i cant find the old thread.
but its just same old “how low can you make the fuel consumption?”
here’s my take on it.
achieved with only year 2015, only performance intakes, NA engine with 39% efficiency.
does that say 25 or 75?
Weight: 309 kg. Okay, my oh-f.ck-meter just went out of scale
that’s 75km/l alright 
So that’s like what. 1.3 liter / 100km? O.o
[quote=“squidhead”]
So that’s like what. 1.3 liter / 100km? O.o[/quote]
1.304l/100km
that’s less than my IRL 135cc daily motorbike…
btw that’s is still not pushing it. i could get 76 or 77km/l
What are the performance stats at that?
lol nerd that thing must be belching a cloud of petrol smog so thick a single pass from that car alone would kill more people than all the dirty VW diesels in the world combined 
i made something in the gallons per mile range once, game reports it as just 0.0MPG though
I’ve gotten 0.4 mpg from a badly tuned transmission on a 60s land barge. I’ve also got a very lightweight (below 700 kg) sports/track car that gets 100.1 mpg. It costs almost $100,000 but is still somewhat decent in the markets. It was in the high 70s for a couple of things until I used sliders to get it from about 85 mpg to that 100.1. I might have to post that one here.
100mpg-> 45 km/l
ehehehehe.
75km/l -> 144mpg
i really thought there would be someone that SURELY beats me on that fuel consumption.
I might have something with lower consumption than that. My 100.1 mpg one is a mid-engined car, using the smaller McLaren body, and using a 700 cc engine I made for another car. Top speed is about 190 km/h, and a 0-100 takes about 14 seconds. Maybe I should try a 500 cc engine and see how that goes 
[quote=“koolkei”]100mpg-> 45 km/l
ehehehehe.
75km/l → 144mpg
i really thought there would be someone that SURELY beats me on that fuel consumption.[/quote]
Perhaps that’s b/c (at least according to google) 100mpg → 42.5km/l and 75km/l → 176mpg? At least to US MPG, Imperial MPG is a lot more.
Its possible to beat you. I couldn’t get my lil engine as efficient as yours using just performance intakes (I was .18% off efficiency…I was using different units, but it shouldn’t change that), but no one said we couldn’t use race intakes, right? I tried using the not-smart car body, but it comes out a bit too heavy so I switched over to the one you used. I still have an extra ~5kg on yours so if I could find where its at the economy might go up slightly. I thought it was perhaps fixtures, but that didn’t do anything so pardon the lack of headlights. Anyway I got 180.5 US MPG or 76.7km/l. I’m sure someone can beat it too.
Damn, and I thought my economy was good…
…but I think this might be the lightest car ever made in Automation. It weighs less than a horse. Much less.
just changing to year 2020 i got 76.22km/l
but then again, i still can switch to race intakes, the engine size is still not optimal using 600cc (still while waiting for the i3 engines. then it can get stupidly low).
it’s still an NA and no turbo. an a lil bit of further refining.
PUSHING HARDER!!!
this time in a brand new engine made in 2020, less efficient, but lighter. although the trim is in 2020, the body was made in 2015.
all of them was a single car, so i attached it here, for proof that i didn’t use .lua edit, i didn’t cheat.
list of things still to be tried:
- even lower capacity
- turbo
- race intakes
- somehow fit race header, because it doesn’t fit in the body right now.
- remake the body in 2020.
- wait for further game updates, and retry all with the 3cyl engines.
Keikei - XECO.zip (145 KB)