Nice! But FYI, it’s 2010-2019 - this excludes 2020.
Thanks, lots of great inspiration out there, I am a good thief
BTW, I am guessing interior will count in the aesthetics? I do not have a lot of free time now, but might have some next week to do one before the deadline.
Odd choice.
Oh yeah, it is… darn, going to have to make it a 2019 then lol. Not sure how I missed that tbh. Shouldn’t affect things too much at least… thanks for letting me know!
Ah good point. Didn’t mention that but no it won’t be
MY2010 Bogliq Bazooka 460AE
A Hypercar by Bogliq that doesn’t sacrifice the quintessential American values of FR in order to go really, really fast, hahaha!!!
When I conceived this car I knew it had to be RWD. I feel that, despite the historical precedent, USDM supercars and hypercars should be both FR and RWD. I think that the success that GM has shown in GT3 with their C6R Corvettes and Camaro’s helps support this position.
So the Bazooka 460AE has a 6L twin turbo pushrod V8, 6spd DSG and lots of mechanical aids. It has been designed to satisfy the most discerning Hypercar segment buyer but remains accessible enough to be the darling of the USDM Youtube tuner and drift communities. I had a lot of fun making this car and I will be making the file available once the competition is over for anyone who’d like one for Beam.NG, plaugerism etc. hahahaha!!!
Also I want to make a special shout out to @VicVictory for workshopping the styling and providing the polish to make this car 110%. It took me this long to work it out but, regardless of results, getting someone else to help refine your car designs is a great learning experience and leads to cars that you’ll still like after 6 months, hahaha!!!
I’ll go let myself out now… Bye!!!
POST-RESULTS EDIT: Here’s the file of the car if you wish to have one for yourself!
10s_Supercar_-HighOctaneLove-_Bogliq_Bazooka_460AE.car (43.3 KB)
Quite a formidable engine, and a viable means of simulating a supercharger with the current game version.
With that sort of mechanical configuration, it’s as much of a muscle car as it is a supercar. As for that NS1 previously posted, I agree with the conclusion that its use of an 8L flat six is an…
8 liters is a lot of displacement, but when it comes from just six cylinders, I get all skeptical, no matter how much power the engine actually makes; in fact, a flat-six engine of that size won’t be as smooth (or befitting a supercar or hypercar) compared to an engine with identical displacement but more cylinders.
Yeah, I have to agree with both of you - odd. A Flat-6 makes a really great track car, if you keep displacement not too high, but it does not make a great luxury supercar which is the ticket here. I used a 3.8 GT3 Flat-6 and turbocharged it as my first version of the XT with 720hp and it is within mere seconds of my V12 Green Hell on the Ring - it’s superlight, ultrafast but does not tick all the boxes.I hope the NS1 has better luck.
Is any fuel octane allowed?
I’m assuming the only eligible fuel type(s) is/are either 95 RON premium unleaded or 98 RON super unleaded, or both.
Unleaded and 98 maximum octane. Thanks for pointing that out, but I won’t penalise anyone who submitted before today for using 100
Clock dials in a supercar? Fancy
A collaboration between myself, @vero94773 and @yurimacs
820hp. 0-60 in 2.9s. 215 miles per hour. $111,000. Automation Test Track in 1:53.08.
'nuff said.
Current Plan:
Today I will go through and download all the cars and check them out. 15/2 I will track test them all and try and get all the scoring done, which should mean the results will be up by 16/2-17/2. Thanks to everyone who submitted
Results
Everybody here made a fantastic effort, with many different approaches that worked to varying degrees, with some opting to try max out on performance, and some opting for a large emphasis on the drivability, prestige & affordability, and some opting to compromise in all areas.
8th- @HelloHi & his NS1. This car was relatively affordable and a decent looking vehicle to my eye with good aesthetic appeal, however it struggled in a lot of the performance aspects (likely a symptom of the strange engine choice and the extra mass it added). Not a bad effort nonetheless, scoring 21/48 overall.
6th- Two entries here, @HighOctaneLove and @nightwave, with both cars attaining 24/48 points
Let’s begin with nightwave and his Tyfon SCW. This car found itself as a decent all-rounder, scoring around mid-table in most aspects besides theoretical performance stats where it found itself towards the top of the table. A solid effort and one I can commend for being one of the cars I would actually buy if it was my money.
HighOctaneLove’s vehicle, the Bazooka 460AE, was not my favourite car from an aesthetic perspective, however this is likely not a symptom of the car itself being a bad looker, but more likely a symptom of it being the oldest and therefore most dated car here design-wise. Additionally, it was one of the less rapid cars on track, however it made up for this in the “sensible” areas such as cost, comfort and prestige, where it finished high up the order. Again, another car I would actually consider buying (especially with it being 11 years old now and likely having a healthy chunk of depreciation!)
4th place- Another tie, between @Urke101 and @vero94773 with 25 points each.
First, urke101 and the R550 Evo 4. This car finished dead centre in pretty much every category except for the theoretical performance aspect, making this car a fantastic all-rounder and again, a very sensible car to buy. Great effort to balance everything in such a perfect manner.
Now, vero94773 and the “Project Blackbird” which I understand was a collaboration vehicle. This car is just insanely fast on the track (the fastest in the group by about 3 seconds) and a fantastic looker in my opinion. However, it did fall slightly short in other aspects such as comfort & prestige, likely due to its positioning as more of a track car.
3rd place- @Lazar and the Kuso Sekai with 29/48. This car was also a great car from an aesthetic perspective, and I genuinely spent quite a while staring at this one. Additionally, it comes in at a relatively reasonable cost and finds itself being fairly rapid round the track and being a great daily driver, with it scoring fairly well in the comfort category. However it did struggle in prestige and theoretical performance.
2nd place- @Riley and the Zephorus Z-S, scoring 31/48. Yet again another fantastic car aesthetically and a great car on track, coming second only to Vero’s absolute monster of a car. Additionally it scored well in most other areas, with its very high cost compared to the competition being its only main drawback.
1st place- @karhgath and his Octane XT640, scoring a staggering 38/48. Wow, this car did fantastically, scoring in at least the top 3 in every single category almost. Fantastic effort, not much more to say.
Great job everyone, and thanks for taking the time and effort to submit these beautiful cars to me. This was a very close competition and I am genuinely impressed by all of the designs and vehicles here.
Thanks @Boxsterholics for hosting this fun challenge and everyone for entering. This contest made me both drool at the entries and cry looking at my bank balance
I guess the aspirated V12 really made a difference here. I see why Ferrari has a hard time letting it go. Still quite surprised to finish first with all the great entries and the fact I am quite new to the game and community.
That was a super fun one.
Thankyou @Boxsterholics for providing a competition that forced me to push my boundaries; I’m pleased with my results and my car scored well where it mattered to me when I designed it!
The link to download the car has been placed on my submission post where you can see what you’re getting, hahaha!!!
@karhgath @HighOctaneLove you’re welcome, thanks for submitting! Maybe I’ll do another one if I can ever be bothered again