Totally agree. Other stats are important too. But to the point that cars with ZERO sportiness are better cars than other cars with more… And once more, I’m not talking about my own car. I’m talking about other cars.
The indexes should have been changed based on the era rather than the previous challenge. In this case, the sportiness should have been bumped.
Even if there weren’t hot hatches back then there were small sports cars. Such as the giulietta GTA that I based my car on. Or the Lotus Elan.
[quote=“Der Bayer”]
The challenge is not simulated in years, just the annual cost is based on 5 years. It would be possible to do five times with a fifth of the buyers each time and you send in new prices. But then, how many of the participants would send in a new price in 24 hours? If they just don’t have the time to do so, they have a huge disadvantage. [size=50]And it would increase my workload by the factor 5.[/size]
I do agree that service cost is too important, so I’m gonna multiply the ingame service cost with .5 in the future.[/quote]
The fuel consumption should have more importance in the service costs. To differentiate better the cars based on their fuel consumption.