Will the racing portion be simulated through Automation and/or Beam testing?
wheel diameter
automation stats, the beam stuff is just for flavor
Then am I just stupid or is there no maximum width then? 710 mm diameter will already get 395 wide tires
the clk gtr had 345 rear wheels as standard, if you think such a wide tire is gonna be beneficial then by all means go ahead. but this better be a good looking machine.
GT1? Hell yeah. And what timing! I was just thinking of cooking a high-quality road version of the HTM winner. Not for some weeks, tho, so glad there’s ample time.
Will you allow some leeway for livery realism? I’ll redo the bodywork, but if permitted, would like to dress it up as more art car than corporate billboard.
Rules are mostly quite sensible and clear. Only the scoring system is a bit murky.
yes but the aesthetics need to be believable from both a decorative and aerodynamic standpoint since it’ll be the criteria with the most focus. i’ll be honest; as it stands, this would need a lot of work in both regards.
now this is epic
Quite interesting rulesets.
I’ve tried creating an engine for that, and hit the “cooling wall” as I’ve accidentally over 700 cooling… ouch…
As a GT1 enjoyer, I have the moral obligation to remind people of this challenge, so here’s a teaser for my car:
I made this, am i correct in assuming a less than 2% or 2 points whichever comes first is the leeway we have before getting marked with an infraction?
Ie. My HP and Torque are both slightly above 650 but within that margin.
no, this would be in penalty of a minor infraction because it’s within 2% on each; the hard limit is 650 on both.
On NA cars does the techpool for aspiration still have to fall between 3-10?
yes, but it can be set to 3
I don’t have any entries from the people posting adverts/pictures, so as a reminder,
@z2bbgr
@geometrys
@ArizonaCaseo
please send your cars in via Forum DMs, and claim your mulligan before the time limit is up!