GT-P Results. Track performance + user vote will change the placing of vehicles.
This result sheet is not the final verdict, and only accounts for 50% of your score.
Well, from the looks of it it does not bode well for the Rado.
This is going to be a commercial flop. The slowest engine - transmission combo and not exactly a good stylist is a recipe for disaster with these results.
I’ve released the 1971 GT-P Market Pack, which has only the 24 test cars I made, I will also release a Pack which uses the cars from this competition.
Seems like V12 was the way to go after all 
There was a method to my madness when I said V12s only in the original rules.
Cool, results! 
Look at that 12L V12 Beast on top 
. Really looking forward for the race.
I predict last place in the race. If not I will be genuinely shocked.
I didn’t tune my car for racing or any track… so yeah… not going to shine there either
Times were mostly competitive.
Not bad for being the only land barge
I am a little disappointed that I don’t get the consolation recognition of having the most HP or biggest motor 
[quote=“KLinardo”]Not bad for being the only land barge
I am a little disappointed that I don’t get the consolation recognition of having the most HP or biggest motor [/quote]
Maybe because you don’t have either of those titles. Check the first place car.
Also, second place! Even with a smaller engine hurting the prestige, great stuff!
[quote=“Leonardo9613”][quote=“KLinardo”]Not bad for being the only land barge
I am a little disappointed that I don’t get the consolation recognition of having the most HP or biggest motor [/quote]
Maybe because you don’t have either of those titles. Check the first place car.
Also, second place! Even with a smaller engine hurting the prestige, great stuff![/quote]
[X] Rekt [ ] Not Rekt.
I know that Leo. Like I said I’m disappointed that I didn’t build that car. I can read and I noticed I was beat out. Thanks for being condescending though. Really appreciate it!
Well, since you said that you had “the only land barge”, I thought you had missed his car on the list. Didn’t mean to sound arrogant or anything. Also, irony and text don’t go well together.
I do have the only land barge based on the pictures of the cars. I built a full size sedan. He just got a bigger engine into a smaller car.
Regardless, text and irony do not go together so I’ll take it as a mutual misunderstanding. No hurt feelings.
Wait… GTP… I built mine looking at the hypercar market.
DAMMIT
[quote=“squidhead”]Wait… GTP… I built mine looking at the hypercar market.
DAMMIT[/quote]
Opps!
wow, I got rekt by the lack of displacement, for sure. And by extension, lack of power and top speed. Also a smaller footprint. I’m fairly sure it was compounded by lack of power also impacting the sportiness score on top of everything that reduced the prestige.
Also, with all that power, I genuinely wonder how the car will stack up in a race. My entry, as usual, is relatively honed for good handling. Time to vote!
p.s. are we allowed to vote for our own car? I’ll declare now that this will affect my vote.
yes you may, if you like it, vote it.
Well, honestly, that’s not as a good as I was hoping for. I thought a 191 would go farther up even with a different market. Downloading the market competition and checking the couple changes I made seems would have netted me a 100.4 which wouldn’t have moved me up much.
I’m thinking I made it too expensive based on what Nialloftara posted the other day with 80% affordability (I had like ~72%). I do know I need to manage costs better while still putting up good numbers and weight too. My cars tend to get heavy and expensive quickly past a certain point. Or maybe, overall, it just wasn’t as good as I thought. Still a lot to learn. 
Good job guys! I can’t wait to see the final places after votes and lap-times are factored in. Gonna need some time to go over all the designs, sure 5 votes is a lot, but its still 30 cars.