into some stats. With a 1,6L inline 6 NA producing the lowest amount of hp at 84,2, this car gets excellent enginge reliability(77) and the lowest fuel economy of the challenge(4,93L/100km). It has the lowest prestige of only 10,7 but the highest ride height of 215,6mm. It is also the second lightest(1168,8kg), second best reliability(80,3) and second best environmental resistance(98,67), only beaten by the Bogliq Storaj in these categories. With this tiny engine it is quite slow around Green Hell, but still get 40 out of 75 bonus points there and a total of 85 bonus points. Low running costs(1720) and general great stats is what leaves the Tiara Mega on the throne.

What about the appearance then? Well, personally, I love it! The front looks like an aggressive rally version of the Swift with slightly flared arches and properly aligned details. It looks so happy with that lower grille and the vents with foglights next to it suit it very well. The indicators under the headlights give it almost an animei look, but the Tiara Mega doesn’t have to worry, Senpai will definitely notice you! The five-spoked wheels accentuates the hot hatch look from the side. The rear end is decent, even if I find it a bit lackluster compared to that magnificent front end (I get an error message about missing trim items, this is probably the reason for this). But all in all this is a great looking little rascal.

Getting in I see a tach, speedometer, fuel gage, fan controls and a CD player. The interior is plain basic, you don’t get anything extra here. Fortunately it does have power steering and ABS as well as some advanced safety features. Just like the Revera EC and the Venture, it is a manual gearbox with 5speed and overdrive. Reaching top speed midway through 5th was apparently optimal for fuel consumption. With 80hp at the wheels and a geared LSD wheelspin is nonexistent and you can floor it whenever you want without fear of the tail slipping out as this is a RWD. 0-100 takes you 12.2 seconds, so redlight racing is out of the picture. Still the throttle response is great at 49,3 and with a smoothness of 84,1 it makes the Revera look like an unrefined hoon. If the enginge could talk it would woo the ladies in mere seconds. Even with the slow acceleration, the tiny chassis is maneuverable and easy to tackle city traffic with. Out on the twisting, winding roads it behaves very well, albeit slightly less spectacular than the Venture. With MacPherson in the front and Solid Axle Coil in the rear this is no big suprise, and i find that rear suspension interesting. And on the gravel roads I understand why it is there. Off the regular roads it really shines considering it’s a hot hatch and getting all the way is no problem. At the destination I can’t help myself and have to park it on top of one of the boulders like a friend with his Wrangler usually does. That remarkable diversity in this car.

I have to conclude on my test, but it is hard. The Tiara Mega might have the least powerful engine and it might be the least prestigeous car of them all, but that just outlines the strengths of it. It is fast enough to still have fun in and the ability to do everything in it is just remarkable. Buzz around the city, take to the twisty roads or load it up with four friends and fill up the car with all you can. As an allrounder the Tiara Mega is in a league of it’s own

GH Time: 10.32.16[/size]

Excellent reviews once again, and congratulations to the winners!

Although, @Kookkei, there seems to be a lack of door handles on the Mega… :laughing:

Thanks for that DeusExMackia!

That would be the issue with fixtures missing mentioned in the review i guess :wink:

Argh, you are killing me maaan :smiley:

But i don’t think i would have made it to the first place. Congrats to koolkei :slight_smile:

Thanks Puffster for hosting this challenge and the effort you put in the reviews :slight_smile:

hahahah a non enthusiasts car won the enthusiast challenge. i genuinely did not see that coming.

more than that

i did not expect to see that :laughing:

the storaj is lighter and more reliable? that big thing? O_o

that 3rd and 2nd place. 0.5 points difference. wow. gg.

for puffster

for hosting this challenge

for the others

and thank you :slight_smile:
and gg

lol koolkei’s been working hard to get a win since joining and nabs it with the smart build! Nice job.

http://funnyani.me/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Senpai-noticed-me.jpg
:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

[size=50]well tbh. a bit too hard #tryhard
it’s only now that i’m starting to get into the “fudge this, i’m entering something stupid for fun” area[/size]

Great result ! :laughing:
Congratulations to Asdren and Koolkei and thanks to Puffster for hosting the challenge.

congrats to koolkei and thanks to puffster for this great challenge!

Time for the final two reviews, thank you all for your patience and great feedback, will be working out a new format for my next challenge and hope to see you all participate there as well. If anyone has some constructive feedback/criticism I am all ears as I like to improve. Have learned a lot from this and hope the next challenge will be even better. Without further ado:

[size=150]Special Review, Bogliq Storaj:[/size]

[size=120]The Bogliq Storaj was the first car to enter the competition, and straight off the bat we knew this was something else. Although it looks like it is drawn with a ruler and compass, there are several aspects that are quite good. So let’s start with the facts. Powered by a 1,3L inline 4 it is the second least powerful car of the challenge, only beaten by the winner. It is however the car with the least amount of torque at 116nm and pretty poor engine reliability at 67,6. In most of the categories it is a bit below average, until we get to the environmental aspect. It has the highest total reliability of 82,2 and the lowest weight of 1092,8kg. Fuel economy is 6,19 L/100km and emissions are 107, all stats that are well below average and contributes to the good final position.

Even though I’ve harped on about boxes and circles in more than half of my text about the Storaj, I will be more thorough now. I will not describe it as a pretty car, but the utter emphasis on practicality and maximizing every cubic inch of space does fascinate me. Looking at the pictures this appears to be a rather large car, but it is only 2,52m wide and 3,94m long, allowing it to be the lightest car of the challenge and still have almost 5500 litres of combined passenger and cargo space. The body also has an extraordinary quality at +10 and it feels so solid, yet not excessively so. It is so charming, there is something fuzzy that i really can’t put my finger on, that x factor. This car might very well go on to become a cult classic, quirky and special, but truly loved by its followers.

Taking it for a spin is next up, and immediately the advantages of “the box” becomes apparent. Parking in the city is a breeze, and the square shape truly gives you total control of the edges of the car. Combined with a comfortably high driving position you have a complete overview of most situations. In the city, the 85hp is sufficient even if 0-100 takes 11,7 seconds. However, when we reach the more open areas and get to my favourite twisty roads, it starts to stand out, and unfortunately not in a good way. Pretty slim tires combined with a high center of gravity results in quite poor handling, and I am never able to pass 0,9G while turning. And while the weight distribution is fantastic, there just isn’t enough power to make it matter. Even downhill, the slim tires increase the braking time enough to reduce that joy as well.

In conclusion, the Storaj is a great example of what a city car should provide, but it falls a bit short when it comes to the width of needs of our target group.
[/size]
[size=150]Special Review, SME Banshee:[/size]

[size=120]As I’ve said before, the moment I saw the Banshee I was smitten. While there are several beautiful and interesting cars that entered, and specifically the Legatus Njörðr came quite close, none took my breath away like the Banshee. Where the Njörðr was a classy and elegant sportscar and the Vichingo an almost purebred rally specialist, the Banshee left me wondering. With a front end that brings me back to classic european sports cars, flared arches and wheels that give me an american vibe and a rear end I could swear comes from Japan, it is a hodgepodge mixture of design features that I never would have guessed could look good together. And to many they will not, this is purely a subjective point of view, but for me, it really works. And perhaps that makes it even more appropriate that the Banshee finished dead last, with only just above half the points of the winner. Like an Alfa Romeo, this is a car that looks fantastic on a poster or in the driveway and gives you that chill when you get into it. But show it to someone disinterested in cars or the owner of a BMW, and they will point out the flaws and errors that are blatantly apparent, yet you don’t care, cause it is not just a car, it’s a being with a soul and character. It is a companion for great adventures.

Well, enough about me rambling on pompously, it is time to find out what it actually can do. As I get in, I notice seats are among the best of all, underlining the fact that this is the most prestigeous car of them all. It also has the worst utility and running costs, which you would also expect from this kind of car. So with a turbocharged V6 and 213hp, let’s give it a go. Immediately I get bogged down in city traffic, and the first issue arises. Even though I have a pretty big engine at my disposal, it is also turbocharged, and in the city the throttle response below 30 is quite bad. It almost feels slower than the Tiara Mega(!) due to the low nimbleness. But I have a decent entertainment system to keep me occupied until I reach the open roads. Now this is where the Banshee shines; the engine can open up and is quite smooth, along with active sport springs that are still rather comfy. 0-100 is done in 6,5 seconds and it peaks out at 228,3km/h. Not as high as I expected, and looking at the figures I am actually suprised. Where the Banshee has an aerodynamic efficiency of 0.845, the Storaj for instance only has 0.808. I would never have guessed the box was more aerodynamic than this! Still, I don’t care. Getting to the really twisty parts I push it to the limit and I’m able to pass 1G if only barely. Although the springs are great, it still only has MacPherson in the front and Semi Trailing Arms in the rear.

After the drive I am still smiling. Of all the cars in the challenge, the numbers tell me this is the one you should not to buy. It is the worst, by a fair margin. Yet cars are not just about the numbers, it is about following your heart. And in that regard, the Banshee has won in my book[/size]

[size=120]
On that bombshell, it is time to end the challenge! Good night and I’ll see you on the next one.[/size]

Thanks Puffster for the bonus write-up pf my entry! :smiley:

Just remember that Bogliq strongly recommends that the service schedule be closely adhered to which’ll ensure your Storaj ownership is faultless and fuss-free for many years to come :sunglasses: :laughing: :sunglasses:

HA! Awesome! My company logo is “American Performance has no compromise!” and the Banshee lives up to the mantra. Who cares if a car is fast, or practical, or pretty? That isn’t what these machines are about. They’re about making you feel alive and one with the machine. They’re about that smile that won’t leave your face. This is what SME wants to bring to the world…the biggest smile you’ve ever had. It’s even better when you cannot really explain the reason for the smile, but still like that you actually have it. Cars are an art form as much as they are a machine, and like all machines, cars should somehow make your life better. Happy always equals better!

Thanks for the great write-up, Puffster! Now you know I’m really dying to find out…how did the Banshee Sport GT (the MR sports coupe) compare with the Legatus? :smiley: I mean, I know it was slower by a few seconds around Nordschleife, but it was actually my initial entry…even if I didn’t submit it first (due to some rule confusion).

Hahaha, of course, the rivalry always lives on :wink: Well, I’ve dived into the stats, and this is actually a really good matchup.
In the engine department, the Legatus Njörðr has a 1,8T I4 that produces 240hp and 254nm, while the Banshee Expo has a 1,0T I4 that produces 195hp and 186nm torque, so brute force goes to the Legatus Njörðr while the Banshee Expo gets the most points from less hp and smaller engine.

[ul]
]Drivability, Legatus Njörðr wins by 7,9 points/:m]
]Sportiness, Banshee Expo wins by 1,7 points /:m]
]… lots of less interesting facts…/:m][/ul]
[ul]
]Top speed: Legatus Njörðr @ 250,4 vs Banshee Expo @ 225,4/:m]
]Acceleration: Legatus Njörðr @ 5,7 vs Banshee Expo @ 5,8/:m]
]Brake distance Legatus Njörðr @ 34,41 vs Banshee Expo @ 32,99/:m][/ul]
[ul]
]Green Hell lap time: Legatus Njörðr @ 8,54,90 vs Banshee Expo @ 8,56,50/:m]
]Total Points in challenge: Legatus Njörðr @ 456,29 vs Banshee Expo @ 445,88 (without reliability deduction)/:m][/ul]
Very close, but a slight edge to Legatus Njörðr

oooooh that’s a close one indeed. It pretty much comes down to a matter of taste.

Yes, fairly close indeed! Thanks for the breakdown, Puffster! :slight_smile: