To be continued with 1.2 Turbo, 1.6L and 2.0L Turbo and non turbo version. More powerfull two 6L motors, one 2.5L and a 3L. And at the top three V8, the 4L, 5.5L and 6.2L. After will come the R/T Line up and the R/T RACE.
The 1L engines are small, but not economical. 15.69% economy is bad. I rebuilt the 1999 BMW M5 engine, a 4.9L V8 with 400hp, and it was more economical than that! you should try running the engine less rich, use lower cam profile and use higher compression and earlier ignition timings. Hope this helps
Try and aim for 25%. This is where they are considered very good. Also you need to work on reducing the time of production as nearly 55 hours is far to many for a mass production naturally aspirated small engine. Get it below 40 hours. As for the V8, that definitely needs reducing. Yes it will take more time to make a good V8 but 100 is as high as you’ll want it to go. The engines are also having their power capped greatly by the rev limit. You may want to consider raising it. 95 RON is the normal fuel in Europe so your engines scores must be below it.
You guys do know the reason why economy goes up with larger engines is because of its ability to convert more of the fuel into useful power ? A 1.0 liter with 15% economy will still 100% sure out last a 30-40% economy " large " engine … just cause the 1.0 liters is MUCH smaller than a 4… you have to imagine every suck it is taking in about 10-25% of a 4 liters displacement as fuel, where a 1 liter is taking the same… but in a much lesser extent
Well, it could go to some uber-light sport compact car. It does not utilize the whatever fuel it has though (RON rating should be very close to the fuel RON, like 94.5-95.0 for 95 fuel). And it’s not powerful enough to justify the high fuel consumption.
An engine alone cannot drive, therefore there’s no mpg or l/100 km stat. This will be shown after you put an engine into a car, probably after the next major update.
The engine efficiency in percent is better when it’s higher.
