The Car Shopping Round (Round 64): Tears in Heaven

Thanks for the votes everyone! We at Pearlite are very relieved proud that Mr. Vercetti was satisfied with our car. Mr. Vercetti is not disappointed, we get paid, and the citizens of Vice City hopefully get to keep their cars now. It’s a win-win for everyone!

Hmm, tough decision… I do have an idea I want to try out, and while I am a little more free this time around, I’m still not confident that I can get the reviews in with the strict time commitments. So I’d like to first ask @puffster if he has something he is really excited to do, and if not, I will do my best to host.

I appreciate being asked, but even though I have an idea that could be pretty interesting, I am unfortunately quite busy for the next couple of weeks and wouldn’t be able to do the challenge justice. Hence I look forward to the new challenge from you @phale :smiley:

Alright then! I want to do a little testing of my own to fine tune the rules, then I should have them posted sometime tonight.

Also, is everyone okay with doing this competition in the open beta?

5 Likes

Yup, have had no trouble running it thus far.

I think you meant the open beta sandbox - I’ve heard horror stories from other users about the lite campaign.

Edit: The last time @phale hosted a round we were asked to build sub-$18k utility trucks. That round was ultimately won by @HowlerAutomotive. I wonder what’s in store for the 21st round of this contest?

He meant the sandbox in the open beta :point_up:

1 Like

I can reveal that I was the guy that threw a spanner in the works sorry people.

edit: but really I thought strops would win hands down, and madrias didnt re-enter so my vote for him was null and void and I voted for koolkei for third
but anyway woohoo new result. However I have found that files are not exporting correctly with my particular game ATM just a heads up @phale maybe check to make sure you are receiving entries as they are meant to be

1 Like

I could have won the round :joy: lol nah jokes it’s all good.

The Car Shopping Round 21: Legendary 40s Cars… on a budget

Hello everyone! I am part of a team that is working on a documentary on classic cars from the 40s, 50s, and 60s. We plan to cover all types of cars, from sports cars and race cars, to GTs and luxobarges. We’ve got a couple of Chevys, a 300SL, even a DB4. Unfortunately, we kind of blew our budget before we got a 40s car penciled in for the show. This is where you come in.

(Car and engine year: 1946.)

We want a car that can stand shoulder to shoulder with some of the legends in automotive history. We want a car with character, one that has a story to tell. What that story is, is up to you. Perhaps it’s a race car that surpassed its competitors with the limited technology of the time. Perhaps it’s a luxury car that exuded so much class it is remembered to this day. Whatever the story is, the car has to be memorable and prestigious. We’re not looking for a Mini here. (Prestige, comfort, sportiness, track time, etc. will all be considered based on the type of car and its story.)

Here’s the catch, though: We need a car that we can actually get our hands on. That means a car that was produced in a significant enough number that they aren’t ridiculously rare today. The original sale price of the car isn’t that important.
(Maximum estimated price of $40000 with 100% markup. You may want to target less than this. But more importantly, I will be looking carefully at the production costs of the engine and body. Also, using limited production parts may hinder your score.)

And we want a car that was actually in production in the 40s, not designed in the 40s and produced in the 50s.
(Maximum engineering time of 48 months, the lower the better.)

We plan on driving this thing around on public roads, and we know how difficult and unsafe old cars can be. We’d really like to not crash our one 40s car during filming. We also want it to be able to run without having to stop and fix it all the time. (Drivability, reliability, and safety are important.)

This is a minor concern, but we are on a budget so we’d like to not have exorbitant fuel or running costs. It’s hard to get leaded fuel these days!

Oh and just in case it wasn’t clear, this car is going to be on camera. Do try to make it look nice, please. That last sentence may be a bit of an understatement.

We’re on a tight schedule, so if you have a car that you can offer us, we’d like to hear from you by 8:00PM EST Thursday, September 29. We encourage you to tell us as much about the car as possible. What is the car’s character, what is its story? What makes it unique? We’d like to set up a nice classic car show over the weekend and we’ll choose our car at the conclusion of the show.

Cars will be judged in open beta, not stable release.

Submission format:
Model: CSR21 - Username
Trim: Car Name
Engine: CSR21 - Username
Variant: Engine Name

Good luck everyone! :slight_smile:

4 Likes

Oh, this’ll be so much fun!

(I think I had the perfect car, but RIP my cars)

OFF TO BUILDING (Once I learn 2 fucking speeches…)

There have been a few rounds of this contest set in the 80s, and one set in the 60s, but as the first round set in the 40s (specifically, the immediate post-war period, and a year before the first issue of Road & Track was published) this would be the first one chronologically. This sounds like a totally new kind of challenge - and one that I could sink my teeth into. But whatever I come up with, it must be something that still gets talked about 70 years later… for the right reasons.

Edit: Can the engineering time be determined by simply looking in the trim engineering tab? Right now I’m getting only 2 years and 10 months, for a total of 32 months - 16 less than the maximum limit.

YES awesome been waiting for this challenge…It is a pity we cant use our lite campaign cars yet.

In Open Beta, the displayed engineering time is the engineering time in months. This is NOT the case in stable, so I highly recommend building the car in Beta. Also, the estimated price is different in Beta.

1 Like

we just survived a war. lets build a car :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:
the streets will be full of rubble

I’ve got a plan for this one…

Just for the record, my post above about the foursome trying to win the rubber had nothing to do with anything sexual. It’s actually something when playing Bridge. (I heard the reference on Jeopardy, have no idea how to play it)

2 Likes

I’d be surprised if anybody here knew how to Play bridge :joy: closest I got was 500. Good times.

LVC - turtle




where should i start? ah yes the chassis
it had a
-ladder, galvanised steel chassis
-rear engine
-front and rear double wishbone suspension
-and most odd thing ALUMINIUM panels

so now the body
-since the hood is so big everyone thinks the engine is in the front, but no the hood is so big so you can still fit stuff inside. also the fuel tank is in the hood as well.

-it has popup headlight. the most unusual thing you will find in this era
-in case the popup fail, you have two tiny headlight right next to the blinkers so you can drive home safely
-while everyone is using cheap colour, this comes with sky blue colour

now lets come to the most basic stuff we have here. the engine
-inline 3 1.5 liter
-pushrod
-carburetor
-runs on 92 leaded

next thing
it only had 3 speed manual gearbox
top speed is 155 KM/H

the seats are bit pricy. there are 4 seats premium quality
also a premium am radio

the safety was advanced too

what costs such thing?
18400$ (with +100 markup)

well… i think this one is not gonna be my forte.

In Open Beta, the displayed engineering time is the engineering time in months.

Is the engineering time (in months) viewable in the detailed stats tab of the overview in the open beta? Are we allowed to use parts that cannot be mass-produced or, at the very least, force limited instead of full-scale production? And is regular leaded recommended over super leaded?