These cars did not make the first cut.
@Restomod Kingdom GT8 4000 Coupe
The tagline may say “the best in the business”, but the GT8 4000 is the worst in the business in a very important category: reliability. At 40.3, this car is leagues below the rest of competition in this top tier priority. To point out why is fairly easy: it’s small 244ci (4 liter) is all aluminum, SOHC, and has stressed internals. In another very important category, price, the GT8 is also among the worst; nearly the most expensive entry at $22,400, which is especially eyewatering when this car is just 158" long and 68" wide, nearly the smallest entry and far too small for a conventional American market vehicle of the time.
@Ludvig Fowler Buckshot 305C Special
The Folwer Buckshot may be fast, but it’s not sporty, with just 3.6 sportiness, and one of just two cars to opt for an automatic transmission. The price of $21,600 is on the high side, a reliability is below average, in part due to the OHC V8 with DCOEs. It’s fast, but not much else going for it.
@DuceTheTruth100 Wells 500 Rallye
The Wells 500 Rallye misses the mark on size; with a 126" wheelbase and 211" overall length, this is a full-size car, larger than what is desired here. Although the price is good, the rest is not; the 350ci (5.7l) V8 is aluminum head, flat-plane, and is a bit over matched for the 3600lb machine, making for a rather slow and unreliable car. Despite it’s huge size, comfort is a dismal 4.1, due to basic interior.
@voiddoesnotknow Grouse Valencia 5.0 Firehawk II
So, this car has two things going for it; it’s cheap, and it’s reliable. But it falls apart from there. This body choice is unfortunate; although it’s length is within the expected range, the car is obscenely wide, 2.5" wider than even the largest full-size machines of the time. It appears to not even fit in it’s own photo. Despite the massive width, it curiously uses a an unusual narrow 60 degree V8 with overhead cams, and just 304ci (5.0l) of displacement and the 2nd lowest hp figure in test. Paired with just a 3 speed manual and lugging this massive body around, performance is predictably poor.
@stm316 Sandhurst Louisianno RT 360 “Special”
Another car with an iron block and aluminum heads, and poor reliability; second worst in test after the Kingdom. The price is on the high side as well, $20,900. On the plus sides, performance is strong, and oddly, despite a 354ci (5.8l) V8, a very high 16.1 mpg.
@Fayeding_Spray EAAC Athena “Leopard SSF”
Not too bad a car, but unfortunately outclassed by other entrants. The price is on the high side, $20,800, but reliability and sportiness are good. Unfortunately, it’s acceleration numbers are unusually slow; despite having a limited slip and a better power to weight ratio than the Sandhurst, it’s more than 2 seconds slower to 60 mph and more than 1.5 seconds slower in the 1/4 mile. A good torque curve matters, and this 317ci (5.2l) V8 lacks mid-range. Staggered tire width and 60 profile rear tires are both unusual choices for this type of vehicle in this era.
@cake_ape Mons Astral C
The good news first: the Mons Astral C is quite affordable, $17,800, and it’s relatively reliable. It excels in a few places, running costs a quite cheap, and driveability is very high. But this car really falls short in performance; the 335ci (5.5l) engine is on the weak end of entrants, and paired with a 3 speed automatic, it was the slowest entrant in both 0-60 and 1/4 times.
8 cars remain. The reviews of the rest of the vehicles will be done in character.