CSR168 - Around the World

soon :trade_mark: when

1 Like

me when the CSR

1 Like

CSR when?

CSR NOW!!!

CSR168
Part 2- Greener Pastures

Car Dealer District, Saturday morning

As promised, Bob met up with his good friend George. Knowing the mind-boggling number of cars on offer, the two knew that they wouldn’t have the time to test drive all of them. Without further ado, the two went into the dealer premises and started looking around.


Kurosake Sumo Dakar
@David_Herrera

“Wow, this one certainly looks tough and ready to conquer the globe.”

“And it indeed is. It’s got a 4x4 system, not to mention spotlights. Despite being this big it’s only got 2 doors, but that shouldn’t be an issue for you. There are a few glaring issues, though.”

“And what might that be?”

“It’s very thirsty for starters. It’s also got a limited slip differential which could maybe come in handy, but this also means that it’s gonna be a bit of a pain to fix. If we go a little further down there are some more similar cars that I’d rather recommend”

“Aight, if you say so.”

Additional Comments

The Sumo Dakar is one of the few submissions with a premium interior this round. Despite this however, comfort remains below average. As mentioned, drivability, fuel economy (due to its large engine), and safety are also quite low. The choice of a solid front axle and trailing arm rear is also quite questionable. Service costs are also the highest of the entire bunch.

In terms of design, the Sumo Dakar is quite handsome, drawing parallels to the Nissan Terrano from the era. The gold and black colour scheme is an interesting choice, hinting at the car’s premium nature, and so does the abundance of accessories (flood and foglamps, etc.). Overall however, the Sumo Dakar does not have the credentials to make it to the finals.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Bovos Viking
@Ultimate_Billy

“What’s your take on this one, George?”

“Pretty competent as far as I can see. it’s got plenty of usable space and it’s got AWD which makes this very forgiving to drive.”

“Is it likely to leave me stranded?”

“It’s quite alright in terms of reliability. Nothing really stands out that much honestly. If anything, it doesn’t stand out at all. Pretty bland looking.”

Additional Comments

The Viking is generally a well-engineered car. All choices seem sensible, and its stats are about average. As mentioned however, its design is quite bland. The front bumper for instance is completely featureless, where most cars of the era would either have either plastic or metal trim, or an indent of some sort which brings some character to the area. The same can be said about the rear bumper, and the sides which have two oval pieces of plastic and nothing else.

The inclusion of the spare tyre is quite a nice touch though. It’s not always visible but from certain angles it really gives the car its missing sense of detail.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Avin - 572 ALL-IN DRIVE
@toxicnet

“Now this one’s a pretty solidly engineered vehicle, Bob. It’s fuel efficient, reliable, and easy to drive.”

“I don’t know man, not to keen on how it looks.”

“Doesn’t look bad to me.”

“Well it’s not bad per se, it’s just too… plain.”

“…Alright then, let’s look at something else”

Additional Comments

Similar to the Viking, the 572 is quite decently engineered, with fuel economy and drivability being particular strong points. The headlight and taillight designs give the impression of something bold, but attached photo shows a clear lack of detailing on the mid- and lower sides of the car. This seriously kneecaps the design and makes the car look chinless.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Hirose Turaco LM
@Nebulon

“This thing is huge! I could practically just move out and live in one of these instead!”

“It’s huge indeed… and quite well-appointed. Never thought I’d see a van with an interior this fancy. You think it’d hold up well throughout the drive?”

“Well your bum certainly will. But mechanically, it’s not quite on par with the others. I’d definitely get one if the trip was around the continent, but not for the thing you’re envisioning.”

Additional Comments

The Turaco is by far the most comfortable car of the bunch, with its premium interior trim and interior volume contributing to this. Most other stats are about average however, and reliability is quite good considering the premium interior and 4x4 drivetrain.

Considerable effort can be on the surfacing of the Turaco, with the creases on the side and bumper bars adding to the van’s character. Little touches like the plaque on the b pillar and 4x4 lettering, as well as the burgundy colour further sells the impression of the Turavco being a premium vehicle. The body is very wide for a Japanese van, but that is one of the limitations of the Transporter body. Overall a solid effort, but unfortunately it loses to others in both engineering and looks.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Yamaguchi Van 190 Vario
@Happyhungryhippo

“Well, this one certainly feels just a little larger than the Turaco.”

“Yes, but not by too much. This one’s more of a grounded offering but I haven’t heard too many good things about its reliability.”

“That’s a little disappointing considering this is based on a goods van.”

“It indeed is. They do offer a dedicated camper version of this though. It’s got a stove, fridge, plumbing, and other quality of life features.”

“Nah, not this time.”

Additional Comments

Japanese van supremacy

The Yamaguchi looks simply like what it is: a van. The two-tone paint is a nice addition given its origins as a camper van, but there is not really much else to speak of for the design. Its stats are overall lower than average as well, though its safety is among the highest. Overall though, it just doesn’t stand out from the crowd very much.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Harada Delilah GTE Royale
@Atomic

“Now this one’s quite interesting… a luxurious and sporty looking van. With a bonus motorcycle to boot!”

“It certainly is interesting… Not sure if I’m a fan of the front though. It’s got a big mouth and those curvy lines.”

“Idk man, I think it makes it just a little more futuristic. Perhaps in a few years. Either way, this thing is big and roomy, has a turbocharger, and is driver-friendly thanks to the AWD system. As you can expect from all this technology though, reliability isn’t the best. Not to mention the cost and complexity of repairing these systems.”

“So… not ideal for the trip?”

“The AWD would’ve been handy… The turbo I’m not so sure about. Motorcycle would’ve gone hard though.”

Additional Comments

80s Japanese van supremacy.

The Delilah truly encapsulates the push upmarket that all kinds of Japanese vehicles seem to be striving for at the time. Though based on an old-looking van, the front is very clearly futuristic and quite swanky. It reminds me of one of the later Toyota TownAces, which have a futuristic face but an archaic rest of the body.

In keeping with its theme, the Delilah is packed with technology, including AWD, turbo, premium interior, and an LSD. This gives the Delilah the highest drivability stat of all other entries, though at the cost of some reliability (though not by as much as I expected), service cost, and purchase price. These could have been overlooked but its comfort stat is unfortunately lacking, even compared to cheaper entries which kinda defeats the whole premium proposition.

Overall an interesting entry, would have definitely been a finalist if it had better stats.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Renzo Manta 4x4
@Capri78

“This one looks quite alright”

“Yes, I think it looks very sensible. Everything under its skin is also sensible. Only issue is that other cars simply do what the Manta does better. Not to mention issues with reliability, as one might expect from an Italian car.”

“What a shame.”

Additional Comments

The Manta is overall quite a decent-looking car. The fundamentals are there, but the headlights and taillights could use a little definition, which would help them stand out more instead of just looking flatly pasted on the body. Normally I’d say that the lights could wrap around the body a little better, but this time I think that the lights appearing on one face is a pretty good choice given how boxy the body is, and just how Italian cars were designed at the time.

Stats are mostly below average, especially in terms of reliability. Because of this, the Manta does not make it to the finals.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Ragnarock Hargrove T-8
@DrDoomD1scord

“GODDAMN!”

“Are you seriously considering going on a trip in a sports coupe of all things?”

“Why the hell not? Look at it!”

“I mean considering some of the more archaic bits of technology this is an impressive car. But are you sure you want to drive it across the world, with all the luggage that you’d have to bring?”

“Nothing beats sex with the driver of a 1986 Ragnarock Hargrove T-8.”

“I’d feel sorry for anyone stuck in the predicament. You’d have no room in the cabin for such escapades though.”

“Ah, youre right. Onto the next car then.”

“???”

Additional Comments

The Hargrove is most definitely the right car at the wrong place. Realistic engineering choices were made and overall stats are quite good for a sports car. Even its drivability, comfort, and safety stats are pretty decent compared to the competition. Perhaps the front brakes could be ventilated (it would be very helpful in a sports car), and a 3-way cat can be used, but other than those nitpicks there’s nothing to be flawed about the engineering.

In terms of design, while it is clearly inspired by contemporary American sports cars it does not look like a straight-up copy. The slightly curved edges of the glass at the rear hatch are an especially wonderful touch, and oh boy do I want to touch this vehicle. Could have been a finalist if some of the other entries were just a little less competitive.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Citrus 45Break Terrane
@CrazyCat808

“Goddamn. GOD ZIPP A DEE DOO DA ZAMN!!!”

“What a beautiful, precious machine.”

“We must have more. Five. Hundred. Citrus 45Break Terranes”

“It’s a dang reliable and economical machine alright but driving characteristics are apparently not very good.”

“You know I can handle a few compromises here and there as long as the car can take me to where I’m going.”

“This would be a little too big of a compromise sadly. We’ll take 500 once its kinks have been ironed out.”

Additional Comments

It goes without saying that the Citrus (and its promotional material) are works of art. Distinctly French without being a copycat. Asymmetrical. Sleek and very modern at heart, with added off-road capabilities thanks to its rugged cladding, bumper bars, rear steps, and roof rack. Absolute cinema, no real flaws to be found here.

As mentioned however, its drivability stat is among the lowest in the competition. Reliability is great and so is fuel economy, but this one stat along unfortunately cripples the Citrus. If it was just a little better engineered, the Citrus would have been a winner.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Kováč Zvládnout Výzkum Xkrát
@Aruna and @Est_Nbmstr

“I’m not gonna even begin to try and say its name.”

“Same here. It’s a damn good looking and rugged car though.”

“Yes, I do love how the front grille is the Czech flag too. How very patriotic of them. What’s your verdict, though?”

“It’s reliable, that’s for sure. driving characteristics are not the best, and in other areas it doess’t perform as well as some other cars. The inside of this is definitely somewhere you’d want to live in though. Never seen a car interior that looks this cozy!”

Additional Comments

I went into this challenge thinking I wouldn’t judge interiors, but the Kovac’s is simply too good to ignore. Seat materials are splendid, and there are plenty of details including gauges and all sorts of controls (and the little fire hydrant at the back) showing the care and attention that went into making this.

Outside, the colour choice and decals are impeccable. No flaws to point out here, just plain awe at the details that went into making the vehicle. This would’ve definitely been a finalist if not for the low drivability, as other stats are actually not too far behind from the rest.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Spander BE Break 16GTB
@Maxbombe and @66mazda

“Oh my days.”

“Those Gauls sure know how to design a vehicle. This is genuinely out of this world, like a spaceship on four wheels. The engineering from Kaizen really helps too, this thing apparently is very easy and fun to drive. Almost feels Germanic. Troll.”

“We must get this car NOW!”

“I’d say the same, but reliability is unfortunately not the best. It’s using some pretty fancy new tech which is good but may not be particularly good down your arduous journey. Let’s look at the other cars for now.”

“No.”

“Huh?”

“Troll.”

Additional Comments

As mentioned in the above dialog, the Spander is a spaceship. the low-slung and slightly hidden headlights, and slightly covered rear wheels only add to this effect. The surfacing on the sides of the vehicle are very nicely done, too. The more I look around, the more details and touches I find, as expected of your designs.

Unfortunately, reliability is an issue. In all fairness, the Spander does use some newer technologies including MPEFI and 4 valves per cylinder. But this also means that the stat ends up being lower than average (and quite significantly lower than the finalists), while purchase price ends up being quite high. If reliability was less of a concern, the Spander would have definitely been a finalist. But alas, RIP.


(Verdict: eliminated)


FCD Mirus 1.8
@NotChris07

After digging themselves out of the rubble, Bob and George directed their attention to one of two surviving vehicles, both of which happen to be plain white vans.

“Well, it’s a van alright. Dependable, fuel-sipping, spacious, and can be repaired by a toddler who puts a triangle block in a square-shaped hole.”

“Hmmm…”

Bob and George had another look around the car and decided against shortlisting the Mirus. Something about the details of the vehicle just seemed to not be right in their eyes.

Additional Comments

Overall engineering for the Mirus is good, with nothing particularly objectionable. Its price is good, fuel economy is good, and service costs are the lowest of any cars this round. This would have been a finalist however, if not for the design.

As good and versatile as the Hiace body is, it almost feels like the E90 body situation all over again where it becomes the default choice for any 80s van (even though it looks more 90s). Because the H100 it is based on is quite curvy, which has quite a few ramifications for the Mirus and other Hiace-based entries this round.

I can see that a lot of thought went into the exterior design of the Mirus, with thick bars and moulding features being used to spice the bumpers up a little. On the side, there are prominent character lines run between the front and rear wheels, as well as above them. There are even heating strips on the rear window.


deep ahh creases

The application of these ideas currently feels a little heavy-handed, however. The character lines feel like it is chiseled by a door wedge, and some panel lines look like it was drawn by a 2.0 size pencil lead. The van sits quite low, which reduces loading capacity but makes it look a little closer to Japanese brochure pics. The little kink at the front door windows also looks tacked on; its integration to the rest of the body could be better. The comments are not meant to disparage you in any way. The stuff that you put on the van is a definite sign of you stepping up as a designer, which is always good.

But again, the use of the H100 Hiace body really handicaps the design as a whole. It becomes a little challenging to make something that isn’t Hiace-y. The front is a decent departure away from Hiace, but the rear is too much of a H100 Hiace to ignore. A little squaring would improve the design by a lot. An example of this can be seen in the next car, the Saidenki.


(Verdict: eliminated)


Saidenki MUV 2.2L
@EnCR

“Look, another van! It kind of looks like a Super Guppy”

“Idk chief, as far as vans go this wouldn’t my top pick. It’s decently reliable but others do what it does better. It’s a little thirsty, but it’s also by far the most spacious thing you’ll ever find around here.”

“I see.”

Additional Comments

Though somewhat limited by the Hiace body, the MUV manages to un-H100 Hiace itself just a little bit thanks to little touches here and there. The a-pillar for instance is quite upright. The headlights and taillights are also quite boxy in contrast, helping the design feel much more period-correct. The crease underneath the rear window is a relatively nice and simple way to replicate the stamping that surrounds van windows around this time

If there’s one thing I’d add it would be to add little gutters on the roof, and maybe stretch the crease on the side all the way to the front. The gutter thing also applies to the FCD Mirus van, if you are reading this section.

As mentioned before however, the van’s reliability is a little lower than the competition and is quite thirsty, in addition to having a relatively low drivability score.


(Verdict: eliminated)


“Well, shame what happened to the forecourt.” Bob said. “Those were some pretty decent cars overall but nothing there really caught our fancy I guess.”

“It is what it is.” George replied, “That’s just part of the car shopping experience. Fortunately, I know just the place that would have the car you’re looking for!”

“And what might that place be?”

“It’s right in front of us!”

“You can always trust Finn Allister Auto Sales to have the best cars available in the market that are suited to your very specific needs!”

“Say that again?”

“It’s almost as if all the cars you’d shortlist would end up there.”


The Finalists

@Xepy
@Mad_Cat and @Tsundere-kun
@Falling_Comet
@Oreology and @iivansmith
@donutsnail
@chiefzach2018 and @variationofvariables


To be continued

28 Likes

pinoy-pride-philippine-flag

16 Likes

A [Presumably] Lower Midfield finish is honestly quite good going for the Manta. Happy with that and I can attempt to build on my improving designs and fix my biggest issues. [Reliability / Comfort]

3 Likes

Our Winson being in the finalist group is definite proof that Great Britain is truly the class leader of passenger car production

6 Likes

CSR now?!?!

that was fun. including the wait.

Anyways, thank you so much for the detailed critique - I really appreciate it! I did have a feeling the design was a bit too rounded for the time period, but it was nonetheless fun dipping my toes into the superdeep borehole that is patchwork and molding :stuck_out_tongue:

Congratulations to whoever made it till here and good luck to all the finalists!

6 Likes

Hey that’s a surprisingly good result! Had great fun with this challenge and I’m looking forward to seeing who’ll win in the end

3 Likes

LETS GO my first challenge entry that’s made it past the 1st round :face_holding_back_tears::face_holding_back_tears: I probably should have focused more on reliability and ruggedness but oh well. It was a good run though, and good luck to the finalists!!

4 Likes

csr when!!

4 Likes

Tomorrow™

2 Likes

Oh well, and I thought I wss joking when I wrote about a CSR round taking around a season :joy:

2 Likes

tomorrow™ when

3 Likes

I will give @S_U_C_C_U_L_E_N_T another week to at least post an update.

After that i will close the round and elect a new host based of the CSR167 results

8 Likes

I want to start with saying that I am not looking for a fight (more that I am genuinely curious), and that I really don’t like how CSR (and other challenges) has turned into kind of a slippery slope when it comes to delays, fact is that I have criticized it multiple times, which many people that are active on this board probably knows already.

I just want to know if there is a reason why this specific CSR is targeted for this here and now. It is by far NOT the most delayed continous challenge on this board, there has been ones that have taken a year to judge too, or close to it. And yes, I agree that is really bad and should not happen, but I haven’t seen moderators tracking down on challenges that has been delayed even more than this. If you are going to enforce some stricter policies on this, starting from CSR168 on, it could be good to know, I guess.

13 Likes

There have been multiple instances where we gave hosts a deadline for the hosting of the CSR-Rounds.

I will agree that we are mostly only doing this for the CSR rounds as they have a special status on the forums. We also have given out host bans for repeated offenders who were not able to finish said rounds.

We are not even asking for a final result, any update would be enough

5 Likes

Thanks for clarifying, as I said I was by no means looking to start an argument.

4 Likes

Hi all,

Firstly, I would like to apologize for the lack of updates. The finals have been delayed for the past few weeks on account of both vero and I being a bit busy lately, and me specifically choosing to spend my spare time with friends and family as opposed to our beloved spreadsheet simulator and the community that surrounds it. As my vollie shifts wind down for the Christmas break however, I now have more time to continue writing reviews. Vero is also helping some more in this time too. Results will come out soon.

That being said all you friendly forum users had to do was ask for an update in plain English. Yes, I am aware of the obligation to deliver reviews, but “CSR when” frustrates more than it motivates. What happened to simply asking “Any updates?”, or “It’s been X days/weeks, can we get an update?”, or “Any news on this?”. Hell, even saying that the reviews are something you look forward to after a long, arduous day would have gotten even the laziest host to continue working.

I’m not trying to throw shade or oppose Mikon’s directive either (an actual nudge and call for update is very much welcome), as I’ve neglected this CSR for much too long and an update is way overdue. In fact, I’d like to thank him for doing this. Thank you, @Mikonp7 for cracking the whip, making a clear-cut request, and putting care into CSR. But for everyone else, nagging of the “csr when” type isn’t going to make me do shit.

Have a good day and touch some grass (or snow) while we cook.

18 Likes

CSR168
Finals - Final Countdown

Finn Allister Auto Sales

“Hello, how are you?” a salesman asked as he approached Bob and George, “The name’s Sal E. Mann. What can I do for you today?”

“Why don’t we start with that boxy, red vehicle over there?” Bob said, pointing at a boxy, red vehicle.

“Which one?”

“The oh-so glorious and awe-inspiring…”


Winson Garnet Mk2 2000
@Mad_Cat and @Tsundere-kun

Sal:
“When it comes to passenger vehicle production, I firmly believe that Great Britain rules above all. Good things take time, and the strike down at the Winson factory ensured that all orders for the Garnet WILL come out good no matter what.”

Bob:
“Tell us more about this beauty.”

Sal:
“This van has been in production for quite a long time, and I’m sure you’ve seen it around quite a lot. This one’s updated compared to the older models. Now it has tough and durable plastic bumpers and arches, so you’d be less likely to nick the bodywork. And unlike most vans of its day, this one’s based on a car platform. So, it drives better than any van from the blue oval! Come take a look inside!”

George:
“Wow, it’s very spacious as expected from a van.”

Sal:
“That’s right, it’s only got five seats but that part doesn’t really matter to you now, does it?”

Bob:
“That’s true… Hold on, we’ve never told you what we were using the car for.”

Sal:
“Sal E. Mann always knows. Now, why don’t we take it out for a test drive?”

Sal:
“As you can probably tell, this thing goes from 0 to 60 eventually :speaking_head::speaking_head: :fire::fire::fire:.”

Bob:
“The engine’s very nice and torquey, so it’s got a bit of oomph that I didn’t expect. Road manners are pretty decent.”

George:
“This vehicle is supremely comfortable, too. The suspension tuning is good, not to mention the space this thing has.”

Sal:
“Well, what do you think about the Garnet then, gentlemen?”

George:
“It’s a wonderful car which truly has stood the test of time. But I do wonder how this would stack up against something more modern.”

Sal:
“Well, let’s have a look at the other red van, then.”

Additional comments

The Garnet is a handsome if less conventional approach to a van, with a short greenhouse and high-waisted body, and a less s q u a r e feel. Despite that, it’s a very handsome and intriguing looking car, though we found it to ride a little too low, which made the less conventional proportions more obvious. The monocoque underpinnings are pretty novel for the era, but the rest of the Garnet is built on very period-accurate engineering, so it’s hard to fault it.

Statistically, the Garnet puts up solid scores in raw practicality, passenger and cargo capacity, excellent ride comfort, and the best safety in the finals. That being said, drivability is just average, reliability, while high, is the second lowest in the finals, and fuel economy is the second worst among the finalists. Additionally, at $16,200 - the Garnet is the second most expensive car in the finals, but service costs are the second lowest.

Overall, the Garnet does a lot right, like design, practicality and interior space, rice comfort and safety - but it faulters plenty too, being quite expensive, not particularly efficient, and it isn’t the most reliable or nice to drive. Despite those problems, the Garnet is a strong performer in many areas, and makes a strong argument for itself.



Paige Tanager VL
@donutsnail

Sal:
“If the Winson’s a little too old fashioned for you, or if you simply want me to convict you of treason, the Paige Tanager is a good option. Think of the Winson as the Apollo 69, while this is the SkyLab. I wouldn’t say that it’s the most moden or sophisticated car in the market, but it certainly is pleasing to the eye.”

Bob:
“Looks quite American.”

Sal:
“Sure does, but this car is actually smaller than most American cars, so it’s perfect for our roads, and wherever you may be travelling next.”

George:
“It’s quite spacious in here. Not as much as the Garnet, but it’s still pretty good.”

Bob:
“Well, the Garnet looks more like a loaf of bread than this one. The Tanager has a proper bonnet and is most probably more related to its sedan sibling than the Garnet is.”

George:
“True… Now let’s get it out on the road and see how it drives.”

Bob:
“As expected of a newer car, it feels very nice and refined, more so than the other red van. Performance feels very similar, though.”

George:
“Well that’s slightly disappointing, isn’t it? You’d think that the newer car would be faster than the old one.”

Sal:
“Well, let me just say. The Garnet gets 24.8mpg. This thing, however, does 30.8.”

Bob and George:
“DAMN!!!”

Sal:
“Pretty good for a big box on wheels, don’t you think?”

Bob:
“It certainly is appealing, but do you have any smaller boxes on offer?”

Sal:
“Of course we do. Are you fucking blind?”

Additional comments

The Tanager by far the most realistically made car here, in everything that it does, whether that be engineering or design. Starting with design, the Tanager is a handsome, almost prototypically American idea of what a van looks like, with an understated and simple design at the surface, but one that’s packed full of detail when you get up close. Engineering is impressively solid as well, with solid reliability, the second highest fuel economy, the second highest drivability and raw practicality, and it’s the safest car here.

The Tanager has some problems though - despite having very high passenger space, interior cargo space leaves something to be desired, being the second lowest there in the finals. Additionally, at $14,900, the Tanager is one of the more expensive cars here, and it’s one of the most expensive cars to service as well. Comfort leaves something to be desired, and while the reliability is very good, it is in the bottom half in this field of cars at 75.7.

Overall, the Tanager does succeed in a few important areas - design, fuel economy, drivability, raw practicality, safety - but it does have a few important flaws; low interior cargo capacity, a higher purchase price and service costs, low comfort, and high but not class-leading reliability. Despite those few flaws, the Tanager does get plenty right, and makes a strong case.



Kaufmann Karree 1.6
@Xepy

Bob:
“No I am not. My eyes are open to the beauty that lies before our eyes.”

George:
“This one’s really handsome. You really can expect no less from a Kaufmann. It’s clearly utilitarian, yet elegant…”

Bob:
“The inside’s surprisingly spacious, too! I remember cars of this size being much smaller inside back in the day.”

Sal:
“Well, that’s the marvel of front wheel drive and a unibody construction for you, Bob. Why don’t we take it out for a spin?”

Bob:
“It definitely feels more lethargic than the two vans… But wow, this is a delight to drive. It’s light, nimble, and feels very solid.”

George:
“It’s pretty comfortable too, pretty close to those vans”

Sal:
“That’s what you get with independent suspension on all four wheels. Not many cars are able to do that at this price range, let alone a German one like this!”

Bob:
“The exhaust sounds quite splendid, too.”

Sal:
“That’s because this has a five-cylinder engine. It’s not every day you can see something like this. Granted it’ll mean slightly higher maintenance for you, but this car is still very unlikely to let you down.”

Additional comments

The Karee stands out from the rest of the crowd, being a small hatchback that packs a real punch. Drivability and sportiness are both the highest of any finalist. Interior room is surprisingly larger than one other entry, which I will discuss when the time comes.

The design feels like a combination of both Mercedes-Benz (I wonder why) and Volkswagen models. The Karee is definitely utilitarian, but there is definitely an air of elegance about it. Everything looks period correct and whatever ideas you had for the car were most certainly well-executed. The use of white UK plates on the rear is an offence punishable by death, however.

Due to the 5-cylinder engine however, the Karee is not as fuel-efficient as one might expect (it is thirstier than the Tanager, which has a bigger engine). The extra cylinder also means service costs at the higher end of the spectrum, while reliability is about average among finalists (76.8). Purchase cost however is $11,900 (second cheapest), making the Karee a tempting offer.



Tioro Terrano Voyager
@iivansmith and @Oreology

Bob:
“Wow.”

George:
“Aku jg mw :face_savoring_food:

Bob:
“This vehicle is a work of art. In other parts of the world, this would have been a normal executive sedan. Here though, they’ve chosen to sell it as a tougher and more rugged model. The engine is about as under-stressed as it gets, and it still runs a traditional body-on-frame setup. Or perimeter frame, either one.”

George:
“This is very nice and well-appointed. That analog clock is baller, and everything from the seats to the doors look very well-padded.”

Bob:
“Space seems to be at a premium compared to the previous stuff though…”

Sal:
"Well, you have the older architecture and rear-drive layout to the blame for that. Plus, it’s based on an executive sedan so clearly space is not a #1 priority. It’s not all bad though, try it out for yourself.

Bob and George:
“Bersiaplah :person_walking::person_walking::person_walking::person_walking::person_walking:

Bob:
“Wow, this is one torquey beast! Acceleration is surprisingly quick, too.”

George:
“The gears are short and are very tightly spaced, good on Tioro and Homada for making this very fit for purpose.”

Bob:
“True… This drives nothing like the Karee though, or even the Tanager. Perhaps it’s an unfair comparison, but I guess that’s what body on frame construction does to handling.”

George:
“It’s comfy and well-appointed inside… though I do wonder what a more basic car would look and feel like?”

Sal:
“Well…”

Additional comments

The Tioro is a gorgeous piece of kit, with tons of detail and attention applied to the designs, and collectively was one of our favorite designs in the entire challenge. Engineering is generally solid, but this running on a ladder frame was strange to both of us, and the 2509cc engine, while not really an issue, did catch our eye as a little foible of the Tioro’s engineering. Statistically, it does very well, with the second highest reliability in the finals, far and away the best fuel economy and prestige in the finals, solid drivability and good comfort.

However, the Tioro isn’t without its faults - due to the body choice and being a physically smaller car than some of your fellow finalists - raw practicality, passenger and cargo capacity are the lowest in the finals. Additionally, it’s not the safest in this pack of cars, service costs are just average, and at $19,000 - the Tioro is the most expensive car here.

For what the Tioro gets wrong, it comes back even stronger with what it gets right - impressively high reliablity that trails only the Quezon, the best fuel economy and prestige in the finals, and solid drivability and comfort scores to boot. That being said, it does make a few pretty big missteps - it’s the most expensive car here, and the smallest car here when it comes to raw practicality and interior space. Despite that, the Tioro makes a very strong case for itself.


Quezon Custom Built
@variationofvariables and @chiefzach2018

Sal:
“…if basic is what you’re looking for, there can really only be-”

Bob:
“Putaningina, si Quezon Custom Built”

George:
“rr RR URR AA AA AAA”

Sal:
“The Custom Built has very solid underpinnings, being based on stuff from the war. And if you love chrome, you most certainly will love this vehicle. If you ever find yourself being chased down by criminals or militia in your adventures, just go to somewhere sunny and it’s over for them.”

Bob:
“This is huge though… probably the size of a lot of full-size luxury cars.”

Sal:
“Well it WAS built as public transportation. Just look at the seats! Legally, you can seat nine but back where it was from you could have fitted MacArthur’s entire army as he bombed the shit out of both the Japanese and whatever was left of Manila.”

George:
“No wonder why it’s so spacious inside… you can practically lie down and sleep on these seats!”

Sal:
“Are you gentlemen ready to terrorize the road and honk at anyone who comes your way?”

Bob and George:
“Of course.”

George:
“You can most certainly call this a Lockheed A-12 the way it handles like an oxcart!”

Bob:
“I feel as one with the road. Never thought I’d feel the bump from a speck of dust on the road but here I am.”

Sal:
“Stop complaining. I will not be tolerating unwarranted slander against peak automotive engineering. You asked for something basic, right? Well, here it is!”

Bob:
“Would it really be worth it to do a long ass trip in something like this though? Something tells me that actual windows and insulation would come a long way.”

Sal:
“First of all, none of us has a physical form that can actually feel heat, rain, or mosquito bites. Secondly, eight thousand seven hundred and fifty Automation dollar car.”

Bob:
“Cars at a cheap price :exclamation_question_mark::exclamation_question_mark:

George:
“Satisfactory”

Additional comments

Without a doubt the most ornate vehicle of this challenge. My laptop seemed to struggle loading both this and the Terrano the most. Truly a masarap lechon sinangag halo halo balut adobo moment.

The pedestrian hazards up front aside (their blood and organs can stain the chrome ornaments for all I care), the Custom Built is full of details as shown in its ad. One thing it doesn’t show however, is this speaker. Perfect for blasting and singing My Way with.

Similarly, the ceilling is padded with padded vinyl, a practice that continues to this day in all forms of privately-owned buses in the SEAman region.


ceiling of the Sistine Chapel

Being the single cheapest car of this round (and by a large margin), the Quezon understandably has some lower stat figures, especially in drivability, comfort, and safety (who cares). However, reliability and service costs are best in class (80.6 and $391.8), and interior room is second only to the Garnet. This makes the Quezon a very tempting proposition if the comfort and lack of windows can be tolerated.



Suisei Yama - Kōjun Y60
@Falling_Comet

Bob:
“Yo, is that a La-”

George:
"Shut your bitchass up.

Sal:
“If you like big engines, then the Suisei will surely not disappoint. Let’s just say that this thing is powered by 3 litres of pure, unadulterated Japanese iron… Producing a mind-boggling 112hp!!!”

Bob and George:
“DAMN!!!”

Sal:
“Inside it’s quite big, too. Lots of headroom, space to fit skis, wood panels and whatnot.”

Bob:
“Hmm… It feels just a tad bit narrow, though.”

Sal:
“Well, you’d be right there but it really doesn’t look like it from the outside. At least you’d be able to navigate city centres relatively easily with this one.”

George:
“We shall see when once we have a go at it.”

Bob:
“Well, this one drives marginally better than the Quezon.”

George:
“It is certainly better appointed, and you are actually covered from the elements.”

Bob:
“I reckon this is worth it for the engine alone. There truly no replacement for displacement, even if it’s not very powerful!”

George:
“Again, I feel like this cabin could be just a bit bigger. But feels sensible. As expected of Susei Heavy Industries.”

Bob:
“You really can’t go wrong with them. By the way, how much fuel does this baby drink?”

Sal:
“20.3mpg”

George:
“Understandable. Though actually, that could have been a lot worse.”

Additional comments

Perhaps I didn’t read each and every single stat carefully, but I was wondering why the Suisei’s passenger and cargo volume was a little low whhen I found this out:

image
damn!!!

Most Japanese cars of the time would have been just under 1.7m wide, with a very similar looking Toyota product being precisely 1,666.2mm wide (as per Wikipedia). The red block represents the real Land Cruiser’s width:

Perhaps a wider body would’ve improved comfort and practicality. Overall stats remain solid however, with the only drawbacks being high service costs (due to having 2 more cylinders than the others) and poor fuel economy (ditto). Reliability is among the best, although I suspect that the score ended up being slightly lower because of the extra cylinders. Otherwise, this is a superbly made pixel-perfect rendition of the Land Cruiser, apart from the rear barn doors which appear to be frameless down the middle.



Bob:
“That was a most interesting experience. I still can’t decide between them because they were all so good.”

George:
“Your ahh really that indecisive, huh? Why don’t you choose a car that speaks to your heart the most?”

Bob:
“I’m just worried about the reliability and economy of those cars… The salesman can say whatever the hell he wants. I need less biased information.”

George:
“My brother in Christ just refer to the spreadsheet… The manufacturers didn’t give us the .car files for no reason.”

Bob:
The what?


After doing their own research and checking files on George’s personal desktop computer, Bob and George went back to the dealership and bought the car of their choice.

And that car in question is...

The Kaufmann Karee 1.6


Though limited by its small size, the Karee manages to impress with its combination of reliability, economy, and comfort, all at a price lower than most rivals making it a great companion for Bob’s journey. It was a very tough decision to make given how compelling the other entries are, but in the end, there can really only be one.

Rankings

  1. Kaufmann Karree 1.6 (@Xepy)
  2. Quezon Custom Built (@variationofvariables and @chiefzach2018)
  3. Paige Tanager VL (@donutsnail)
  4. Tioro Terrano Voyager (@iivansmith and @Oreology)
  5. Winson Garnet Mk2 2000 (@Mad_Cat and @Tsundere-kun)
  6. Suisei Yama - Kōjun Y60 (@Falling_Comet)

More rankings will be generated as needed.

Thank you for participating and bearing with the quarter-long round. I hope you all had fun making cars for this and experimenting with the new Al Rilma features (before that all became stable). I look forward to seeing what the next CSR brings.

I would also like to take this opportunity to wish everyone reading this a Merry Christmas, and a happy new year. And 恭喜发财 as well in case the next CSR goes well into February.

a cartoon character is wearing a santa hat and carrying a white bag
Merry Christmas

Thank you and have a good rest of the year!



26 Likes

It’s 恭喜發財 you unripe grapefruit. Massive props for the first beta Al Rilma CSR round and congratulations to the winner!

6 Likes