A legendary legacy, Coupes! (Round 3)

Returning with a bang for 1981, Hikaru Katana CHI-18-3 ‘Izanagi’

Play any citypop this time, it’ll probably fit…

Kyoichi Hikaru, the man that had so successfully brought Hikaru H. I. to the forefront in the mid 1960s all the way through the 1970s, was now just as successful as his pride and joy, the Katana line of small sports cars. With the immense success of his first project at the age of only 26 in 1965, he had proven to his father, the man that had founded the company in the first place, that he was driven, purposeful and responsible enough to be in his position. Of course, his career didn’t end there, he then went on to found within the company a dedicated department for the creation of the Katana line of sports cars, employing a variety of talented engineers to help him make truly incredible cars. The 1970s rolled around quickly, and by the turn of the decade, Hikaru-san knew that the now venerable but somewhat underpowered first generation Katana needed a worthy successor. In his home country, he would be lucky enough to avoid any sort of oil crisis, and as such, their work during the 1970s on the second generation Katana was fruitful, producing a fun, slightly more powerful, if slightly heavier sports car. While it didn’t seem to make the same excellent impression that the original made, it was certainly still a success by almost any metric.


(1981 home country advert for the all-new Katana.)

The world was changing by the time that 1979 had rolled around though, and even the once quite powerful second generation Katana was being quite easily outclassed by offerings from Antares, Nordwagen and HAMFA, among others. As such a replacement was required. By now, it would be and understatement to say that Hikaru-san was a different man. He was certainly no longer the lively, naive 26 year old that he was in 1965, he was now very much 40 years old, and he could feel each year of it. His first son, the child that had given him the inspiration to create the Katana in the first place was now a teenager, and was just entering his final year of high school, and Hikaru-san knew that the stresses of teenage life were catching up with his boy. He regularly disrespected his father, spoke to him far less than as a younger boy, and appeared to talk less to pretty much everyone, especially the girl that he had grown up with who lived in the house next door.

All of this really dragged on Hikaru-san as he walked into work in early 1980, still trying to think of what he could do to make his brand-new idea for the Katana a good one. All that he had to do, he would tell himself constantly, is make a car that looks like a Katana, is a bit more powerful than last time, and is cheap enough to sell well. As such, that was what he did. From the base of the already-existing 1976 Hikaru Samurai Sedan of that year, he would attempt to create a Katana that would save money and time, eliminating the need to engineer a new chassis and body. He would simply redesign part of the body to contain some of the signature Katana trademarks, a sloped back, sidevents and half-covered rear wheel, but leave as much the same as possible.

All of this expedited the process of creating the new Katana, but within him, there was a nagging feeling, one of dishonour, that he was failing his father, the one who granted him the honour of creating cars in the first place. He would push that all down though, and continue working through the creation of his new car. By the later end of 1980, the design work had been finished ahead of schedule, and the engineering teams were preparing a first prototype to be tested.

It would contain Hikaru’s updated 1.8L straight six, now equipped with 24V DOHC and an almost unheard of electronic multiple-point fuel injection system, and unsurprisingly, was now pushing just over 120HP. The interior was to be constructed in the same fashion as the original, retaining the same expensive ‘Jindai Sugi’ wood panelling, but this time updated for the 1980s. It contained a fully adjustable cassette system and a highly advanced electronic climate control system. The interior furnishings were also quite luxurious, with supple wool used on all soft surfaces and leather where necessary. Unsurprisingly, the car was quite hefty now, weighing almost 900kgs unladen.

The new car would be test driven early in 1981, and the test driver, the same one that had driven the original Katana all the way back in 1964, insisted that he be the one to test the new car. They would head down to the same test track, and the test driver, Minato Koriyama, was told to go nuts with it. They saw him pull away smoothly, get the car up to speed, and watched it as it accelerated off into the distance. Quite quickly, he came back, and with an expression on his face that was nothing short of pure rage.

“Hikaru-san, you dishonour yourself, your customers, and your family name. I refuse to drive any more of your cars if you don’t at least try to put some effort, some soul into them.”

He walked off, got into his own car, and drove off.

With that glowing review, Hikaru-san was conflicted, but Hikaru H. I. needed a new Katana, and that was what he was going to provide them with. As mid-1981 rolled around, the all-new Katana was released to the public, and all that Hikaru-san could do was wait. Would his attempts to cut down on weight make his car into an ugly duckling, or a cheap, cheerful shooting star? Would it remain as precise and refined as a samurai sword, as the Western reviews had said about it, or would it be as dull as a butter knife? He knew deep inside that his car had been Americanised, becoming heavy and cumbersome, and that he had abandoned what had made his first car beautiful - the idea that had made his country successful - that there is beauty in simplicity.

13 Likes

After a four year hiatus, the Sidewinder for 1986 comes back reimagined. Reimagined that is, to a 4-seat coupe. Dont let the extra seats fool you because, sticking to its roots, there’s still a big V8 under the hood packing a serious punch.

The 5speed manual is sure to make every stop light fun, you’ll get used to plastering grins on your wife and kids faces. More sporty than ever, the Sidewinder is poised to take aim.

This design represents a bold and radical shift from what was original to the Sidewinder nameplate. In an attempt for a new type of customer, Wells rolled the dice.

7 Likes

1984 ARMOR HURRICANE S/C

1984 was the last (and best) year for the second gen Hurricane. Introduced in 1975, it followed the Mustang’s trend of downsizing. It now rode on a 99 inch wheelbase, which was much smaller than previous Hurricanes but still 3 inches longer than the Mustang II. With the longer wheelbase and shorter overhangs than the Mustang, Armor was confident that their ponycar would at least win the eye test with prospective buyers.

Styling was rather conservative, and became increasingly so with it’s 1979 facelift. 1982 saw the addition of plastic bumper facias that blended with the bodylines. S/C’s still retained their trademark headlight covers, which were clear and left the headlights functional even if the door mechanisms malfunctioned (American safety regulations prohibited any coverings of the headlights while they were on).

The fastback-style roof remained throughout the platform’s run. At the time, Armor Motors was reluctant to give their ponycar a hatchback. Instead, they offered more access to the trunk by lowering the bottom of the decklid and having the taillights raise with the trunk.

Even by 1975, the 353 CID V8 was long gone. Second gen Hurricanes now offered a standard 2.2 liter inline 4 and a 3.3 liter V6. Both engines were developed together and featured identical 3.5 inch bores and strokes. In an effort to save money, these engines shared internals like pistons, conrods, rings, valves, etc.

The 303 CID V8 remained for the S/C. Through the seventies its smogged carburetors left much to be enthused about. However, in 1984 Armor introduced its Jet-Tech throttle-body injection on all of its engines. This seemed to wake up the 303 particularly, now boasting 205 hp and helping the Hurricane S/C to a 6.2 second 0-60 time. It was one of the quickest American cars produced for 1984.

While the S/C was electronically limited to 135 mph, police packages featured a chip that would allow the car to climb to its natural limit of 156 mph.

Interestingly, 1982 was supposed to be the last year for the second gen platform. But when spies revealed the next Hurricane to be front-wheel-drive, public outcry became too much to ignore. Third gen Hurricanes would have to be retooled as rear-drive ponycars and would arrive for the 1985 model year.

8 Likes

ACZT

ACZ Presents the 1984 Badger!

ACZ is proud to present the Badger for the 1984 model year! The successor to the famous 66 Badger, the new model is proud to bear the name and carry on its legacy!

History

Amidst the tightening emissions regulations, enthusiasts are still demanding for a cheap, fun car with the creature comforts and safety of a modern vehicle. While some smaller turbocharged options exist, some want a callback to the big V8s of yesterday. The Grand Deluxe and L-4 have some performance trims available, but the customers wanted something with fewer doors. Thus, development of an all new Badger started.

The Badger

Chassis

Once again, the Badger was formed from a shortened Grand Deluxe chassis, but it keeps its sibling’s standard double wishbone suspension. The new Badger is nearly identical to the original’s wheelbase, keeping its sporting credentials alive. However, the new monocoque construction keeps the body rigid and light, improving cornering and acceleration.

1984 ACZ Grand Deluxe
Drivetrain

The new Badger received a beefy 4.6L V8, producing upwards of 275 horsepower, thanks to its clever EFI system and forged internals. This power is sent to the rear wheels through a 5-speed manual and a new viscous differential.

Body

The body was developed in house by ACZ, keeping its split grill and wide taillights from its ancestor, but stays in line with the modern design language. Inside, you’ll find seating for 4 and a premium cassette player.

Performance

The new powerplant allows the vehicle to do 0-60 in 5.5 seconds and can a standing quarter mile in under 14 seconds! The double wishbone suspension and sport tires keep it planted in the corners, up to a gut-wrenching .95 lateral g. Topped off with a curb weight of under 2800 lbs and standard disk brakes, this vehicle can stop and turn on a dime!

Affordability and Driveability

While the performance is extraordinary, the complexity is ordinary. The pushrod V8 powered by regular gasoline keepsrunning costs low. Plus, as one of the first ACZs with standard ABS, this vehicle has a trick up its sleeve to keep you out of the bushes. Even if you do end up in one, the monocoque chassis will better disperse the forces of the impact and ensure that you will walk away to tell your friends how you binned your car.

Closing Remarks

The new Badger keeps its predecessor alive with its outstanding performance and new features. While the 66 Badger set the bar, the new Badger continues to define the standard in the modern world.

The son and the father waiting in the shadows to strike when the time is right.

4 Likes

Are we good for 14th? Just checking on everyone!

1 Like

Did I already submit mine? I’ll do it tonight in case I forgot

I think i have to send mine, cant remember if i did or not.

Hello, we got a day ish, so imma put submissions

Submissions:
@stocazzoo
@xsneakyxsimx
@Ultimate_Billy
@Isabella
@abg7
@Ch_Flash
@Kreator
@MoteurMourmin
@OME
@DuceTheTruth100
@GassTiresandOil
@toxicnet

If your name is missing here, I didn’t get your round 2 submission. (Gonna allow until 14th 11:59 AM MT)
Don’t forget to post your ads too!

And lastly

ROUND 3 RULE SET is out. Check top post

5 Likes

@stocazzoo , you’re on an older version. And you named it wrong.

So 2012 is the latest possible model/trim year? What about the earliest one?

no earliest set, because i want people to lean into the retro looks, tho you must keep the modern language in design, and i didn’t say resto-mods. i would say going before 1990s is a soft limit.

I think they’re referring to the year of their entry. I would think 2000 is the earliest year, but as I’m writing this I realize it should probably read “entry year 2000-2009 inclusive” or sometime like that.

Dalluha Coach & Motor Works presents the…

1983 Norðwagen Loki GS 6x4

(Nordwagen Loki Grand Sport 6-cylinder 4-wheel drive)

The original Nashwar was intended to be a halo car as much as a quantifiably supreme performer, sold on the merits of subjective bragging rights as much as objective laptimes and other metrics. By the time Norðwagen was founded and the Loki rebadge released, several developments had already begun which culminated in a revision of its mechanical design.

In 1963, the recipe for a prestigious supercar differed little from the one for ultimate performance - mid-engine, rear-drive, high-strung all-alloy V12, as small and light as possible. Even if tires struggled to keep up, a V12 was the singular choice for a powerplant where power/weight was more important than just outright power. By 1983, this was no longer the case; engine technology had advanced to the point that six-cylinders could be reasonably tuned to put out more than adequate power, and V12 packaging and its consequences resulted in a dynamically inferior car for this size class. While the costs of purchase and maintenance were long established as prices worth paying for duodecacylindrical prestige, the car actually being slower and clumsier was not. In the sixties, this was a moot point. In the eighties, a well-tuned six-cylinder was the answer.

Enter the 6P830-38 engine series, the (street-legal) apex of which, the 38E-S400, was installed in the GS 6 Loki, as well as comparable trims of other models, notably the Valkyrja (Valkyrie) sports sedan.

1985 Valkyrja GS-6x4

An all-aluminum, 24-valve DOHC flat-6, all-forged 100x80mm internals, variable intake cam timing, and individual mechanical throttle bodies interfacing with an electronic fuel injection and ignition computer, the result outperformed the old V12 in almost every way except - subjectively - the soundtrack. It nonetheless remained music to enthusiastic ears, with hair-trigger throttle response and a 7900rpm redline. The relative merits of a world-class philharmonic orchestra and George Lynch can be debated, but their respective quality for their genres cannot be denied. Smoothness was also behind (75.8 vs 87.3), but remained solidly above V6 and V8 competitors, and wasn’t critical in the first place. The most notable improvements were: a 5.1% reduction in mass, a 33% increase in power which peaked some 1200rpm sooner, and - crucially - far friendlier packaging, which opened the path to utilizing a gamechanging drivetrain technology that in 1963 was more theoretical than practical: all-wheel drive.

Buyer expectations had also shifted in that time. The use of a shoehorn to install oneself in the pint-sized Loki was acceptable in 1963. Twenty years later, those with the means and the wish to drive a cutting-edge supercar wanted room for their stock portfolio and latte as well, not to mention their own mostly increased girth. Other models arrived to fill that need, while Loki would remain as small as reasonably possible, its mission focused on being the last word in both speed and agility, while remaining reasonable for mundane passenger transportation.

Loki still sold on bragging rights, but now they were based less on what it had, and more on what it could do. It was still named after the trickster god, but now not for being tricky to drive, but for the tricks one could do with it. Combining a full four hundred horsepower, a small, lightweight, and slippery body with ample downforce, meaty sport-compound tires, all four of which driven via a sophisticated yet reliable triple-Torsen drivetrain, with special attention paid to unsprung weight and low rotating inertia especially in yaw, the results speak for themselves:

6 Likes
is anyone even going to read this? I guess I'll just put a spaceship here (_)(_)=====D~~

Planar_Badge_original_rainbow3 (Small)

The 1982 ZY21 Zedas EX-S

By Planar

The ZY10 series Zeydra was a success by all counts, even spawning a sedan version as a cheaper alternative to the Danazine, and there was a lot of hope for its successor, 1979’s ZY20 series, to continue that, and it, well, didn’t.

Debuting a year after the SM40 Danazine, it once again was on a larger modified version of the Danazine’s chassis, but unlike the ZY10 it wouldn’t just inherit good dynamics, it would also inherit quite a few issues. The PASS hydropneumatic suspension, Rotomax’s insistence to stick to carburettors or clunky mechanical fuel injection, and overall early run quality woes made it a less than popular upgrade from the ZY10.

But that’s where the ZY21 came in.

The ZY21 and SM42 Danazine doing their “sit and paw” tyre change trick- 1982 press release for the cars’ launches.

The ZY21 wasn’t a massive overhaul of the ZY20, but just like its SM42 cousin it focussed more on refining what it had. Updates to the PASS suspension and mechanical fuel injection improved reliability, minor styling tweaks rounded out the already decent looks, and most importantly, an EX-S performance model was introduced.

The EX-S would set a fire under the Zeydra, to say the least, with Rotomax’s RXVN-92 V12 powering it (a first for the Zeydra), the engine’s 206kw launching it to a top speed of 265 km/h, while added aero and ventilated brakes improving handling in not insignificant ways.

Comfort would be one area the ZY20 as a whole was a clear improvement in, with the PASS suspension only aiding its higher quality interior, complete with a cassette deck as standard in the ZY21, and high quality leather everywhere you look, that created a complete package of comfort with at least some sporting pedigree still.

5 Likes

We got aditional submissions from
@moroza and @lotto77

Round 2 is over, just give me a lil time to go through the submissions.

3 Likes

Round 2 results:

The total score is 66 now (28+38) and previous scores are carried over. Here I also include a short note of what I thought of the design so far.

@Isabella Hexe Magdalena: 44/66 points

Rather a light weight and economical coupe, the mechanical side of this car was a delight, sadly it lost points on design and story. The character of the car was carried over nicely, it barely got bigger and heavier while the look makes me reminded of the original design. But as an 80s entree, the Magdalena looks too late 90s in design, another point is the use of such high profile tires that also knocked a few points off. The 80s earned 26/38 points.

@Kreator ACZ Badger: 40/66 points

The Badger for 80s did feel like an athlete who let go and honestly matches the times, mechanically it’s a great submission, but design wise, it felt like a downgrade to it’s 60’s model. No power bulges, no theatrics, just an 80s sedan with a V8 engine fit in it. Story wise, kinda makes sense (some points won back by it) but still, too tame for a muscle car. For 80s Badger got 23/38 points

@xsneakyxsimx 1968 Maunderer GT: 46/66 points

A big downgrade from 60s this design was a hard one to see. There was clear attempt to keep the original identity in looks but it was confusing on some design choices. Mechanically it’s fine, but the charm in the look from 60’s has been lost. 80s design gets 24/38 points

@Gr1tty_CoviD 1969 Lobo: 42/66 points

The design is well enough 80’s having a clear Italian influence over it, while identity kept well, the rear design does seem too loud for the era. 25/38

@abg7 1962 AMS Antares V8 5.0 35/66 points

The design improved by a good bunch for 80s, but the design yet again, looks too modern as if it’s a late 90s car. Mechanically it’s good and the identity got a bit confusing, loosing major "charm factors in it’s design from a British look, to an American look. 29/38

@Ch_Flash 1969 HAMFA 63/66 points

This, is what this challenge was all about. Truly looks like an 80s car while if i see it from afar, i can still tell it’s a Hamfa! Kept to it’s roots, whilst growing with times as we see the plastic bumpers and the 80’s box design! 38/38 points!

@DuceTheTruth100 Wells Sidewinder 47/66 points

Honestly, love this car, love how 80s it looks, but it’s like what dodge did to it’s Charger badge in 90s… it went from a 2 door sport car with German/Italian influence, to a Japanese coupe… Only place you lost points, is the Identity area (and the rear end design a bit) , sorry man… 26/38 points

@GassTiresandOil Armor Hurricance SC 61/66 points

This is what i expected to see from a 60’s muscle car being humbled by 80s gas crisis but be f**kin mad about! The car has character and charm still whilst being true to it’s roots. A simple but deserved 36/38 points.

@lotto77 Zeydra F6U 52/66 points

This picture may not do it justice, but this is a good muscle design, and it does feel British! Like how Escort was to Capri, this translates well between the two era, both mechanical and looks wise. A great glow up from 60s, a well deserved 32/38

@OME 60’s Grief 61/66 points

The character in this design is just perfect, you look at it and see the Italian design influence kept and what a great look. 38/38 enough said

@Ultimate_Billy BS 750LSI 52/66 points

This, was a confusing car in a good way, it’s that one car company that did things their way and didn’t care. One of the most unique identities I’ve seen and kept pretty well. The design was just a preference that didn’t match my taste but i do respect it. 30/38

@toxicnet Jackman Phoenix 40/66 points

I like the effort that they made a convertible, but the design is weak, headlights and grill are too modern for 80’s and the rear seats stick out far too high. Identity well kept tho! 20/38

@MoteurMourmin Hikaru Katana 63/66 points

I was excited for the Katana, the ad was perfect, the 80’s boxy shape and everything about it…

And it didn’t disappoint! The car does feel less premium from it’s 60’s counterpart, but overall it’s a great design. 35/38

@moroza DCM Nordwagen Loki 53/66 points

The picture may do this cars a bit of injustice, but the design did improve from 60s, and the story behind it justifies the mechanical/engineering changes. By looks it might be a bit confusing to see these two cars are sharing the name but after a second look you’d say “ah, ok, yeah i see it”. 32/38 points

Thank you for the submissions, all the cars were a ton of fun to look and find the advancements and iconic features. Hope yall keep it up for Round 3

11 Likes

I’m worried what my laptop would do for round 3 when i have to take photo of @MoteurMourmin and @moroza 's submissions. Pray for this lil guy.

Yeah, I’m not super surprised. Visual designs have never been my strong suit, especially as we get into the newer car designs.

Not even sure if the Maunderer will get a mid 2000s version yet…

1 Like

There’s always another option… outsourcing.
I’d be open to providing such a service, since I didn’t get a chance to join in sooner, and it feels a little late to hop into a legacy-type challenge this far into the run.

…that is, as long as a collab like that is allowed by the host…

i don’t mind, you just have to work on the design structure he set up