Best buy for under 14K 1993 (Final verdicts: page 5/5, final conclusion!)

ROUND 2: COMFORT

Cheap cars are seldom comfortable, at least that was what the old truth said. Well, none of the cars really offers luxury car comfort, that should be said. But even here we found some huge differences, sometimes really surprising ones.

For everything other than very short trips, the Hakumai is a pain to ride in. The engine is loud, and in combination with rudimentary sound insulation and lack of an overdrive it can make the noise almost deafening in the long run. The seats are primitive and lacks padding and the suspension is harsh. In fact, you are allowed to load over a tonne in this compact hatchback, which kind of shows how unnecessarily firm the suspension is set up.
@interior

Generally, large cars are usually more comfortable than small ones, but the Wells i5 is an exception. It is built with primitive technology, using a leaf sprung solid rear axle, the engine is not as loud as in the Hakumai but still quite noisy, paired with a lack of sound insulation. The seats are very simple and nothing that you want to sit in for too long. At least, the suspension setup is not as harsh as in the Hakumai, but an overly low tyre profile hampers the ride very much.
@DuceTheTruth100

Hearing protectors are recommended in the Sunnet ISI. The engine is really incredibly noisy while the sound insulation is almost nonexistent. Suspension wise it is a little bit on the firm side, but nothing that’s not possible to cope with. Seating and interior appointments are of a quite low standard even here.
@Just4

The Python Mini is a small and simple car, and that means small and simple on comfort, that’s a thing that is hard to get around. But for its size and simple appointments, it seems like they have at least tried. The engine is reasonably quiet, somewhat compensating for the lack of sound insulation, but being small and rev happy the gearing can get a bit tiresome at highway speeds. The interior is simple but separate seats in the back gives more comfort than trying to cram in 3 people on a hard bench, when we’re talking about cars of this size.
@Aruna / @Ryan93

The dampening in the Kinden Cub is a bit on the hard side. The engine is kind of noisy but tall gearing and decent sound insulation helps somewhat. The interior is somewhat less spartan compared to some of the other cars and the seats are kind of comfy, with separate buckets even in the rear.
@bilobilo

The Régal has a decent suspension tuning, that delivers the usual french mix of comfort and handling. But it is kind of noisy, due to a loud engine and lack of sound insulation. The seats are simple, however, this is yet another four seater, a little better comfort but a little less practical when it comes to carry rear seat passengers.
@karhgath

The Armor Cricket may not have the quietest engine we have seen, but a better sound insulation compared to some of its competitors and a tall gearing compensates for that. What’s not as good, however, is the suspension that has kind of a hard setup.
@GassTiresandOil

The FM Street has a well appointed interior, at least compared to some other of the superminis, seating is decent despite the rear bench seat, but short gearing means that there is kind of a drone from the noisy engine, despite relatively good sound insulation. Suspension setup is firm, but by no means rock hard, and is possible to live with. The fact that it is a really small car can’t be ignored in this case, though.
@Jaimz


Room for improvement, in the Ibishu Pessima…

The Ibishu Pessima has a suspension set up for comfort, maybe it is a little bit wallowy though and an installation of sway bars would probably only be a benefit. Tall gearing and a quiet engine somewhat compensates for the primitive sound insulation. Seating comfort is decent but nothing special.
@EngineEmu


…as well as in the Shidley Bruv.

We have already mentioned that power steering would have increased the comfort of the Shidley Bruv. Also, the suspension is a bit hard. The engine is on the noisy side (far from the worst in this test though), but gearing is sane and sound insulation quite good. When it came to seating and interior appointments, we found nothing to complain about.
@missionsystem

The Tiffosi Nuova Citta 60 is reasonably quiet even at highway speeds, the seating comfort is fine for the class, and while the suspension is on the firm side, it is still not harsh. For its small size, we would say that it is a pleasant car to ride in.
@fasmukji


Small, but with room for surprises: The Sanfrecce Giardino.

The Sanfrecce Giardino has a well dampened engine but the gearing doesn’t do it any real justice, being a bit rev happy at highway speeds. As in the Tiffosi, the ride is a bit firm but the dampening seems to be better matched to the spring rate here. One very pleasant surprise is the seating comfort, beating some more expensive cars.
@piglet916

The IP Urbana has a reasonably pleasant ride comfort, with what seems to be well thought out dampening and spring rates. The seating comfort gets an OK rating, neither less or more. The engine is a bit on the loud side and it has high revs at highway speeds, making the car a bit noisy.
@Knugcab

The LCE has ride and seating comfort that is about similar to the IP. What should be said, though, is that the LCE is a more quiet car at highway speeds, due to taller gearing and a less noisy engine.
@abg7

The Akira Sparrow features a pleasant ride comfort, and the seating comfort is also quite good, again, a car with a back seat contoured for two, with a nice seating comfort but sacrificing some practicality. The engine is a bit on the noisy side but sane gearing and decent amounts of sound insulation does help.
@Serperior98

The Impulso BT has a soft suspension setup, maybe even a bit on the soft side since it seems to bottom out sometimes. The engine is not the quietest we have experienced but still reasonably dampened, and the tall gearing makes for low revs at highway speeds. Simple seating and sparse sound insulation somewhat hampers the comfort though.
@chichicoofisial

The Decarlis D20 has a well chosen spring and dampening rate, and we found the seats a little more supportive and comfortable than usual in this class. Tall gearing combined with a quiet engine and high quality sound insulation further enhances comfort.
@Arn38fr

The Mara Zvezda is built with bad roads in mind and that have resulted in a long suspension travel, even if being a little bit stiff, that will swallow even the worst bumps. Seating comfort is decent, and a quiet engine, reasonable sound insulation and tall gearing makes the sound comfort decent even at highway speeds.
@AndiD

The Akane Aurora has a soft suspension tuning. Also soft, a little bit too soft, are the seats, which can feel cozy on short trips but in the long run we would have appreciated a more supportive padding. With the gearing being a little bit short, the sound insulation a bit weak and the engine loud, it is a kind of noisy car too.
@OME

A car with a long wheelbase such as the Baltic Motors Liesma GS are usually less bouncy to ride in than a shorter car. Ride comfort is decent despite the dated construction and we liked the very comfortable seats. Sound insulation is good, the engine a little bit harsh but it goes with low revs at highway speeds. The Baltic is far from as dated as it first looks like, at least comfort wise.
@TheYugo45GV

The smaller Proletariat Piersic is of course a little bit bouncier but on the other hand has an advantage in not having a heavy solid axle with leaf springs in the back. There is decent seating comfort, but the engine has a drone that gets tiresome in the long run. Luckily, tall gearing and adequate sound insulation helps a bit there.
@HighOctaneLove

Hyensu Harmony has a good seating comfort, a smooth and pleasant ride even on bumpy roads, and the good sound insulation and comfortable gearing somewhat evens out the engine that is a little bit too buzzy for our taste.
@Maverick74

The relatively long wheelbase of the Hart Jupiter makes for a decent ride, but maybe the rear suspension is a little bit stiffer than we would have liked. Seating comfort is OK, the engine is not overly noisy and both sound insulation and gearing are at a sane level.
@Fletchyboy100

The ride in the GSI Egesta is soft, smooth and pleasant, the seating comfort is what you can expect from a car in this class today. The engine may be a bit loud but the sound insulation is adequate and the gearing not overly short, making it acceptable when it comes to sound comfort even at highway speeds.
@oppositelock

For its small size and low sticker price, we would say that the level of comfort in the Dafeng is a surprise. It rides over the bumps in a way that would have made some much larger cars jealous, the seating comfort is good, especially in the back with a seat contoured for two passengers, but of course at the expense of practicality. It also rides very quiet with a well dampened engine that runs at relatively low revs, and a fair amount of sound insulation.
@mart1n2005

The Barusu has very supportive and comfortable seats, with a back seat contoured for two passengers (three is usually too much in a small convertible anyway). The ride is soft and pleasant, but unfortunately the loud tractor-like burble from the flat 4 is a bit too much. That is, however, helped up by the fact that the sound insulation is good for being a convertible and a sane gearing for highway speeds.
@ImKaeR

Gujarat Master might look like a relic, but a pleasant surprise is how it is beating most of its modern competitors when it comes to comfort. The for its time advanced suspension system is still highly competitive, after all, and the spring and dampening rates well chosen. Seating comfort is at least as good as in most modern cars, and the new engine that came for the 1990 model year is very well muffled. It does not rev too much at highway speeds either, and thankfully the sound insulation is better now than it was in the 50s. Apparently, some manufacturers need to take a look at one of the oldest cars still on the market, to learn a lesson or two.
@BannedByAndroid

Not really as old, but still a “veteran” on the market is the Legion Wimbrel. But with a relatively long wheelbase, sane suspension tuning (but maybe a little bit stiff in the back), good seating comfort, high quality sound insulation and a wisely chosen final gear it is still highly competitive. If we are allowed to complain, the engine is a bit noisy.
@donutsnail

Is the Orion Sentinel kind of a small limousine at a budget price? Well, not too far off actually. Thanks to a soft suspension tuning (but maybe with a bit too restricted travel), 4 wheel independent suspension, a very high gearing that makes the strong V6 rev almost nothing at highway speeds, some luxury appointments like an automatic transmission, and much more, it gives you much for the money at least when it comes to comfort.
@Hshan

Another top performer is the Hirochi Exatima, one of the secrets are that the tyres are engineered for comfort, another one the well chosen dampening and spring rates. Sound levels and seating comfort are decent too. In fact, if Hirochi just could add power steering, it would be the top performer here by great margins. Now, it has some competition at the top.
@nicholasrams774

Generally, it could be said that many of the cars are equal here. a few of them very bad, none of them excellent but some of them still being highly competitive. It is mostly a question about which sacrifices you can make. But Orion and Hirochi are probably the closest you can come to comfort levels found in more expensive cars.

22 Likes

ROUND 3: PERFORMANCE

Another disappointing thing regarding cars on a low budget used to be the performance. Gutless engines was used to save money and the fast lane on the highway could more or less be forgotten. But is it like that today? Since performance generally have started to become better even in regular family cars, chances are that it is also true for the cheapest cars on the market, right? Well, sort of, but still, the differences between slow and fast are huge, as shown by our testing.

You are not supposed to be in a hurry while driving a Proletariat Piersic. 0-100 is done in 17.6 seconds, 80-120 the slowest in the group at 16.4 seconds. The quartermile is done in 21.16 seconds and the top speed is the lowest in the bunch at 149 km/h.
@HighOctaneLove

The Baltic motors Liesma GS is another slow performer. 0-100 time is the worst of the bunch at 17.9 seconds, 80-120 is done in 13.2 seconds and the quartermile times are the highest in the group at 22.06 seconds. It should be said, however, that it can reach 174 km/h, but with our 110 km/h speed limits that is most often less important.
@TheYugo45GV

The Shidley Bruv feels kind of sluggish too. 0-100 needs 16.7 seconds, 80-120 13.2 seconds, the quartermile is done in 21.31 seconds and it has a top speed of 168 km/h.
@missionsystem

Another car that can’t be accused for being fast is the Python Mini that needs 14.8 seconds to reach 100. 80-120 is done in 12.9 seconds, the quartermile in 19.75 seconds and the top speed is 160 km/h. However, it feels a fair bit more quick than the Shidley.
@Aruna / @Ryan93

The IP Urbana has kind of similar performance to the Python. Reaching 100 takes 14.7 seconds, 80-120 12.5 seconds and it makes quartermile times of 19.5 seconds. Top speed is 166 km/h.
@Knugcab

A marginally faster car is the Régal. It needs 14.2 seconds to reach 100, 11.8 seconds to take it from 80 to 120, and makes 19.62 second times on the quartermile. Top speed is 160 km/h.
@karhgath

LCE LQ1 has about the same acceleration times as the Régal, with a 14.3 second time to 100, 11.6 time from 80 to 120 and identical times on the quartermile. It should be noted, however, that the top speed is a higher 177 km/h.
@abg7

A little bit quicker is the Mara Zvezda. It has a 0-100 time of 13.4 seconds, 80-120 time of 10.7 seconds and quartermile times of 18.91 seconds. Top speed is 170 km/h, and we are now in the range where we are starting to talk about acceptable performance, especially for its price class.
@AndiD

The Dafeng is very much identical performance wise with a 0-100 time of 13.5 seconds, 80-120 time of 10.8 seconds and quartermile time of 19.39 seconds. Top speed is 174 km/h.
@mart1n2005

Also about identical is the Sanfrecce Giardino. 0-100 is done in 13.5 seconds, 80-120 in 10.8 seconds and it does 19.2 second times on the quartermile, while the top speed is 176 km/h.
@piglet916

The Tiffosi Nuova Citta 60 does 0-100 in 13.1 seconds, 80-120 in 9.96 seconds and 19.15 seconds on the quartermile, and can reach a top speed of 183 km/h.
@fasmukji

The difference is not big in the Legion Wimbrel. It does 0-100 in 13.9 seconds, 80-120 in 9.6 seconds and 18.91 seconds on the quartermile. Top speed is 177 km/h.
@donutsnail


Sunnet ISI: Decent performance but far from the class leaders.

The Sunnet ISI is another car in about the same league. 0-100 is done in 13.1 seconds, 80-120 in 9.96 seconds and at the quartermile it is capable of 19.15 second times. It has a higher top speed of 190 km/h though.
@Just4

The Hirochi Exatima feels a bit quicker. It can make 0-100 in 12.5 seconds, 80-120 in 9.72 seconds and 18.78 second times on the quartermile. Top speed is identical to the Sunnet, though, at 190 km/h.
@nicholasrams774

With a 13 second time to 100, the Hakumai is a bit slower in acceleration from standing still, but it can on the other hand do 80-120 in 9.24 seconds. Quartermile is done in 19.15 seconds and it will top out at 183 km/h.
@interior

The Kinden Cub feels reasonably quick with a 12.4 second time to 100, 9.36 second time 80-120 and 19.02 second quartermile time. It will top out at 194 km/h.
@bilobilo

After the engine update three years ago, the Gujarat has modern day performance. 0-100 is done in 11.6 seconds, 80-120 in 9.6 seconds and the quartermile is done in 18.31. The old shape maybe takes its toll when it comes to aerodynamics, though. Top speed is a rather average 177 km/h.
@BannedByAndroid

The Akira Sparrow is another car with decent performance. It takes 12.2 seconds to reach 100, 9.24 seconds to accelerate from 80 to 120 and it makes the quartermile in 18.55 seconds. Top speed is 196 km/h.
@Serperior98

The Decarlis D20 has kind of frisky performance for this class. 0-100 takes 11.9 seconds, 80-120 a reasonably quick 8.76 seconds and it does quartermile times of 18.42 seconds. Top speed is 193 km/h.
@Arn38fr

In the same league is the Armor Cricket. 0-100 takes 11.8 seconds, 80-120 8.88 seconds and the quartermile is done in 18.31 seconds. Top speed is 196 km/h.
@GassTiresandOil


The Barusu Ochinchin can absolutely make the wind in your hair blow strong.

Another decently quick car is the Barusu with its 0-100 time of 11 seconds, 80-120 time of 8.4 seconds and 17.83 second quartermile time. Also, it can reach 200 km/h.
@ImKaeR

The Hyensu plays in the same league with an 11.1 second time 0-100, 7.92 second 80-120 time and 17.94 second quartermile time. It “only” reaches 190 km/h though.
@Maverick74

The FM Street is quick when it comes to acceleration with its 10.4 second 0-100 time, 7.8 second 80-120 time and 17.47 seconds at the quartermile. On the other hand it has a very limited top speed of 160 km/h but unless you’re going to drive on the german autobahn, it can be forgiven.
@Jaimz

Identical acceleration times, but a much higher top speed, is present in the Wells. 0-100 is done in 10.4 seconds, 80-120 in 7.8 seconds and the quartermile in 17.47 seconds. But it can reach 196 km/h - over 30 more than the FM.
@DuceTheTruth100

The Impulso has identical 0-100 and quartermile times to the FM and Wells, but a quicker 80-120 time at 7.32 seconds, and it can reach 204 km/h. Competitive even against many cars that costs much more.
@chichicoofisial

Akane Aurora is another car with a 10.4 second 0-100 time. 80-120 is done in a quick 6.96 seconds - safe passing of other cars is really not out of the question. At 199 km/h, it barely misses the magical 200 limit for the top speed. Quartermile is done in 17.7 seconds.
@OME

It seems like the 10.4 second 0-100 time is a barrier that is kind of hard to break in this class, since it is the times even for the Hart Jupiter. It also makes 80-120 in 6.96 seconds just like the Akane Aurora and is a little bit quicker on the quartermile at 17.58 seconds. Top speed is a fast 209 km/h.
@Fletchyboy100

Even the Ibishu Pessima needs 10.4 seconds to 100, 80-120 is done in a reasonable 7.08 seconds. The quartermile is done in 17.03 seconds and it can reach 212 km/h - certainly a faster car than its looks may suggest.
@EngineEmu

The GSI Egesta manages to break the 10 second limit and needs only 9.78 seconds to 100. 80-120 takes 6.6 seconds and the quartermile 17.23 seconds. Top speed is 210 km/h.
@oppositelock


Class leading performance: The Orion Sentinel.

A large car in this class means that they have crammed in a weak, gutless engine, hampering the performance very much, right? Not so for the Orion. 9.66 seconds to 100, 6 seconds 80-120 and a 16.99 second quartermile time. Also a high 223 km/h top speed - impressive!
@Hshan

So, what could be said? Well, some cars are actually pretty fast, like the Orion, Other cars not so much, like the Proletariat. None of the cars can claim sports car performance. But more interesting - none of the cars could actually be called dangerously slow - and that really shows that something have happened in this class lately. Again, only 10 years ago some cheap cars were downright scary if you took them for a ride on the highway.

19 Likes

Quick, comfortable… My boat is doing better than expected. Fuel costs will be my downfall though :smile:

Spoiler alert: I can only say…prepare to (sort of) fail where you probably expected it the least in the next round. :stuck_out_tongue:

Looks like my car is pretty well balanced, it was hard to squezze boxer4 engine into convertible within 14k budget. I’m afraid of a part with fuel economy, service costs and safety

2 Likes

So far my Sparrow is doing better than I expected. Pretty middle of the road tbh but so far so good.

I don’t know how well it’ll compare to the others with running costs tbh. The car’s still quite a bit heavier than it should be for its size imo, so I’m not sure how it’ll fare in fuel economy. I suspect that 6.6l/100km will keep its “middle of the road” streak going.

2 Likes

I did not want to cram too much power in this car, but looks like I should have squeezed in a bit more, the Junior looks like a pretty poor all-rounder after 3 rounds.

2 Likes

So far I am surprised that my car performance whise isn’t the worst with such a tiny displacement, tho the comfort is horrible and I was well aware of that XD

1 Like

Yeah, limited by choice…I had a 1989 Nissan Micra (driving school car…on loan after I passed) up to 100mph and trust me…that was easily fast enough!! :rofl:

5 Likes

Exactly, I have chosen to not put a big emphasis on top speed, in 1993 our maximum speed limit was 110 km/h anyway.

4 Likes

So far, I am really surprised about the Dafeng! No real weaknesses (yet?) but substantially cheaper than the rest.

1 Like

I must say that I am too, but we are not done yet.

Bruh…me and those LEAF springs though!!!

I KNEW that was gonna be my downfall lol, along with a few other things.

What if this challenge progressed 2 years or so and had the same competitors or evolutions of the current cars… :thinking:

That would be nice.

Just a thought, don’t mind me.

Just don’t put leaf springs on non heavy duty vehicles, maybe unless if its a exception

1 Like

Not to be rude, but even if leaf springs were outdated in 1993, you had braking distances about 20 meters longer than the competition. That’s more alarming if you ask me, and can’t be cured with a change of suspension type.

2 Likes

Definitely.

For me, I’m going to try and re-work the car and see if I can keep it @14k…my own challenge.

Might be the new '94 model :thinking:.

2 Likes

ROUND 4: ROOMINESS AND PRACTICALITY

Since this test features cars of all possible sizes, there is of course a wide spread when it comes to the roominess. But it might come as a surprise that not all large cars are big inside - and that some small cars actually are better. Also, space isn’t everything. For practicality it speaks for itself that four doors are more than two. A hatchback is generally more practical than a sedan with its large rear hatch and folding rear seats - a station wagon even better. And if the suspension can’t take the cargo, what is a huge loadspace good for then?

Being a convertible is of course one main reason why the Barusu is deemed unpractical, but it is actually cramped on the inside too, and has the smallest luggage compartment in the test. Of course, cramming more than four people into this is completely out of question too.
@ImKaeR

The Python Mini is a tiny car and that is apparent on the inside. There is just not much room for either passengers or luggage in a car with a length of only 324 cm. Though neither the luggage compartment or the passenger area are the smallest of the tested cars and the hatchback gives some flexibility at least. Also, it can only seat four, even if comfort for more than two is a bit out of the question.
@Aruna / @Ryan93

The Tiffosi is almost as small, in fact, it has a slightly smaller passenger compartment, the most cramped in this test, but there is more room for luggage. Again, a four seater but the hatchback gives some added practicality.
@fasmukji

Despite being in the tiny car gang in this test, the FM offers some more passenger space than the Python and Tiffosi. The luggage compartment is slightly smaller than in the Tiffosi but a bit bigger than in the Python. Even if it is out of the question to do it in any kind of comfort, it legally seats five. But watch out when loading, since the suspension will soon bottom out.
@Jaimz


Proletariat Piersic: Rear hatch gives practicality.

A tiny car like the Proletariat does not offer much when it comes to passenger space, and the three door body is hampering practicality. But its luggage compartment is quite large at 478 litres and the hatchback makes it easy to load and flexible to enlarge. The bad thing is that you will overload the car quite quickly due to its low load capacity.
@HighOctaneLove

Five seats, five doors, a little bit larger, the Sanfrecce should be a little bit better than the really tiny cars - and it is. The passenger space is a little bit bigger, as well as the luggage compartment. Also, the maximum load capacity is adequate for its size.
@piglet916

The Dafeng has a pretty decent space for the passengers, however, it legally only seats 4. Also, the luggage compartment is not really the biggest one we have seen. Four doors is of course good, but a small sedan will always have a flexibility disadvantage compared to a hatchback.
@mart1n2005

Kinden Cub has got some flexibility through its hatchback 5-door body. Also the luggage compartment is larger than in the very smallest cars, and it can cope with kind of heavy loads. But a cramped passenger compartment and legal seating only for 4 is of course disadvantages.
@bilobilo

Hart Jupiter is roomy for its passengers and seats five with ease. But a 333 litre luggage compartment is kind of disappointing and also, the sedan body means that there is not much flexibility to make it bigger.
@Fletchyboy100

Akira Sparrow is cramped in the passenger area but has got a quite large luggage compartment, that is easy to load through the hatchback, and equally easy to make larger. It also has a decent cargo capacity. Five doors is of course practical but it can only take four passengers.
@Serperior98

The sedan body of the Shidley Bruv lacks some of the practicality of a hatchback, especially since it has a relatively tiny luggage compartment. But it has four doors and is roomy for its passengers, and the suspension can cope with heavy loads.
@missionsystem

Decarlis D20 is not an overly roomy car for its passengers, however, the luggage compartment is rather big for its size, the 5 door hatchback body makes it practical and the cargo capacity is adequate.
@Arn38fr

The Akane Aurora could not be called roomy inside, but it would not be fair to say that it felt cramped either, the space is adequate but not much more. It seats five and has a decent luggage compartment, but the suspension bottoms out way too quickly when loading.
@OME

The Impulso BT is roomy for its passengers and has a decent luggage compartment at 408 litres, has 4 doors but lacks a hatchback. However, the load capacity is a bit too low to get a really good grade.
@chichicoofisial

The Sunnet ISI has a quite large luggage compartment but suffers from the same (not overly, but still) low load capacity as the Impulso BT, and is also a bit on the cramped size for its passengers. It also has the practicality of its 5 door hatchback body.
@Just4

The Régal is kind of strange. It has a very cramped passenger compartment but on the other hand an enormous cargo compartment that can swallow everything that is thrown at it. The hatchback means that it is easy to load, but only 3 doors and 4 seats hampers practicality a bit. Besides, the load capacity is a bit mediocre considering how much the car can take in its cargo area.
@karhgath


Gujarat Master: Not as good as one may think.

The Gujarat has a roomy trunk and a decent load capacity to handle it. However, it is easy to be fooled into that there is more room for the passengers than it actually is. RWD layout is a bit more space consuming that the transverse FWD that is commonplace today.
@BannedByAndroid

Ibishu Pessima is one of three station wagons in our test, and of course that means good practicality and flexibility by default. But the cargo compartment is not impressive for being a wagon, the load capacity is terribly low, the interior space is mediocre and it only fits 4 passengers. Not really the best wagon on the market when it comes to doing wagon duties.
@EngineEmu

On the outside, the LCE LQ1 may not look like much, but for its size it offers surprisingly much room for both passengers and cargo, and a 5 door hatchback body means that it is both flexible and easy to load. The load capacity could maybe be improved a little bit, though.
@abg7

The Hyensu is slightly larger than the LCE both in the trunk and for the passengers, and it has a better load capacity. Being a sedan it suffers a little bit when it comes to flexibility, though.
@Maverick74

Hirochi Exatima is extremely roomy for its passengers, second only to the large Orion, and has a decent cargo compartment. What’s not so good, however, is a low load capacity.
@nicholasrams774


GSI Egesta: Small, chubby - and spacious.

GSI is roomy for its passengers, relatively roomy for luggage, in fact, considering its size we are impressed, but it has a tragically low load capacity and compared to a hatchback, a small sedan has some flexibility drawbacks.
@oppositelock

It is easy to be fooled into that the Baltic motors Liesma GS is a spacious car considering its large footprint, but maybe thanks to the space consuming RWD layout, it is cramped for its passengers. However, the hatchback makes it practical and the loadspace is huge. The suspension can take it without troubles too.
@TheYugo45GV

There is no doubt that the Orion is spacious - so spacious that it could have been the winner with no real competition, but there is a really major drawback - the load capacity is terribly low. Taking your family on a vacation in the Orion will soon result in illegal overloading. Orion should really look at this problem since it might really worry many people in the customer base for this model.
@Hshan

The large Wells i5 of course offers lots of room for both passengers and cargo. Also, it has a suspension that can handle the loads well.
@DuceTheTruth100

Armor Cricket is a practical station wagon with a relatively large loadspace and a suspension that can take the loads. There is cars that offers more room for its passengers, but it would really be unfair to call the Armor “cramped”.
@GassTiresandOil

The same thing could be said about the Mara Zvezda - however, it is a little bit more spacious than the Armor both for passengers and cargo. Not extremely but still.
@AndiD

The Hakumai is surprisingly roomy for both cargo and passengers for its size, and the load capacity is (as stated before, ridiculously) high. The only drawback is the lack of rear doors.
@interior

The IP is probably the largest surprise of them all in this test. It is really hard to believe that this tiny little blob has one of the largest combined passenger- and cargo areas, you have to see it yourself to believe it, and for that matter, sit in it. The only drawback is the lack of rear doors, but the importer says that a 5 door hatchback will come later this year and a 4 door sedan for 1994, which will solve that.
@Knugcab

All in all, the Legion is probably the most practical allrounder here. It is roomy for its passengers, roomy for cargo, has a decent cargo capacity and features a hatchback. Finding something to complain about when it comes to practicality is actually hard here.
@donutsnail

12 Likes

One thing that must be said OOC…

Staggered tyres are generally a no-no for this type of car and would in most competitions result in binning.
What’s even more wrong is staggered tyres with the narrow ones in the rear - but they do improve some Automation stats for FWD vehicles, and are because of that generally seen as min-maxing.

Now it is too late since I somehow missed it, but if I had seen it earlier, the Ibishu Pessima would have been among the instabins for having 155 up front and 145 in the rear…

Something to think about for the next time for @EngineEmu since it would result in an instabin in most other forum competitons too, except for maybe FWD dragracing or something…

2 Likes

Feels like with each segment the Python Mini is doing worse and worse :joy:

3 Likes

There might be a reason why there isn’t lots of kei cars on Swedish roads…just saying. :wink:

3 Likes