Anyone else getting an “Empty Folder” when they try to open the Trump Cards link?
[quote=“Packbat”]@CadillacDave: I was about to post the same comment when Der Bayer posted this:
[/quote]
Oh right 
this is why I should pay more attention
When i saw the start of the last pre-season race, i thought “Is this BRC or Formula Offroad?” The Islandics like to drive on lakes/rivers/ponds… 
I had already opened the trump cards and I noticed that the stats on my car were wrong. It shows my car having 144 HP, 156 Nm and 113.5 engine reliabilty. I can’t find the original car files to check but I believe I was at 190 - 200 HP and 25 - 30 reliability. If those are the stats you have could I resend my car?
Anyone who thinks his stats are completely wrong, please send me the Automation export of your car.
Don’t send me your car if only
- engine reliability or
- car reliability
are different. Those are processed values and don’t match the ingame values. Please also note that TrackSportiness and TrackDrivability are not equal to Drivability and Sportiness.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
edit: will upload the fixed trump cards again.
Trump cars working. Thanks @DerBayer!
THIS IS MY WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION! 
This is the Lizzott MUP HV12.
(Shown above in the color “Missing Texture Purple”)
A V12 Muscle-Hearse
Able to go from 0 to 100km/h in seconds thanks to its V12 with a displacement of liters developing horsepower and torque.
It is also able to stop from 100 to 0 in meters.
Cornering-wise it can pull G’s in not only the 50m circle, but also the 250m circle thanks to its innovative suspension-chassis combination which works to keep the body centimeters off the ground.
It also made it around the automation test track in seconds.
I really, Really!, like the “economy” 
for Isaac’s Jeepers. 2.02 liter per kilometer… 
I think i may have made a mistake using a V6 : 
@RobtheFiend: I assume it’s a gearing issue - if your first gear is too tall relative to the minimum fuel economy speed, the fuel consumption goes through the roof.
@CadillacDave: I doubt it - I believe V6 is best power/weight that you can get right now. I would have used one if I could have got enough power out of it.
@salen00b: …I’m speechless.
[quote=“Packbat”]
salen00b: …I’m speechless.[/quote]
… 
It was tough fiddling with the V6 trying to get power out of it but in the end i gave up, I feel my car is competetive against the vans and Jeep thing at least it might surprise me though
I picked V6 simply because it’s the shortest and therefore making my car something like mid-front engined so I have great weight distribution.
[quote=“salen00b”]
It is also able to stop from 100 to 0 in meters.[/quote]
as opposed to kilometers? Hahaha. Sorry, just had to.
Edit : looking at trump cards, and WOW, some of you people went very bonkers on the engine configurations
Sheesh, didn’t realise my engine reliability was that bad…
…can anyone advise me on what to expect with a 15.3 engine reliability other than overheating, blown engine, etc?
With a bit of luck you’re going to be just fine.
Also I am SO rooting for Isaac!
[quote=“squidhead”]
With a bit of luck you’re going to be just fine.
Also I am SO rooting for Isaac![/quote]
Phew! I’ll hope you’re right!
And same, his car is wonderful. Especially with the 202.4l/100km economy! Also, @przemicho, your car is beautiful. Reminds of classic Alfa Romeo’s from a similar era.
uhhh… My car is suppose to have AWD not RWD. But the stats seem the same so… oh well? 
There is no AWD in 1966, only manual 4x4 for hardcore offroading.