can i submit 2 turbo cars? one for actual competition, one for the shiz and giggles.
i finally have found the turbo car that is more competitive than the NA on my testing. 
Of course.
Just from a few comments it seems like people are finding NA better. I must be missing something or breaking a rule. I have yet to find a NA car that is better than my turbo. I just can’t get the same performance. Its probably me because its not difficult to attach a turbo to something and get it to go fast (especially considering AVUS is mostly just two straight lines). So I’ve either stumbled into something great or I’m completely oblivious to the obvious.
edit: It’s probably the body I’m playing with and the weight.
As for the 1991 rules, they look pretty good to me. Nice and simple, can’t ask for more. I don’t see anything that I have reason to disagree with, but I will admit I’m just a bit sad to see the PPX still can’t run its default engine (a 6L V8) without disqualifying. Not that I think you should up any of the displacements as I understand we are trying minimize potential accidents/incidents and maintain certain safety standards.
As the entries start rolling in, there are now the first turbos and I’ll keep this question open until we have the results. If a 1000cc turbo car wins, the 2:1 factor will of course stay.
As to the 6L question.
The C2 class could already be deadly fast … With larger engines we could get speeds in excess of 450 km/h.
I can easily see that, in testing my 1.0T is getting close to 300 kph.
A small clarification.
As I said a second car per team is allowed. But as both can be in the same category and of the same design, with only minimal changes, the finishing position of the second car goes to the next team.
That means every team can only take the best finishing place.
I think that’s fair, there is no problem if you get second thoughts and want to try a different design, but koolkei’s cars are too similar, he said he just couldnt decide which setup is better.
^well from what i have been trying so far.
the most important thing here is the aerodynamic of the car first, and the weight of the car comes in a close second.
and then peak power comes 3rd.
but since i didn’t know if the competition would be dragged on or not, i made 2 versions, one for the max potential speed run, and the other one is the slower but more durable one
[size=85]and IMO, turbo becomes more competitive because you can put richer fuel mixture in to squeeze out that extra bit of power (by that i mean almost 50hp extra)[/size]
Yes. From what I know know, Turbo and N/A is really a close call. That means the people who said 2:1 were tight
Although its very hard to produce a turbo.
Is it ok if I reveal my Versuchswagen car ahead of the competition? It is currently fastest and might drive the competition somewhat.
There is no danger my car is not ranked, and only to serves for research, pr and to develop track.
Feel free.
Here is also another outline for 1991
I added a “no mods” rule. They are not prohibited but modded cars are deprecated and will only be run if the creator supplies me with instructions and required files. I dont mind mods pers se, but otherwise it kills the competition.
Since driveability and fuel economy have no role here, my turbo is half a second per lap faster than NA. If you also consider that car will start from 0kmh (mph) only once per race, the difference will be even greater.
I will try and build one more NA engine and if that wont be faster, than I am submitting turbo
91’ rules are looking good I think that race intake and exhaust will level out the field
Sure I don’t think we have any real idea what’s fast on this track so a little push might be good.
Ok then tomorrow Sunday will see the first event. A week ahead of the main race we will present the Versuchswagen 90.
Ah yes I think that it’s close to final.
I also made sure the CU class is the same as the 1990 C1, just without the cost restriction. So one can theoretically take the same car and improve the performance.
But what do you think unlimited or a very high number like 100,000? I prefer the second option, because that makes it more challenging.
Yeah go for it mate
Would be nice knowing your times 
Have to go now. Will write something more tomorrow, how it was achieved.
But the track times are no secret.
Sneak
540KG
WAT
Experiment a bit with transmission and quality. Dont forget you can also set negative quality.