During this week I will review all cars.
This is my little review about the submissions:
I’m impressed that more entries
- Doesn’t have an engine with vvl to improve the performance and fuel consumption, and responsiveness and smoothness.
-Had multi point injection. Direct injection had the benefits of better fuel consumption and better performance and responsiveness.
-Doesn’t had hydropneumatic suspension: increases the comfort and drivability.
vmo, I think I can explain part of those choices.
VVL: While it’s nice to improve performance and reduce fuel consumption, it does add a not-insignificant penalty to reliability, at least from my experiences.
MP-EFI: As you said, improved fuel economy and performance, yet without the price penalty of Direct Injection.
Hydropneumatic Suspension: Expensive, hurts sportiness a lot, isn’t reliable, and you’ve got access to Active Sport/Active Comfort for basically the same price (once you factor in using the Semi-Active dampers), and they’ll do just about as much while keeping your sportiness up.
Because 4/11 cars doesn’t accomplish rules, do you want to give them one last chance?
Personally, I have no problems with allowing a last chance revision. While it is a small rules list, I’ve had moments of just outright overlooking something simple, and I know I’d personally hate being left out of a challenge because I missed something by half a point, so I’m willing to wait a bit more to offer a final revision.
^yup. i did just that… +1 tires. because. you know… curiousity… and derp…
Ok.
All the disqualified cars can send me now the model corrected.
Except you, koolkei, that I will set to you to 0.
thank you very much good sir
All I can say is, Madrias, that tail light placement must have taken a lot of patience xD
well i know im not taking the trophy on this one. but i think, at least i could get 1 vote…
also… number 4. madrias. MOAR LAMPS!!!
Damn son… these lights. Here take my vote.
[quote=“koolkei”]well i know im not taking the trophy on this one. but i think, at least i could get 1 vote…
also… number 4. madrias. MOAR LAMPS!!![/quote]
Was it that obvious?
The resemblance to your car shopping entry was a dead giveaway 
Yeah, but I figured on the Car Shopping entry, I didn’t want to go through that mess again. It looks awesome, but it’s about as fun as it looks to do all of that.
I have felt that pain. I also remember the pain from a time before shift + click copied fixtures.
Trivia: “making the round lights really small and pretending they are LEDs” is a card on the Automation custom edition of the online Cards Against Society.
I can understand that one. I’ve got a habit of these overly-extravagant tail-light designs.
4 hours before the votations closing.
The design winner is 8bs.
This is the design for a premium sedan (my opinion): clean lines, nothing about chrome excess or complicated things, and a possible real-life car design.
And the winner… is: NormanVauxhall, with the ŽM-Automobili Iurlaro Caterina (congratulations), and here the results:
results.zip (48.1 KB)