#Final Cuts
December 3, 2012 - Okay, this is it. If the car makes it through this round I’m test driving it. If I’m test driving it, it means I might buy it right there and then. So that means the car has to have value. Therefore, I’m going to have to somehow determine what I can afford and what is actually worth spending my money on. It’s time to get a little more objective. MSRP divided by the key stats, that should give me a good idea as to what car is really the most valuable. Here goes something. Eight enter, but only three will be finalist in CSR 15!
##Round 5
@AirJordan, Smooth V-Block GT
This car was on borrowed time. I couldn’t stand to eliminate it in the last round because I loved the styling. It just looked so good. The grille was sleek and absolutely imposing. I can see the cars holding me up in the fast lane trembling as this car’s mug crept up and became omnipresent in their rear-view mirrors. The taillights were a magnificent intricacy of function and beauty. Everything about the outside of this car was absolutely stunning. I just cannot get past the price per horsepower. Of the remaining cars in the pile, this car cost the second most per horsepower. It also wouldn’t have done well in practicality if I had calculated costs for that. It’s only two-seats and that’s just dissuading when considering what I really want. Maybe if this car was an absolute power monster, I would have looked past the lack of the larger interior. This is certainly what I would consider a proper muscle on the outside. I just need more power under the hood to pull the trigger on the V-Block GT. The field was just too good to settle for 465 horses.
@titleguy1, Danver Spectra SR8
Honestly, I’m slightly surprised this car made it this far. That’s not a knock on the car as much as it is a statement of a lack of notoriety. I actually kept forgetting about this car. It just never ran afoul of the criteria I was judging by in the last four rounds of cuts. I originally mentioned that you don’t want to stand out as I weed through the field. Subtle pleasing of my tastes was the way to go. Well the Spectra SR8 did superbly until now. I finally found something I just don’t like compared to the rest of the field, and it’s the 422 HP rating. However, this car was so cheap that the price per pony was actually comparable to some of the prospective cars that were weighing in at over 600 HP. That means I would have plenty of change left over to buy aftermarket parts for the 5.2L V8. The car was otherwise of good quality with a premium interior, good fuel mileage, and respectable performance stats. However, as I compared my last group of cars I realized that this sedan was respectively average, albeit a great package overall.
@rcracer11m, Bestial
This is another car that quietly ducked through the first few rounds of scrutiny. However, it almost didn’t make it past the the looks stage. I presume I could have saved myself the trouble had I cut the vehicle there, but it wasn’t that bad looking. Mostly I wasn’t a fan of the stubby design. The fixtures were nice and the front end went together really well. The one glaring issue I had with the vehicle was the rather large scoop in the rear doors. I mean, barring some quirky ventilation system that has a means of transferring through the door frame below the C-pillar, they can’t possibly be functional. I don’t like faux vents and such. The faux fuel cap on the back of the newer Mustangs barely passes muster in my book. The Bestial stayed in this long much to do with the fact that it was throwing around 575 HP. That impressive HP number comes from a 4.8L DOHC 4-valve XPV8 that spins to 9000 RPM. The car had a luxury interior and a good fuel economy of 22.3 MPG for what it came equipped with. The Bestial’s downfall was that it was one of the most expensive of the remaining prospects making the cost per statistic points relatively high. The car’s value wasn’t atrocious, but it was somewhat low in most categories without standing out anywhere. Again, it was another case of good, but not good enough compared to the competition.
@Sillyworld, Glacier Aero pack + MT
No, no, no, no. NO! I did not want to cut this car. It looked A-M-A-Z-I-N-G. It was the best looking car here. And it was a sedan. And it had a manual. And I wanted to buy it based on looks alone. I just cannot justify the lack of power compared to the competition at this point. I drew an arbitrary line in the sand at 400 HP a few cuts ago and lo and behold the Glacier had 400 exactly as I went through the pile. Therefore, it got to stay. However, I cannot fathom why the Glacier’s engineers thought 400 HP would suffice for this car. Mind you, the 400 HP comes from a 6.2L V12. I was expecting at least a stupid amount of torque from the engine, but it only produced 410 Ft-Lbs. Disappointingly the dyno sheets made it look like you had to be over 4000 RPM to wake the car up. How do you have that many cylinders and that much displacement and quietly come in with 400 HP? It’s really this car’s Achilles Heel. It places the price per horsepower way above the rest of the competition. The 7-speed manual and looks couldn’t help this car overcome it’s relative mediocrity among the remaining vehicles. No stats were really overly impressive and the cost wasn’t exactly the lowest of the group. If the engineers spent as much time on the functional design as the design team took on the outside, I think this car would win. I was truly disappointed when I discarded this brochure.
@asdren, Revera RF1
Excuse me while I wipe the drool off of my chin as I look at this motor vehicle. Wow. This car is truly imposing. It kind of looks like a Nissan GTR and I’m not a big fan of those cars, but this is no twin-turbo V6 AWD car. This is a N/A 702 HP 5.5L V12 throwing the power through a single-clutch sequential transmission in a RWD car. I’m not a big V12 guy, but this is my kind of V12. Oh man I could do quite a bit with 700+ HP. It’s mouth-watering. Not to mention, this monster has 4 seats, even though it’s only a 2-door car. That’s what earned this vehicle it’s exception from the last round, yet it would still fall short in these cuts from reaching the final round. Now this car is predictably stupid fast. It’s also relatively practical with its back seat. It also has the look and function of a track monster, drag strips and road courses included. So where does this car fall short? Well, if you’ve yet to catch the theme of these cuts, it’s the value. Other than the horsepower value, buoyed by the fact that there are over 700 horses acting as the denominator, the other categories are relatively poor when compared against the last remaining vehicles. Every point in each stat category costs quite a bit more than the Revera’s counterparts that have either been eliminated or will be moving on to the test drives. 702 HP would have been plenty of fun, and the 4 seats made this car a distinct possibility, even though it wasn’t a sedan, but it was the most expensive of the remaining cars and the value was really only extraordinary under the hood.
#Test drives are being scheduled for @Madrias’s Storm Insaniti LX, @thecarlover’s Solo Jetstream SM, and @strop’s Courcheval Manta Touring.