Blaire Automotive is an entry-level company with hints of premium sprinkled around. Started in 1956 by Craig Campbell and has been run as a family business for its entire lifetime. Today, Blaire Automotive stands as the 8th best selling American brand.
Trims
Touring - Base
Touring S - Standard Model Name S - Sport
Hybrid - Hybrid (typically used under the Touring & Limited trim levels)
Limited - Premium
GT - GT/Muscle
VST - Performance
Models (ADM)
Sedans
Cahvack - Midsize
Leo - Subcompact
SUVs
Conswell - Fullsize
Outlast - Fullsize Crossover
Everglade - Midsize SUV
EL-1 - Midsize EV Crossover
EL-4 - Compact EV Crossover (2023)
Borough - Subcompact
Hatchbacks
EL-3 - EV Compact
Leo - Subcompact
Coupes
Ace - Midsize Muscle
Rodman - Midsize Sport
EL-2 - Compact EV (2022)
Design 1: Large Crosshair Grille heavily inspired by dodge w/ slim long headlights with an LED strips and squared indicators. Large lower grille with chrome trimming.
Design 2: Smaller Crosshair Grille w/ shorter slim headlights without LED strip & squared indicators. Small lower grille w/ fog lights and matte black trimming
In case you’re wondering where the Crosshair Grille comes from here’s a photo of the 1994 Blaire Cahvack
Well MXST is supposed to be me going overboard when it comes to engineering. The MXST trim is usually sold in limited quantities (in lore) So the use of outrageous specs doesn’t cost the company a super amount of money.
I suggest making the engines smaller if it’s supposed to be comfortable. And if you want a performance car with a v6, you could make it smaller. Maybe a 3.0l. or a v8
I feel like the base can keep the I4 (since it is the base model) and the MXP & MXX could have a 2.0L or 2.5L V6, and the MXS would have a turbocharged version of the V6 with the MXST having a turbo V8 (Probably a 4.0L since it is for a fullsize sedan modest in size). Is that okay orrr should I choose something different?
The MXX could have something smaller, a 4 cyl that size could be found in a pickup truck. And the MXP could be better with a 3.5l v6 instead of really big 5 cylinders. Granny probably dont want to be sitting in a vibrating car if she wanna get Loose with the 4.5L. Im pretty sure you can make that same power with a 3.0L turbocharged engine. You could also get more fuel economy with smaller engines
Besides the obvious NVH issues, there is one other problem: All three of these engines are very heavy for their configuration. A 2.2L I4, 3.5L six-cylinder and a 4.5L V8 would be preferable - and more realistic to boot.
