Exploration vehicle challenge (RESULTS ARE IN!)

[cpufreak101]

the results are finally in, so from worst to best, here are the scores:
KakarottSajyajin
-98.4
JasonPoland
-89
HighOctaneLove
-72.1
DoctorNarfy
-39.1
KLinardo
-38.7
NuiYorqCiti
-20.3
TheH4xxOr1337
-11.4
Sillyworld
-8.8
Asdren
18.8
Urbanliner
22.3
AirJordan
22.3
Riso
24.2
Puffster
30.1
ThecarLover
30.8

and finally…
Zabhawkin
32.0

congregationalists, you won, if i ever come up with anything good i shall post the review, but i’m far from creative, so i might ask the english department at my school to do something, or would i want the auto tech teacher? bah, who cares, i’ll try to form up something, just set your standards really low

[KLinardo]

@cpufreak101

scoring: off-road, fuel economy, engine reliability, total average reliability, total seats 2X multiplier
comfort, utility, drivability 1X multiplier
every $100 below max budget (one point per 100), Total torque, total doors, total emissions 0.5X multiplier

Example score:(121.8+25+102.2+130.6+10+32.9+65.5+30.1+5.5+88.5+2-283.05)/12=27.6 pts (rounded to nearest tenth)
test vehicle: 27.6 points on those rules

I’m confused. Where exactly did the negative points come from?

[Sillyworld]

From the car emissions. You divide it by half and then subtract it. If the emissions are really high you ended up with a negative score.

[cpufreak101]

@Sillyworld

From the car emissions. You divide it by half and then subtract it. If the emissions are really high you ended up with a negative score.

correct, all the cars that were negative had at least 1500 emissions, with all the positive numbers being no higher than 600, the emissions was definitely the score destroyer for this one

[Zabhawkin]

[quote=“cpufreak101”]

@Sillyworld

From the car emissions. You divide it by half and then subtract it. If the emissions are really high you ended up with a negative score.

correct, all the cars that were negative had at least 1500 emissions, with all the positive numbers being no higher than 600, the emissions was definitely the score destroyer for this one[/quote]

From what some people posted I thought I had lost this one, because even though my emissions were low and my economy highish some were posting much lower emissions to the point I didn’t think the strengths of my submission were high enough to offset that.

[Puffster]

Should probably have finetuned it some more, but here is mine with my stats:

[Sillyworld]

I’ll share mine too… meet the powerbus.

For $19,500 with a roughtly fuel economy of 9 mpgs, the powerbus can carry 7 people and thanks to its air springs suspension, you can perform complicated experiments inside and nothing would spill.