My point wasn’t on the diesel but on the probability of a turbo on an economy car.
It wasn’t rare at all.
But on a petrol sure it didn’t exist like it does now.
In Automation there’s this “cheat” to make petrol engines more fuel efficient but at a cost (reliability etc…).
As it’s not forbidden, I don’t get why you couldn’t use that. It’s up to you to balance it, to make it reasonnable if not realistic.
Kasperi is preparing his morning breakfast, A cup of coffee and macaroni. It’s nothing special really…
He thinks about what car would he eventually end up buying? There are many to choose from but there could only be one, He decided that he would want some opinion from the person that knows their thing.
Kasperi called a lift from his cousin then head off…
Binned for: Outdated Catalytic Converter (2 ways instead of 3 ways)
Other notes: Bad power curve, RPM limit way higher than It should be, Poor fuel economy, AWD with open differential, Pretty hard brake pad and the Overall stats aren’t high enough to be competitive with the rest of lineups.
Binned for: Not posting the advertisement
Other notes: Highly questionable body construction (Space frame), Funky suspension tuning (-2.1 camber), Engine cooling slider set to 100, Computer controlled Automatic 5 Speed gearbox in a car at this price range, Semi active sway bars, Fully clad Undertray and the car performance is very poor compare to the rest (25.2 seconds to reach 100km).
oh no
you what-
how in the hell do you do that???
why???
Ig that’s technical a eco shitbox lmao
But holy shit that is real slow
The acceleration for this car is about 1.1 m/s2…based on this Researchgate thread your average human might be able to out-accelerate it. Wow.
definitely quicker than a 2CV, i guess i can tell you that.
These are the performances from the two models of 2CVs available in 1974!
2CV4 24ch : 100 km/h en pointe, 1000 m départ arrêté : 50,8" !!!
De 0à 100 en 68 "
80 à 100 en 4ème : 37"
Pas plus de 92 km/h en moyenne “à fond” (circuit de Montlhéry), consommation 7,04 l
2CV6 28,5ch : 107,5 km/h en pointe, 1000 m départ arrêté : 45,"
De 0 à 100 en 37,4 "
80 à 100 en 4ème : 23,4"
Moyenne “à fond” 102 km/h, consommation 7,3 l
despite not understanding french, i can tell you that car’s not any quicker than a 2CV. However a human can out-accelerate it and the automation car. Even walking is a better option than the two.
And my Nissan 720 diesel does 0-100 km/h in 70 seconds. Woho. I would be happy with 25.
Vous feriez mieux de surveiller votre dos là-bas, monsieur.
A Yugo 45 is 5 seconds faster to 60 and it has 45 HP.
Meanwhile at Volkswagen
The shattered remains of my scrap hauler does 0-60 in 13 seconds. That ecobox is certainly one kind of impressive. Honestly, good job.
For all the people not wanting to copy-paste on google translator 
2CV4 24horsepower : top speed 100 km/h , 1000 m standing start : 50,8" !!!
0-100km/h in 68 "
80 to 100km/h in 4th : 37"
Average speed 92 km/h full throttle (circuit de Montlhéry), fuel consumption 7,04 l/100km
2CV6 28,5ch : top speed 107,5 km/h, 1000 m standing start : 45,"
0 to 100 kph in 37,4 "
80 to 100kph in 4th : 23,4"
Average speed full throttle 102 km/h, fuel consumption 7,3 l/100km
So it’s 68 seconds or 37.4 for the “wildest” 2cv!!
