AMCW Scout Sport
Scout presents a mix of strengths and weaknesses. While its suspension tune and practicality fall short, with the rear not catching up with the front and limited off-road capability, it excels in safety, fuel efficiency, reliability, and meeting the intended brief. The vehicle offers reassurance to drivers and passengers with its safety features, achieves acceptable mileage, and instills confidence in its long-term durability. With a sporty character and a performance feel, it shows promise in terms of driving experience. However, improvements are needed in terms of suspension refinement, comfort, and off-road capabilities. In summary, it has room for improvement and would benefit from further refinement to address its shortcomings. When making a decision about buying Scout, it is essential for potential buyers to carefully consider their priorities and take into account the pros and cons highlighted in this review. This thoughtful assessment will help them determine if the vehicle is a suitable match for their specific preferences and needs. - not considered
Schultz Berger 364H
Schultz is a mixed bag. While there are some notable drawbacks, such as the peculiar and cheap-looking hood vents, headlights that don’t extend sufficiently to the sides, and rear lights design that doesn’t quite work, the overall build quality is solid and reliable. However, the decision to utilize a light truck mono-chassis may seem out of place on a sporty premium SUV (going for light truck mono feels a bit min-maxy in this instance). Performance-wise, Berger 364H suffers from high RPMs at cruising speed and a subpar stopping distance, which may impact the driving experience. On the positive side, there are no major complaints about the construction or components, indicating a durable and well-constructed vehicle. Potential buyers should carefully consider the balance between the vehicle’s strengths, such as its solid build quality and reliability, and its weaknesses, including design flaws and unconventional engineering choices. It’s crucial to assess individual desires to see if Berger is suitable for their lifestyle. - not considered
WM Welkin 3.5 4x4
WM takes a minimalistic approach to design, offering an unassuming yet acceptable appearance. Despite its drawbacks, including high-ish RPMs at 110km/h, weak brakes, and a simplistic design, it excels in drivability, performance, off-road capabilities, prestige, utilitarianism, and affordability. While it may not satisfy those seeking a visually striking vehicle, it provides a smooth and enjoyable driving experience, adequate performance for daily use, and the ability to venture off-road. With a decent sense of prestige and utilitarian features, it caters to practical needs. Considering its low price, WM presents an appealing option for budget-conscious buyers. - not considered
(it is a good effort however lack of visual appearance drags it down massively in this design orientated round)
Wells Activ Sport
The design falls short with small door handles and unappealing elements like the carbon fiber piece under the headlights. The tire width is comparable to that of a Polo, and while some effort was made at the rear, overall aesthetics leave much to be desired. Moving on to the drawbacks, Activ Sport experiences high RPMs at 110km/h, potentially impacting fuel efficiency. Satellite navigation is absent, opting for a premium CD system instead. The inclusion of a clutched differential raises questions about its performance offroad, and the off-road capabilities and load capacity are disappointing considering the solid axle. On a positive note, Wells Activ Sport showcases solid drivability and satisfactory performance, although not exceptional. In summary, Activ Sports’ design flaws, high RPMs, lack of satellite navigation, clutched differential, underwhelming off-road capabilities, and limited load capacity hinder its appeal. However, it does offer decent drivability and performance. - not considered
IP Brigadier 4800 GLX
IP Brigadier 4800 GLX excels as a purpose-built off-roader, offering reliability, decent performance, and impressive off-road capabilities at an attractive price point. However, there are some drawbacks to consider. Its off-road orientation hinders on-road performances and drivability, while the soft suspension compromises handling and comfort, furthermore, Brigadier is equipped only with ABS, there is a complete absence of ESC or even TC which is a major oversight in our book. While the design has some disproportion, the small details and rear of the vehicle add visual appeal. The fuel economy could be improved, but the overall reliability and value make up for it. In summary, IP is a purpose-built off-roader that stays true to its intended purpose. It may not deliver exceptional on-road performances or the most comfortable ride, but its reliability and off-road capabilities make it a solid choice. The attractive price further enhances its appeal. Potential buyers looking for a capable and purpose-built off-road vehicle should consider IP Brigadier 4800 GLX, appreciating its positive attributes while keeping in mind the minor drawbacks. - not considered
(I applaud you for making a purpose-built offroader and absence of min-maxing. However, Lando is not looking for a hard-core offroader and Brigadier lacks in design department considering the competition)
Bowie Alamo 5.0 PXC
Bowie Alamo 5.0 PXC offers a satisfying driving experience despite a few shortcomings. It exhibits a noticeable roll angle during sharp turns and could improve fuel economy. (LED DRLs may seem too modern for 2003 - yes am aware of E39s angel lights but those circles were much thinner). However, the vehicle compensates with its positive features. It includes a satnav system for convenient navigation and boasts commendable drivability with smooth handling and responsive performance. Comfort is ensured for both the driver and passengers, and on-road performance is solid, instilling confidence in various road conditions. Alamo exudes prestige, displaying sophistication and quality. Its practicality shines through with a decent load capacity and utility stat. Safety, reliability, and performance also meet expectations. Despite areas for improvement, such as roll angle, fuel economy, and LED DRLs, vehicle excels in satnav availability, drivability, comfort, on-road performance, prestige, load capacity, and utility. These attributes make it an appealing choice for buyers prioritizing these features. - not considered
(this one is the one that just got cut from the finals. If its rear design was a bit more detailed it would make it to the finals)
Fowler Atlas 360GP
Atlas combines impressive drivability, low RPMs, ample torque, prestige, affordability, and overall performance. However, practicality and fuel economy could use improvement. Its unconventional design, reminiscent of the nostalgic Ford Scorpio, is both unique and appealing, although the front could benefit from more sculpturing. Despite feeling somewhat dated for its 2003 release, this SUV remains a competitive option in its segment. It offers a satisfying driving experience with its smooth cruise speeds and responsive power delivery. Safety features such as electronic stability control (ESC) enhance driving confidence, and the inclusion of satellite navigation adds convenience. While lacking in some modern refinements, Atlas delivers a decent package that balances style and capability. With room for growth in practicality and fuel efficiency, it remains a viable choice for those seeking a capable and visually appealing SUV.
Capable Hefter
Hefter has made some design improvements but still falls behind its competition. Its rear bumper, made of a steel beam with sharp edges, could use refinement. The wheels have a modern touch, but overall, the pickup truck gives off a mid-80s appearance. While the vehicle has drawbacks in terms of practicality, braking distance, undertray optimization, thin tires, and slower acceleration compared to competitors, it compensates with strong points. Capable Hefter offers good drivability, providing an enjoyable driving experience. It exudes a sense of prestige and delivers commendable fuel economy and reliability. Safety is also a highlight, thanks to its weight. In summary, Hefter shows improvement in its design but still lags behind its competitors. It suffers in practicality, braking distance, undertray optimization, and acceleration, but excels in drivability, prestige, fuel economy, reliability, and safety. Potential buyers should consider these factors when deciding if it meets their requirements. - not considered
That's a wrap for a round 2
Finalists are: @the-chowi , @S_U_C_C_U_L_E_N_T , @mart1n2005 , @Riley , @pen15
Good luck!
