Young Norwegian Car Enthusiast Challenge(reviews published)

Terribly sorry for the lack of replies so far, went on a cabin trip on thursday where I was promised web access. Ofc, the cake is a lie, and so was this, so I’ve had VERY limited access to the internets on my cellphone. Will answer all today :slight_smile:

Yes, or at least I’ve received a PM from you with a car and short description, so I’m assuming that’s the one you’re talking about :slight_smile:

[quote=“Vri404”]I got 74.8 Reliability on my vehicle.

I said F*ck it, it’s close enough[/quote]

I know the reliability one is harsh, so I won’t disqualify you for this since you are so close, but there will be a penalty involved in the scoring

Thanks for the headsup, was suspecting this since there were no entries there, I’ll remove it from the first post and enter the info myself (such derp, much fail, wow :blush: )

[quote=“stensen”]

They’re multiplication signs in this case.

thanks, now i see. might have saved me from submitting the most ridiculous car of the competition.[/quote]

My bad for not making that clearer (note to self on next challenge)

Great to see so many new entries, list will be updated today

Okay, an ad huh? Let’s see if I can do one in the character of 2002… I think around this time I was salivating over the Murcielago…

After a fair bit of searching, I found a photo of a Norwegian (I hope) roadway that wasn’t the Atlantic bridge in the middle of a storm, Storseisundet bridge (though that would have been epic), Trollstigen road (which unfortunately didn’t have any photos with cinematic angles I could use for an ad), that was also under commons with modification license. Unfortunately it required I place the car a little too low in the frame for my liking, but hey, it’s still a nice photo.

I got some serious help from my Scandanavian friend with regards to the name. Otherwise I would have had no clue that funny looking d was in fact a voiced dental fricative… I’m no linguist.

Also excuse the craptastic logo. I came up with it on the fly and it seems that the MM designs so far have been pretty, uh, blocky and modular and un-Italian in general, so have a Bauhaus font xD

^ That’s only like 5000x better than my crappy “advertisement” was. :blush:

[Redacted]

I did get sick of reading up on kidney transplants… So I spent like 3 hours on it xD

Also shit I can’t remember if my entry actually has a manually locking diff. I better check.

These Ads are made in a Faux-1980’s style.

1st is based off of an add for a tiny Mitsubishi Kei Van.

2nd is entirely original, and also joking at the Volvo ads of the time.

LOL I saw the original pick up 5x as many women in a minivan and during my Google searches.

1 Like

[quote=“strop”]Okay, an ad huh? Let’s see if I can do one in the character of 2002… I think around this time I was salivating over the Murcielago…

After a fair bit of searching, I found a photo of a Norwegian (I hope) roadway that wasn’t the Atlantic bridge in the middle of a storm, Storseisundet bridge (though that would have been epic), Trollstigen road (which unfortunately didn’t have any photos with cinematic angles I could use for an ad), that was also under commons with modification license. Unfortunately it required I place the car a little too low in the frame for my liking, but hey, it’s still a nice photo.

I got some serious help from my Scandanavian friend with regards to the name. Otherwise I would have had no clue that funny looking d was in fact a voiced dental fricative… I’m no linguist.

Also excuse the craptastic logo. I came up with it on the fly and it seems that the MM designs so far have been pretty, uh, blocky and modular and un-Italian in general, so have a Bauhaus font xD[/quote]

looks amazing! which body is that though?

Godt å se enda en nordmann. :slight_smile: Heldigvis har vi latterlig billig bensin og diesel for tiden. Deleprisene (om man er litt behendig selv) er heller ikke så verst og koster så og si det samme over hele EU/EØS.

A little hint: Big, burly American pick-up trucks with huge V8s weren’t taxed in Norway in 2002 (and as such, a Ford Excursion was the same price as a BMW 320 estate). :slight_smile: This loophole was plugged just before the Hummer H2 hit the Norwegian market.

edit: oh… edited the translation in.

Strop, that is some sleek looking ad. Pretty cool.

i still have no idea how to make a proper ad…

Googling something like “2000s car ad” worked pretty ok for me, though the number of actual 00s ads was very thin compared to all the vintage ones from the 60s, 70s and 80s. Then again I’m no google master.

p.s. the body is some 90s/00s coupe thing… it’s a fairly recent mod as far as I can tell. But I just download most of them anyway so I forget :laughing:

This is the mod: steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/f … earchtext=

[quote=“strop”]Googling something like “2000s car ad” worked pretty ok for me, though the number of actual 00s ads was very thin compared to all the vintage ones from the 60s, 70s and 80s. Then again I’m no google master.

p.s. the body is some 90s/00s coupe thing… it’s a fairly recent mod as far as I can tell. But I just download most of them anyway so I forget :laughing:[/quote]

i found that it’s either a car with a long lore… or this.
youtube.com/watch?v=D4qnl19axAU

or just plain bentley

[size=150]ABR HQ, Oslo, January 25th, 15.35[/size]
Weather: Light drizzle, 1,2C (34,16F)

With slow steps I made my way to the coffee machine, still trembling slightly from the massive hangover. Thank god Trygve had stayed to receice all the new arrivals while I went skiing. I don’t want to see another afterski in my life!

Walking into the shop, the first car in line was A NPC Garrish Throwback, and both the ad and name could not have been more appropriate. It looks like the bastard child of a Ford Granada and Volvo 940 raised by it’s american cousin, a Jeep Cherokee. This sounds weird, maybe even bad, but after examining it from all angles I like it more and more. Yes, the body might be a bit dated, but the rims and wheelarches give it a sporty yet rugged appearance. I could be like Eric Forman in “That 70’s show” in the vista cruiser with the Garrish Throwback.

Next up was the Legatus Njörðr, and the amount of differences to the Garrish Throwback… well, they are extremes in regards to concepts. From spacious and rugged utility in the Garrish to sleek sportscar on a budget in the Njörðr. And while I was loving the lines, the scepticism was there. Where to put my skis, my hiking gear or my groceries? Will i be able to get to the cabin? As I got in i was flabbergasted (more on this will be covered in the final blurb or review) by several solutions. Legatus apparently were true to their roots al least. This should indeed be an interesting test drive.

After some crazy extremes I was almost relieved when i gazed upon the IV-C SW-4x4. From the outside it at least appeared that their designers had kept their cool. Either that or stolen the design plans from VAG and streched the wheelarches a bit. Not a bad idea though, there is a reason why they sell a ton of octavias and passats here in Norway. While I love the all black theme, I am not 100% sold on the front foglights arrangement, but that is just me I guess. The 4x4 on the other hand whould suit this car very well. With the appearance of an allrounder, it would be interesting to see if that would be an advantage or not.

In the following slot I had to do a second take. It might have been the bright orange making me temporarily blind, because initially the Solo Beaver BM Adventure looked like the sporty version of the IV-C SW4x4, but after a few seconds the differences started popping forward. The hood scoop, bigger headlights, different rims and double exhausts as well as a lip. Where the previous car tried to encompass a variety of groups with toned down exterior, the Solo Beaver BM Adventure definitely were making a statement. You will not go unnoticed in this car

After the estates I was suddenly looking at a hot hatch. The Komodo Tiara Mega was something of an oddball. Where I was loving the front end of the car with nice lines and aggresive, interesting fixtures, I really hated the rear. The vent placing was nice, but taillights and semicentered exhaust did not suit this body. However, what really tickled my fancy was the engine. Not a racing engine, but definitely economical. Combined with low profile tires it might be really fun on the tight, twisty roads up here. A bit concerned about how the gravel roads would treat them though.

I moved on to the Erin Merna Vox, and the wheels immediately caught my eyes. My bike has wider tires than that! Well, someone was thinking about fuel economy for sure. After going a few rounds I was decidedly undecided on what i thought about this car. Some features looked great, like the sloping of the rear door and the layout on the tail in general, albeit i might have done some small changes. The front however made me feel split in half. There were parts that looked great, well aligned and thought out. Yet it somehow seems happy and mad at the same time, like a Jekyll & Hyde thing. It definitely made the colour seem appropriate.

Striking! That’s the word that popped into my mind when I turned the corner and saw the SME Banshee. Some might argue that the arches are too wide and the black trim belongs to the eighties, but the combination just made my day. This car makes an impression and you either hate it or love it, but by god, I think I’m in love. The popup headlights combined with the shape of that front end, foglights for daytime and the lip just makes me happy. Well, it would definitely look good on a poster, now I just hoped it was as good as it looked, because not all poster cars are fun to own.

Being next in line after the Banshee could easily have been disheartening for many, but the Vichingo was up for the task. First of, the frontend on the Vichingo delivers tons of attitude, just like the earlier Lancer Evos . My suprise was even greater when I saw the side of it. Not really sure if this is a hatch or very short minivan, and combined with the crazy tires on it, I was truly baffled. This was something completely unexpected and different. What had they been feeding the designer? And more importantly, could I have some of that as well? As i put down the spec sheet I was smiling broadly and really looking forward to the test drive.

Finally I reached the latest arrival for now, and this was the Revera EC. Now, the Revera EC did not get my heart racing like some of the other contestants, at least not immidiately. It is not flashy or on the extremes of the designs. However, the designers have payed a lot of attention to detail. The layout is well thought out and aligned, and it gets prettier and better the more you look at it from different angles, especially the rear end of the car. It is one of the best rears so far, even if I personally would remove that spoiler, but now I’m nitpicking. The front end is also really good, even if my initial impression was a bit boring. While it isn’t the most flashy or dramatic, I’m struggling to find a bad angle for the Revera EC, and that is not as common as one would believe!

Clsoing up shop for the night, I realized the hangover was gone, and there was a slight spring in my steps. Things were looking exciting, and the deadline was not there yet!

An early 2000’s Norwegian car ad can be seen here:

youtube.com/watch?v=ORiQhPZp3gs

For the sake of fun, are we allowed to have more than one entry per person?

You might have more than one entry for fun/comparison, but only one will be part of the actual competition, the other will be scored outside of the main group

Hehe, never said anything about proper, as long as you made one that’s more than enough. Besides, I think yours is pretty good, beats all I’ve made so far!

Jappjapp, godt vi er flere :slight_smile: Deleprisene hvis du jobber med bil kan være helt ok, men hvis du tar en tur til Polen f.eks. får du fort rabatter på nærmere 70% i forhold til her dessverre :cry:

Sorry for all non-norwegians, just not that many of us, will keep it in english from here on :wink:

True, as long you kept to two seats on green plates (regular cars are on white). It would have defied the point of the competition though, hence i left it out of the rules list :slight_smile:

Now, I don’t want to exclude anyone from the challenge, and I think that small errors or deviations from the rules should not be disqualified but instead penalized(quite harshly) pointswise proportionate to the deviations instead. All errors will ofc be informed to the parties involved so they have a chance to fix it, but this way I can keep the deadline as well. Feel free to comment if you feel this is good or bad

are we allowed to make changes? i figured i made a mistake that limits this thing really badly.

edit: actually, u already asnwered the question