REVIEWS PART 2!
The decision was now made which cars that would look good enough on the TV screen, but also important was how well the image of the car did fit the upcoming protagonists.
(First a little OOC info how this works.
Since I noticed that some of the important stats are actually linked to each other, I deciced to put them in three different groups, which are cheapskate score (price, fuel economy, SVC) that explains itself, gag score (offroad, practicality, utility) that shows how well the vehicle copes with doing the reoccuring gags, and finally sensibility score (safety, reliability, driveability, comfort) that shows how well the vehicle works as a sensible mode of transportation for a family in 1997.
To go further to the finals, the vehicle has to score at least “fair” in the 5 point system (poor, weak, fair, good, excellent) in all three categories. So, “fair, fair, fair” actually is a ticket to the finals, while “weak, excellent, excellent” is not. How come?
Well, an UAZ Buhanka would probably score extremely well in the gag and cheapskate categories, but poor in the sensibility category. Do you think that an UAZ Buhanka is the right vehicle in this case? Neither do I.
Also, the rating is compared to other cars in this challenge. If I say “the reliability of car X is low” it means among the other cars in this challenge, not necessarily that your car is extremely bad overall.
So, maybe a bit of “spreadsheet elimination” and boring reviews this time, but remember, in the finals, subjective stuff like aesthetics will once again matter, as well as individual scores. Also, even if reviews are boring, I have some interesting surprises going for the finals.)
THE ONES THAT DID NOT MAKE THE CUT…
AXUUS SABRE - @DuceTheTruth100
The Axuus Sabre was the most expensive car to buy when new. Fact is that (adjusted for inflation) you could buy a Salon AND a Mara for the same amount of money.
Fuel economy is on the low side, still no disaster, but a large-ish engine and automatic transmisson probably contributes there.
Service costs are pretty much mid pack, neither high or low.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: POOR
The Sabre is a reasonably practical and utilitarian family wagon, albeit not impressive in any way, some competitors beats it both regarding space and load capacity.
As an RWD car with open diff and economy tyres, it will get stuck when some of the cars are still rolling on through the worst of roads.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
A rather nicely appointed interior and sophisticated rear suspension makes the Sabre a decently comfortable car.
It is the most pleasant car to drive of them all. Power steering, ABS, automatic transmission and predictable handling probably helps a lot here.
Sophisticated technology takes its toll and the Sabre is by no means a trouble-free car.
Advanced safety technology makes the Sabre one of the safest cars of the bunch.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: GOOD
FMC GANNETT 3300i - @Lanson
For a car with a rather large engine and auto transmission, the fuel economy of the Gannett is acceptable, still it’s only average in this bunch of cars.
Service costs are on the higher side, even though there is worse cars.
The FMC Gannett was only marginally cheaper than the most expensive car, the Axuus.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: WEAK
Practicality and utility is slightly below average among the cars, due to, for example, a mediocre load capacity. However, it is still fair numbers.
The FMC will struggle in some of the offroading scenes with its RWD, hard tyre compound, open diff and low ground clearance. Fact is that it is the worst of all the cars.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
4 wheel independent suspension with a relatively well chosen tuning means that the FMC is the second most comfortable car of them all.
4 speed auto, a relatively flat torque curve, good handling, ABS, variable power steering all contributes to the FMC being almost as nice to drive as the Axuus.
Advanced technology takes its toll and the FMC has reliability slightly below average.
Being among the larger and more modern cars of the bunch, the safety rating of the FMC is rather high.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: EXCELLENT
BRICKSLEY WARDEN - @Madrias
3.9 litres of V6 in a large car with automatic transmission of course wants a sip every now and then. The fuel economy of the Bricksley leaves much to be desired.
Service costs of the Bricksley Warden are far from low.
This is a larger and more advanced car than most of the bunch - but that is also reflected in one of the worst purchase prices.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: WEAK
Due to the size, the Bricksley of course has decent room inside, but not impressive.
Despite the comfort oriented rear suspension type, the Bricksley has a high load capacity, one of the things bringing up the utility rating.
A LSD and more ground clearance than some of the competitors gives the Bricksley good offroadability for a RWD car.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
A large car with independent rear suspension, good sound insulation etc. gives the Bricksley a high rating for comfort - despite the rough running 90 degree V6.
Predictable handling, automatic transmission and all the driver assist systems available in 1987 means that it is an easy car to drive despite its size.
Reliability wise, the Bricksley is slightly below average in the group, but that is really just slightly.
The Bricksley is by far means the safest car of the bunch, probably due to sheer size and modern safety engineering.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: EXCELLENT
SALON BONUS DELUXE - @Mad_Cat
The Salon was the cheapest car to buy of them all in the group. Less then half the price of an Axuus.
No other of the cars even comes close to the low service costs of the Salon.
Some of the more modern cars gives better mileage, but that does not mean that the Salon is bad, it is remarkably better than average.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: EXCELLENT
The Salon is one of the smallest cars, and it shows, even if it is surprisingly roomy inside for its size and has a decent load capacity.
Finnish forest roads aren’t known to be autostradas, and that is evident in the engineering of the Salon. It can handle bad roads reasonably well.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
Comfort in the Salon is comparable to a torture chamber. No other car in the group is even close to being this bad.
Manual steering, manual transmission, hefty amounts of understeer, RWD with a primitive leaf sprung axle - driving experience really sends you back to 1974, more than any other of the cars.
Reliability is at a pretty average level - which maybe is not impressive considering the simple tech the car is built on.
Safety is the worst of the bunch due to small size and ancient engineering. At least this “luxury” version has decent headrests.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: POOR
SAGUARO T-REE 2000 WAGON - @MrdjaNikolen
For being such a small car, the Saguaro is really disappointing from an economical standpoint. Both fuel consumption, service costs and purchase price is higher than average.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: WEAK
When it comes to the ability to carry stuff, the Saguaro represents the average car more or less. Neither bad or good.
Offroad capability with an open differential, only front wheel drive and a less than ideal tyre compound is pretty mediocre.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
4 wheel independent suspension with an almost “french” suspension tuning means that the Saguaro has more than acceptable comfort for its class.
Power steering, front wheel drive, automatic transmission and a small footprint makes the Saguaro an extremely easy car to drive.
Reliability stats of the Saguaro are disappointing, in fact the worst of all the cars in the bunch.
The Saguaro has more safety equipment than usual for its class and era, making it a surprisingly safe car.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: GOOD
WARREN WARLOCK - @Texaslav
The so called “Big block V6” gulps fuel like an old drunkard gulps discount beer.
Service costs are on the higher side.
Purchase price is the third highest after the Axuus and FMC.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: POOR
A car as big as a house can of course carry a whole house too more or less - when it comes to carrying loads and/or passengers the Warren is superb.
Despite being only RWD, the Warren manages to beat all the other cars, including the AWD ones, for offroading capability. The answer is probably in the Eaton G80 differential that this example is optioned with.
GAG SCORE: EXCELLENT
The Warren is the top contender when it comes to comfort. It is not unthreatened as king of the hill - the FMC comes close for example - but in the end the Warren is unbeaten.
For its size the Warren feels surprisingly nimble to drive. It can more than well compete with some of the smaller cars.
If only given a little service every now and then, a Warren Warlock can probably serve you for a large amount of years. Reliability is better than average.
Safety is on par with the average car - not notoriously bad but still not impressive considering its size and safety equipment.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: GOOD
…AND THE ONES THAT GOES TO THE FINALS!
GASCAR 1015 1.6 - @conan
The Gascar is not a Gasguzzler but neither is it a Gassipper. It is pretty much mid pack when it comes to fuel economy.
Gascar has managed to keep service costs at a very sane level.
Considering the amount of car you get, the Gascar 1015 is surprisingly cheap.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: GOOD
Low load capacity somewhat overshadows the large amount of room this practical liftback has to offer.
Maybe because of the decent ground clearance, it manages to somewhat work offroad despite only being front wheel drive and on hard compound tyres. It is not better than average though.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
The Gascar 1015 does not shine when it comes to either comfort or driveability, but neither is it remarkably bad. It is about average.
This car is about as unkillable as a mountain goat. Reliability is top notch.
Like in so many other areas, the Gascar seems to represent the average car when it comes to safety rating.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: FAIR
HAYAKU STELLA 1600XS - @Hilbert
The fuel thirst of the Hayaku Stella is very low, among the better of all the cars in this bunch.
Servicing an Hayaku Stella is slightly cheaper than average.
Despite having kind of a budget image, the Stella was not remarkably cheap to buy, in fact slightly more expensive than the average in this bunch.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: FAIR
The Stella is decently roomy, practical and utilitarian. Not excellent by any means but it fulfills the expectations you could have.
Despite fair amounts of ground clearance, the FWD Stella does not impress offroad.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
Comfort in the Stella is at an average level.
Despite the manual transmission it is an easy car to drive. Power steering and ABS probably contributes to this.
Even if Stellas does not seem to encounter catastrophical failures very often, they are a bit cheaply built and not the most trouble free cars on the market.
Safety rating is more or less on par with average in this group.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: FAIR
MORAVIA JESTRAB - @Maverick74
Being a pioneer with fuel injection, the Jestrab has amazingly good fuel economy for the 70s.
The Jestrab has service costs that is pretty much equal to average.
Compared to some of its competitors, the Jestrab had a quite high purchase price.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: FAIR
For its size, the Jestrab is relatively spacious, practical and has good utility rating.
It gives a kind of rugged image, but the front wheel drive and 13 inch hard compound tyres aren’t going to help you at all during bad road conditions.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
The comfort in the Jestrab is a notch higher than average, which is a positive surprise considering age and size of car.
Despite not even having power steering, the Jestrab is an impressively easy car to drive.
The Moravia Jestrab seems to be a car that is hard to kill, it has better reliability ratings than many other of the cars that has been considered.
Safety wise, the Moravia Jestrab is at an about average level.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: GOOD
HAKARU CARICA - @Executive
Fuel economy of the Carica is slightly below average - not impressive for this type of car maybe.
The Carica is one of the cheaper cars to service.
Purchase price of the Carica was more or less at an average level.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: FAIR
The Carica is surprisingly roomy and practical, but being a small car is still something that shows in its ability to carry stuff.
As a little FWD econobox with relatively tiny hard compound tyres, the Carica is nothing to count on where the road ends.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
Nimble size and power steering makes the Carica relatively easy to drive, but manual transmission and lack of ABS might be the reason why it is not top notch.
A surprisingly well appointed interior means that the Carica has nothing to be ashamed of comfort wise for what it is, though it is still a small car with relatively primitive suspension, putting it somewhere in the middle.
Reliability wise, the Carica is placed just a notch below the very best cars.
Not all small cars are deathtraps. The Carica is better than average and probably among the best cars in its class.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: GOOD
MARA IRENA - @AndiD
Despite automatic transmission and a relatively primitive engine, the Mara Irena gulps less fuel than average.
The Mara Irena is among the cheaper cars to service.
Purchase price comes second only to the Salon.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: GOOD
The Mara Irena is a real workhorse with space for all your needs and guts to move it around too, impressive for such a small car.
The ground clearance is surprisingly low considering the standards of Archanan roads, meaning that this RWD, open diff car with hard compound tyres is kind of weak on the worst of roads.
GAG SCORE: EXCELLENT
The Irena is not really an Ivera Executive, but still offers decent levels of comfort.
Driving dynamics of the little Irena is at a pretty good level, considering the primitive tech with leaf sprung rear axle and RWD.
Reliability wise, the Irena is one of the better cars from its era.
After the 1986 update, the safety is at an acceptable level.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: FAIR
MATSUMA FUJI 1800DLX - @mart1n2005
Compared to the average car, the Matsuma Fuji 1800 DLX is slightly less thirsty on fuel, despite being all wheel drive.
Service costs of the Matsuma is at an average level.
Purchasing a Matsuma Fuji was a bit more expensive compared to some competitors back in the days.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: FAIR
Some competitors beats the Matsuma Fuji both when it comes to roominess and load capacity, although still is decently practical.
For an AWD car the offroad capabilities is disappointing, at the same level as some of the 2WD competitors.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
A comfortable suspension tune and a nicely appointed interior means that comfort is decent in the Matsuma Fuji.
AWD, secure handling and a variable ratio steering are all things that makes the Matsuma Fuji nice to drive.
Fujis have a reputation to break down much less often than the average car.
Having safety equipment on a much higher level than the regulations required back then, the Matsuma Fuji is still a decently safe car.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: GOOD
GSI BROODMASTER - @oppositelock
Fuel economy of the Broodmaster is about average, which is not too shabby with a V6 and automatic transmission.
Service costs of the Broodmaster is at an average level.
Purchase price of the Broodmaster was slightly lower than average.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: FAIR
The Broodmaster has decent room, but above all it has a high load capacity, its truck like leaf sprung solid axle actually is an advantage there.
Despite having an open diff and only RWD, the Broodmaster is actually decent when it comes to doing light offroading.
GAG SCORE: GOOD
Comfort wise, the GSI Broodmaster does not stand out in a neither bad or good way.
Despite power steering and automatic transmission, the Broodmaster is not the easiest car to drive, maybe due to its primitive chassis technology.
Considering the simple technology, the Broodmaster could have been a tad more reliable.
The Broodmaster is about as safe as average.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: FAIR
KAMIKAZE NAGOY - @Sealboi
The Kamikaze Nagoy drinks remarkably less fuel than average.
Service costs of the Nagoy is at an average level.
Purchase price of the Nagoy was at the expensive end of the scale.
CHEAPSKATE SCORE: FAIR
The hatchback is practical and roomy in itself, but both loadspace and capacity is compromised.
A limited ground clearance, only RWD and open diff means that there is better cars for bad road conditions than the Nagoy, finishing near the bottom of the list.
GAG SCORE: FAIR
The Kamikaze Nagoy is a comfortable car to travel in thanks to relatively soft suspension tune and 4 wheel independent suspension.
Kamikaze? Yeah, that’s the right name for this car considering its oversteering tendencies that gives a disappointingly low driveability.
Considering that, it might be good to know that your chance of surviving the crash is better than in many of the other cars.
Reliability is lower than for most cars in the bunch.
SENSIBILITY SCORE: FAIR
TL:DR - Moving on to the finals are @conan , @Hilbert , @Maverick74 , @AndiD , @Executive , @mart1n2005 , @oppositelock and @Sealboi . Congratulations!