http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=722033497
Essential Mods material, right here! This body rocks my socks off!
1 Like
and the R5 aswell! Think about it, small hatches vs muscle cars vs some MR vs 911ā¦Itās like goodwood historic racing 
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=719774747
EDIT: Might have said it too quickly. Despite low weight Iām not sure this car could be competitiveā¦
1 Like
Interesting, up to this point Iāve been using only one screen while I was fixing the power supply inside my second monitor. As soon as I got it fixed and plugged back in the BRC Tool began crashing, so I thought maybe I could use Fraps to record the problem. Then I realized that Fraps was preventing the problem (and that it wouldnāt capture the crash screen).
Except with just a few more turbos 
Hope someone can find a way of recreating the gorgeous smell of slightly unburnt petrol that is synonymous with Godowood tooā¦
1 Like
How long left to submit cars for next testing? I have my car ready to go but I still canāt send attachments in PM
EDIT: attachments working now, have sent submission
Just sent my updated entry, $9999.96 instead of $8962. Should be slightly better.
1 Like
Damn mines only $9999.15, you sir really know how to squeeze the budget
wew, you guys are penny pincher.
on another news. iām only making a LITTLE bit of progress, from mid 2:12 to high 2:11ā¦ dammit.
who would fucking know that i could get better times on -0.2 front camber than -0.5 camberā¦ certainly wasnāt me
edit:
does oversteering tendency puts any stress/pressure on the driver?
as far as i know the stress/pressure on the driver is shown by the difficulty in the BRC tool
-0.2 may just suit the rest of your suspension settings better, if youāre increasing front camber you have to adjust rear camber and/or spring stiffness/sway bar stiffness to work with it, more negative camber generally means better times if tuned right
okay. only purely looking at the difficulty.
i could get to almost 2:10 now, but with -3.0 rear camber
and with a >1 ton car, 29.7/70.3 bias. it may be fast in the qualifiying, but itās a deathtrap after a few laps.
iām not doing it, but iām already pretty close to it.
I finally revised my car. Itās not anywhere near as fast as the othersā, but I wanted to try a different design choice.
Can someone suggest a competitive body (or point me to the post where it has been done already). Iāve seen some suggestions further back in the discussion, but I failed to take good notes.
I hope @Der_Bayer checks his inbox in time, so my updated entry makes it into the next test.
I sent in a Pantera, wonder how it fares against the Porsches.
i donāt even remember what i sent in for today ā¦
Wasnāt the next test tonight? Or has āReal Lifeā interfered?
It was planned to be in 4 minutes. But maybe I wonāt be able to do it tonight, so maybe tomorrow morning.
Iāll answer all of the questions of the last few days then, too.
3 Likes
I tried to get $4k off my entry from the Hokenheim race, but I am stuck at $11k with absolutely nowhere left to remove quality without dipping the engine under 40 reliability. Guess I have to build a new carā¦
my new car is on 29.6
donāt worry too much about it
my engine is at a 17.4 for reliability with a total reliability of 48.4 for the entire car.
Thatās way below my comfort zone. Maybe thatās why my car is slow.