Then again, any rear suspension type more advanced than semi-trailing arms (roughly equivalent to rear MacPherson struts) would add unnecessary cost anyway.
2003 ACR Lanea Aventura 6XSi
It is also incredibly sporty. Because of 1. The AWD and 2. The inline six. It also has this spoiler! What do you need other than this? Go to your nearest ACR dealer and inquire about the coolest car around. Ignoring all the other cool cars. Do not under any circumstances go to Ilaris.
stats:
infinite
cost: 16900
6 cylinders
5 seats
ok good night
p.s. dONT TRUST THE YANGWOO!!! HATE safety. LOVE speeding. TEXT and DRIVE. do NOT USE CAR SEAT!!! yangwoo bad!!!
PRETTY COOL
ONLY PROBLEM I HAVE WITH YOUR CAR
IT’S NOT A YANGWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
SAFE SHIT
LOOKING IMPECCABLE
REMEMBER TO USE CAR CHILD SEAT
SHOP AT ALDI MOTHERFUCKER
FLAMING FLAMES
QUACK QUACK
MOTHERFUCKER
BET YOUR WIFE FUCKS YOU
BLESSED BY GOD HIMSELF
LOVE THY NEIGHBOR
DRIVE YANGWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Given that ladder-framed cars cannot have a MacPherson strut front end, this exemption for such platforms makes perfect sense.
SUBMISSIONS ARE OPEN
The deadline is on Sunday, 18th June at 23.59 UTC+7.
Before submitting make sure to read through the rules and priorities again. If you have questions, feel free to ask. Good luck and have fun.
Here is the car next to some typical Indonesian vehicles!
Look how small and reserved it is, despite the enormous interior!
Here it is parked in an extremely tiny parking spot!
Buy this car now! It is perfect!
GLOBUS TRAVELLER LT
The Traveller is not the first what comes to your mind when you think about US cars.
However, the car from Florida is comfy like a kingsize couch, spacious like a football stadium and the V6 is strong as a bald eagle.
And no, it won´t invade your garage if it notices a drop of oil - it is a world car and therefore peaceful and economical.
The advert features an USDM model built for the local taste. Asian market RHD versions with less garish interior colors are available in your area.
2003 Billancourt Spacieuse
From France with love, this spacious MPV has comfort, style and room, lots of room. A premium leather interior with innovative French design keeps all five passengers comfortable on their journeys. That, in addition to ISOFIX anchor points and state-of-the-art safety make this the perfect vehicle for the small family. A 2.0 N/A four cylinder engine pushes 152 hp to the front wheels through a 5-speed manual gearbox, which, while it won’t set your pants on fire, is enough to get out of its own way.
THE IP RUBIQ
Most people will probably buy the Rubiq because of its looks. And can we really blame them? After all, the chic styling is hard not to fall for.
But there is more to the Rubiq than just a stylish outside. The upright shape makes it roomy and practical. The 1.5 litre engine is very sparse on fuel. We think you will appreciate details like the rear seat split not in two, but in three parts, giving great flexibility, and the wood trim in the luggage compartment that will spare the carpet when loading heavy stuff. The build quality and reliability is at a high level.
So don’t be ashamed if you fall for its looks. Even from a rational standpoint, the Rubiq is a purchase that will hold up well.
On the other hand, if it’s too slow (>12 seconds to 60 mph), they (and their children) will most likely complain about the lack of straight-line pace, which would make overtaking or passing traffic unnecessarily difficult.
I’ve never been to a south east Asian country but from what I’ve observed of photos and videos I don’t think anyone is driving 0-60 at any point with how busy the roads are. Under 12 seconds is pretty fast for such cheap cars anyway
South East Asia in 2003 could tolerate much slower than a 12s 0-100 time; the Dahiatsu Xenia is a seven seater that was once available with a 1.0L three cylinder engine.
With that being said, how much does the buyer value 0-100km/h time? If they have to choose between slower but more economical car or faster but less economical car, which one would they pick?
Their preference will be for economy over performance - they won’t want anything that’s too fast for their needs, but as long as it returns good fuel economy figures and meets the requirements, it will be under consideration.
As long as it isn’t slower than 13 seconds or so then it’s fine. Most of the inspiration cars have engines ranging from 1.7-2.0l in displacement, and their 0-100kmh times are roughly in the 11-12 second range. Fuel economy is good, but if it means a painfully slow car then the clients would definitely go for the faster car but less efficient car.
Are wagons strict or is a “long hatchback” okay too? Thinking of using the 08_US_liftback_S_cpp body, thing’s basically the wagon but with a bit more window slope
2003 Oran Zelda ST7 2.5 V
MSRP 16,500 SIMOLEONS
Think of the children, order an Oran Zelda today!
You wouldn’t want to disappoint your family, right?
License plate according to flag logic.
Are you looking at cargo weight capacity as a stat??