Automation Airfield Power Lap Times

Added.

You have 2 number 1 spots in the OP :wink:

Might as well throw another production car into the mix.

Name of car: PAK Gold Standard 400-17
Intended use: EXTREME MUSCLE/Hypercar
Year: 2017
Power & Torque ratings: 1514hp @ 6900 rpm / 1693 nm @ 5100 rpm
Price (prod. cars only): $350K
Turbo or NA: Twin Turbo
Weight: 1575 kg
Format : F-AWD


ā€œHey, letā€™s build a premium muscle car.ā€
They built 3. In one. What a mess.

The power wars are escalating! I feel very un-me-like, having a car surrounded by things 1.5-2 times more powerful on the board :laughing:

The V6 is certainly a good choice, strop. I imagine you could zoom past all of us with some more tinkering. :wink:

Iā€™m not going to be tinkering with that car any further, because thatā€™s how (at least in this version), the car is going to be sold. Iā€™ll add that the calculated fuel economy of Salamander is 11.6L/100km, it uses sport compound road +8 tyres, it comes with standard entertainment, and its price tag of 250000 Automation Money Units is with a 40% markup on a Tiny factory because my company is tiny and Australia has significant car taxes for high performance and luxury vehicles :stuck_out_tongue:

As you can see, Iā€™ve no problem making the car go fast (see Race car leaderboard where I pretty much abused the sliders to the maximum). And Iā€™d love to put my F-AWD car on the board too (the PAK looks really good, I like it and the fact itā€™ll be a competitor), butā€¦ Iā€™ve already made it several times in the past with a V8 and Iā€™m waiting for V16s with quad turbo supercharging to come out, because thatā€™s what it was always meant to be :smiling_imp:

Haha! Both my PAKs are really unoptimized powerhouses. Massive gas guzzlers with little regard for anything else. Amped up super tyres and a robust suspensions keep them in check. Wish I could do what you did with 800hp. :smiley:

I gave it another shot, with a smaller chassis and the same engine as before. This may be my last race submission, as I plan to stick to front engine vehicles; Though I might try a forced induction route. :smiley:

With this, it feels like I am approaching the limits for front engine vehicles. Though it feels as if a tad more could be shaved off here too. :unamused:

Race car airfield submission 2;
Original larger images; imgur.com/a/HCHdL
Time; 1:02.80
Name of car: DXM - Wyvern RS
Intended use: Race
Year: 2020
Power & Torque ratings: 1460hp, 976ft-lbs
Turbo or NA: NA
Weight: 1181.0kg
Format: AWD

Was the tech year limited to 2017 or not?

It technically is in the OP, but hey, the screenshotā€™s helpful. Thatā€™s a lot of g in the small circle test!

Tech year is limited to 2017 for production cars, 2020 for race cars.

Name of car: Hasszahn Platsch R
Intended use: Race Car
Year: 2020
Power & Torque ratings: 1116 HP@9200RPM/1044NMā‚¬6500RPM
Price (prod. cars only): -
Turbo or NA: Turbo
Weight: 1118.6Kg
Format (MR, F-AWD etc.):Mid engine/AWD
Picture of lap time: http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/306613531669208394/79F9D705C997B768D6B3F584AFE0A7F5F6CD7D57/?interpolation=lanczos-none&output-format=jpeg

Gemina Fuglia XRP - the testing platform for Gemina XIIIā€™s new Customer Assisted Performance Development program is a track exclusive machine made in very limited edition.

It features a naturally aspirated 4.6 liter V12 mounted mid-ship, derived directly from the 3.0l used in the AGP Series. Because of the broad torque curve a 4 speed sequential gearbox was deemed adequate. Aiming maximum driver involvement, the 760PS are sent solely to the rear wheels.


I reckon youā€™d have a good chance of making your car faster if you went for a 6 or 8 cylinder engine.

You may have a point. I was limited in engine size because of the engineā€™s length. Also, better weight distribution maybe? Iā€™ll give it a try. Thanks.

I Only Have the Standalone Demo so Iā€™m Very Limited with Choices, But I Decided to give it a Try anyway:
Name of car: Letto Genji ā€œEDSHā€
Intended use: Production Hypercar
Year: 2016
Power & Torque ratings: 398 hp@8600 RPM & 261 ft-lb@7300 RPM
Price (prod. cars only): $358.9k
Turbo or NA: NA
Weight: 2655.6 lb
Format (MR, F-AWD etc.): Front Engine Rear Wheel Drive
Picture of lap time:
i352.photobucket.com/albums/r333/Letto18/Automation-2016-mar-5-001.jpg
i352.photobucket.com/albums/r333/Letto18/Automation-2016-mar-5-002.jpg
i352.photobucket.com/albums/r333/Letto18/Automation-2016-mar-5-003.jpg
i352.photobucket.com/albums/r333/Letto18/Automation-2016-mar-5-004.jpg

Race Version:
Intended use: Race
Year: 2016
Power & Torque ratings: 455 hp@9100RPM & 296 ft-lb@7300 RPM
Turbo or NA: NA
Weight: 2213.4 lb
Format (MR, F-AWD etc.): Front Engine Rear Wheel Drive
Picture of lap time:
i352.photobucket.com/albums/r333/Letto18/Automation-2016-mar-5-007.jpg
i352.photobucket.com/albums/r333/Letto18/Automation-2016-mar-5-006.jpg

Hereā€™s a blast from the past.
Name of car: Ventnor Bambino GT*
Intended use: Production supercar/grand tourer
Year: 1970
Engine: 402 CID V8, Mechanical Fuel Injection
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Power and Torque Rating: 410 hp @ 5300 RPM, 456ft-lb @ 3300 RPM
Price: $138820
Turbo or NA: NA
Weight: 2861.8 lb.
Format: Mid-engine, rear wheel drive.
Picture of Lap Time



An update on the Bambino from 1965, the GT featured a luxurious hand-made interior and a few exterior styling tweaks.


In addition, the 402 six-pack was upgraded to utilize fuel injection.

  • Ventnor is a subsidiary of Petoskey Motors ZLC.

That first one is in no way a hypercar, more like a hot hatch.
If you want to build a real hypercar, get the full game.

yeeeeiiiisss GET. THE. FULL. GAME.
YOUā€™LL LOVE IT OVER HERE.
muahahHaHaHaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

jk, if you fo like it, we would always welcome newcomer here :slight_smile:

[quote=ā€œnerdā€]

That first one is in no way a hypercar, more like a hot hatch.
If you want to build a real hypercar, get the full game.[/quote]

I Put Hypercar as thatā€™s what the Game put it as looking at the Market:
i352.photobucket.com/albums/r333/Letto18/Automation-2016-mar-7-001_1.jpg
Iā€™m Guessing Due to P/W Ratio? or maybe Top Speed of 312.5 km/h?
Also, I Do Plan on getting the Full Game when it Becomes more affordable, With Limited/No Income $33 Canadian is too much for me at the moment, If It were to go on sale at some point though for around $10-11 Iā€™ll be sure to get it, Maybe even $20 if need be.