In that case I’ll have a post up tomorrow night. Built an entry this morning before leaving for a quick vacation, few tid bit stats.
Struts and live axle rwd
5951cc
5psi boost
12 valve
400+lbft from 1450-4650
29mpg us
0-62 in a hair over 5 seconds
1 Like
Ah faaaawk! My game files got corrupted somehow and I had to do a clean install. rage: All my cars got f’d up due to mods failing to load. I’m going to have to redesign everything -_-
Oh man, I have the benchmarks so crushed… this should be good 
I hope everybody slays the benchmarks. They’re not good benchmarks. Especially the 80s ute. That’s the one that needs beating the hardest.
I’m honestly not even going to look at that spreadsheet. I’m just here to experiment and have fun.
2016 Cornaldie VX-Turbo Ute 4.1 For Sale
$17,600
Location: Innisfail, QLD
Good work ute that is regularly serviced, extremely reliable and insanely low mileage (less than 10,000 km). Owner migrating. Like new! Fully specced and powered. Best bargain you’ll ever find. Call now!
8 Likes
@strop Just wondering, can I set the car/trim year to something like 2010, but use a body that unlocks in the 70s/80s? As much as the areo efficiency of the newer bodies is nice, I really want to use an older body to look different from what I assume the majority of entries will be. I wasn’t sure if using newer tech on an old body would be frowned upon or if the safety penalty and areo penalty I will incur balances it out?
1 Like
While searching on Gumtree an interesting advert catches your eye…
Wow! A Devil Z replica, authentic down to the triple carburettors, big turbo and timeless style, that only costs $17,500!!!
Meh, probably broken…
Then a banner ad for the new 2017 range of Bogliq Mavericks pops up and the ad is conveniently displaying their utility variant…
Presenting the 2017 Bogliq Maverick Loadstar!!!
Want to buy a ute but you’re afraid that since Ford and Holden have ceased production you’ll have to buy a 1 tonne truck instead? Well fear not, Bogliq Australia has just refreshed our line-up for the 2017 year and the Loadstar is still part of the team!
Packing 200Kw of creamy smooth V8 power, the Maverick Loadstar has plenty of storage space, plenty of style and leaves you plenty of cash in your hip pocket!
And the price for all this? Just $15,000 Driveaway… Bogliq Australia truly is the company that holds Aussie values closest to it’s heart!
Buy better, buy Bogliq
12 Likes
Could you clarify how an older trim is advantageous? Is it merely in the depreciation? Considering the depreciation penalty for cars with high prestige, are older cars with high prestige a terrible choice to enter?
1 Like
As pretty much spelled out and explained in the story, Tesla likes old stuff. So it’s a subjective thing, and the very thing that everything else fights against in this challenge.
Yes, you can do this. However if it doesn’t look right it will attract comments. I’ll be sharpening my tongue over here 
That being said the stats are the stats are the stats, so there will be no penalties on using new tech in an old body. There’ll be no concessions for safety and aero penalties incurred by the game.
5 Likes
The prestige ute, in the spreadsheet has 7.1 l\100km, but the Falcon ute should be closer to 12 l\100km (or 14 depending on which mpg figure they use).
2017 Ford Falcon Ute – engine range
It was made to be with rear-wheel drive. The engines are combined with a 6-speed automatic transmission. There are two petrol and one gas engine:
4.0-liter six-cylinder engine from 261 hp and 288 lb-ft (391 Nm) of torque, with a combined fuel consumption of 20.1 mpg. 4.0-liter six-cylinder turbo engine. The production of this engine is 362 hp and 393 lb-ft (533 Nm) of torque. This engine will have a combined fuel consumption of 18.5 mpg. 4.0-liter six-cylinder EcoLPi engine of 265 hp and 302 lb-ft (409 Nm) of torque. The combined fuel consumption will have 18.5 mpg.
Or am I just being overly picky and pedantic over it?
This is actually a good point and a subtlety that I considered but didn’t mention: You are correct, Australian built utes by and large have terrible fuel economy.
However, in Automation, it’s quite easy to build vehicles with better fuel economy, so the standard has changed somewhat. This is one reason I actually increased the price of fuel relative to what it really is in AUD.
1 Like
OK, thanks for the clarification.
Your inflated price, compared to AUD, is the ACTUAL price we are paying in the UK. Feckin’ taxes…Grrrrr…
one more post from me, here you can see a concept called
etam gtr
a transversely mounted v8 twin turbo
awd drivetrain 50/50
6 Likes
Oh no, here comes trouble - the Alstrena UL-5!
< A reconstruction of an Alstrena senior level meeting circa 2004 >
We’re a big generic car maker, so we just have to enter into every market, don’t we!
What’s that? There’s a type of a car called a ‘ute’? Do we have one yet?
No? Well, we just have to make one!
Nah, don’t worry, we’ll just use our mid-size sedan platform and nick all the others bits from our parts bin.
Research? Into what? Our target market? No no, we don’t need that, we just need to sell these things that’s all!
Introducing the 2006 Alstrena UL-5. A ute made by people who know nothing about utes because they simply saw a gap in the market. It’s uninspired, dull and simpler than white sauce. It has an engine, some seats, a radio, a gearbox and some other stuff too, all of which when put together are generally regarded to be described as a ‘car’.
Truth be told, it’ll probably serve your every need pretty well if you’re looking for a ute. But don’t expect it to be a memorable care to own, nor a fun or enjoyable one. It is simply a vehicle that looks good on sales reports.
Though in saying that, it actually looks really ugly.
The only reason you’d buy it is because you’re too scared/stupid to consider anything else.
This particular model is some mid-range trim or something with a 2.5l V6 under the bonnet, 6 speed automatic and all the features you’d expect from such a generic car. It’s painted in Scottish Salmon Pink aka “Hint of Vomit” Peach. Don’t worry, if you’ve submitted anything into this competition, you’ve already beaten this.
11 Likes
Five years ago, we set out to build a thinking man’s (or woman’s) ute: one without the inherent compromises of live-axle designs and with unusually high economy for the class. So we built a ute version of our existing ZV4 sedan and named it the Utility. It’s primarily aimed at the Australian market, but we designed it so that it could theoretically be sold anywhere… in the world.
Unlike most other ute manufacturers, we played the efficiency card. To that end, the 2012 ZV4 Utility 2.6 is powered by an all-alloy, 2.6-liter turbocharged straight-six which combines high fuel efficiency (just over 7L/100km) with decent performance, allowing this workhorse to serve as a show pony when you want it to. And by sharing the donor sedan’s all-independent suspension and unibody construction, it handles, stops and steers very much like a real car, not a truck with a ladder frame and/or a solid rear axle. In short, it looks like a truck but actually feels like a car.
Inside, you’ll find our advanced safety suite and a full set of driving aids, plus a premium interior with an infotainment system to match, ensuring peace of mind on even the most tedious journeys imaginable. And a wide range of exterior colors is available, including the Brilliant Blue Pearl of the example shown here. Amazingly, all of this can be yours for just $20,000 excluding markups - and it still is, considering that the ZV4 Utility remains in production to this day. Go on, you know you want one!
6 Likes
Sometimes, what you really need is a good, simple ute. No fancy turbochargers, no strange suspension arrangements out back. A big V8 and a solid rear axle.
This is the 2012 Sinistra Starfire SE-8. It packs a 500+ horsepower, 7.7 liter V8 engine capable of hurtling this ute to 100 km/h in 5.3 seconds. At Sinistra Motors, we believe in RWD. AWD is expensive, complicated, heavy, and chews into your fuel efficiency. FWD is good for hatchbacks and cheap four-cylinder powered cars, but not for vehicles that have to carry any weight.
But why choose our ute over someone else’s? Well, 26.2 US MPG, for starters. 8.98 L/100km. Sure, it’s not the best in the world, but we’re throwing all of that fuel into an engine that produces 580 horsepower. It then fires that power into a 6 speed manual gearbox, through the driveshaft, into a viscous rear differential, and out through the rear tires, in proper fashion.
Of course, it is a ute, and with a solid axle resting on coil springs, you can actually haul things in it. And up in the cab, we’ve kept it nice and simple, but it feels just like being in one of our sedans. Which is to say, it’s a little plain, but we’ve given all the comforts you need. Our standard equipment package includes 2 cloth-covered seats, an AM/FM/CD player with Bluetooth support, a nice 6 speed stick, and enough airbags to survive an accident and walk away.
We’ve also decided that a full-width sunroof was an essential add-on to aid your enjoyment of this beautiful machine. While it doesn’t retract, it does pop open, so it can let the hot Australian air out of the cab if you need it to. Also, power windows are standard equipment, with driver, passenger, and rear windows all being able to open.
Sinistra. Simply Better.
10 Likes
Wow that front end design is silky smooth. So elegant for a ute!
3 Likes
That ute is a nice contrast to my entry - simpler and gruntier but still a looker!
As for why I prioritized efficiency, comfort and dynamics… Well, I believed that I could combine the ride and handling capabilities of a VE/VF Commodore ute with a level of fuel economy unheard of in any ute, while still having enough cash to spare for more creature comforts than I would normally install.
And although I toyed with the idea of building an actual truck (albeit a much cheaper one from 2003), I abandoned that plan after realizing it wouldn’t be competitive or attractive enough and deleted said truck once it had served its purpose.
Finally I intentionally made my ute fast, but not too fast, because I figured I didn’t need lots of power to make a competitive entry. In fact, I built a test car with a >400-bhp NA V8 earlier, but chose not to submit it either because I thought I could do a better job by focusing on efficiency and comfort.
1 Like