Mine are also in alignment with what my company would use in 1985. (you can probably figure out the specs for each engine based on the names) Single family, three variants, two actual displacements.
I just dropped in updated Ford 302s from 69.
And I just dropped in a retuned version of the very fuel inefficient engine I made for the Terrible SuperECO. Sadly it makes 0.4-0.5 MPG too much at 0.7 MPG, but at least it is below 1 MPG!
Is the ruin! You’re hired. I like it the dissasters. 
I feel like I’ve gotten NA engines pretty decently pegged down now, get them to work as they should and understand (mostly) how they are affected. Turbos on the other hand… they don’t make sense to me at all and become mediocre at best. Which is of course why I will gladly supply the standard model of the Peppermint NE-2 with just such an engine 
well this ends tomorrow it would seem
Yep! There may be a little bit of a delay after the deadline if anyone needs to resubmit due to issues, but the contest should be ending in ~27 hours and the results not long afterwards. 
A note from Weiler Motor Company Engineering Department in regards to engine sourcing with project ‘PE’ …
"…and while I understand in full why this contract is very lucrative to the company as a whole.
I am uncertain as to just what actually needs to be done.
While we have tailored 2 budget variants of our AR/AV-4 25 motors for 2 of the models, and developed a 1.6L OHV motor for the standard package, these were done per several reasons.
As you know of the modular engine program, which is in stage 2 as stage 3 is months from early test, the purpose is to construct engine blocks for varying purposes, and both engines in the sport and delux variants have produced considerable results.
Our chief concerns include if what is current, can properly stack up with the competition.
While our motors are reliable even when built our budgets, there has been a concern for fuel economy. We are running out of time and I need to know if economy is our absolute goal, or a proper balance of performance, economy and usability.
I will be eager to hear your reply within the next 12 hours.
From -name classified-
From …"
Which is a story way of saying I’m …unsure.
I’m sticking to what engines I’ve built in the past and what would suit the company.
But I’m torn between various ends, including economy or outright performance. Maybe I’ll simply submit and see how far down I’ll rank up. -sighs-
…hm. I think I can say with confidence that you will not be the least economical in the competition.
In the interest of the RP.
Excerpt from communications between Peppermint and LHE.
“…while we appreciate the concern over the use of an OHV design with the ever tightening emission restrictions placed on vehicles, it should be noted that we (LHE) were among one of the first American automotive establishments to make the switch to engines designed to run on non-leaded fuel reaching full compliance by 1974 with the introduction of the second generation XM family of engines. It should be noted that the engines which have been test fitted into the NE.2 have been in no way modified over the standard production units used in today’s LHE lineup, which allows us to sell them to you at such a low price. While we strive to build exceptionally reliable engines, breakdowns are unavoidable, and with the XM families nearly complete interchangeability of parts, acquiring parts, whenever needed, is exceedingly simple. That is something to keep in mind from other providers which may be tailoring engines or even designing all new variants for Peppermints NE.2 project…”
From Drivetrain Engineering at Ardent Motors Corporation:
“The Taurus-series motors supplied for the Peppermint NE.2 model series represents the latest incarnation based on decades of engineering and production excellence from Ardent Motors. Continuous improvement and analysis in design and real-world application have led to many improvements over the years. As always, reliability, low maintenance cost, and efficiency are the foremost design concerns. The 3rd phase Taurus-series motors are already slated for launch on the 1985 Ardent Manhattan, with a High-Output version available on both the Manhattan and the Smoke coupe. We are proud to be able to offer and adapt full drivetrain modules for the NE.2 project. Enclosed are the specifications for the new TB8-E and TB8-E-HO engines, as well as gear ratios and performance testing data from the refitted NE.2 prototypes.”
**[size=120]Uni 19D2MP [/size]**for the standard trim
at first. our engineer tried to meddle with the already existing engine. but they just cannot get anything that’s satisfactory for them.
not changing the bores and lining, not even turbo. they blamed it on the valvetrain. maybe it’s just old tech, or maybe they just haven’t worked much with it so they don’t know what to do with it.
we end up doing an overhaul on the engine. so much things done they it can almost be said it was designed from scratch.
using the same block, they changed the cylinder lining to a heavier alloy but a more solid ones. the coolant flow paths is being redone, the ECM and injection systems are also changed for more efficiency. the block heads are fully design from the ground up. but only at this point that someone realised they f*cked up. this is not a one off engine, we’re supposed to be mass producing this engine.
“we can’t possibly do all this manually one by one by hands. Duuh” *facepalm
so after wasting money and time, they finally just designed one from scratch that uses some of the components being used from the original engine, and some of the measurements too, for cost cutting and making up time that they lost.
this is what we end up with. 1.9l DOHC 8v inline 4 engine with good reliability, efficiency, and acceptable performance.
[size=120]CE - Lux[/size] trim for the Luxury trim
[size=120]CE - Sport[/size] trim for the Sport trim
inline six for both the luxury and performance trims. because it delivers both good performance and a smooth engine.
With about an hour left in the competition, let me go ahead and give a hearty and public “thank you!” to everyone who is participating. I’m signing off for the night, but submissions will close at 11:59:59 on schedule, so please get those last-second PMs in. I’ll update the “Pending” list with all submissions I haven’t yet verified in the morning, so let me know if you don’t see your name listed; once I have a chance to check the entries themselves, you should be getting a PM letting you know if you’re all set or if there are issues that may need resolving. Results will follow once there aren’t any more issues or if it becomes clear that the remaining entries cannot be fixed in any reasonable timeframe; I don’t expect the latter, but we are playing an Early-Access title, and funny things happen.
Thank you again, and good luck to all!
Edit: Well, never mind, then - apparently I am still awake, and can close entries on time. Expect PMs sometime tomorrow, probably afternoon EST.
I’m happy with the Montes engines that I submitted
Okay, that worked out pretty well. Results should be coming later today.
10-4, hopefully by the time i get home, doubt it though
15 entrants. 20 engine families. 43 engine variants. It pleases me enormously that this simple format attracted so much interest.
The Peppermint Automobile Company will, of course, have many factors to weigh in deciding what engine to buy - how far do they need to be shipped? will the supplier still be in business in five years? how hard will it be to train the mechanics at Peppermint’s dealerships on maintenance procedures? and so on - but before asking any of those questions, they have to decide which engines most attract their interest. So, without further ado:
[size=150]Results[/size]
In the Standard category, the winning engine is the Standard variant of cpufreak101’s VI-150 with 48 points, ahead of conan’s Mitsushita 4J2Z-GG at 42.5 and vmo’s Montes 634-I at 39 - congratulations to you.
In the Deluxe category, the winning engine is Lordred’s LHE X8M E85T with 45.5 points, ahead of koolkei’s CE Lux at 43 and the Deluxe variant of Puffster’s ABR Peppermint at 41 - congratulations to you.
In the Sport category, the winning engine is the Sport variant of Puffster’s ABR Peppermint at 42, ahead of vmo’s Montes VE394-TT at 41 and the tie between the Sport variant of cpufreak101’s VI-150 and High Octane Love’s Bogliq 8BE40S at 40 - congratulations to you.
Winning the Single-Supplier category with 121.5 points is Lordred - congratulations!
The winner of the One-Block category, and second place in the Single-Supplier category, is cpufreak101 with 115.5 points, followed by conan with 112.5 points and Puffster with 112 points. Additionally, VicVictory gets an Honorable Mention for scoring 105 points using only two engine variants between the three trims, placing fourth in both Standard and Deluxe with the Taurus Phase 3 TB8-E. Congrants to all of you.
Finally, the sole entrant in the In-House category is simo4295, who through heroic effort and a complete disregard for engine lifespan managed to produce 42 points. (Particularly impressive: 5th place in the Muscle metric for the Standard trim. Out of a 1.4L!) Congratulations, and thank you very much for entering.
[size=150]Final Scores[/size]
Italics = multiple engine families; underline = Peppermint 1.2 block. Tied entries are marked “(tied)”; otherwise, the first listed wins the tie.
Standard Scores:
[ul]]cpufreak101 (VI-150 - 3.3L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI): 48/:m]
]conan (Mitsushita 4J2Z-GG - 3.0L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI): 42.5/:m]
]vmo (Montes 634-I - 3.0L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI): 39/:m]
]VicVictory (Taurus Phase 3 TB8-E - 4.4L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 38/:m]
]Rossriders (AR4p Standard - 2.5L I4, SOHC 4v MPFI): 37/:m]
]Lordred (LHE X4M E85T - 1.7L I4, OHV MPFI Turbo): 37 (tied)/:m]
]High Octane Love (Bogliq 8BE34B - 3.4L V8FP, SOHC 4v MPFI): 37 (tied)/:m]
]Riso (Ford 302 - 5.0L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 35/:m]
]MadamVastra (Argent 6 2.0 EFi - 2.0L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI): 33/:m]
]koolkei (Uni 19D2MP - 1.9L I4, DOHC 2v MPFI): 31/:m]
]07CobaltGirl (Chevy 305-LB9 - 5.0L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 29.5/:m]
]Puffster (ABR Peppermint - 3.4L V8XP, DOHC 4v MPFI Turbo): 29/:m]
]simo4295 (Modified Peppermint 1.2 - 1.4L I4, DAOHC 2v, MPFI Turbo): 22/:m]
]CadillacDave (B1 Series B150 - 1.6L I4, SOHC 4v SPFI): 18/:m]
]nerd (Incredibly Economical Engine - 10.9L V8XP, OHV 4B Turbo): 4/:m][/ul]
Deluxe Scores:
[ul]]Lordred (LHE X8M E85T - 3.3L V8XP, OHV MPFI Turbo): 45.5/:m]
]koolkei (CE Lux - 2.7L I6, SOHC 3v MPFI): 43/:m]
]Puffster (ABR Peppermint - 3.5L V8XP, DOHC 4v MPFI Turbo): 41/:m]
]VicVictory (Taurus Phase 3 TB8-E - 4.4L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 36/:m]
]MadamVastra (Argent 6 2.5 EFi - 2.5L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI): 35/:m]
]Rossriders (AJ5 Standard - 5.0L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 34/:m]
]conan (Mitsushita 4J2Z-GM - 3.0L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI): 33/:m]
]07CobaltGirl (Chevy 350-L98 - 5.7L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 32.5/:m]
]High Octane Love (Bogliq 8BE40E - 4.0L V8FP, SOHC 4v MPFI): 31/:m]
]vmo (Montes V8400N - 4.0L V6, SOHC 4v MPFI): 29/:m]
]cpufreak101 (VI-150 - 3.5L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI): 27.5/:m]
]Riso (Ford 302 - 5.0L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 19.5/:m]
]simo4295 (Modified Peppermint 1.2 - 1.4L I4, DAOHC 2v MPFI): 9/:m]
]nerd (Incredibly Economical Engine - 10.9L V8XP, OHV 4B Turbo): 4/:m][/ul]
Sport Scores:
[ul]]Puffster (ABR Peppermint - 3.2L V8XP, DOHC 4v MPFI): 42/:m]
]vmo (Montes VE394-TT - 3.9L V8FP, DOHC 4v MPFI Turbo): 41/:m]
]cpufreak101 (VI-150 - 3.8L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI Turbo): 40 (tied)/:m]
]High Octane Love (Bogliq 8BE40S - 4.0L V8FP, SOHC 4v MPFI): 40 (tied)/:m]
]Lordred (LHE X8M P85T - 3.8L V8XP, OHV MPFI Turbo): 39 (tied)/:m]
]Riso (Ford 302 - 5.0L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 39 (tied)/:m]
]conan (Mitsushita 4J2Z-GTG - 3.0L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI Turbo): 37 (tied)/:m]
]koolkei (CE Sport - 3.0L I6, SOHC 3v MPFI): 37 (tied)/:m]
]MadamVastra (Argent 6 2.0 Turbo - 2.0L I6, DOHC 4v MPFI Turbo): 36/:m]
]07CobaltGirl (Chevy 350-L98X - 5.7L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 35/:m]
]VicVictory (Taurus Phase 3 TB8-E-HO - 4.4L V8XP, OHV MPFI): 31/:m]
]Rossriders (AR4p Sport - 2.5L I4, SOHC 4v MPFI): 26/:m]
]CadillacDave (Baby Six 3000 - 3.0L V6, DOHC 4v SPFI): 22/:m]
]simo4295 (Modified Peppermint 1.2 - 1.4L I4, DAOHC 2v MPFI Turbo): 11/:m]
]nerd (Incredibly Economical Engine - 10.9L V8XP, OHV 4B Turbo): 4/:m][/ul]
Combined Scores:
[ul]]Lordred: 121.5/:m]
]cpufreak101: 115.5/:m]
]conan: 112.5/:m]
]Puffster: 112/:m]
]koolkei: 111/:m]
]vmo: 109/:m]
]High Octane Love: 108/:m]
]VicVictory: 105/:m]
]MadamVastra: 104/:m]
]Rossriders: 97/:m]
]07CobaltGirl: 97/:m]
]Riso: 93.5/:m]
]simo4295: 42/:m]
]nerd: 12/:m][/ul]
[size=150]Calculation Sheets[/size]
Entries-v2.zip (26.7 KB)
As you can see, the calculations for this competition were quite simple. That’s not to say that I didn’t manage to introduce a bug into the spreadsheet anyway, because I absolutely did (it was in the calculation of tied results, for the record), but all things considered, this was a pretty straightforward process.
The spreadsheet itself is broken out into eight sheets. The first four cover the competition between all entrants - one sheet for each trim and one sheet for the combined categories. The second four sheets add the old 1982 Peppermint 1.2L Electro drivetrain from the NE-1 for comparison. (It would hypothetically have placed between Riso and simo4295 at 73 points: tied with simo4295 at 24 in Standard, between cpufreak101 and Riso at 22 in Deluxe, and between Rossriders and CadillacDave at 27 in Sport.)
This was definitely a fun learning experience for me - I hope to build off it to run more and better competitions in the future. And if anyone wants to employ a similar formula for their own competition, feel free to adapt these sheets to that end.
Edit: Oh, and thanks again to Lordred for more Stupid High Resolution Helplining - I have to admit, I giggled like a fiend at the thought of sending him his own freaking entry for photographing. 
2nd overall, that’s probably the best i have ever gottel (at least i won out on the standard )
Shoot, only half a point out of podium finish 
Really enjoyed the format, thanks for another great challenge Packbat, always a pleasure and quick followup! Congrats to Lordred, I think I will tell my driver to aim for your car in the BRC race next round 
Who said 80s turbos couldn’t be useful!