Materiel cost of 13k is likely a total production cost of 16K+, I doubt your company would make enough money on that car to even offer a warranty.
[quote=“oppositelock”]A couple things:
Still crazy turbo lag.
Your redline is too low.
Try biasing the AWD split towards the rear.
Your front tires are wider than the rears.
Check your brake fade, vented rotors might be a good idea.
Max camber on both axles is probably not ideal.
Your suspension is too low and no doubt bottoming out.[/quote]
Turbo lag: Fastest lap with this set up
Redline : For everything to be green for that price and production units, it is where it needs to be
Tried all the splits for AWD: That is most ideal for time on nurm
Brake fade is 0%: it is ideal where it is at for time on the nurm
camber: is most ideal for time on the nurm
bottom out is -4.1%: fastest time for nurm
3 yr/36,000 mi warranty, abuse is not covered under warranty.
[quote=“chlumsky”]
Turbo lag: Fastest lap with this set up
Redline : For everything to be green for that price and production units, it is where it needs to be
Tried all the splits for AWD: That is most ideal for time on nurm
Brake fade is 0%: it is ideal where it is at for time on the nurm
camber: is most ideal for time on the nurm
bottom out is -4.1%: fastest time for nurm[/quote]
I am very curious, what is your Nurm time 
I put a picture of it under specs for the car, it is 7:16.76, with this car at this price.
[quote=“chlumsky”]
I put a picture of it under specs for the car, it is 7:16.76, with this car at this price.[/quote]
Ahh, sorry but the last image will not load on my end, I did try reloading it but it will not showup.
Which track is ‘Nurm’ I can only assume that 7:16 is a good time. 
[quote=“Lordred”]
I put a picture of it under specs for the car, it is 7:16.76, with this car at this price.
Ahh, sorry but the last image will not load on my end, I did try reloading it but it will not showup.
Which track is ‘Nurm’ I can only assume that 7:16 is a good time. [/quote]
It is known as green hell on here. (Nürburgring Nordschleife)
Then indeed, it is quite a good time.
http://s8.postimg.org/6j58efoo3/Bogdan_MK1_A.jpg
Made for Bogdan, I call it the Bogdan MK1. Your thoughts would be greatly appriciated. 43 MPG (18 km per 1 liter of fuel used
), 425 HP (316 kW), 2.4l twin turbocharged V8 $63000 MSRP.
http://s12.postimg.org/66cn2k6gr/IZZY_MK1_ECOBOOSHY.png
Made for IZZY and Derrick 81.2 mpg (34.52 km/l), 210 hp (156.59 kW),136.4 MPH (219.5 kph), “Daily Driver, hatchback, grocery getter, econobox”, $25,900. Lap time is just for reference, vehicle was not tuned on/for a track.
Regular Pump Gas.
Your thoughts would be appreciated.
http://s2.postimg.org/ib081u9av/Derrick_MK1.png
Made for Derrick. Derrick MK1, 355 HP (266kW), 30 MPG, $45,000. Most fuel efficient engine produced for cars made at chlumsky corp so far.
Those brakes are probably no bigger than those found on a 1970’s economy car.
I would increase the size of the rims significantly. Probably to 17-18 inch.
[quote=“nerd”]Those brakes are probably no bigger than those found on a 1970’s economy car.
I would increase the size of the rims significantly. Probably to 17-18 inch.[/quote]
it wouldnt let me get bigger brakes so I went with the best ones. Plus they are lighter!
Also I think I omitted that info, how can you see the brakes? lol you must see them through the rims. Don’t worry, they are carbon ceramic.
Also the tires are like that because of the superior grip.
All you need to figure the brake size is to see the wheel size. You can’t fit big rotors in those wheels.
I already thought of this and changed it to say 21 inchers, it wouldn’t let me go past 170mm for the brakes. I usually go with regular rotors, but the ceramics were a godsend.
[quote=“chlumsky”]
I already thought of this and changed it to say 21 inchers, it wouldn’t let me go past 170mm for the brakes.[/quote]
That’s odd. I can go over 170mm just fine on 21 inches.
Even the default size is bigger. (200mm)
It’s going to be a deathtrap with those brakes.
[quote=“nerd”]
I already thought of this and changed it to say 21 inchers, it wouldn’t let me go past 170mm for the brakes.
That’s odd. I can go over 170mm just fine on 21 inches.
Even the default size is bigger. (200mm)
It’s going to be a deathtrap with those brakes.[/quote]
60-0 is 88 ft 11 inches…
The US average highway stopping distance for passenger vehicles is 193 feet (55-0 MPH).
[quote=“chlumsky”]
60-0 is 88 ft 11 inches…
The US average highway stopping distance for passenger vehicles is 193 feet (55-0 MPH).[/quote]
Brake fade also matters. If you threw that around a track with a lot of long straights and tight corners for many laps, the brakes would wear out from the heat and become unusable.
Brake fade has been eliminated, it was -1.6% and now it is zero.
New price is 132,625 US on F1B1B