Hoon Competition (1994) [Top Three Reviews Posted]

There are many reasons to own a car. It may be a requirement of a job. It may be a requirement to get to one’s job. It may be a mark of status.

But for some, the value of the car is a bit more … visceral.

A hoon is, in a word, obnoxious. They do burnouts on public roads. They race on public roads. Their cars are loud, brash, and - for the hoons, at least - ridiculously good fun.

For this competition, we are drifting back in time to Peak Hoon - the mid-1990s - and offering a simple goal: make the ‘best’ hoontastic production car ever. Your budget is meagre, and - being an auto manufacturer - you have to maintain at least the appearance of legality … but let’s see what you can do.

(Thanks to Shaded009 in the Out of Africa competition for inspiration, Leonardo9613 and NexxusDrako for early feedback on the challenge design in the IRC channel, and Lordred for beta-reading the final draft ruleset. Errors that remain are my own.)

[size=125]Rules:[/size]

[ul]
]Base game + Pyrlix’s “High Quality Essentials” Steam Workshop collection only/:m]
]1994 (or earlier) on all tabs/:m]
]Must use unleaded fuel/:m]
]No Race Intakes/:m]
]No Race Tubular headers/:m]
]Must have a catalytic converter/:m]
]Must have at least one muffler/:m]
]Engine reliability > 0/:m]
]Vehicle reliability > 0/:m]
]Safety at least 33/:m]
]$12 000 or less target price (visible in the Market tab)/:m]
]Vehicle must be saleable (Competitiveness > 0 in at least one market segment) in Fruinia in 1994/:m][/ul]
(I believe Competitiveness > 0 in Fruinia will be satisfied if all other criteria are satisfied.)

If an entry is ineligible for any reason, I will post to that effect in the thread. Corrections I can do trivially on my end (e.g. “redline should be 7700 RPM”, “sorry, please use the v2 trim in the .zip file as my entry”) are free; otherwise, I allow up to two revisions of any nature for any reason prior to the deadline. (If you send me an ineligible revision to an eligible entry, I will keep the eligible entry, but it will still count toward the revision limit.)

[size=125]Scoring:[/size]

In each scored criterion, a car’s value will be equal to:

this - worst -------------- * (criterion value) best - worst
So, for example, if the best Utility of the field were 50, the worst 10, and Utility were valued at $4000, then a car with a Utility of 34 would have a value of $2400 for that criterion.

(Edit: Utility is not valued at $4000. Utility is valued at $0. Do not optimize for Utility.)

The final score of a given car is equal to the sum of the values for each criterion minus the running costs in Fruinia and 15% of the target price.* In other words, the net value of the car over and above the cost of ownership.

[size=85]* 15% here represents an annualized version of the purchase price, assuming the car is owned for five years and then resold.[/size]

The scored criteria are:
[ul]
]15% of Total Cost (flat deduction, as above)/:m]
]Running Costs in Fruinia (flat deduction, as above)/:m]
]Wheelspin (higher = better)/:m]
]Limited-Slip Differential (Open & Manual Locker = 0, Automatic Locker = 0.75, Viscous LSD & Geared LSD = 1)/:m]
]Rear-Wheel Drive (AWD = 0.5, FWD = 0, 4x4 scored as if 2WD option were selected)/:m]
]Quarter Mile Speed (not time)/:m]
]Prestige/:m]
]Sportiness/:m]
]Drivability/:m]
]Number of Seats (max 6 scored)/:m]
]Cargo Volume/:m]
]Comfort/:m][/ul]
For this competition, each of these criteria is worth $1000 except LSD, which is worth $500. Values for criteria will be read from the .lua files for added precision.

Final scores and parenthetical comments will be given for all cars; the top three will be compared in review format.

[size=125]Entry Format:[/size]

Please name your vehicle in Automation as follows:
[ul]
]Model name: Hoon-[username]-[anything]/:m]
]Trim name: [anything]/:m]
]Family name: Hoon-[username]-[anything]/:m]
]Variant name: [anything]/:m][/ul]
(You may abbreviate or misspell your username so long as you are unambiguous.)

Entries should be submitted in folderized .zip files, as can be generated by the Export function of the game. Include in the PM with your entry:
[ul]
]The name of your car company, with favored abbreviation if desired (e.g. “Packbat Auto Works (PAW)”)/:m]
]The name of the vehicle submitted for review (e.g. “Pteropus GT”)/:m]
]Any other information about your entry you think I should know (e.g. “GT stands for ‘Goodbye, Tyres’”)/:m][/ul]
The deadline is 11:59:59 p.m. EST on Wednesday, November 18th.

[size=125]Accepted Entries[/size]

[ul]
]Packbat - PAW Pteropus GT (reference only)/:m]
]thecarlover - Solo Loon XS/:m]
]TheTom - AMW Rooster/:m]
]Leonardo9613 - Baltazar Quark 1.6 EX/:m]
]Riso - 1993 Riso Motors SHX/:m]
]strop - MM Excelsior Rosso Corsa/:m]
]Sebesseg - Heisler Kardhal Sargossa 323 T/S/:m]
]Madrias - Storm Automotive Savage TT/:m]
]nialloftara - Centauri Commune Neutrino FX/:m]
]oppositelock - GSI Dingo/:m]
]koolkei - Komodo Motors Cavaro Fox/:m]
]Lordred - LHE Astonish X4PE-Lite/:m][/ul]

[size=125]Results[/size]

[ul]
]Rankings, 11-4, plus misc. trivia./:m]
]Top Three Reviews/:m]
]Scoring Spreadsheet/:m][/ul]

Is high or low wheelspin the better one, I’m pretty sure I know the answer to this but just making sure.

Yes, high wheelspin is better - I’ll edit to clarify.

“So, for example, if the best Utility of the field were 50, the worst 10, and Utility were valued at $4000, then a car with a Utility of 34 would have a value of $2400 for that criterion.”

i still don’t understand this part… where does the value of the ‘best value’ and ‘worst value’ comes from??

and 15% of the target price means, 15% * Sales price. right?

Sliding scale based on what we makes, it’s the best and worst entry’s score.

ohhhhhhh ok then

i’ll try to do a quick design

[quote=“koolkei”]“So, for example, if the best Utility of the field were 50, the worst 10, and Utility were valued at $4000, then a car with a Utility of 34 would have a value of $2400 for that criterion.”

i still don’t understand this part… where does the value of the ‘best value’ and ‘worst value’ comes from??[/quote]

As nialloftara said, these would be the best and worst values of the entries I’ve received. Basically, it doesn’t matter what the maximum or minimum theoretical values are - car shoppers are going to judge vehicles compared to the best and worst they’ve seen.

Correct.

Looking forward to your entry!

[quote=“Packbat”]
As nialloftara said, these would be the best and worst values of the entries I’ve received. Basically, it doesn’t matter what the maximum or minimum theoretical values are - car shoppers are going to judge vehicles compared to the best and worst they’ve seen.

Correct.

Looking forward to your entry![/quote]

okay. makes sense

it’s not a quick design afterall…
compromise between cargo and utility with everything else…

a lot of question.

since the price limit is the of the sale price… will there be any extra points is i get it under $12k?
also. it’s on 0% margin right? if i do get some points, based on what? the biggest margin i can get while still keeping it under $12k?

you said 0.5 score for AWD. im guessing 1 for RWD. but since i kinda derped and skipped that… what’s the point for FWD? i just tried to make 3 cars, all of em FWD.

[quote=“koolkei”]it’s not a quick design afterall…
compromise between cargo and utility with everything else…[/quote]

Aagh, sorry - no points for utility. Utility is not a scored statistic. I’ll add a note to the OP.

15% of the sale price is deducted from your score, so each $100 under the limit is effectively $15 added to your score (all else being equal).

Yes, 0% markup. I couldn’t figure out a good way to reward marking up the list price (or a good way to calculate minimum required markups), so I didn’t.

It’s 1 for RWD and 0 for FWD. FWD was still pretty competitive in my experiments, though - FWD drivetrains are a lot cheaper.

(Edit: Adding a note on that, too.)

This is a post purely to remind myself that I need to enter this because BURNOUT.

so if i do FWD…i get zero points for the drive train…

i designed this, and almost posted this…
last night… but then a power outage, so. fuckit and i went to sleep.
and came back to that post above…

sooooooo
where’s the trash bin again?

alsoooooo
manual vs automatic???

So, uh, I decided I’d try making a turbo car out of the not-Alfa body.

It’s damn hard making a turbo car for 12k or less, even in 1994. I ended up having to cut the quality of just about everything so reliability and general build quality is kind of shit.

…my god, I made an Alfa.

I chose the Opel Calibra-ish body which is big. That’s why I had to go for pretty cheap options almost everywhere… even under the bonnet, unless we’re talking about capacity :smiley:

@koolkei: The styling on the Cavaro Fox is pretty sweet, but I can understand your decision to start over.

[quote=“koolkei”]alsoooooo
manual vs automatic???[/quote]

Manual vs. automatic is not scored. (Maybe it should be, but it isn’t.) Pick that however you see fit.

I should be clear: the ten criteria listed in the OP, plus Fruinia running costs and total price, are the only factors that go into my scoring spreadsheet. I know sometimes people forget to list all the relevant criteria, but I want to be absolutely clear that that is not the case here. If it isn’t listed in the Scoring section of the ruleset, it doesn’t affect your score.

Presenting the 1994 Solo Loon XS! Perfect for the hoon in everyone.

I had to choose between burnouts or decent acceleration. Let’s just say the tires will have to be frequently replaced…

goddamit… even after i make an RWD competitor im still not sure if i want to submit the RWD one.

the FWD is almost 6 out of 10 better in some categories
lower weight, higher drivability, better fuel eco (not that this matters), better safety, higher utility and lower price.

but both have low burnouts in favor of everything else…

do i take the blunt penalty of submitting an FWD and hope it makes up on everything else
or forge ahead with the worse RWD… but have better chance of being at least average score

A quick note: fuel economy affects running costs, and running costs do matter.

A footnote, in case anyone was wondering: the reference car does not count when determining endpoints of ranges. If it, for example, were to have less wheelspin than any real entry, I would edit the wheelspin cell on its line in the spreadsheet to put it in a tie with the minimum among the actual entries.

(Going for 100% transparency with my process here.)

[quote=“Packbat”]

A quick note: fuel economy affects running costs, and running costs do matter.[/quote]

[size=85]
waiiiiiitttttttt there’s nothing on the OP saying anything about running cost… if it does matter… i say fudge to RWD. im submitting my cavaro now[/size]

nope derp.

im set on the cavaro. just need to a little bit more setup

In that case, please add Running Costs in Fruinia to the criteria listed in the OP, because currently, I don’t see it! (And I was debating whether to go richer on the fuel mix).