[LHC] - Letara History Challenge - Rd 5 [Results being posted]

April 1960

The first month has been very tough for Ludger Frehse and his team. Primus pre-produced 1000 Astrona 2400 in Export-spec, expecting them to sell within a month - but only half the amount was ordered in Letara.
So most of the now unused cars were not shipped to Letara but offered with noticeable discount to the Hetvesian Police, hoping that seeing the Astrona patroling on Hetvesian Highways will increase it’s popularity.
As the car was designed by a 100% Frunian team (they do make the best sport sedans, so why not developing it there?) Primus hopes for governmental orders from there as well.
One of the new police cars is now parked in the Letaran PRIMUS dealership, it should represent the values integrity, dedication and service the police stands for, so does PRIMUS.
Other measures have been taken, so comes every Letaran Astrona with a letter from Egino Bailoni, lead engineer of the Astrona project, thanking the customer for choosing Primus.
“We know we are not the only company in trouble, but our product is really great. However, competition does not sleep, so we must step up in image and service to succeed”, said Frehse in an Interview.


1 Like

Levante and ITAL addendum: non-consumer proposals.

Government Procurement Vehicle: Fadiga Ariete

The Ariete is, in and by itself, a parts bin special put together by an ailing Fadiga, razing components left and right from their work trucks lineup. Based on the ladder frame of the serie 200 truck, the Ariete got his 4x4 system from the smaller Scout off-roader, a bunch of heavy-duty differentials from the serie 400, and it’s transmission straight out of an american truck. Even the engine is the trusty old “3 liter”, an oversized and massively undersquare inline 4 block with a giant balancing mass attempting to stop the engine from disassembling itself.

Despite this, the Ariete turned out an unexpectedly competent vehicle, with impresive off-road capabilities. The new coil spring suspensions, as well as good ride height and all-around solid axles means the Ariete just doesn’t stop. Good undertray protection means it doesn’t need to stop either, and even if the 89 HP engine isn’t a monster of raw power, it puts out a respectable 222Nm (163lb/ft for the imperial guys) of torque, helping trodding along harsh terrain with no problem, as well as towing a respectable 1.8 tons payload. A carrying capacity of 1.1 tons isn’t super impressive, but it’s workable.

The real selling point is it’s price. Sure, the interior is as basic as it gets, and fuel consumption is manageable, but being a tad under $12,000 is an impressive feat for a 1.5 ton Jeep-thing. Add service costs of a low end city car in the equation, and the Ariete becomes a truly alluring proposal.

With good enough performance and low price, the Ariete seems a winning proposal, but will it held to the scrutiny of Letaran officials? A lot of Fadiga’s future rides on this thing, so it better be!

Race car project: Levante 670 "Siluro"

With most of the “Reparto Corse” going on to work on the next generation “Progetto MR”, resources for the new '59 racer were comprehensibly limited at Levante. With the impossible task of replicating the success enjoyed in the previous years by the 620 sport, facing the emerging mid engine opposition and in the middle of a full-blown displacement war, Levante chief engineer Bruno Giordano had to think out of the box for the new car.

Starting from a refined version of the 620 monocoque, Giordano worked on to apply the lessons in aerodynamic efficiency the team had learnt from the small ITAL-Levante Barchetta to the new sports car. The fiberglass body is the very first built at Levante, and shows it with creaks, rattles, and a tendency to chip and crack. But it makes the car light, and together with some impressive aero tricks like the long, tear-shaped tail, and the headlights buried in the front grille, it helps the car achieve a near 300 kph top speed.

The venerable 6-in-line race engine gets a displacement bump to 4 liters, a new 4-valve aluminum head, and two massive Degl’Orti W55R double choke carbs, bumping the power to an impressive 381 HP, and 0-60 mph in a meager 5.7 seconds. New radial tyres try to rein in the power, but can barely take the abuse. The 4-speed gearbox is taken from the old 620 sport, as well as the LSD differential driving power to the rear wheels.

All this compromises have given the car some pretty nasty traits too. The massive lump in the front skews the weight foward, calling for some high-speed understeer; The lightweight body, combined with an highly aerodynamical body and said foward-bias on weight, means the car has a nasty tendency to skid in 4th when at near top speed, making this a terror to drive.

While far from a favourite, this old-school underdog can be seriously fast when driven by a specialist like the crowd favourite Johan Jurgensen, one of the few drivers truly capable of extracting everything from this experimental rocket on wheels, making him a dark horse for the inaugural race at Lerance Raceway this year.

ITAL current status as of '58

ITAL has built quite a reputation in Letara during the previous years, selling a slew of Prima’s all around the country to the populace till the new Safety Regulation Act of '55. While ITAL was able to somehow get the bare minimum safety rating required, the cost of the humble Prima had rocketed of near $2,500, making it a tought sell for ITAL dealers. Adding to the problem was the fiasco of their new bigger sedan, having to be recalled and retired from the market due to engine heads giving under stress and catalytic corrosion even a mere 15,000 miles in.

As such, ITAL needs a big hit, and the introduction of the successor to the Prima successor, the Rivoli, it’s aiming at exactly that.

A picture of a Rivoli 1300 Lusso showing at a dealership, in all it's brown glory

Aviable with both the old Lampredi 1.0 liter boxer 4 and a new 1.3 boxer 6 engine, The Rivoli is a clear move upmarket, a bold move in the current economic climate. If the Rivoli can replicate the Prima success remains to be seen, although for sure ITAL hopes for a smash hit after the blunders of the last few years

(ooc: this is not a comp car, but it felt wrong leaving the ITAL brand sleeping for 10 years before ever talking about the little car that could alltoghter. Take this as a small bonus post on the lore of ITAL, if you will. Thanks Cake_Ape for indulging my obsessive lore needs, by the way :laughing:)

10 Likes

so apparently I need a proper thingy here so uhh
Yeah this is Vausse Autocars, based in the US of A bringing Letara the finest burger boats




I think this counts as being registered now idk, I hope so

:person_facepalming:

No
 when I tell you in a DM to register “in this thread” - meaning in this DM thread
 Anyway. Got the info.

hey listen, Im a moron, Im only here for the fun of bringing some US powerhouses to smol euro country

1 Like

Rd. 2 RESULTS

Chapter 2: :wastebasket:


This post will be OOC as it’s just dealing with some unfortunate housekeeping before I get to the meat and bones of the reviews. A somewhat new format I’ll try out to see how it goes. Perhaps some bad news for some, but maybe also some relief for others. So, let’s rip the band-aid off, get the less fun stuff out of the way, so we can get to the good stuff.



CONSUMER CATEGORY

Although I strive to have as few bins in the consumer category as possible, there are still things that cannot be explained away or swept under the rug in some RP/lore friendly fashion. These cars broke some hard rules:

@Happyhungryhippo Primus Astrona 2400 Export: Tech pool of 5 snuck into the model body and chassis.

@TheYugo45GV MAYLAND Mark 5 Coupe: Most Trim is 5 tech pool.

@ldub0775 Edgewater Silverstone GT-R: This was a more difficult one. You changed the suspension to DW on this model; the other trim has Macs. I could’ve binned both, but chose to only bin one. I chose this one because it breaks another rule: it is the only car to break the noise limit regulation.

@SheikhMansour all three trims: Year for model, trim, family, and variant on all three cars is 1964.

@happyfireballman Rhania Hunter Type-F: You chose a completely different wheelbase model for this than the other two consumer cars. I could’ve binned all three, but chose to be nice and keep the other two.

@ChemaTheMexican Garland L200-A: The variant has 5 tech pool all-round.

@GassTiresandOil Kessel Sperling: You changed the front suspension to DW from Solid-axle Coil on this trim. I could’ve banned all three trims here too, but chose to be nice and keep the other two.

@Texaslav Benetsch Gwesda 26U: Some extra tech pool snuck into the bottom end, fuel system, and exhaust. Tsk tsk.



GOVERNMENT ASSIGNMENT

@Ch_Flash Martinet Crapaud Ranger: This offroader has functional aero.

@IDK158 Vausse Julius: Safety below 25.

@Prium Fitz C90 L: Safety below 25.

@happyfireballman Rhania Hunter Type-M: Does not have a second brake (or rear?) light.



RACING

@Fayeding_Spray Walkenhorst Xr2 (Cat 1): Safety below 25.

@TanksAreTryhards Levante 670 “siluro” (Cat 1): Engine too big for the category. Would’ve been fine for Cat 2, but that’s not how it was submitted, unfortunately.

@FidleDo Liberty Phoenix Racer (Cat 3): Engine noise above regulated limit.


Let me know if you like this format, or would prefer the bins to come when their own categories are released in the poll below:

  • Keep this format: release all bins at once at the beginning to get it over with so that reviews can focus on reviews only.
  • Revert to releasing bins at the same time as the reviews for their respective categories.

0 voters

Next post will be a bit more uplifting, I promise!



16 Likes

There must have been an error while exporting, because I am a 100% sure I checked it


Sorry officer. I did not know I couldn’t do that lol. I was basing my car off the original Jeep Wagoneer, which initially was offered with either solid axle front suspension or independent front suspension. Obviously, since it was a Jeep no one really cared about the IFS and it was phased out pretty quickly. I’ll know for next time.

Edit: Come to think of it, I’m not sure why that wasn’t allowed. The rules only state 3 trims can be submitted. Why do they have to have the same suspension setup? Automation now allows you to clone cars so that you can change suspensions (among other things).

It’s just a question. I’m just grateful that you didn’t bin all of my entries.

Oh god i really tipoed the racing entry? lol

It was supposed to be cat 2, no limits allowed! I probably just copy-pasted the wrong number. If it’s “recuperable” for cat 2 fine, otherwise, oh well, i’m an idiot! :sweat_smile:

Well, darn. Was the 26U the only trim that was broken, or was it all of’em?

I’ll be honest I think I read the racing rules incorrectly as my car will probably be in the wrong racing class too with its tiny engine

The trims must be clones of the model, keeping the same model family in automation means not changing any chassis things, even if in real life stuff does change, that isn’t the rule here.

If it was accidental Cake recommended to keep the trims as the same model until you are done, and then clone them out and rename them for export.

1 Like

I suspect making Cat 1 the under <2.5L class and Cat 2 the unlimited class might have tripped up a few people

Yeah, I misunderstood the less than and greater than signs tbh

It’s a pretty easy fix tbh, it’s clear that those are just typos and are meant to be in a different class. That’s if Cake_Ape decides for it of course. I can see an argument against it, as other people might start to request to fix other typos in orher rounds and turning all into a mess and a lot of extra work for our host.

Of course I would like to see my car run, but it’s a win/win in both cases, i either see my car running or get some nice free RP stuff to write!

I almost stumbled on the same R1/R2 since lower number classes are usually faster. Actually we’ll see about that, the track favors speed and power so some R3s will probably do well.

I hope the poor Letarans can catch a break soonℱ with all the depressing news. RIP “gaudy convertible” sales for now I guess


1 Like

Yeah I corrected a lot of people on discord in the past few weeks, a lot where confused and inverted the classes.

Something was clearly confusing, but also I understand Cake, it was a written rule. Still, some small wording to make sure the greater/lesser than signs were correctly read would have helped (e.g. small engine vs unlimited, or something). I suggest some naming to be added to the classes next round to make it clearer and avoid some issues.

4 Likes

dam looks like Vausse isnt taking the Julius to the government. Hopefully sales in the US will mean it still makes decent money

VAUGHN REVUE LETARA

The magazine that goes out to all of you Letarans driving a Vaughn, Wraith or VCV
Spring 1962

EDITORIAL

This time we are giving you more than just an editorial. This is also kind of an open letter, to the government and to other car importers/manufacturers, that like us are seeing the need for change.

What needs to be changed is in our opinion the safety regulations and the taxation system. At Vaughn, we see no conflict in having a tax system based on the safety of the car, since of course it will lead the buyers into making better, more informed choices. Also, minimum safety requirements is probably necessary to keep an acceptable standard on the vehicle fleet of this country.

Now, Safety is something we are taking very seriously at Vaughn. For example, sled tests performed in the United States, with cabs from ex-government VCV Enforcers, are currently conducted for development of the “Nitro-Sack” system that will make the safety belt obsolete, probably at the end of this decade. An easy description of the system, is that the steering assembly (and the space normally occupied by the glovebox) contains a container of compressed nitrogen gas, and a nylon sack. At impact, the container releases the gas into the sack, creating an effective restraint system. Tests with the system pre-inflated have shown great potential, and at the moment it is just a matter of making the system able to release the gas quick enough and at the right time, which is something our engineers are working hard with at the moment. It solves the problem some scandinavian manufacturers have tried to cure by adding an upper, diagonal portion to the seatbelt. While effective, we don’t believe in them at Vaughn, since the struggle with using such a seatbelt system is probably going to leave the belts unused. The Nitro-Sack also probably has potential to protect children riding in the front seat that are too small to use a seatbelt.

What we feel needs to be changed is how the current system works. At the moment, it is based on a complicated points system, which punishes for example small cars, cars using jump seats, convertibles and vehicles with ladder frames. That means that to lower taxation, or to even be allowed to be sold, such vehicles (that all have their niches to fulfill) needs to have all the latest safety equipment. On the other hand, a large unibody 2-seater coupé could, by a less serious manufacturer, as well get lead weights bolted to the floor instead of having even the most rudimentary safety equipment, since weight is such a heavy factor in the scoring system. Even if we only make large cars at Vaughn, we can admit that weight is only a factor working in your favour in a head on collision between two cars, and the advantages will be evened out if everyone drives a heavy car. To put it this way, in a rollover a seatbelt may save you regardless of the size and weight of the car, lead weights bolted to the floor will absolutely not do it.

Being forced to remove jump seats if the vehicle is seen as being “on the limit” by the government is another factor that has questionable effect and is more effective on paper than in real life. Even if a full size seat obviously is a safer place to be in, being seated in a proper seat is always better than riding in the cargo area, which people will be tempted to do if vehicles does not offer the desired seating capacity. Accident investigation we have been doing in the US shows that in the accidents either involving a VCV enforcer, and/or having a pickup truck as the opposite vehicle, the worst injuries have been sustained by people riding in pickup beds.

Our suggestion is that regardless of the size and construction of the car, the regulations should be based on a minimum of safety equipment instead of an illogical scoring system. A good side effect: If all the cars are required to have a certain level of safety equipment, it will make every car from the most tiny to the most large one on the market safer, if it is forced only into small cars, it will only make the small cars safer, which means less of a safety benefit.

Our suggestion is that from 1/1 1964, all new cars should be required to have a safety equipment that consists of (1). Those regulations should be updated with an interval of (2), since progress is made all the time (for example, in 10 years a requirement of Nitro-Sack probably will be more actual than requiring a seatbelt). Also, we suggest that vehicle using (3) safety should get a higher sales tax of 10%. Vehicles using (4) safety should be tax exempt while the rest keeps the 5% tax. That would allow for some diversity on the market when needed, while still leading consumers into choosing safer cars when possible.

Until next time, happy motoring!


Taking this OOC because it would be hard to get a realistic flavour on it.

  1. Either (A), the latest unlocked basic safety at the starting year of the round at the allowed techpool, (B), standard safety that is at least one notch below the latest unlocked one during the same circumstances, or (C), advanced safety that is at least two notches below the latest unlocked one during the same circumstances.

  2. At the start of every new round, but using the same rules for how it should be applied, to make it fair and easy

  3. Cars using any kind of basic safety, or using the worst allowed variant of standard safety

  4. Cars using advanced safety, that should be of at least the best possible variant unlocked at the allowed techpool at the start of the round.

11 Likes



Rd. 2 RESULTS

Chapter 3: Consumer car segment 1955-1963 - city cars


Left to right: Aero Zipp Base @Edsel, KHI 1325 @doot, Aero Zipp Premium, Resuki Tabi 900B @Repti, Knightwick Dragonfly Saloon @mart1n2005, Aero Zipp Convertible, Resuki Tabi 1300D, Resuki Tabi 1500S, Knightwick Harris 1500, KHI 1325 Luxe


Once again we start the reviews with the city car segment. These were the smallest cars with short wheelbases that were nimble, easy to drive, and (usually) good on gas. Not built for the open road, they were most at home on city streets. The best in this segment would get you (± some family members and ± your groceries) from A to B within the concrete jungle reliably and in relative comfort. Now that much of the inner cities have been rebuilt after the earthquake damages, roads widened, and parking space integrated in city planning, is there still a real need for these kinds of cars? We shall find out



Right in 1955 the smallest car on Letaran roads made its debut, the Aero Zipp. Although officially classified as a ‘city car’, the popular designation soon became ‘micro car’ - the first ever of its kind. The Base model was the cheapest city car on the market and was the only budget city car offering in this era. And it was truly bare-bones: basic interior, no radio and a tiny 0.4L I3 propelled the car to a blistering 71 km/h, making it the slowest car on Letaran roads. It really had no creature comforts and was miserable to drive, having the lowest comfort and the lowest drivability rating of any car on the road. At least it was good on gas, one of the cheapest offerings in terms of long-term upkeep (but not the cheapest due to the difficulty of working in such a small body), and easy to park
 Overall, though, the car was just too bare-bones, too uncomfortable, too impractical with only two seats that it never really caught on as a serious contender. Although slightly faster, better to drive, and more comfortable, the Premium model suffered much the same fate.

Also released in 1955 were the Resuki Tabi 900B and 1300D. Compared to the Aero, you got a lot more car here for just a little more money: full 2+3 seating, a radio in both trims (basic and standard, respectively), standard interior, and a larger, more powerful engine that propelled the cars to safe highway speeds. The Resuki cars were also good looking: cute yet stylish with well-thought out chrome accents in the appropriate places and a distinctive grille. The premium interior in the 1300D was particularly attractive as it was the cheapest car with such an interior on the market, and could be had well within “standard” pricing. The 900B had decent comfort for the class and the 1300D was outright good, easily rivalling more expensive and larger cars. Long-term upkeep for both was also quite reasonable and both had excellent reliability, and both were among the easiest to drive cars in all of Letara. So it is easy to see why the Resukis were a major success in this segment, and remained strong sellers throughout their production run.

The final city car released in 1955 was the Knightwick Dragonfly Saloon. Price-wise, the Knightwick slotted in between the two Resuki models. Overall, the Knightwick seemed a little outdated with its looks, ladder frame (all others thus far were unibodies), and solid rear axle (all others had fully independent suspension on all four corners). More forward thinking was the 4-speed gearbox, however. Overall, the car was quite average, with decent drivability, reliability, and comfort. It was not quite as practical as the Resuki cars with only 4 full seats. But that was not really a problem, because its main market turned out to be older, mostly retired, buyers who preferred the more traditional (older) looks of the car. With the kids out of the house, they didn’t really need all the seats - four were enough to ferry around some grand-kids if necessary. Due to a bad fuel economy, long-term upkeep was quite expensive for the class, but as long driving was kept to a minimum this cost could be minimized somewhat. So while not an outright huge sales success, the Knightwick did find a niche, and was relatively successful in it.

Introduced one year later, the Knightwick Harris 1500 was a slightly more upscale offering than the Dragonfly. It had more stylish chrome on the outside, a nice two-tone paint job, and a more premium interior. The Harris was also more comfortable, even a little more than the 1300D, was a little better to drive, and it was the most prestigious city car too. Of all the city cars on the market thus far, it is also the first one with enough ‘oomph’ to make it a relatively comfortable tourer for longer inter-city trips. Younger buyers were equally unsure about its dated looks and engineering, but pensioners who didn’t lose their investments in the economic crash, or had good secure pensions, and wanted a more comfortable and capable city car opted for the Harris 1500.

Released in 1958, the Resuki Tabi 1500S was introduced to the market. At first glance, it seemed a direct competitor to the Knightwick cars, in an attempt to lure the older buyers into the more modern cars. Similar to the Knightwick offerings, and in contrast to the other Resuki cars, the 1500S had 4 full seats. It retained the premium interior of the 1300D, also on par with the Harris 1500, but thanks to a more sporty suspension tune its overall comfort was slightly lower. Yes, indeed, looking at the performance is where it becomes clear that it is not really a competitor of the Knightwick. It is something new altogether. The Tabi 1500S is a small and nimble car, perhaps best classified as ‘city-sports’. It had really good acceleration, only beaten by true sports cars, good top speed, good handling. Yes, this car truly bridged the gap between ‘city’ and ‘sports’. Perhaps a little extravagant given the economy of Letara at this time, but it was still quite a tempting offering for younger buyers who didn’t yet have a family, had a decent job in the city, and wanted to feel a little bit of excitement. So in the end the Tabi 1500S didn’t see too many sales, it was a little too niche - but whomever bought it was a very satisfied customer indeed!

Three more city cars were released in 1959. First was the last addition to the Aero Zipp line, the Convertible. This car was very similar to its sibling micro cars: small anemic engine, lack of any kind of performance, lack of comfort, hard to drive
 ok, no need to hammer this poor little car any more. The Convertible was in an unfortunate situation that it tried to fill a non-existent need in the market that its earlier siblings already tried to fill, and at an unattractive price to boot.

The other two cars were the KHI 1325 and KHI 1325 Luxe. These cars were at complete opposite ends of the city car segment; the 1325 was almost the cheapest on offer, and the 1325 Luxe the most expensive. In fact, the latter was the only ‘premium’ offering in terms of purchase price, with an upkeep to match. Both were on slightly dated ladder frames and had solid rear axles. Interestingly - and uniquely - both were wagons with 2/3 seating, making them the most practical city cars. The 1325 had a standard interior with standard radio and the Luxe model had a premium interior with a class-exclusive phonograph! The Luxe was also the only city car with an automatic gearbox. So while built on the same platform and in the same segment, they were truly catering to a different market. The 1325, aiming for the lower end of the city market immediately captured a large portion of buyers. Its low price combined with superb practicality, good comfort for the price and overall good stats, it was a very appealing prospect for anyone wanting a decent car to haul their family and a large amount of luggage. Although a city car, this niche had at this point not been filled yet even in the ‘wagon’ segment, so sales were brisk. The Luxe, on the other hand, was trying to extend the city segment into the ‘premium’ realm. It was by far the most expensive city car, but it offered comfort not seen even in more expensive family cars, and combined it with really good practicality and cargo space. Its Achilles heel was its performance and reliability. In this class the consumers would expect to at least make 100 km/h, yet, the Luxe came just short. And the car became known for frequent issues as the advanced interior electronics tended to fail. So it was on paper an interesting proposal, in practice however it came at the wrong time, and never became as popular as it’s cheaper sibling.



to be continued




23 Likes