just a heads up for everyone- submissions haven’t officially opened, but please re-read the brief again as the maximum price cap has changed from $36,000 to $40,000.
Convertibles will generally take a statistical hit compared to their coupe equivalents, so how should they be buffed? An equivalency multiplier (probably 1.02x to 1.1x depending on convertible type) could be considered.
Kyorg and i have discussed it, and we do plan to add a multiplier in some capacity.
Drivability will be a 3-star (i.e. major) judging criterion, but with manual transmissions yielding inferior drivability to any form of automatic transmission (especially an advanced one), I’m expecting Tim to just take the hit. However, the sportiness penalty for even an advanced automatic transmission may not be acceptable, although something with an auto manual or dual-clutch gearbox could yet tickle his fancy.
And on top of that, there should be a maximum loudness value of somewhere between 55 to 60, to accommodate entries whose engines have performance intakes.
On that note, I’m torn between the small, lightweight, mid-engined approach, and the lure of a bigger, brawnier FR alternative - I’ll just go with the one that holds the most promise.
And with exterior styling also being a 3-star judging criterion, I’m assuming Tim will take any exterior color as long as it suit’s the car’s overall appearance - although there are a few (such as neon pink or cyan) he will hardly even consider touching with a 10-foot pole (or driveshaft), regardless of what kind of car it’s applied to.
Finally, there should also be limits on body unlock years - Tim won’t want something that looks too outdated, after all.
alright i’m just gonna respond to all of this one at a time;
-
as i said in the brief, there were many different directions that companies went in irl at this period of time, including transmission choices, which is why i left it open-ended so people can try whatever works best.
-
i tested 8 different cars, a handful had performance intakes and i didn’t have much trouble staying under the limit of 50 loudness.
-
there’s no preference for color, people are free to do what they like.
-
i’m not setting a specific body unlock year, it’s an unnecessary rule as far as i’m concerned.
4 Likes
I agree with all of that.
Also, this reminds me somewhat of what CSR 152 would have been if the client had been looking for a dedicated (premium) sports car instead of a full-on luxury car with a dash of sportiness on the side.
Submissions Open
CSR 162 is now open for submissions, and the ruleset is locked in. Please be sure to re-read the brief, as there are important changes.
4 Likes
In collaboration with 1989 Vauxhall Frontera Fanboy, here it is. the 2005 Vanovo 379 “Fantastisk” V8, the last hurrah for the decade-old A40 platform
i don’t expect this to do well but worth a shot
12 Likes
Am currently building a very… convoluted (lorewise) entry if anyone wants to collab with visuals?
1 Like
'05 AMS Antares 5.0 V8 GT Coupe
Part GT car, part muscle car, all sports car, the Antares combines sleek looks and surprising reliability with stunning performance, from $40,000 AMU.
The Antares’ 5.0-liter all-alloy, naturally aspirated, quad-cam, 32-valve V8 sends a formidable 450 horsepower and 420 lb-ft of torque (at 6600 and 4600 rpm, respectively) to the rear wheels via a six-speed manual gearbox and helical LSD, yielding a 0-60 mph time of 4.3 seconds and an electronically controlled top speed of 186 mph, while also taking just 12.35 seconds for a standing quarter-mile, and retaining WES 11 compatibility for good measure.
With standard-fit high-performance tires (245/40R19 front, 275/35R19 rear) surrounding 19-inch alloy wheels and large vented slotted disc brakes with ABS, as well as track-tested 4-wheel independent suspension (dual wishbones up front and multilinks at the rear), the Antares can also turn and stop on a dime, needing just 37.5m to stop from 62 mph, while capable of 0.99g on a 200m skidpad, thanks to 50/50 weight distribution front-to-rear.
A sports car need not be uncomfortable or unsafe, however, and to that end, we’ve thrown in a high-quality premium interior (with a wide range of colors and trims), stereo sound system (complete with satnav!), six airbags (2 front, 2 side, and 2 curtain), stability/traction control and adjustable adaptive dampers for various road conditions. So what are you waiting for? Make a dealer appointment for a test drive today - you’ll thank yourself for it!
10 Likes
To Speed and Enjoy in L.A.
The CBL2 by Yamaguchi is not a fancy ride, no.
It is comfortable, fast and reliable. It´s the one doing it all right and not impressing.
Great value, Japanese modesty, but all by being fun to drive and returning no disappointment. Engines availabe are a four cylinder with high possible revolutions, a sporty turbo version of it and a sophisticated flat six. The US spec version has the latter, with a healthy output and perfect smoothness.
Understatement is the way to go. Your Yamaguchi dealer will show you something that won´t impress the neighbour, but instead the one who deserves a pleasant surpise: YOU!
10 Likes
Does anyone want to collab on the styling? I’m really struggling with the rear end of my current build
2005 Hydrion Stryker GT6
After spending the '90s realigning to the wishes of the new corporate owner (and former competitor) Kerberos, Hydrion decided it’s time to take a chance on the sports car market. Borrowing the Kerberos five valve I6 and modifying it to become the Tigershark engine, they’re debuting the engine in the all–new Stryker coupe, with the ads emphasizing the “Fast, with Class” tagline. There’s also talk it’s almost a full second faster around the Dunsfold Aerodrome than a C6 Corvette, despite giving up two cylinders and roughly one hundred horsepower.
10 Likes
16 Likes
HI quick question
does 50.2 Db of engine noise is too much my exhaust is already strangled to 253% please help 
anything over is a bin, unfortunately
27 Likes
Try changing the type of exhaust headers or intake you’re using, since those can also affect the noise level.
2 Likes
Or Adding Balancing mass
2 Likes