BRC 1976 - Under Pressure [E8-Q]

There are two other obvious competitions, turbo v NA and slick tyres v sports.

Personally I think, those will be the big discussion points, more than car layout. The porsche has really good traction, but terrible weight distribution. FR cars have great weight distribution and can use much more rubber, but lack traction badly. MR cars are on the middle of both those issues, but with the wedge being severely limited in engine space. All of which makes for great tradeoffs and as you said, more competitiveness between different approaches.

3 Likes

:grinning: Yes, very subtle.

I definitely like that there are entries going for all sorts of different layouts, even if we do gravitate to similar bodies. And I will be very interested to see if the Turbo cars doing 4 pit stops can go fast enough to make them worth while. I kind of hope not, but I think it’ll be close. I think if the NA cars have managed to deal with the tyre wear issue, then yes, they should do well I think.

I’m running rhe FR porsche… So which category do i belong to? :stuck_out_tongue:

It is worth noting that I still managed to squeeze in a transversely mounted 4.2-liter mechanically injected DOHC crossplane V8 into the not-Lotus body, if only just. Even with the primitive tech on offer in 1976 (no slippy diffs of any kind and narrow tires, particularly with tire quality set to its default value of 0 as stipulated by the regs) it would not take much work to make the resulting car handle well enough to be a strong contender.

2 Likes

A 4.3L square V8 just about fits :wink: With a longer stroke even more, but at the cost of reliability or revs.

Narrow tires? Back in 1945 we were running on 155s!!! For 1955 we widened out to massive 175s! In 1966, we got 225s. Finally, in 1976 we get tires that actually stand a chance to stick to the tarmac!! I mean, sure, for racing, 265s aren’t crazy wide or anything, but considering it’s 1976, they’re still wider than the average car on the street in 2016! These are super duper FAT tires!!!

2 Likes

Actually, does the game assume we use radial tires compared to bias on a year, or doea it assume we constantly use radial?

I suspect @07CobaltGirl was referring to real-life tire sizes. In-game tire sizes in '76 were much narrower, particularly if default quality levels (read: zero) are used.

no, i’m pretty sure it’s the tire limit size in BRC season 1945, 1955, 1966, and 1976

Oh how I regret not being here when early years happened. There is something special about tunning “slow” cars.

3 Likes

Speaking of tires, I meant to ask about something (it may have been talked about before). @Der_Bayer, do you have plans to expand on the driver error system to include things like spinning out, slides, brakes locking up, etc?

Yes and both the car bodies were fantastic. :stuck_out_tongue:

I very much like the variety now to be honest.

Was there a BRC 1945? If so, what was the fastest time around the automation test track?

search button is your friend…

6 Likes

152.xx seconds on qualifying, so 2:32.xx for ATT. 153.83 for actual race, won by Absurdist.

BRC Search

6 Likes

I need more like buttons :confused:

Man, 1945 was so good, been trying to live up to that season ever since. Was it 1945 or 1955 that I had like 800 stiffness rear sway bar… good times, good times…

2 Likes

Hello all, I am now back from Atlanta GA so if people want to start sending cars in for the car reviews I am around to get them now.

Also, here is the engine for my car.

2 Likes

@GenJeFT You just want the files spit out from BroBot right?

I believe he wants the export of the car from in game, not from the brctool