Omneres Automotive - All things

[nosirrbro]

[size=200]OMNERES AUTOMOTIVE[/size]

Omneres Automotive. Started in 2001 with excess funds from the Omneres Corporation companies, Omneres Automotive is a company that sells low to high end sports cars, super/hyper cars and luxury cars, and more.

[size=180]Cars:[/size]

[size=140]2002 Vesra[/size]:

The 2002 Vesra (Released 2001), a Sports Sudan, is Omneres Automotives first car. It was designed as a multi purpose that is sporty yet not horribly expensive and family friendly. It comes with two varients, Sport, a faster sportier car, and EcoSport, a semi-sporty version of the car that’s much cheaper and way has better economy while still being quite nice.

[size=150]Stats:[/size]
Vesra Sport:
Price: $43,000
Horsepower: 301
Drivetrain: Manual 6 Gears RWD
Economy: 11 mpg
Top Speed: 162 Mph
Acceleration: 0-62 5.8 Seconds, 50-75 3.1 Seconds
Other: Comes with a sport enterior and premium entertainment system

Vesra EcoSport
Price: $25,000
Horsepower: 72 (Not alot but the car is optimized to run well on even this little power
Drivetrain: Manual 6 Gears RWD
Economy: 31 mpg
Top Speed: 102 mph
Acceleration: 0-62 16 Seconds, 50-75 12 seconds
Other: Sport Enterior with standard entertainment

[size=140]2002 Veioter[/size]:
The Veioter (Also made in 2001) is a supercar by Omneres Automotive. Its quick, sleek, cheap (For supercars, that is), and generally an awesome car for 2001.

Stats:
Price: $83,477
Horsepower: 564
Drivetrain: Manual 6 Gears AWD
Economy: 11 mpg
Top Speed: 188 mph
Acceleration: 0-62 3.5 Seconds, 50-75 1.5 seconds
Other: Sport Enterior with Premium entertainment

[Neon00]

I like the Vesra but I feel either the wing needs a change or to be dropped, but other than that, it looks good. On the Veioter, it looks more like a muscle car that wants to be a supercar, but just can’t quite reach it Also, I believe that bodystyle is front engined, which is rather uncommon, so I don’t know whether to say +1 or stick to the traditions. Either way, both of them look rather good.

[strop]

A screenshot of the stats will bring more veterans to the yard for comment! (Overall stats and the track stats, given these are sports cars).

First thing I notice is that the Versa develops 301hp but gets 11mpg. What? How! Given its price range I think running costs would also be important, so I imagine a lot of people would balk at buying a car with the same fuel consumption as a Murcielago (released around the same time), but with half the performance.

[nosirrbro]

[quote=“strop”]A screenshot of the stats will bring more veterans to the yard for comment! (Overall stats and the track stats, given these are sports cars).

First thing I notice is that the Versa develops 301hp but gets 11mpg. What? How! Given its price range I think running costs would also be important, so I imagine a lot of people would balk at buying a car with the same fuel consumption as a Murcielago (released around the same time), but with half the performance.[/quote]

Yeah. I haden’t really payed much attention to the economy on that one…
Anyways, its still alot cheaper than the Murcielago so that would probably be the only selling point, but still a reasonably good one.

[VosNox]

Couple things…

The chrome grill on the Versa seems very out of place, especially in a not so shouty sedan. And as stated before, 11 MPG from an engine that produces only 301 HP is beyond bad. I’ve got upwards of 20 from a 2500 HP engine. You really take your time and learn how to tweak this engine. For ~70K you could buy a Merc, Audi or BMW that would run rings around that.

The Versa sport is even worse. What kind of engine is that? Maybe a 1.5 or 2L i4? In 2001 you could by a Corolla with nearly three times that HP for the same cost. How much does that way? 2500-ish? 72 HP is nowhere near enough to move that much effectively.

Do yourself and check out my Slya for a great primer on how to build a sport sedan.
automationgame.com/phpBB3/viewto … 4&start=20

As for the Veioter, 564 HP for ~84K is damn cheap. That’s SLS AMG power for the price of a newer 4 series. Again, the MPG is far, far too low, even for an engine with that much power; and I am damn sure you could far better than 188 MPH with that much power.