You managed a even lower response than me. Impressive, most impressive.
It’s a safety feature 
Are you really sure you want that much power? Yes? Well ok, I’ll try. ROFLOL The little 1bbl doesnt help either but it is cheap and I was trying to stay within the limits I gave myself on how far from the original Ford 300 I could go.
I thought that carb looked small, no way my engine was going to be able to breath through a single barrel carb. With the four barrel however I like that fact that at any rpm my motor puts out at least 300 ft/lb torque and still returns 14 mpg.
Mine is just one shade of green off of "normal for the color of the carb at full power so there is a TINY bit of room for improvement but they didnt really come with a 2bbl in bone stock form so that is why I stuck with the 1bbl.
The fuel efficiency of carbs in this game is something that has made me scratch my head for a while. After all, my frame of reference for economy cars and carbs comes from 80’s Japanese cars. And their most efficient variants ALWAYS came with 1bbl carbs. If one ever came with a 2-pot, it was either aftermarket or the “performance” version.
Not counting a Nissan with DCOEs, of course. 
The 557 idea came from the “557 demon stroker kit” for a ford FE 460, I had to adjust the bore and stroke slightly to maximize economy, the cam is also set to only 19 or 20 with a restrictive exhaust. I think hot rodders would have loved this engine, just with intake and exhaust work you can get 300+ HP, riching the mix (from it’s stock 15.0:1) can net you another 20 or so.
I’ve been thinking the same thing, all the 80’s american cars were 1 or 2 barrel carbs for emission reasons, 4 barrels were solely the high powered option.
Yep, my sisters 65 Mustang has a 200 with a 1bbl and it gets GREAT mileage, she is pushing high 20s to low 30s in summer. If this were an Automation car it would only get 15 if that. They need to rework the efficiency of the 1bbl at least.
About 18 hours left to go. Time to get those last minute submissions in!
Both of tonight’s last-minute submissions failed to pass muster.
Reminder - all new entries AND revisions of rejected models must be in by the deadline tomorrow morning or they will not be included!
(sorry guys, I looked at them as soon as I got home. Waiting till the last second doesn’t always pay.)
16 entries plus one benchmark truck. How do they all stack up? Well, I won’t keep you waiting any longer!
16th - WRM Lifter - 4.0L V8 (FWD!) - “The Brain Rattler” - 47.54%
15th - RAI Ponderosa x1 - 6.0L V8 - “1st Gear 4EVA!” - 49.98%
14th - SBA Archa Super Hauler - 10.9L V8 - “Over 10 Liters of Tire Burning Fury” - 50.53%
13th - Shepherd Bootstrap V8 Fleet - 6.2L V8 - “SBA’s Little Burnout Buddy” - 50.57%
12th - Rado Racher - 3.0L I-6 - “OH GOD WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!” - 51.04%
11th - BKOO Targa Truck V8 - 6.9L V8 - “Congrats! It’s a Dichotomy!” - 51.98%
10th - Desert Motors Fjord F100 - 4.9L I-6 - “So Trucklike, It’s Uncanny” - 53.14%
(Benchmark) - Ardent A100 S - 3.9L I-6 -“Still Waiting to Accelerate” - 53.41%
9th - Shoshone Rugged 8 Traildasher - 5.3L V8 - “Play in the Mud and Still Be Bored” - 54.08%
8th - Bush Joseph V8 - 7.6L V8 - “You Can Smell It Before You Hear It” - 54.30%
7th - Centauri Minotaur 557 - 9.1L V8 - “They Lied. It’s Actually A 3/4 Ton.” - 55.41%
6th - Ponni Workmate - 5.2L I-4 - “As Smooth As A Gravel And Razorblade Shake” - 55.44%
5th - ManHell Tiramillas AFR - 5.0L V8 - “Now Comes With A Storage Bin For Bits That Fall Off” - 55.54%
And your top four, who will be in the comparison…
… will now be listed in ALPHABETICAL ORDER BY MANUFACTURER. (What, you thought I was going to spoil the winner before I released the review?)
Bogliq Haulage, DMA HT78B, GSI Homesteader, and Romanov Galik.
Congrats to those four. I will do the review writeup over the next few days hopefully. And thanks to everyone for participating.
Oh, and before you go, here’s a few highs and lows for you.
Highest Drivability: BKOO
Lowest Drivability : WRM
Sportiest: GSI
Least Sporty: Rado
Most Comfortable: ManHell
Least Comfortable: Romanov
Highest Utility: SBA (Yes, its number was so high I’d consider this one a 3/4 ton, too… maybe even a 1-ton.)
Lowest Utility: Rado
Most Offroad Capability: DMA
Least Offroad Capability: SBA
Most Reliable: Desert Motors
Least Reliable: ManHell
Highest Fuel Economy: Romanov
Lowest Fuel Economy: WRM
Most Expensive: Bogliq (Wait, what?)
Least Expensive: Romanov
Highest Maintenance Cost: Bogliq (Seriously, HighOctaneLove? What’s up with that?)
Lowest Maintenance Cost: Ardent
Love the little comments!! Just too bad that my truck didnt make it but as you said it was very close to your benchmark
Very nice comments! And such fast results. VicVictory you’ve already done an awesome job here, thanks for investing the time and doing it all so fast and accurate.
I am glad I managed to execute the communistic idea of a truck that will be a nightmare to sit in. 
Who hoo, can’t wait.
I can’t believe I didn’t score least sporty! Great contest!
Me either, I mean if his was 0 then it would be lower than mine, I am almost at 0 as it is.
The majority of my costs come from tech points in the chassis/frame/body to up its environmental resistance (as was true for the real F-100), also some in the engine to increase durability(the Ford 300/4.9 is damned tough). I was trying to make as close to a true “half-ton” truck as I could, most true half-tons in the '70s were rarely over 350ci (5.7L), the F150 is a “heavy” half-ton in this era and that would have been out of the scope of what I wanted to build.
I am guessing the “OH GOD WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!” came from that turbo ramp because I put a turbo in a half-ton pickup.
That is late 70s turbo tech for ya!
It took me quite a lot of tuning to get to a utility of 130.9.
Blasters: I have to give you props for building a truck that was representative for that time in history.
I’m guessing that DMA is short for Desert Mountains Automotive?