If it’s not too much trouble, would you whack up the power and weight figures for the cars alongside the cars? I suspect my car was a lot less powerful than most of the top half of the field (at least, I hope!)
That said doesn’t seem like a bad result. But it’ll be nearly impossible to beat @HowlerAutomotive on points!
It’s possible that, even if @HowlerAutomotive were to win Stage 2 overall, he’d regret not upgrading the braking system and using an all-alloy engine, since these changes would’ve improved drivability and weight distribution respectively. But I suspect that he won’t have to…
It’s time for the 3rd stage, so you must vote to give points to your favorite cars (don’t worry, you can vote for yourself for first place), just don’t repeat votes and nominate the same car 3 times.
Now, if it happens something weird like a car that honestly doesn’t look that good gains a lot of votes (as last times when someone cheated [whom is participating in this round by the way)] I reserve the right to impose a % penalty on the total points for that car, now, on to the voting…
You have 59:30 hours to vote
DEADLINE: June 26th 12:30 pm UTC-5
Link to the showroom post (if you want to open it in a different tab or something) Big Fruinian Muscle Cars Cup Stage 2 [FINISHED]
WHICH CAR YOU VOTE FOR 1ST PLACE? (5 points)
0 voters
WHICH CAR YOU VOTE FOR 2ND PLACE? (3 points)
0 voters
WHICH CAR YOU VOTE FOR 3RD PLACE? (1 point)
0 voters
@Sillyworld Before the start and up until somewhere in the middle of the cheapening process (I last checked at about $23k I think), the Firebrand was a tenth or two faster than the Revera’s current time. But I wanted to build an all rounder, not a specialist - and for round 1 scores, three grand in price makes a massive difference. Even a few hundred does.
The first versions did indeed use lighter materials for the body and the engine. The weight distribution of the final version is not too far from 50/50, even with the Iron block (which was among the last changes), but the increased weight up front did have an impact on performance. That said, the material change was a conscious decision so I do not regret it. I did not know what times other cars would bring to the table, and fully expected someone to go all-out on performance so I had to weigh every tenth I gave up versus the increase in Round 1 value.
Both the 1st and 2nd Round were won by specialised cars - the one that had the ultimate value for money was not near the top around the track and the one that was unbeatable around the track was quite pricy. I wanted to make the Firebrand do both, so I had to think through very carefully what I was willing to sacrifice in each category. Second place in two rounds where the requirements work against each other, especially considering the strong competition, is roughly where I hoped to end up, and better than what I sometimes expected looking at the other cars.
@strop, I hope so 
I put a lot of work into the looks and presentation so I’m hoping for good results from round three.
It’s interesting how you manage to end in both second places, I learned a lot by examining your car!
It was intended (sort of) that in the first round pony and pony budget should exceed, and in the second muscle and muscle premium, being the third round the defining one.
Anyways, as @strop asked, here is the 2nd round table with weight and power.
Interesting, i didnt think sebring times would improve that much with just a raw increase in power, ill take 3rd!
Unless you’re on the Virginia international raceway (mega ultra bumpy), or the carpark autocross, more power wins 
That said your car was obviously well tuned for track, like mine, hence punching above power for weight. I don’t think I could have gotten much more out of my configuration without compromising a few key points, such as build quality and reliability and the ability to use it as a daily!
Also, omg, so hard to pick just three cars this round. The styling standard is really high.
As a relative newcomer I did not trouble the leaders (or even expect to), but to be best in class (Muscle Premium) for stage 1 of this round was unexpected, although if I had designed a car with more bang for the buck, I would have done even better.
Dont be shy, vote my car
i expected my car was the cheapest, lightest, and powerless in the competition. boy am i wrong…
but of course… asdren is running away with this round isn’t he?
winning both round 2 and round 3. he’s the overall winner it seems.
It’s just like what happened in stage 1, where winning rounds 2 and 3 caused a massive upset win. Though this is more running away with it.
For stage 3, well, it’s probably going to be different anyway because our bodies from stage 1 are locked in.
And in case you were wondering… yes, I totally forgot about this xD
Anyways, here are the results for the round 3!
Congratulations to @HowlerAutomotive wasn’t the cheapest, wasn’t the fastest, wasn’t the prettiest, but still manage a solid 54 points. In a way, is weird because @asdren car was very modern, the design, the engineering, and still the Firebrand prove that even the old cheap technology is worth its use 
Congratulations to everyone who participate, proving to the fruinian petrolheads that even the big muscle cars can be fast, relatively cheap, economical and environmental friendly!
Oh man what!!! I was looking forward to a top ten finish only to be beaten by the car that was constantly behind me hmph! Congrats to everybody. on a seperate note how can there be 20 votes when there was only 18 competitors?
4th. ooh. i didn’t expect to be that high, i thought i would be in the middle pack.
but those 2 up top… literally doubled mine… scary
@howlerautomotive who would’ve thought a race ready v12 car done on the cheap side would’ve won. congrats, that was a nice build.
and now. to round 3, where the moaning about your valvetrain choices in round 1 begins.
I did vote, so I guess some expectator in the forum (maybe vri404) also voted 
I was the other vote. I wanted to stay involved despite not having an entrant to the contest.
So, If that’s a skew to the votes, I apologize if you didn’t like that, but my votes wouldn’t have changed the outcome to be honest.
Nice job @HowlerAutomotive, strong performance indeed. Same to @asdren and @AirJordan . The styling round always shakes things up a bit and I was lucky to benefit a bit from that!
I’ll mitigate my valve train choices with my sheer displacement… I have a lot of potential power at my disposal still!
Don’t worry, I believe the voting was, and ought to have been, open to non-participants. Otherwise it’d be the equivalent of those internal industry awards that the public doesn’t care about
Ah all good I was a little perplexed lol.
say that to the DOHC 4 valve guys…
i just stayed in the middle line with SOHC 3 valves. not bad but not the best but okay-ish
