CSC74 - Renaissance [FINISHED]

3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !! 3 days left hurry up !!

@the-chowi
@l0jli
@superbiirdd
@azkaalfafa
@adamfmx
@vero94773


Ad but no file:
@ILIKECARS


Let me know if your name is not where it is supposed to be!

4 Likes
2026 CITRUS ÉLANION CONCEPT by LAVELLE STUDIOS
24 Likes
Gallery



18 Likes

18 Likes
Submissions are closed I have recieved complete submissions from:

@the-chowi
@l0jli
@superbiirdd
@azkaalfafa
@adamfmx
@vero94773
@ILIKECARS
@qofsolus
@_4bigguys
@titleguy1



Let me know if your name is not where it is supposed to be!

6 Likes
Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1Round1
Click to expand review

This proposal presents a new design language on a very popular type of vehicle; the SUV. Though not substantially flawed, this entry’s design is held back by its design execution.




The very first feature that catches my eye is the bright blue accents, which have both good & bad traits. I for one like the colour and they fit well together with the brown-ish paint and white details. However, I’m not sure if I like them as part of the rims and spanning across the bottom of the windowsill; they look really gimmicky as LEDs (like something that I would find on a cheap RC toy car), which drags the design a bit. Speaking of the rims, I actually do like their design, but they are absolutely huge, and they give the car a tall ground clearance which throws off the proportions for me. That brings me to my next point of critique: the dimensions of the car. The whole rear appears squeezed together, especially when looking straight at it. The body that was chosen is really tall and skinny, moreover the aforementioned wheels make it worse. Adding more plastic trim on the bumpers or making the wheels smaller would have improved it.

Identity wise this entry does score some points: wrap-around turn signals are present at the front & rear, as well as a continuation of the ‘Airbumps’ along the sides (the latter of which have a much better integration of the blue LED accents in my opinion). There is also some asymmetry, specifically the front grille, which incorporates the logo (although it looks a bit squished). The headlights look fine, but they could have been incorporated better into the side vents. The DRLs are decent, though nothing special. The rear features a bit plain looking taillights although they follow the same rectangular design philosophy as the front.


The biggest issue that I have with this entry however is the overall design execution. From far away, everything seems fine, but when you look closer, all the different elements just poorly finished, for example: the whole front design is a composition of different fixtures, but together, they do not work well together at all. The different shapes of the headlights and grilles feel mismatched. The same goes for the rear end. Another example is the mirror area: There are both normal mirrors and a set of cameras underneath them (something that I find weird); the cameras themselves are then on top of a black triangular trim piece which also seems to come out of nowhere. The design execution, combined with the extensive use of premade fixtures also shows a lack of complexity and thought put into the design.


As a design language I see a recurrence of rectangular elements in both the headlights and taillights, as well as the side ‘Airbumps’. The main feature of the car would be the paint scheme, with multiple accent colours and contrasting roofs. The wheels would have flat yet futuristic looking rims, and here and there a sprinkle of that star-shaped pattern would be present as well (in the grille mesh for example). I’m not sure how the front-end design would translate to other vehicle sizes though.


Overall, whilst my review may make this seem as a complete failure, I don’t think this is a bad attempt at creating something that fits the brief, and there are definitely some elements that I appreciate. It’s just that the execution and lack of complexity really hold back the whole design for me.


Verdict: eliminated!
hide


Click to expand review

Having 2 different concept cars to showcase a design language is a very smart call, especially when the design language itself is consistent and clear. My personal favorite is the compact Copain, so I’ll start with that one, although pretty much everything I say about this car counts for the Famille as well.




First things first, the headlight assembly is probably the best feature of this design. I love the way that the DRLs encompass the black trim, which houses the headlights and the asymmetric logo, a nice nod back to the older Citrus models (I could even see some ADAS sensors incorporated there in a production model). It gives the car a distinct, instantly recognizable look and a strong identity which I’ll get to later in this review. The front & rear bumpers are where things go a bit south though; especially on a brand-new modern car like this I don’t like how simple the vent and grille design is. The way that they are split reminds me of cars from the 2000s where each bumper had a separate grille and vents section. Another issue that I have with this car is the paint scheme; whilst I absolutely love the flashy green paint, it’s missing a secondary accent colour like silver or white for example. Especially around the ‘Airbump’ at the side is where I think another accent colour could have worked really well. The sloping roofline brings the design back on track however, and I like how it makes it stand out amongst other SUVs and crossovers, and it also adds another layer of funkiness which is exactly what I am looking for in this competition. The taillights follow the front design cues, reinforcing the design language itself, a detail I really like. Maybe they could have had a more vertical emphasis to help with the tallness of the rear, but overall, there is nothing else particular of note (apart from the aforementioned lower vents).

The Famille minivan shares both the good & bad traits of the Copain. However, I would still like to focus a little on what I like and what I dislike about this car specifically. To start with, I like the boxier approach of this design language, helped by the squared-off profile of the car. I’m not sure if this was intentional, but the wheels reflect that approach perfectly as well. However, I simply cannot unsee how tall it is. Especially from the rear is where this problem is the most prominent. Why are the taillights so high up? The result of this is that the whole trunk looks like a featureless slab that gives the car a bulky and heavy look.

Both cars carry a very strong identity; they’re not over the top funky, yet still have some of that slight weirdness in its design giving a balanced look, obviously also helped by the previously mentioned paint scheme. This feels like a very logical evolution of the design language used in the 2021 Citrus models. There are references to other Citrus models as well, the most noticeable one being the 3 vertical stripes at the front and also some slight references to geometrical shapes.


Build quality is extremely well done on this car. There are almost no areas where the fixtures clip with each other or that have bad reflections. Panel lining is realistic and makes sense, very impressive.


As a design language, I see the front & rear lights as the main feature of this car. Cars would frequently have the same lower grille and vent design on the bumpers, as well as the side ‘Airbumps’ carried over yet modernized from the previous 2021 model range. Other features include a blacked-out roof, upright C-pillar, potentially accompanied by a spoiler and a strong character line on the sides.


Overall I am really fond of this entry. I like the consistent design language, which definitely has potential for actual production models. Though there are also some elements about this car that drag the whole aesthetic a bit.


Verdict: moves on to the finals!
hide


Click to expand review

This entry brings some unique ideas to the table. It’s as if the designers were asked to create a fashionable yet weird design, and then took it up a notch, which leads to some of the best but also the worst features of this car.




The front bumper looks interesting to say the least. I love how the grille extends to one side of the wheel arch, and how that space specifically incorporates the logo and Citrus name itself. However, there are an equal number of parts that I dislike about it. First of all, the way it abruptly cuts off on the other side just doesn’t do it for me. Especially when looking head-on, it kind of looks like a fish, made worse by the dotted DRL pattern inside of the grille. The pattern itself is also a feature that is not my cup of tea. It doesn’t seem to add any value to the design at all other than to look somewhat cool just because it can. The sides feature an extremely high belt line combined with a surprisingly upright and forward A-pillar, giving the car really awkward proportions. The side panels also feature a thick chrome trim piece, which brings me to my largest issue with this car: the paint scheme. I don’t have a problem with the bright blue paint; it’s the excessive amount of chrome that just doesn’t resonate with me whatsoever. I know that there are other trims of this entry that feature these trim panels in different colours but since this was presented to me as the main model of the bunch, I will treat it as such. There is just a little bit too much of it around the entire car, especially the front & rear bumpers which are a complete bling bling disaster. Speaking of, the rear also has the same asymmetrical design feature as the front, and I like the way that the fog light is integrated into it. The taillights are once again a different story though, I’m not fond of the overall design and the fact that they are squeezed all the way to the undersize of the tailgate glass. I like the rims though.

This car carries a very strong identity, don’t get me wrong; I just dislike the way that all the different elements and features are put together. I personally think that adding some more references to older Citrus models as well as getting rid of 75% of the chrome would have improved this entry a lot.


Build quality is not the worst of the competition at all, but there are some slight artifacts here and there, especially around the front & rear lights. However, the crease on the sides is well made and takes away some of that visual weight as well.


As a design language, I see very funky and experimental designs (perhaps a bit too much). Both front & rear would feature 3 triangular lights as well as asymmetrical logo placements (a true must for a modern Citrus in my opinion). The secondary accent colour would be the main feature of the car, and I could see that secondary paint potentially being offered in more colours that chrome or black.


Overall, this entry showcases both advantages but unfortunately mostly drawbacks in its design. Especially the proportions and some elements specifically are things that hold back this entry for me.


Verdict: eliminated!
hide
9 Likes
Click to expand review

The design of this car shows an interesting contrast. On one hand, it has all the Citrus bells & whistles, with multiple references to older models. But on the other hand, it doesn’t seem to quite capture the brand identity, even if it has said features.




I’ll start with the front. Right off the bat, it feels overly slanted, and all of the different elements are squeezed into a small area, adding to the awkwardness of the proportions. The result of this is that the asymmetric logo piece sits too close to the center, made worse by the thick silver trim that also doesn’t match the flow of the grille at all. The lower fascia looks fine, although I’m not a fan of the round fog lights (which are actually part of a larger problem, but I’ll get to that later in this review). From the side, the car looks quite tall, though the black cladding around the body does remove some of that visual weight. The taillights look simple but would work well on any production car. The rest of the rear end mimics the front, including its shortcomings, like the squished black trim panel under the light assembly (which could have been left out in my opinion) as well as the round exhausts that I am once again not a fan of.

Much of the effort appears to have been put into the Citrus references, giving it a strong identity. I believe it’s somewhat of a retromodern interpretation of the original 70s Citrus Reine, obviously encouraged by the paint scheme. First of all, I actually do like the silver roof element that both encompasses the panoramic sunroof and doubles as a spoiler, a clever way to emulate the silver roof element of the old model. More include the hood creases and the silver trim piece that goes around the entire greenhouse.

Unfortunately, this design is also held back by one key problem: it feels dated. I’m not sure where to pinpoint this issue exactly, but I think it’s because of multiple different elements combined. The aforementioned fog lights for example are a feature seen on cars 10 years older than this. The whole design features very smooth lines and curves which stand in contrast with the modern sharp creases and shapes as shown in… all of the inspirations that I provided. The rear has very prominent exhausts, when most modern cars showcase a huge emphasis on their sustainable background with hybrids and EVs. I’m not saying that this car isn’t allowed to have an engine, I just find it unusual that is has such extrusive exhausts, especially when it is the most noticeable feature on the entire lower bumper.


In terms of surfacing, this entry does very well. Even if I have complaints about the design of some surfacing parts, the way that it is put together is well done & executed. There are some areas where the fixtures float or clip with each other (especially around the headlights/hood), but it’s not a huge issue compared to other entries in my opinion.


As a design language I see vehicles that appear proud about their French identity, and are not afraid to showcase it either with French flags found all around the cars. Recurring elements would include the silver 2 tone roof and heavy black cladding on SUV/crossover models. Both DRL and taillight designs would be carried over from the concept, as well as the grille mesh and hood creases.


One last thing that I would like to add is my explanation as to why this entry doesn’t quite capture the brand identity. To me, it seems a bit overdone, especially with the French flags and the Renaissance badge on the side. It looks like a parody of what a weird and funky car would look like, rather than a genuinely quirky but cool design. If it was just a little bit more restrained (dare I even say toned down :fearful:) with the French references and took a bit more modern, lighter approach, it could have been a winner.


Verdict: eliminated!
hide


Click to expand review

I thought I’d review this entry next, as it adopts a retromodern design inspired by the original Reine from the 1970s as well. This time around, however, the car takes a much more modern and appealing approach, which is why I prefer this over the previous entry.




To begin with, the front-end design is great. I particularly like how the triple lines are integrated into the DRL design and extend all the way down to the lower grille. The glass bar across the front makes the car recognizable among others, while also nodding back to the old model. Once again, I see a lot of potential in its design, particularly in the placement of the cameras and ADAS sensors on a production model. The hood features a nicely integrated aero element, although in my opinion it could have been left out or perhaps fused with the glass bar to allow for a more sloped profile. The logo housing looks good as well, though it could have been slightly larger. The headlight assembly is quite slanted, but it works well with the protruding front bumper. The grille is thoughtfully executed, especially the bars in front of the mesh, which align nicely with the flow of the DRLs and the protruding plastic element. That last part, however, would arguably have been better without (I can see how it somewhat contributes to the overall design but especially when looking at it head on it kind of appears like the car is missing its front teeth). The sides feature additional aero elements, including side vents that tie in well with the aerodynamic focus seen on older Citrus models. Moving upward, the roof features a large silver spoiler element, which interestingly includes side windows (?) that help reduce its visual weight. I’m not entirely sure what to think about the shark fin mounted on top of it, but given that this is a concept car and it looks cool, I’ll take it. That brings me to my least favorite part of this car: the rear. Whilst I don’t have a problem with the taillights and diffuser area at all, the proportions are just not appealing, specifically how tall it is. Aside from the taillights, there’s very little going on, which makes the rear feel somewhat empty. The squeezed taillight glass only emphasizes its tallness, and the huge bulge isn’t doing it for me either. The diffuser is nicely done though.

In terms of identity, this entry scores very well. Features like the aforementioned stripes in the DRLs and the swooping belt line make this car unmistakably a Citrus. This design would definitely be a cool addition to the brand’s evolution, even if it’s such a departure from the 2021 lineup. I would also like to point out the custom rims, which are simply incredible, and they make the car stand out even more than it already does. I believe that they are inspired by the triple stripe element, which demonstrates a very thoughtful design (I have also noticed something similar at the rear of the side skirt, very nice).


Unfortunately, surfacing is one of the weaker aspects of this car. Several areas, especially along the sides, show artifacts where fixtures clip awkwardly or clash with cut-outs, which disrupts the overall flow of the design. These minor issues are immediately noticeable; once you see them once, you can’t unsee them which is distracting from the car’s otherwise clean and purposeful lines. Specific areas include the rear wheel well, where parts of the character line are cut away (why?), and the front bumper where the molding fixtures clip with each other in the middle.


As a design language, I see very modern and quirky designs with (once again) a blacked-out roof and thoughtful colour combinations. Most of the design elements would refer back to the original Reine from the 70s, though interpreted with a contemporary vision of course, the use of very sharp and strong character lines would be present as well. The main feature of the new Citrus models would be the crazy looking wheels with styling never seen before on any other car.


Once again I am really fond of this entry. The design has many strong points, such as its styling and attention to signature Citrus cues, though the surfacing issues prevent it from feeling fully refined.


Verdict: moves on to the finals!
hide


Click to expand review

Whilst not a complete retromodern interpretation of the 1970 Citrus Reine, it seems to take most of its design cues from that model (like the previous 2 entries), hence why this review is next. Unfortunately, there’s little about this entry that resonates with me, mostly because of the design execution and lack of refinement.




At first glance, the car doesn’t look particularly bad. It is upon closer inspection however, when the details just instantly fall apart: the glass bar surrounding the headlights and license plate has a lot of potential, yet it sits way too low because of the way that the DRLs are split, resulting in the frond kind of looking like a fish. Speaking of the DRLs, they’re a bit disproportionately large compared to the rest of the car. I’m also not fond of the lower grille, specifically the fixture that was used. Using premade fixtures isn’t a bad thing; if they’re applied well and integrate coherently with the design, they can work just fine. However, in this case the vents break the visual flow of the front design. The whole grille fixture is also horribly outdated (originally derived from an 8-year-old model). The sides feature inverted door panels (?), along with these long orange side markers, which… okay. The one element that I actually do like are the silver trim pieces at the bottom, not sure how they connect with the rest of the design though. The rear doesn’t improve the front’s shortcomings. Once again, the taillights sit way too low, and the license plate & logo placement does not look appealing at all, made worse by the extremely slanted tailgate (the latter of which could have had potential in my opinion, by using vertical taillights and a more protruding diffuser area for example). All of this brings me to the weakest aspect of this design: the silver spoiler element. Arguably, it’s the least successful iteration among all entries, lacking any form of refinement whatsoever.

The car does have some nods to previous Citrus models, mainly the paint scheme and the silver spoiler feature… as well as the wheel covers which I actually do like. I wouldn’t see them coming to any production cars, but it works well on this homage model. I particularly like how they don’t cover the entire wheel, which makes it look less ponderous (something that usually happens when trying to modernize wheel covers on new cars).


Surfacing is not that bad, mostly helped by the fact that there are no molding or fixtures that usually cause some mishaps reflections wise.

I’m not really sure how I would see this design language used on other models. Some elements could be carried over like the front-end and taillights, as well as the paint scheme. Things like the mirrors and that silver roof element would not make it to final production.


Overall, this entry is simply not my cup of tea. While there are a few details that I find appealing, they are largely overshadowed by the car’s shortcomings. Several elements fail to harmonize with the overall design. Despite some interesting touches, this entry struggles to make a strong impression compared to the others.


Verdict: eliminated!
hide
7 Likes
Click to expand review

This is undeniably one of the most creative interpretations of the Citrus brand image. However, how some aspects were handled resulted in a car that certainly looks cool, but struggles to present a clear design language from my point of view.




Kicking things off, let’s take a closer look at the overall design. The first thing that stands out to me is the very low and wide profile; as mentioned before, it’s a detail that I like because it’s reminiscent of the aerodynamic focus seen on mostly the older Citrus models. However, because the silhouette is such a departure from a ‘normal’ car, it becomes difficult to implement elements that are able to be replicated to production models. The front for example looks quite striking on this very low-slung hood, but it is simply impossible to replicate such a design on a taller body style like an SUV or a minivan. It also suffers from a relatively large underbite, especially when looking at it from the side. Speaking of the sides, they feature generous gaps that allow air to pass through. I like the idea of them, but they don’t feel integrated very well, as if there is something missing like a lip surrounding the vents or some kind of mesh. The rea wheel covers add to the focus on aerodynamics, though I’m not a huge fan of full wheel covers on modern designs. Another detail that stands out to me is the rectangular pattern present along the entire car, which I think is an interesting feature that has potential on other models (maybe some of that blocky emphasis could be repeated along more areas of the car?) The rear mimics the front lightbar and triple stripe design, though the rest of the bumper is now completely gone. It looks quite eye-catching, but once again there could have been a bit more detail around the air vents. The solar panel roof is a really cool feature though.

The most notable elements that make this proposal a Citrus are of course the quirky approach to its design, as well as the aforementioned 3 lines under the front & rear lightbars, and the paint scheme. The last bit is accompanied by the gold rims, which are not my cup of tea unfortunately. Their design and colour are just a bit too sporty and traditional in my opinion. The asymmetrical headlights & brake lights look solid though, and they work quite well with the lightbar.


The build quality is actually really good, given that the car experiments with unconventional creases and shapes, nice. Especially the way that the front grille and headlights flow into the protruding fixtures on the corners of the fascia looks great.


Key elements that would be carried over from the concept to the production vehicles would be the front & rear lightbars, as well as the rectangular pattern seen on the grille mesh and the interior. Some higher end models would adopt actual solar panel sunroofs similar to the one found on top of the Fisker Ocean, though its range capabilities would not be as much as advertised in the concept brochures :wink:.


It was a tough choice whether this would make the finals or not, as it does have quite a lot of elements that appeal to me. However, the design doesn’t showcase enough elements that are able to be carried over to production models, unlike some other entries in this competition. Therefore…


Verdict: eliminated!
hide


Click to expand review

Once again, a very unique and creative approach to this brief with excellent design execution, making it perhaps the most well-thought-out submission of the entire challenge.




This entry handles its outlandish approach remarkably well. From a distance, it almost appears like a normal city car, almost, because there is practically nothing normal about its design, yet it also doesn’t look overdone. The front fascia looks excellent, and I like how it is composed of multiple different areas in different colours and textures. There is actually a lot going on when you’re looking up close, but everything feels tidy and perfectly in place. The lightbar does look a bit generic, though they are accompanied by these large fog light-ish pods featuring an X made up of O’s (more on that later). I see a lot of potential in those, like displaying different patterns based on what type of vehicle it is (for example luxurious or sports models). Some aerodynamic elements are also present, specifically on the hood and sides. Speaking of the hood, it is mostly made up of a weird alternative material, also seen on the splitter, side skirts and rear bumper. I believe it’s supposed to be some kind of recycled plastic or maybe even carbon fiber (unlikely though), but to me it looks more like bird droppings :face_with_peeking_eye:. I like how the rear is split into 2 layers though, with the bottom one having a modern interpretation of the ‘Airbumps’ seen on the previous generation of Citrus vehicles, which looks really nice. Those rectangular rugged elements are reflected on other parts of the car as well, like the taillights for example, adding to the consistency. Overall, it looks like the whole body is made up of multiple divided parts (most notably the fenders in comparison to the sides), and I think that works very well. I would like to point out the greenhouse, which looks a bit too vertical in my opinion, though it has grown on me a little. The wheels look solid.

This entry brings a lot of new ideas for Citrus vehicles, but no worries, it is also crammed with references to old models as well. As mentioned before, the sides and rear bumper feature those rugged ‘Airbumps’. Once again, the front grille(-less) area has the asymmetric logo as well as the 3 illuminated vertical lines, which are accompanied by a very ‘fresh’ looking lime green colour (pun intended, the colour works excellently with the Citrus brand image by the way). The rear wheels are also partially enclosed with wheel covers; them being painted the same shade as the fender cladding really helps with the proportions, but they are not a must on this car in my opinion. One of the new features includes the XO pattern present in the DRLs and taillights. They give the car a playful and crisp aesthetic which I really like. Also worth mentioning are once again the rims, which somewhat resemble the inside of a lime.

Build quality is another highlight of this car. Even though it is completely made up of 3D fixtures, it still has realistic panel gaps and shut lines. There are barely any areas where the reflections don’t line up, or where the fixtures clip with each other. I really can’t fault it, well done.


As a design language, I would see designs inspired by geometry and linearity, looking very modern and slightly utilitarian even. Key elements carried over from the concept would definitely be the secondary accent colour, as well as the light ‘pods’, though maybe placed in other areas. The taillights would vary from having said ‘pods’, or using the second option which is the lightbar accompanied by the horizontal lines on the corners. The wheels would definitely be borrowed from the concept car as well.


Overall, this entry undoubtedly fits with the brief, as it brings a consistent and well-though-out design language, whilst also staying true to the brand’s past identity. There are some elements here and there that are not really my cup of tea, but those are rather small nitpicks compared to the rest of the design. Well done.

Verdict: moves on to the finals!
hide
6 Likes
Click to expand review

This entry suffers from a problem the complete oppositive of the previous entry. Whilst the design is consistent and thoughtfully put together, it seems to be missing its core identity that links this car to the Citrus brand.




This entry takes quite a different approach to the brief, which leads to one of the best elements of this car, but unfortunately also some issues. I’ll start with the good aspects though. The car honestly looks quite refreshing amongst the other entries, where the quirkiness lies in its proportions and profile, rather than parts of the design specifically. I’m personally a big fan of egg-shaped cars, and the colour certainly helps with that as well. Cab-forward lay-outs are in at the moment, which makes for a very contemporary design. I also like the squared-off side cladding, which is painted in the same alternative material as the previous entry, though the combination of more grey tones makes it look a lot better. The headlight assembly is a different story however; I don’t like how the headlights themselves are pushed all the way to the outer corners of the car, making it look a bit like Sid from Ice Age… I’m also not fond of the way that the hood is extended forward, as it kind of gives the car a forehead, even though the hood itself is quite short. However, the front bumper looks solid, nothing else in particular of note. The rear looks solid as well, especially the proportions look satisfying to me at least. I’m not sure if the taillights follow the same design philosophy as the rest of the design, since they look quite bulbous compared to the sharp edges and creases on the rest of the car, but it’s not a huge issue or something. My main problem with this entry is that the design, apart from the profile, looks a bit generic. Especially the rear; whilst it does look great, it just doesn’t feel as experimental with its design than other entries. If it went a bit further with its quirkiness, it would have improved a lot I think.

There is 1 clear element reminiscent of the Citrus brand on this entire car; the asymmetrical DRLs. I honestly quite like them, as they are an alternative way to integrate asymmetry into a design rather than the usual offset logo placement, etc. Now I did mention in the rules that the Citrus references weren’t necessary, however, the overall design is still missing that quirkiness, that feel that makes you certain that this is a French vehicle. Therefore, I think that adding some more references to older models would have improved its French identity.


Build quality is not so great on this car… maybe even the worst of the competition. It lacks refinement, which leads to a lot of areas all around the car where the reflections don’t line up at all. Especially the roof suffers from severe fixture clipping and floating. It looks as if the car is shedding multiple layers of its skin. :face_with_peeking_eye:


This concept leans close towards a production model, so some areas could be directly brought over to the new Citrus lineup, including the front fascia, cab-forward A-pillars and wheels. I would also like to experiment with those funky door handles connected to the windowsill. The protective cladding would be reserved for more rugged models of course, though made of normal plastic material.

This is quite an interesting design proposal, that offers quite some different ideas from the other entries. It could have definitely been a winner if it wasn’t for the build quality and the lack of a more ‘French’ identity.


Verdict: eliminated!
hide


Click to expand review

My least preferred entry from the bunch, held back by a rather dated design, bulky profile and lack of refinement regarding the execution. I don’t want to repeat myself too much here so I will keep it short:




Overall, this design does evoke some quirky Citrus elements, which I’ll get to later, though it doesn’t feel well though-out like some other entries (something that is very important to me in this challenge) It’s as if you took another car, and then tried to squeeze in some funky elements afterwards. The profile looks really tall and ponderous, especially when it comes to the A- and C-pillars which are pushed all the way to the end. What makes it feel dated to me is the very short front overhang, accompanied by quite a long rear-end. The front bumper and sides are composed of many different molding elements, lacking any form of flow at all. The rear bumper is mostly made up of that one McLaren grille, a fixture I really, really don’t like. The only element that I don’t hate so much about this car is the taillight assembly.

This entry features some references to the Citrus brand, like the triple vertical lines on the front grille and the wheel covers (the latter of which also contributes to it’s datedness). The sporty Citrus GLS paint scheme is also present, tragically linking this car to the brand.


Build quality is okay. There are not much fixture mishaps around the car, mostly due to the fact that the design does not show a lot of complexity or creativity.


Just like the previous entry, this concept is already quite close to a production model, so some elements like the front headlight assembly would be brought over to any new Citrus models. The taillights could potentially be converted into something more vertical to allow for taller designs like MPVs or SUVs.


I don’t want to come over as rude at all, but unfortunately this entry just cannot live up to the other entries in a lot of aspects. I do appreciate the fact that you understood the brief of the challenge though, if it wasn’t for the execution…


Verdict: eliminated!
hide
12 Likes
Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2Round2

For round 2, I will showcase my interpretation of the design language of each finalists car on a Citrus production model. The car in question is the upcoming Citrus Avenir I, a luxury oriented large saloon. The reason behind this round is that the design language itself and the implementation of it are really important aspects in this challenge to me, hence why I would like to judge that part specifically as well.





@qofsolus

For the front, I went for a smilair linear design as seen on the concept. The pods are split into 2 pairs; 1 pair working as part of the headlight assembly and the other 2 pods being integrated into the DRL design. For the rear, I chose the taillight design with the lightbar accompanied by horizontal lines on the corners, as it fits the saloon shape the best in my opinion. The design language does allow for some variation between models. Whilst the concept car was certainly funky, it is difficult to apply that identity on other cars without it looking a bit dull. I think that’s because the core features of concept car itself look either a bit generic (like the front lightbar) or are impossible to integrate in a production model (like the wide fenders & seperated body panel areas) when implementing the design language. The result of this is that the concept certainly looks cool and stylish, but the production models lack some of the concept car’s energy.





@titleguy1

I went for an alternative approach for the headlight assembly, this time featuring fangs and distinct wraparound turn signals. The front sensors and cameras are hidden behind the glass as well. The rear has similair taillights as on the concept, though a bit more prominent. This triple stripe DRL and taillight design does remind me of that specific French car manufacturer, but I don’t mind :face_with_hand_over_mouth:. What I like about this design is that it allows for a lot of variation whilst also looking quite quirky. If I would see this car in real life, I would definitely think that it is from a French brand. What I struggle with is that the concept car’s design relies heavily on retromodern features like the silver roof element and the dipping beltline, which are both challenging to use on production models that don’t directly reference the original Citrus Reine.





@the-chowi

This design language was the least difficult to implement into a new Citrus model, as both concept cars already leaned close towards production cars as well as having distinctive and consistent core design features that can easily be replicated, perhaps even the most in this round I would say. Obviously, the front & rear feature very similar light assemblies and bumper designs as seen on the concepts. Overall, I have to say that I really like the DRL and taillight design. However, like on the first review in this round, I feel like this design language also misses some of that unique and funky energy.

15 Likes
FinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinalsFinals

4th - @azkaalfafa
5th - @vero94773
6th - @_4bigguys
7th - @superbiirdd
8th - @ILIKECARS
9th - @adamfmx
10th - @l0jli

Choosing a winner was surprisingly difficult, as all 3 of the finalists are very strong contenders. In the end, the Élanion outdid the other 2 with a more quirky design, even if it was somewhat held back by its build quality. The Copain/Famille stranding on 3rd place because it does not allow for much variety within its models.

I would like to thank everyone for participating in this challenge, I hope you enjoyed it!

9 Likes

Thank you for hosting @CrazyCat808! I’m going to see what I can think of for the next round. A post should be going up in a few days :slight_smile:

Little bonus pic — a sketch of one of the original ideas I had when designing my entry. People who saw the original version of the design will know how much I chose to tone it down…

10 Likes