Oh, no confusion, the quality slider comment was for 07colbaltgirl.
I won’t make any more off topic posts, now let’s see some more iron on the track!
ok thanks!
Here is the 302 Z28 motor (1960 block) in my Alpha entry, modified as the Alpha 302! I did drop the redline to 5k, as it was up near 5700 and just dropping like a fly after 5k anyway (and suffering horrible valve float). Quarter mile time dropped to 13.7s and track time dropped to 85.74 (42.87 x 2). I did have to do a bit of fine tuning on the drivetrain and suspension. It didn’t require the stiffness the 350 needed to keep it steady, as it is ~100 lbs lighter in the front.
I’ve made a car but it fails to run the track I’ll have to wait for the next update. 
Name of the car: R60 Potentia
Name of the Company: CTech Industries
Pictures:
i.imgur.com/vEGgbUB.jpg?1
i.imgur.com/9f19Gwz.jpg?1
i.imgur.com/5FVeZkY.jpg?1
i.imgur.com/2LJaMRN.jpg?1
i.imgur.com/4q1ARX1.png?1
i.imgur.com/6uYSTQs.png?1
[size=150]disqualified because low MTBF[/size]
Mod edit: Removed Quote… for the love of god… DONT quote a post right above you with all the images in it.
Aaaannnnddddd…I’m done here. 431 hp from 323 ci in 1960? I can’t beat that. Probably because I’m not going to abandon my American Muscle push-rod V8’s, and also because American cars didn’t see a 5-speed until the late 70’s! Good job though!
I proceed to participate with this.
abload.de/img/automationlauncher.exw8k9t.png
abload.de/img/automationlauncher.exxwjy8.png
100% rules conform.
So this is why we check our equality signs! 
Ya sorry about that, it’s been changed. Hopefully they’re the right way now.
For MTBF it’s still wrong and you should specify if it’s miles or kilometers.
[quote=“pyrlix”]I proceed to participate with this.
abload.de/img/automationlauncher.exw8k9t.png
abload.de/img/automationlauncher.exxwjy8.png
100% rules conform.[/quote]
Your engine is more expensive than 1200 and takes more time to build than 75 hours, so your engine isnt following the rules
[quote=“lztd15”]
[quote=“pyrlix”]I proceed to participate with this.
100% rules conform.[/quote]
Your engine is more expensive than 1200 and takes more time to build than 75 hours, so your engine isnt following the rules[/quote]
The joke was that before, the equality signs said the engines had to be MORE expensive than 1200 and take LONGER than 75 hours.
[quote=“OCAdam”]
Your engine is more expensive than 1200 and takes more time to build than 75 hours, so your engine isnt following the rules
The joke was that before, the equality signs said the engines had to be MORE expensive than 1200 and take LONGER than 75 hours.[/quote]
now they’re fixed.
pyrlix it would be great to have a submission (with the new rules) from you though
MILES!
So areewe assuming mtbf to be in kilometers not miles? Guess I’ll be going back to the drawing board and squeeze some more rpms from my pushrods.
I think it should be miles.
It’s miles, sorry for forgetting to specify.
And please make it > 25k Miles. 