CSR165 - Status-Driven Speed [Results!]



Vizzuri Grandeonda Prestazioni GT '25

Shown in Leggero Oceanico Onda d'Urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents & Midas Oro Onda d'Urto Metallico brake calipers.

Presenting the Vizzuri Grandeonda Prestazioni GT. The final performance-oriented evolution of the Grandeonda SUV; featuring a Twin Turbo 3.8 Litre V8 producing more than 700bhp @ 6900RPM providing effortless acceleration of 3.1 seconds to 62mph/100kph as well as a 11.05 seconds quarter mile time. It is able to pull 1.07gs in cornering using Pirelli P ZERO™ (PZ4) sports tyres paired to it’s flow-optimized undertray and advanced active aerodynamic techniques. It may weigh in at 2,051kg, though it is no slouch on the race track, competing with even the sportiest and lightest of track toys available, complete with launch control to give you the feeling of being a 50 calibre bullet rifle shot.

The chassis and body blend lightweight but strong Aluminium and Advanced High-Strength Steel to provide a stable and muscular template for success on the road and race track alike. With active suspension in all four corners to provide adaptive control mated to Vizzuri’s smooth Helical AWD, it provides superior comfort, traction and control on any surface. The aerodynamic undertray combined with cooling flaps are optimised for low-drag: resulting in a 26.7mpg fuel economy (Combined).

The aerodynamics of the Prestazioni GT were enhanced from the standard model: Flow around the front exits over the side of the body through front-side vents to control air along the body of the car, and with the fixed rear wing plus spoiler lip help enable the car to reach just over 226mph/364kph and maintain it stably (Only available on private roads & race courses with de-limiter key activation). To aid the car back to 0 from such a high speed: Heavy duty vented disks with 6/3 piston front/rear ratio provide immense stopping power in any situation.

The Grandeonda Prestazioni GT comes with additional extras such as: Infrared Laser Night Driving assist (Front-side vents situated), front and rear radar & parking assist cameras & sensors, side-mirror lane assist indicators (Mirror glass), hands-free sensor for the boot lid (in proximity to the car key).


Colour options

(Prepare your scroll wheel for a ride... Lol)

Onda d’urto selection:

Shown in Acciaio Cristallizzato Onda d'Urto Metallizzato Opaco with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Arancione Cremisi Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Arsenico Argento Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Bagliore Solare Giallo Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Blu Marea Onda d'Urto Metallizzato Opaco with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Bologna Corallo Rosso Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Ciliegia Più Scura Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Corallo Innevato Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Corteccia Di Cipresso Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Diventare Verde Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Lago di Como Verde Acqua Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Leggero Oceanico Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Leone Bronzo Onda d'Urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Mela Verde Fresca Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Midas Oro Onda d'Urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Nero Jet Ossigenato Onda d'Urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Nevicata Onda d'Urto Metallizzato Opaco with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Platino del Vecchio Mondo Onda d'Urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Punta Prosciutto Sabbia Onda d'Urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Roma Blu Elettrico Scuro Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Venezia Viola Onda d'urto Metallica with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Verde Berillio Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Shown in Verde Mistico Onda d'urto Metallico with Fibra Di Carbonio Nero accents

Metallics selection:

Shown in Argento Silenzioso Metallico

Shown in Blu Crepuscolo Metallico

Shown in Blu Vivace Metallico

Shown in Caldo Lago Blu Metallico

Shown in Corteccia Di Pino Marrone Metallico

Shown in Grigio Ardesia Metallico

Shown in Polvere Di Sabbia Argento Metallico

Shown in Rosso Metallico

Shown in Verde Metallico



22 Likes

I found a little brochure that could be of interest :wink:




6 Likes

@iivansmith

5 Likes

For optimal viewing please use desktop.

Garrison Motor Company presents the
Corseque X630
✦ Advert

The 2025 Garrison Corseque is a mid level premium offering for the prestige brand that offers a chassis platform with flexibility that allows incredible future proofing.

The Corseque has all the typical appointments of a premium vehicle of its class, with an emphasis on safety and practicality with Surround 360 degree cameras, Radar cruise control, Automatic lane keep assistance and state of the art forward collision avoidance, aiming to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick Plus.

Corseque also leads the newest generation of Garrison visual iconography with a new stately face and running light signature, harkening emotions of the past and yet looking towards the future.

Typically offered in V6, Hybrid and EV powertrains for optimal economy, torque and emissions, the X630 variant takes the legacy V8 powertrain offered in past products to the newest generation of vehicle with updated refinements and technology while retaining performance associated with its pedigree.


Specs

✦ 5.2 Litre DOHC Marksman Small block V8 with forced induction
✦ 630 HP|712 LB-FT (allegedly)
✦ 2205 KG
✦ 8 Speed Automatic
✦ 23 inch Rims
✦ 3.1 second 0-62
✦ Electronically limited to 155 MPH
✦ 2.4 ton braked towing

© 2025 Garrison All Rights Reserved

14 Likes

Mills Grandala SP



4.0 liter V8 engine,
850 Nm @ 2000-5100 rpm,
650 hp,
2100 kg

4 Likes

Hexe Emma GTS

4.0L Twin Turbo V8
660 kW
1110 Nm
409 km/h top speed

Is it too fast?
Yes
Is it too powerful?
Yes
Do you want it?
Yes

Yours for $ 69 690 AMU

3 Likes

These big, bulky behemoths may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but most of them sure look great! They’ll even give even the best real-life equivalents (as shown in the link below) a run for their money:

1 Like

Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale Renault Rafale

Completed Submissions (.car & ad):

@DoctorNarfy
@the-chowi
@Magmort
@WIET_SE + @themagicmoonman
@Er_Foxone
@DuceTheTruth100
@asdren
@karhgath + @Prium
@AKA_NOBUDDY + @moroza
@vero94773
@Tsundere-kun + @vouge
@Aruna
@Xepy
@That-S-cop + @Portalkat42
@ErenWithPizza
@Isabella
@Koviico + @xsneakyxsimx
@Lurka


.car only (missing ad):

@Texaslav + @Kyorg
@happyfireballman


Ad only (missing .car):

No-one!

Thanks everyone! Please give us some time to collect, import all the cars, input data, take photos, and write reviews! We’ll try our best to get them out as quick as we can.

16 Likes

Size does matter.

Engineering and writeup courtesy of @Texaslav

The Somervell SBP Showdown is a creature of man’s best and worst impulses. Created as a halo car and intended for very limited production and purchase from the beginning, the Showdown is an assertive and (arguably) stylish SUV body mated to sportscar suspension on a low and wide frame and outfitted with a bespoke, $25,000-an-engine powerplant: a true, terrifying, money-guzzling jack of all trades.

It’s as long as a Suburban, the wheels are so big buying Forgis is redundant, and its 8000-rpm even-fire W10 invites felonious mischief. The Showdown driver makes a statement with his vehicle, and that statement is: I’m the center of the world. I literally generate gravity so that you can orbit me. Beat that.



Fun Facts
  • Unique performance-oriented Somervell SBP model, no “normal” equivalent - although obviously related to Somervell and Bowie-branded fullsize trucks and SUVs

  • Based on a lightened and “perimetrized” frame for a lower center of gravity and higher “stable” top speed, at 186 mph

  • Equipped with Somervell’s Twin-Five 400 engine: A naturally-aspirated even-fire W10 comprised of two Arlington staggered-five mills with a taller deck. 700hp@7500.

  • Fiveseater despite being very long; presented as a lifestyle-oriented super SUV for “a family and their things” rather than a soccer mom car

  • ActivAir suspension with magnet dampers and no physical sway bars

  • BS-4S 305-width tires on 23 inch rims for a full g of grip

  • Clutchpack-based, rear-focus AWD and Arlington’s 9-speed, paddle-and-column shifted automatic

Color Picker

Gallery
Image 1 Image 2 Image 3
19 Likes
ARRIVE UNINVITED,
DEPART EXALTED.
Lumiere Algol χ Vitesse noir

Everything your family needs
…and a little extra.


also i don't even know if this was accepted because it was mad late due to technical difficulties. i just wanna show it off at this point. im going to bed now. bye

by @supersaturn77 and @nvisionluminous

7 Likes

[Somewhere at Rhania HQ…]

[I am simply too busy this week to make an ad, so a place holder will be here]

THESE BINS ARE CRAZY!!! WATCH TILL THE END (GONE BAD)!!

YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE WHAT WE HAVE BINNED THIS TIME (INSANE)!!

CRAZY BINS!! WE GO THROUGH THE RULEBREAKES OF CSR165!!

I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS HAPPENED!! (MY CAR IS CRUSHED)!!


FIRE THESE ENGINEERS BRUH!!! :

CBC Diva SD by @AKA_NOBUDDY & @moroza

Rule Break: WES 6 (Not WES 11)

Honestly this thing is so all over the place, if it weren’t for this rule break it might have just gotten a realism bin. A 382hp, 2L, Single Turbo, Flat 6 redlining at 9200rpm??? what in tarnation brother. Theres no saving this one, the design itself is not bad per say, but definitely not what we wanted, way too boxy and with no ounce of sportiness - proving that massive rims (24 inch) does not make a car look sporty.

(But fr tho what is this engine choice)

Rear wing shenanigans :

Zilverhorst Se7en by @WIET_SE & @themagicmoonman

Rule Break: 5kg Rear Downforce (Not Negative)

This isn’t a massive rule break but rules are rules. Besides this rule break it’s a rather simple build, besides dome interesting choices ( 22 inch STEEL rims, 380mm rear discs with ONE piston, etc) no techpool was changed from default though which does not help it either. Design wise there’s not much to say besides that it really doesn’t look “super”, barely looks sporty - with all the action going on in the rear with the massive wing and diffuser the rest looks very plain otherwise.


Literally what even are emissions! :

Shromet Levine PRO by @DoctorNarfy

Rule Break: WES 6 (Not WES 11)

This so called “meme SUV” has returned from hiatus, or well attempted to since it wouldn’t even have left the factory floor with these terrible emissions! Looking past this though is a big, brash and simply massive SUV that Grace & Luca were just not looking for unfortunately. Unfortunately no sportiness shines through unless you hear the TTV8 rumble, but that is where it stops, the sheer scale of this even eats up the square 295mm, 23 inch wheel setups. Design wise it’s a pretty basic LA housewife runabout with a random chrome triangle on the doors (?) massive, tall face and for some reason a single dual exit exhaust to expel the TTV8’s bad emissions.


Look at how fast this one is cornering… NOOOO!! :

Galdini Zentoro by @vouge & @Tsundere-kun

Rule Break: 127kg Rear Downforce (Not Negative)

Now this one REALLY hurts, this is easliy one of the better entrants, one that had a good chance of winning this whole thing. Having the cheesemaster & the designmaster work on a car together usually works out well, but this one is quite a tough bin, but it’s way too big of a rule break unfortunately, OOF. Ignoring the stats which might be affected a decent amount due to the downforce, the design is one of, if not the best we have received, well crafted & thought out, but not completely perfect by virtue of having a very high beltline making the side profile have somewhat odd proportions. But yeah, this one really sucks, especially because of how big the rule break was lmao, anyways - sorry boys.

Unfortunate for these 4 entries, all could have been avoided with a double check of the rules!

(We are slowly but surely doing the reviews for the remaining entrants with the time we have after work, plz be patient! We will see you all soon except these 4)

20 Likes

there must be a mistake, the engine we used was a v12.

Welp the one we received did not have it…

10 Likes

Something went wrong, indeed. I’m not near the right PC at the moment. @iivansmith could you please DM or post an engine summary screenshot?

Whole vehicle summary would help, too. We had 30-something Sportiness IIRC.

Sapporo Saroma:

16th, by @Er_Foxone

Alrighty here we go, the Saporro Saroma, first impressions is a rather tame looking coupe-suv considering the spec sheet we looked at beforehand, but more on that later. The design is quite safe I would say, no real risks taken, and to be honest - not much in the way of having sporty elements besides the sloping roofline. Front & rear fascia’s are not too bad but not really in your face and bold like I was hoping to find here, it does have a decent amount of detail though - just needs a bit more zest I think.

Now, onto the numbers - 750hp & 1000Nm, bonkers amount of numbers that you would never realistically need, perfect. Powering this beast is a 4.4L TT V8 which itself is a pretty healthy unit, BUT, the bits & pieces around it do let it down quite a bit. The test drive concluded that it’s not the most drivable thing out there, quite the opposite actually - which was not helped with the reliability issues we experienced on this short drive somehow. It’s a quick car but I would not feel comfortable in doing any speeding in this one, nor would I really feel comfortable buying it in the first place, most of the areas we tested were quite below average and was not satisfied with how things went throughout the testing, pass.

Most notably, I like the contrast between the blacked-out roof and the neon green paint, it hides some of the visual mass and proportion-wise, it looks great, even with 22" wheels (sized nicely). I wish there was more visual mass removed from the bottom of the car, perhaps a small black trim at the bottom could do a lot to the design and visually “frame” it properly. Also, I wish that was a more cohesive design language, mainly the relation of the front fascia design with the rear design, as the tail lights feel very different and has a different “vibe” than the front. The sides also seem a bit too bare perhaps.


Carcharhini Stratos GT:

15th, by @Magmort

Right now before any testing even started for the Carcharhini Stratos GT, one thing immediately jumped out at us, the borderline cartoonish proportions of this thing, it is so short and stubby if you were to only ever see this thing on photos you would think it has a wheelbase of around 2.4m, which is quite sad considering that the design itself is not really too bad and has a decent amount of detailing throughout, not personally a fan of the nose though - some bits feel like they do not belong on there.

Now besides all that, our real worry was the drive since we saw a few numbers beforehand, and well, the proportions are not the only thing thats smaller than what it should be. A whopping 460hp from a 4.3L N/A V8? there are hatchbacks that nearly have this amount of power with half the engine, really not sure what the engineers were thinking on that front, but the test drive will reveal how that affects the experience - As expected it surprisingly (not) was not the best, it was the slowest car we had to test today, nearly a 5sec 0-100 time is not cool when again, hatchbacks can achieve this too. Besides the performance, the handling and sporty feel are also very much sub-par and not what we were looking for, it’s not even the cheapest car here and that does not help its case at all, pass.

This design has weird proportions firstly - although the height is great and the wheels seem to nicely ‘fit’ the size of the overall body, the greenhouse is comically squished and feels so short, almost like there’s no room inside for its occupants and a severe lack of rear headroom (or legroom!). This is really bad considering it’s a 2.8m wheelbase lol. Perhaps a lot of effort has been made to maintain a long bonnet and a sloped almost sedan-like rear roofline, but… I think you can do a coupe SUV on a 2.8m wheelbase that is more practical looking than this. The build quality itself is not bad at all, there’s effort in detailing throughout, and the overall angular vibes are maintained nicely. Overall, the styling works well but wow that greenhouse is just comical, sorry.


Rhania Monstro YE:

14th, by @Happyfireballman

(Pause) The Rhania Monstro YE… Yikes. Now we were not sure how this specific car ended up here since we saw leaks of a much nicer looking alternative, not sure what happened to that one, probably lost the sketches and couldnt access it. But with the one we have here today we almost could not wait to get inside that car so we could stop looking at the outside, there were so many design related questions that we almost didn’t want answers for, like why does it have Nascar style blast-pipe exhausts on the side? or what age were the designers? but anywho…

We went for a drive. The Monstro does feature a 3.8L TT V6 with 610hp which is a healthy number and does do a decent job of punting the car around with ease, it was quite a mediocre experience with not much to take away besides the fact that it really was not comfortable at all, everything else felt very uninspiring and not well thought out, and the fact that it almost maxed out our budget.. yeah it was an easy no from me.

This design doesn’t look cohesive or flattering at all. I think an attempt has been made to go after that large wheel and small greenhouse concept, but the execution leaves a lot to be desired. The tyre sidewalls are massive, perhaps chasing a comfortable ride, but it sacrifices a lot of visual appeal - does not scream super or expensive at all. The front looks extremely awkward and does the strakes design concept is not reflected in the rear fascia at all. Looking at it from different angles gives distinctly different vibes, and honestly this looks economy car rather than super SUV.


Hexe Emma GTS:

13th, by @Isabella

Now the Hexe Emma GTS does seem quite enticing on paper, big headlining numbers - 886hp and 1120Nm all from a 4L TT V8, a 3.21sec 0-100 time and a blistering 10.66 on the 1/4 mile - wow, we really needed to investigate this one further. The investigation turned out to be somewhat disappointing unfortunately, the visuals just did not back up any of the performance numbers, no real design features at all, no creases, no sporty lips, no nothing besides an almost sad looking face and a rear end which has potential (no potential for the rear parking sensors though, they are pointing to the sky and also very high up).

Going onto the test drive the Hexe was not the worst thing to drive in to be fair, it felt quite sporty and was somewhat drivable considering the amount of power it has, but DAMN was it uncomfortable to be in, for sure the least comfortable i’ve been the whole day - is the 5K savings on our budget worth it? I don’t quite think it is unfortunately.

Another entry with slightly comical proportions, but this one seems a little worse in terms of build quality. The wheels look absolutely massive and the roofline itself looks a bit wonky. The color doesn’t really do it any favors either, and unfortunately the front fascia kind of looks a bit awkward honestly. The rear end meanwhile has a massive blacked out bottom section with not much going on, and the tail lights fit nicely with the body but doesn’t really stand out. This car tried to go for quite extreme proportions that honestly does not work at all and the rest is just quite a bit of a letdown, with a very awkward vibe going on throughout that seems to me quite confused.


Allure Escapade V.2

12th, by @DuceTheTruth100

On to the next one which is the Allure Escapade V2, now straight off the bat it was clear that this one was not really going to be for us.. It looks way more designed to be on the luxury side and not the sporty & wild side, no part of this alludes me to think that it should be fast, expensive maybe, but not sporty. I was also not quite sure of the build quality since there was a piece of rubber seal or something hanging out from the door gaps on the side, and besides work being put into design there was not really much thought put into having good detailing, no sensors of any kind and no front fender gaps next to the door.

Not sure if we were given a pre-production model but it felt quite unfinished. The test drive did not reveal much in the way of greatness, everything felt quite average across the board, with the exception of it’s 620hp 4.4L V8 punting it from 0-100 in a impressive 2.93 seconds and a sub 11 second 1/4 mile time - but again unfortunately the looks do not back up the sporty numbers you get from it.

Another entry with 24" wheels, perhaps to equalize the size and sheer visual mass of the body itself. This is on a 3.1m wheelbase, but the overall proportions is good. I like the floating roof design, but the light blue paint doesn’t scream muscularity or aggressiveness or road presence, much unlike its size. It’s a nice and simple shape overall, reminiscent of a real-life car (not necessarily a bad thing), but perhaps unambitious in its overall shaping - it’s more of a simple and sleek vibe rather than angry road monster. The front fascia is fine, it’s quite complex, but also not really linking well with the rear, so you’ve got different vibes. The attention to detail and build quality could be better too.


Revera RX Supersport

11th, by @asdren

Our next option does look a bit more promising than the previous ones, very very good performance numbers, and a design that does’nt put you to sleep? Lets get into it. Looking at the Revera RX Supersport you can sense that it means business with its aggressive design, wings and big diffuser - i do quite like the nose of this one but the rear feels quite lackluster in comparison, but not the worst we’ve seen, no real complaints further.

Now where this one really shines is in the performance category, a whopping 800hp from a 4.2L TT V8 redlining all the way up at 8000rpm, not the highest we’ve had here but the Revera does have a secret weapon, it’s lack of (relative) weight - only slightly above 1900kg is very light for this class of car and you can tell by how damn fast it goes in a straight line, 2.85sec to 100 and 10.43 on a 1/4 mile is no joke - this is even more amazing when you consider that its 20K UNDER budget, insane, however the lack of quality does show - the car just did not feel very prestigious at all, reliability issues where present and was super uncomfortable - we also heard that it doesn’t score very highly on the EURO NCAP safety tests, all this puts it safely out of contention for purchase - saving all that money ands up costing you a lot.

Even though it uses a 2.9m wheelbase, this leans towards the more ambitious side of design styling to me. Even with ‘only’ 22" rims, the wheels are nicely proportionally sized to the rest of the body - even with a forward-cab greenhouse, it still looks sporty and nice, the vibes it gives off (to me) is like an oversized hatchback - although the body is large, it visually looks small and sporty, nice. The front design is nice, I like how the side vents are done, and I appreciate the effort of trying to replicate the look in the rear too. Overall it’s quite nice and I appreciate the ambitious attempt but perhaps more care could be made in smoothening everything out or perhaps going next level on the depth of detail.


Mills Grandala SP

10th by @ErenWithPizza

Righto the, onto the next on which is the Mills Grandala SP, which honestly is not a bad looker at all, very good first impressions, decent front & rear fascia’s and a good uniform design throughout - nice simple luxury-esque looks that certainly has some sporty edges to it, however it could’ve gone a little further down that road - speaking of going down roads though, this thing is quite low, it’s bordering quite close on being a sporty wagon, which is not the biggest problem, but it would be slightly more work getting in & out of it and would make me slightly scared if we were to eventually end up on a lovely British dirt road.

Moving onto the test drive the Grandala behaved itself quite nicely overall, nothing too exceptional but nothing really bad either, truly a middle of the pack experience however we did notice that we were getting the best fuel economy along the drive with the 4L TT V8 being happy to cruise along the motorway. It’s no slouch either with a 0-100 in just above 3.1sec and and a 1/4 mile just above 11.1sec, overall a decent car, perfectly average.

First impression is that this looks more like a tall wagon for me - it’s pretty long and low to the ground, which isn’t bad at all, but lacks a bit of the road presence we’re looking for as a super SUV at this price. It’s a relatively simple build, clean and nice, but I wish more time and effort could be put into it I think. With 23" wheels, it fills the wheel housings nicely, but I feel like it’s setup a bit too low to the ground - perhaps chasing a sporty look, but lacks the excitement or ambition as some of the others. Overall, not much else to say other than it’s not a bad looking build, but just… okay and doesn’t stand out.

More to come!

19 Likes

Looked taller when I made it and the measured ground clearance is, although on the lower side, in the ballpark of real cars in the class. But it also has massive wheels which makes it look lower than it actually is.

2 Likes

I forgot to change my engine, it was a dummy engine. Realized when I made the advertisement but had already submitted it, my bad :melting_face:

3 Likes

csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2
csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2
csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2csr165round2

Armuth Bouvier DL630GT Black Diamond:

9th, by @Lurka

Now next we were given the keys to the Armuth Bouvier DL630GT Black Diamond, quite a mouthful isn’t it. The Armuth is honestly not a bad looking thing, especially from the front end, nicely thought out and well put together - however that does fade away quite quickly when you start to move around the car where you are met with basically a blank canvas on the side and some massive yellow-lettered all-terrain tires, not quite sure why the company sent it with those. The simple rear does leave quite a bit to be desired but the big lettering does make it feel quite cheap.

HOWEVER getting behind the wheel of this thing you start to get the appeal, its very very easy to drive and feels nice & prestigious too, not to mention insanely comfortable, but all this does come at the cost of not feeling the most sporty thing to drive around - this was backed up by being the second slowest entry we had out for the day with a 0-100 of 3.68sec & a 1/4 mile of 11.78, overall it’s a very decent option but does lack in key spots which we dont want to skip out on.

First impressions are… we get a free roofbox! Perhaps to offset the low practicality score… Anyways! It looks great. It uses the same body with another entrant but this one looks a lot better, with nicely sized large wheels and alright cladding that feels a tad bit excessive. Also there are floating all-terrain graphics on the tyres… maybe can use trim settings to work with that or just avoid this rim option with the graphics lol. It does provide a nice visual interest but there are other ways to do this, like perhaps more molding on the body itself as it’s really flat. The front looks amazing though, it looks really nice, but this effort seems to be lost on the rear, as it feels very minimalist and it doesn’t really work with the vibes of the front.


Vizzuri Grandeonda Prestazioni GT:

8th, by @Aruna

Our next option from Vizzuri has captured my eye quite quick with it’s design, the Grandeonda Prestazioni GT is a handsome one with with a definite sporting edge to it, it was personally one of my favorite designs that we had out for the day - good proportions, fluid design throughout and good details all over makes this a very good contender going off of looks alone if you asked me.

The numbers were good as well, 700hp from it’s 4L TT V8 and claimed times of 3.1sec to 100 and a 1/4 mile of just above 11 seconds - all for just 64000 pounds? this had me even more invested. The test drive soon followed and didn’t go completely as planned unfortunately, despite having the number behind it the car was not the most drivable one out there, nor did it feel as sporty as it should’ve - but it was still a pretty decent all-rounder, not exceptionally good in anything but not bad in anything either, it was pretty light on fuel though. But yeah, quite sad this didn’t perform as well as it looked, still, very solid car - just not 100% up to par of some of the others.

First impression of the design is that it’s a bit unbalanced and slightly confused in which direction it wants to go. The sides go up in a slightly curvy way towards the back, with a substantial amount of black cladding that rises a bit too abruptly to my liking. Otherwise, the overall proportions are okay, the wheels fit well to the body size and the front and rear design vibes can match, with a mostly angular feel. There’s a lot of effort at the front to add depth to the headlights which is appreciated but the rest (the grille and lower vents) feel flat still. Overall, not a bad design at all.


Hartford Peregrine 600R:

7th, by @the-chowi

Next on our list we have the Hartford Peregrine 600R, another coupe-suv that hides its size quite a bit - first impressions on the design front are looking good, but could be better, small details are lacking and some things i would do different personally like adding a rear wing of sorts would help out a lot, that being said its still nice, just not WOW.

What is wow on the other hand is how this thing feels on the road, easy to drive and insanely sporty feeling, it feels like you are driving a much smaller and track-focused sports car - very well optimized. Helping out with the sporty feel is a 640hp 4L turbo V8 and a weight just just below 2 tons which add up to a 3.1sec 0-100 and a 1/4 mile of just above 11sec, it does however lack a comfortable ride and a prestigious feel though, but i could tell this was just made to feel like a sportscar, which is great, but not for a car that we would want to daily.

The design has great proportions, but it may seem that the body itself could be made ‘slimmer’ or more ‘sportier’. I understand it’s an SUV and it rides high but this one uses 24" rims just so the overall proportions feel balanced out, ideally for realism 23" would probably be the ‘max’ I would go (and I really love large wheels too lol), so perhaps next time can try to make the body work with a 22" or 23" while still keeping the overall proportions (perhaps more visual mass removal or more exaggerated molding). I would also prefer perhaps a spoiler at the rear, because as it currently stands there’s a lot of curves and bulbous-feeling surfaces that doesn’t help it feel ‘aggressive’ or ‘muscular’. The build quality itself is also okay, nothing too special, perhaps more attention to detail could help a lot.


Voltari Spår RS:

6th, by @vero94773

The Voltari Spår RS is our next option up for a test drive, intrigued to see how it feels on the road because well, I’m not quite sold on the looks, don’t get me wrong, it’s not ugly or anything, but it just suffers from the same issue as a lot of the others cars we have out here today in which it just doesn’t evoke a feeling that its powerful and sporty, but to it’s credit it is still nice & well-built.

Moving on from the looks and reading about the 600hp 4L TT V8 of the Voltari, the test drive gave me the impression that it was just above average in most sections we tested today, the best bit about it being that its quite a comfy thing to be in and we’ve heard that its quite reliable too, but being at the max price we are willing to spend, im not quite sure that we will end up with a order for this one.

My first impression on the design is that it’s quite unambitious, and it has an extremely weird and jarring a-pillar top windshield part that is swooped down and has very flat shading. I know it’s a game thing but hmm even the shape is very weird to me. Moving towards the front, it’s also a just a massive grille and surrounding vents with hmm not that much interesting things going on or anything eye-catching. The rear is also quite traditional, in that it’s realistic for a regular sports SUV, but doesn’t really scream super or ‘presence’ or eye-catching to me. I think overall, it needs more ambition and a lot more attention to detail and finishing touches.


Garrison Corseque X630:

5th, by @That-S-cop & @Portalkat42

Very interested to see our next option, the Garrison Corseque X630, it does look like a good one on paper with its 707hp & 1090Nm from its 5.2L turbo V8 and pretty decent claimed performance numbers as well. It’s quite a handsome looking SUV too, very well built and a lot of thought put into the design, however i feel it does lack a lot of sporty appeal, i would not think this has as much power as it does just by looking at it, which is sad - it’s a very good base to work from though, very brute-ish with it’s high beltline & low roof, just a very safe design.

Safe does also apply to the car itself since this one scored very well in tests for that, as you could think with how beefy it looks, sadly the other aspects are not the best, its pretty easy drive but lacks that sporty & prestigious feel we were after, it is pretty practical though so Grace should have no issues fitting all her required equipment in it. Overall it’s a good car, spacious, nice to drive, and a nice looker, just not the look we were wanting.

Design-wise it looks large despite being on a 2.8m wheelbase platform. It’s superbly well proportioned and has a nice overall styling direction - refined, clean, and looks larger than it actually is, which adds to its overall road presence. I love the high beltline and blacked out roof, along with the exceptionally well done side molding. The rear also looks incredible, with a very well made tail light bar, but the front could use some refinement. Small attention to details such as the slight indents on the roof and a stylish chrome side trim are nice touches. Overall not bad at all, but perhaps the slightly bulbous front hood runs counter to its otherwise sharp-ish styling.


Somervell SBP Showdown:

4th, by @Texaslav & @Kyorg

Alrighty the next car for us to test is quite an interesting one, the Somervell SBP Showdown, interesting of course referring to its looks, because this American brute has A LOT going on in that department - A lot of, which personally, i am just not a fan of - it’s very tall & narrow (the rear being especially tall) i can somewhat see why some people would like the front & rear fascia’s but it’s just not for me, and its absolutely massive too, the wheels look like they came from a Sainsbury’s shopping cart despite being 23’s, i do like the angular vibe but proportionally its a nightmare in my opinion.

Tthat being said it is very very well made and you can tell when you step inside it, you immediately get the feel of it being super prestigious and expensive, the test drive revealed that its quite easy to drive and also feels surprisingly sporty despite the size. Powering this behemoth is a rather unusual 6.5L N/A V10 with nearly 700hp , of which we’ve heard a lot of good things about on the reliability side (and a lot of the great deal of fuel usage) it also dispatches the SBR to 100 in just over 3.1seconds and finishes the 1/4mile in 11.2seconds which is crazy considering the size, on the note of size, it clearly does not matter in the case of being safe since this one surprisingly scores on the lower end of. Overall it’s a solid car, but not sure i can get over the looks to placea an order for one.

Guess what size wheels are those - 23"! And it looks like it might struggle at carrying the sheer heft and weight of a… very American car. Proportions is what kills this car I think, but I also think this was the design intention from the very beginning - a massive, very American statement of size. But… I think you can execute this concept in a better way whilst incorporating more flattering or muscular proportions. Right now there is a lot of effort being made in the rear haunches to emphasize the muscular rear wheels, but the wheel itself looks very small, so it kinda looks like one of those air-up muscle suits… or a shopping cart. The front also looks slightly weird, and the rear looks very very tall and narrow, it doesn’t scream wide and sporty, but it does get your attention - but not in a ‘wow’ way but more in a ‘what IS that’ way. The highlight of this build is the quality itself though, it’s extremely well made, so huge plus point for that.

More to come!

sorry if the reviews sound off or feel a bit off; we reviewed each car separately but didnt work out so we tried our best to combine it and added extra design notes at the bottom; also added design details to the previous reviews as well.

19 Likes