Lukerules117s land barge thread with the stupidly long title

because they are common, easy to get parts for, reliable, I like the body style of the older ones and probably about as close as you can get to an affordable to maintain luxury car.

I would say so. They started building the Windsor
302 in 1969 and it lasted in regular production until the mid-90s. It
was sold in everything from the Mustangs, to the Bronco, to the F-Series
trucks, and, of course, the panther bodies.
The parts availability for that engine is very high, especially with
all of the aftermarket applications and the modding community
surrounding Fox Body cars. Youā€™re also going a little lower tech with an
OHV engine instead of the SOHC 4.6 design.
Also, because it was produced for so long, you can get it with
carburettors, various versions of fuel injection, and several
transmissions will mount up to it. The boxy panthers were pretty
simplistic cars, and werenā€™t as popular as their late 90s and 00s
counter-parts, but it would still serve you well, cost you probably
next-to-nothing in insurance, and be even cheaper to buy.

And all of that sounds perfect to me. :smiley:

Relevant

1 Like

Yeah not swayed against it at all, and at least they DIDNā€™T use a square wheel some a certain British car, and im not swayed against an old american car at all, and that is the kind of handling I not only expect but desire.

What handling?

2 Likes

ā€¦And by now, lukerules117 must have been regreted their decision on asking for an opinion :stuck_out_tongue:

In the internet, everyone have an opinion

5 Likes

I never claimed to have a good opinionā€¦ but its one Iā€™m sticking too damn it! Besides, Iā€™ll get plenty of opportunities to get nonboaty cars with tiny I4s later on in life, but the opportunities a big american luxobarge will only get fewer and fewer, and right now Iā€™m dumb enough to think getting one would be a good idea so why not? If I donā€™t get one Iā€™d probably regret it, but if I did get one Iā€™d also probably regret it. :stuck_out_tongue:

4 Likes

Just saying, as it has been mentioned many times already here.

You are not the first person coming here asking if X car is a good first car choice.

And then to say all the flaws your idea has do not matter and that the opinion of guys who in many cases had the experience (and regret) of owning terrible first cars does not matter.

You will buy the car, and regret it, but please donā€™t be that guy who then complains that itā€™s a slow ass badly made boat that is going to cost a fuck ton of money in gas when oil comes back up (which WILL happen)

I am really wondering why you guys ask for other peopleā€™s opinion if you are just going to ignore it all.

1 Like

Iā€™m not really ignoring it all, if anything more people have been recommending the panther platform rather than against it. somethings are just somewhat pointless to point out due to how well known they are however like ā€œboatyā€ handling, bad gas miliage(which will be bad in any fullsize car), and overall poor performance, and if anything it actually performs as Iā€™d expect, or slightly BETTER when it comes to acceleration and gas mileage. That said from what Iā€™ve read the panther platform cars seem pretty good for a somewhat cheap to maintain fullsize car.

If to get a Panther, get a 96+
The 4.6L SOHC is by far, a better engine than the 5.0 (302) Windsor, Cleveland, and M (simply M)

List of Advantages over earlier models:
OBD-2
R-134 A/C system
Compatible parts for a decade.
Huge parts availability.
Inexpensive to buy
Inexpensive to maintain
Highest fuel economy of entire Panther range due to lean 4.6L and tall highway gears.

1 Like

Compatible parts for a decade.
Huge parts availability.
Inexpensive to buy
Inexpensive to maintain

well Iā€™ve also heard the same about earlier models with their windsor 302 in regards the that aspect, however the lack of OBD-2 ports in older cars is something Iā€™m concerned about mainly because I have no clue what they have instead, but I am a bit weary about getting a nonpushrod engine as Iā€™ve heard they tend to be unreliable and more expensive to maintain, however a bit better gas miliage would be welcome.

Donā€™t tell that to my 1997 Crown Victoria with 332k on the odometer

1 Like

Fair enough, I probably will end up getting a newer panther if I was to get a panther at all just because itā€™d be easier to find them in good condition as well as probably easier to check if there are problems due to the OBD-2 ports, I just wish they had that 80ā€™s american luxury car look that I love, but meh appearances are unimportant I guess.

1997 Lincoln Town Car

Lincoln had custom body work on their Panther to keep it looking like the older ones from the 80s, because they knew their market.

1 Like

Iā€™d argue that they also did a similar thing on the older panthers by making them look a bit more 70ā€™s-ish with the pronounced lights on the side and grill and that makes the town cars look even better to me. That said I do prefer the look of the late 90ā€™s lincolns to the fords.

Edit: just to make it clear Iā€™ll try as much as I can not to weigh body style into my decision.

Yeah, we have a 1999 Expedition with a 4.6 that just rolled 200,000 miles. Theyā€™re great engines.

Hinestly, Iā€™d still recommend you the Lexus. Yes, it is more expensive, but it is a better car.

While the Panthers were built just so FoMoCo could have something large, using parts off the corporate shelf, the LS400 was created as the ultimate luxury car.

This means that it is no-compromise. Its engine was not created to work in a truck, a sports car, a premium midsizer, a cop carā€¦ it was built to be a great luxury car powerplant.

The transmission was not a run-on-the-mill unit, made for as many uses as possible, but a comfortable cruise machine.

The Lexus is much lighter and has double wishnome suspension, which gives a better driving experience.

The LS400 also has reliability that matches or even beats the Panthers - barely anything fails, and usually it is minor things.

If it breaks down, parts were made for over a decade for the Lexus LS400, SC400 and Toyota Celsior.

Indeed, it was so good that 1/20 of the sales went to people employed by rival fullsize manufacturers, which is disproporrionate to the number of fullsize manufacturer employes in the landbarge buyer population.

Yeah, it is more expensive than the Panthers, but similarily a gourmet dish is more expensive than a McDonalds meal. Which one would you buy if you wanted a great experience?

Dude. Yes, it is more reliable and more of a luxury car, but have you listened to any of the points the other users have made? Because clearly you fucking havenā€™t.
The 302 and Modular motors were made for donkeys years, so parts are by no means in short supply and performance parts (if he chooses to go down that path) are also very much available. LS400s in America are expensive whereas Panther platforms are not, and thatā€™s really what it all boils down to. If he wants a cheap, slow ā€œluxuryā€ car, the Panther cars are easily the better choice and itā€™s not hard to see why.

5 Likes

They are not that much expensive. The purchase price of a Lexus would be about 1k (3k vs 2k) higher than the Lincoln, which is not much, considering how much better the LS is. And the reliability and part cost difference is going to generate costs that would be $500 at worst. At best, youā€™ll spend less cash fixing the Lexus.

So the cost difference is going to be $1500 at worst, which is not much, considering how much better the LS400 is.

Believe it or not, thereā€™s more components to a car than just the engine. The 1UZ-FE is a brilliant engine, yes, but: I donā€™t think you understand that EVERYTHING has a limited life. For example, the gauge clusters are notorious for going kaputt on LS400s. If OP canā€™t solder, heā€™s gonna have to pay to get that fixed. The steering system on the LS400 also wasnā€™t brilliant in terms of reliability, and the steering issues can be pretty serious.
Add these issues together with the lack of available parts and the ā€œluxury carā€ tax (people will charge you more for repairs) and youā€™ve just gone and got yourself a money pit.
I love LS400s, I really do, but it doesnā€™t make sense to get one considering the prices of the things in America and considering that OP will happily settle on a Crown Vic or Towncar or whatever the fuck.

Edit: Also, how the hell can you say $1,000 isnā€™t a lot? A lot of people donā€™t even have $1,000 to spend on a new car in the first place.

1 Like

Both the lexuss and panthers are cheap enough that Iā€™m not too concerned about initial price of buying them but rather the more long term costs(which in terms of gas I am aware that the lexus has an advantage). but honestly being light isnā€™t really something Iā€™d want especially while just learning to drive, yes itā€™s better for gas mileage, but it also improve acceleration(which i donā€™t really want) and is bad for safety. Iā€™m also somewhat skeptical about them having better reliability, I donā€™t doubt that they are somewhat reliable, however if something DOES break it is in the end as you said was ā€œcreated as the ultimate luxury carā€ and as such would most likely have less available parts then a luxury car built primarily out of parts designed to be able to suit pretty much anything, because while the parts in the Lexus will mostly be only in their other luxury cars the panther platform will have an engine thatā€™s been put in anything from sports cars to trucks to luxury cars and as such will have a much better parts availability.

Believe it or not, thereā€™s more components to a car than just the
engine. The 1UZ-FE is a brilliant engine, yes, but: I donā€™t think you
understand that EVERYTHING has a limited life.,

Finally someone else who realizes engines arenā€™t the only parts that wear out!

4 Likes