[size=200]MONEY NO LIMIT![/size]
Materials specifically; and the reason for it. IDC about ‘too high tech’ stuff, because that’s the point!
Tantalum Hafnium Carbide: Extremely high melting point.
Boron Carbide: Very lightweight, super reliable, super stiff.
M.Y.T. (Massive Yet Tiny): Engine Design; look it the crap up!
Call up Bugatti or Pagani and tell them about your idea! Maybe they’ll do it and pay you highly for the suggestion 
[size=30]i doubt it’ll happen, though[/size]
Y u no has idea?
Fuck it I’ll feed this
Add spherical valves to you super engine.
coatesengine.com/csrv-advantages.html
Also CCB these kinda posts should be in “off topic” general chat is for game related topics only.
You do know Aerogel is not fully solid, right? Tough to make an engine out of that.
[size=50]_[/size]
[quote=“nialloftara”]Fuck it I’ll feed this
Add spherical valves to you super engine.
coatesengine.com/csrv-advantages.html
Also CCB these kinda posts should be in “off topic” general chat is for game related topics only.[/quote]
I didn’t know there was a section for that… oops.
EDIT: This problem is fixed.
[quote=“CCB”]
This isn’t necessarily aerogel, it’s just a material as light as aerogel.
newsoffice.mit.edu/2014/new-ultrastiff-ultralight-material-developed-0619[/quote]
It has the stiffness of rubber… I can’t fathom making an engine out of that.
So everyone is going to just critique my picking of materials and not find stuff to replace it? Wow… 
Remember, read the first post before posting.
Because it doesn’t make any sense mate. The materials are way too advanced and barely, if not at all, used by car manufacturers on a big scale.
It can be fun to add this as Future DLC later on, when Hybrid cars come and such (and will then those materials still be needed?)
For now, its way too complex and also the engine designer is locked to any further development.
The first thing that will happen next is revamping the turbo calculations.
[quote=“WizzyThaMan”]Because it doesn’t make any sense mate. The materials are way too advanced and barely, if not at all, used by car manufacturers on a big scale.
It can be fun to add this as Future DLC later on, when Hybrid cars come and such (and will then those materials still be needed?)
For now, its way too complex and also the engine designer is locked to any further development.
The first thing that will happen next is revamping the turbo calculations.[/quote]
Read the posts in this thread to find out that I accidentally put this in the wrong category: General, instead of Off Topic. And too advanced? That’s the point! Remember the MONEY NO LIMIT sign?
maybe you should read all the replies to your posts and the OP and try again!
There is no point theorising about weird uber-materials to make engines out of; the IC engine is going to be phased out for the electric motor and investment in hyper expensive, probably toxic and hard to find materials just isn’t worth anyones time or money… Being polite on the forum also earns you many internet points 
[quote=“HighOctaneLove”]
sign?
maybe you should read all the replies to your posts and the OP and try again!
There is no point theorising about weird uber-materials to make engines out of; the IC engine is going to be phased out for the electric motor and investment in hyper expensive, probably toxic and hard to find materials just isn’t worth anyones time or money… Being polite on the forum also earns you many internet points [/quote]
This is a what if scenario. Deal with it. It’s not like this would actually happen.
FYI you need a lot of engineering information before you could even start hypothesising as to what some of these new materials will be useful for, let alone if they could be used in an IC engine. Many would agree that the F1 engine represents the pinnacle of what can be done with existing materials and technology yet there isn’t a road car engine that could hold a candle to these F1 engines. So if current tech is capable of producing extreme motors then what specific benefit do you envisage getting from these new materials?
More RPM’s? The gas turbine engine is much better at handling high RPM’s than piston engines and uses current materials. Harder revving engines aren’t always the best choice, especially if you’re moving weight, so it’d be better to look at technologies that improve engine flexibility rather than outright rev range.
Better efficiency and less pollution? Changing the fuel to hydrogen solves the pollution issue and hydrogen is literally everywhere so efficiency isn’t so important anymore. Besides, converting to electric motors neatly sidesteps all the engineering issues with using hydrogen and is cleaner across the board.
So, rather than suggest uses for materials that no-one fully understands, maybe you could theorise about something worthwile, like how does someone go about making an electric car that will capture the imagination of the car enthusiast!
A reliable rotary engine would be pretty sweet if we are throwing random concepts around :-p
alright, I will play.If I had no money limit and could build any motor I wanted I would start with a simple 2jz.
The block would be billet
next the engine would be bored out and stroked to be a 3.4L - 3.6L, a billet crank, rods and pistons would be used.
the head would see extensive porting and polishing as well as 1mm over sized valves, dual titanium valve springs and retainers a custom set of 294 degree race cams and a set of either HKS V2 cam gears or Titan motorsports cam gears.
the engine would have a dry sump oil system, and cam driven fuel supply
it would feature a hypertune intake manifold paired with an accufab 125mm throttle boddy
moving onto the the exhaust side it would have a one off turbo manifold with a 3 int vband for the turbo to sit onto and be mated to 100mm turbo with around a 1.0A/R to keep the spool times down, out the back of the turbo it would have a 4.5 inch vband and 4.5 inch straight piped exhaust so the turbo could flow.
I think motor wise that should cover it may have missed some small stuff but meh
Wow, what a dreamer I am.
A slightly late reply to a dead thread… 