CSR 110 - PRELIMINARIES PART 1
March, 1969
Jukka is sitting in the kitchen drinking coffee. He bought some car magazines yesterday, and decides to look at them in case there is any interesting car he might want to buy. He takes a magazine and flips it open.
Ardent Sentinel by @VicVictory
Hmm, the design is not good at all in my opinion. The car is also quite large, and i really just want a small car. The 19.6 MPG rating isn’t that great either. It is still quite cheap but i think this car is not for me.
Not a contender in finals
Mikko 1400 GT by @Bmaggiori
This car at least looks nice. The fuel usage is not the best but it isn’t that bad. The interior is a bit confusing, it has really expensive - looking seats and dashboard, but that radio looks like something i would find in my Moskvich. I think im gonna pass on this one.
Not a contender in finals, Premium/Basic minmax
Hessenburg E2000 Touring by @BannedByAndroid
This car looks nice, but the release of this car is going to be delayed because of some engine production problems. I need a new car as soon as possible so this car is out of question for me.
Not a contender in finals, too much engine ET
Mitsushita Royale by @conan
Hmm, the design is a bit bland but it has really good specs. The 23.5 MPG rating is great, and the safety and reliability ratings are good as well. It seems to have some kind of rustproofing in it too. I might try this out later.
A contender in finals
Andes by @Rise_Comics
Oh god, the design is terrifying, and the stats aren’t great either. Wait, does this car even have door handles? i can’t see any at least. This car is definetly not for me.
Not a contender in finals
Courageoux Quinze by @mart1n2005
Wow, i really like the design of this car. The stats aren’t the best though, 22.7 MPG rating is good, but the safety and reliability ratings aren’t that great. Its not really that expensive though, so i might take a look.
A contender in the finals
Znopresk Z213 A by @NormanVauxhall
This thing looks nice, but seems to suffer from some production issues, so i guess this might not be the car for me.
Not a contender in finals, too much trim PU
BAM Bavaria by @Der_Bayer
This thing also has this weird fancy interior - crappy radio thing going on. The fuel efficiency in this thing is great, but the relaibility isn’t great and service costs are a bit higher than in the other cars. I think this car is not what i am looking for.
Not a contender in finals
Quaglia 1600C by @HybridTronny
Well, this car looks nice, but the fuel consumption isn’t that great compared to other cars. The reliability and safety also aren’t the best, but the car is cheap, and has low service costs. There is still many cars left to look at, so maybe i will try to find something better.
Not a contender in finals
FABEL Type 3 1600 by @MrChips
This car is really beautiful, and the price isn’t bad either. The fuel economy is great, but the RR config makes the car quite terrifying to drive, and the service costs are quite high as well. I might pass on this one, because i need a car thats easy to drive.
Not a contender in finals
G160 K by Giusseppe by @undercoverhardwarema
Well this thing isn’t really attractive, and the fuel economy is quite bad as well. The handling isn’t great but it is cheap and service costs are acceptable, but im not really looking for a van anyway so i won’t consider this car.
Not a contender in finals
Pemhall A50 by @Centurion_23 and @goblin95
Another van? Well, this thing actually looks like a nice car. The handling is not great in this van either, and the reliability is lower. The fuel consumption is a bit better but im still really not looking for a vam so i won’t consider this car.
'Not a contender in finals*
ČMZ-GSR Siberia 2.2 by @ST1Letho and @kobacrashi
An offroader? Well this thing is interesting. The fuel consumption is terrible, and the car itself isnt cheap, but it is extremely safe. The reliability is also great and service costs are low. The 4x4 drivetrain might be nice to have in winter. I will definetly try this out.
A contender in finals
Beijing People’s Automotive Group KC755WR by @yangx2
More offroaders? Well the safety is good but not as good as in the Siberia, and the reliability isn’t as good either. the car is also a lot lighter but the fuel consumption is just as bad as in the Siberia. Wait, this thing is FWD? Ok, definetly not going to consider this.
Not a contender in finals
CZA Borovi 1.5 by @balkanski_brat
This car looks good, and is cheap too! Safety and reliability aren’t great, and neither is fuel consumption… The service costs are really cheap, but the other factors make this car undesriable for me.
Not a contender in finals
Buergerfahrzeuge - Kutsche by @Mikonp7
Um, this car is really weird-looking. The fuel consumption, safety and reliability are quite bad too. Not interested.
Not a contender in finals
Dominion Victory Premier by @thecarlover
This thing looks nice. The fuel consumption is also decent, and reliability is acceptable. The car also is really safe, and isn’t that expensive, so i might take a look at it later.
A contender in finals
Jukka is finishing his coffee as the phone starts ringing in the living room. Jukka goes to pick up the phone and it’s Sirkka.
“The car broke down again, it doesnt start up and now i’m stuck in the fuel station, can you come here to help me?”
Jukka says he is there in 15 minutes, hangs up and goes to help Sirkka.
END OF PART 1 OF THE PRELIMS, NEXT PART IS GOING TO BE POSTED TOMORROW
