Instabin (I forgot about this one)
Eris Vaqueiro Largo
@SheikhMansour
Exceeded loudness limit by 0.5
And now, onto the cars that didn’t break any rules.
Reviews
Mitsushita Zevol 1.5 J
@conan
The Zevol is a very well-engineered car. It is big and practical, and also efficient for its size. It is also the most comfortable car of the bunch. No complaints on that front. The exterior design leaves much to be desired however, with its rather awkward proportions. Lengthening the front overhang could help on that front.
Reduit W3
@kobacrashi
The Reduit is a small car, sure. But it also has a comically small engine, measuring at a measly 821cc. The engine itself is made entirely out of cast iron, which makes no sense in 2019. Overall the car does not give you much for its $19,000 price tag, except for variable electric power steering which is quite unnecessary in this context. There is also too much camber on the front and rear for a car like this. Exterior design is solid, no complaints there.
The interior looks okay, but is really nothing to write home about.
Peöne Zabelle 1.7
@ChemaTheMexican
The Zabelle is the opposite of the Reduit, having a very large 1.7 litre engine that isn’t too powerful for its size. Appearance-wise, it is chic, with an upmarket feel that I personally like. Yet, it has a basic interior and the least comfort out of all the entries.
The interior looks more “standard” than “basic” in my opinion. That aside, the interior doesn’t match up to the car’s upmarket external appearance. It looks too basic and dull, and a few splashes of colour could help make the interior look livelier or at the very least, more upmarket. Also, the pedals are flipped (with the throttle on the left and the clutch on the right)
FMC Casso 1.5
@Lanson
The Casso’s engineering is good, with everything placed where it should be. The only exception to this is the six-speed manual which while not completely unrealistic, is not something commonly found in this class of car. Vented rear disc brakes too. But considering that the car has such features, it is impressive that it is one of the cheapest in the competition, tying with the Yamada. The only thing that’s really holding the Casso back, however, is styling. The headlights and grille look like they have been squished together. A little spacing out can help.
As for the interior, it is generally good. I like the little details including the seatbelts and the centre console, which is angled towards the driver. However, I don’t think that wood is a thing for cars at this price point. In addition, the position of the front seats look rather awkward, and the rear seats look more at home in a much older car.
(Also, UK plates are yellow at the rear because UK law)
Ryoma Isogu XL Fleet
@noid5454
The Isogu is one of the smallest cars in this competition, partly because of the body itself which is based on a kei car. Styling wise, it looks good and feels modern. However, the long rear overhang and the lack of any kind of front overhang makes it awkward to look at from the side. The taillights could also benefit from wrapping around the corners of the body. Engineering-wise, the Isogu provides good fuel economy. However, the use of a fully cast iron engine is unrealistic for a 2019 car, and semi-active swaybars are an unecessary expense.
Despite its small size, the interior feels spacious due to the car’s tall, boxy shape. The lack of a centre console adds to the spacious feel, and would allow for easy access between the front and rear seats. The layout of the controls and all are good, but the lack of any colour besides grey makes the interior look dull. A little (fake) aluminium or non-grey fabrics would go a long way.
Tahirr Benevento
@Odyssey_Fan
Much like the Isogu, the Benevento is built on a kei car body. The engine has no balance shafts of any kind, and as such the engine could only rev to 5400rpm. Peak power is also at the 5400rpm. In addition, the brakes fade a lot and the wheels are tucked too far into the body, while the rims are huge for tyres of that diameter. The suspension tuning is also horribly out of sync.
As for exterior design, there is not much to say. The headlights are ancient and the rear bumper is sunken, meaning that in the event of an accident, the tailgate and whatever cargo it holds will protect the bumper and not the other way around. The exhaust sticks out like a sore thumb and so does the taillight which looks like it was simply tacked on. Not to mention that the front and rear license plates are different.
Faqqink MPV01 1600-16-5
@Mikonp7
The Faqqink MPV01 has a Faqqink big cast iron engine, measuring exactly 1600cc. Other than that, the engineering is good although the brakes suffer from some fade and fuel consumption is quite high. Some of these flaws can be forgiven however, since the MPV01 is the cheapest car of the bunch. In terms of exterior design, the MPV01 is exactly the kind of car that I had in mind, being similar to a Toyota Avanza and other cars in that class. The plastic cladding makes for a crossover-like appearance which is also quite popular in this segment of car. Overall, very nice.
The general design of the dashboard is very fitting for a car in this day and age, with its large centre screen and climate control dials. Some vents would be nice beause, well, where else would the cool air come from?
Matsuma V-xl7
@mart1n2005
On the other hand, the Matsuma was certainly something that I did not expect. Unlike other entries, it is based on an actual van. That isn’t to say that the car is bad though. In terms of engineering, it is solid and does well in most aspects. In fact, the Matsuma has a grand total of seven seats which makes it by far the most practical car out of the bunch. Fuel economy is on the thirsty side but this IS a van after all. As for exterior design, the van looks thoroughly modern and quite adventurous despite not having as much cladding or crossover accessories as other entrants. Very good overall.
GSI Noma
@oppositelock
The Noma is a futuristic, cute little box. And with its Jeep-esque wheels, roof rack, and side markers, the Noma is just one step away from becoming a crossover. My only complaint is that the taillights are all mounted on the tailgate, but that’s just a nitpick. The interior looks rather futuristic despite being made out of 80s parts and feels quite premium. Still, for a 2019 car with basic infotainment, an actual screen and climate controls would be preferred over the trip computer that the Noma has.
The Noma has the best fuel economy out of all the entrants (even with an automatic transmission), given its small dimensions and low weight even among its kei car-sized brethren. But because of its low weight, it has the lowest safety of all the entrants. No biggie, though. Overall, the Noma shows that good things come in small packages. And at a price, given how small that package is.
Yamada X-Kreatif 1.2 i-NDi
@variationofvariables
Motoaki Tanigo my father. Much like the Faqqink, the Yamada is exactly what I had in mind when I came up with the idea for the challenge, albeit with a lot of plastic cladding. The Yamada looks good overall, and has that distinctive Asian feel that makes it look at home in Southeast Asian roads. No complaints in the exterior design department.
The interior, much like the exterior, just about nails it. Cheap plastics in THAT shade of grey and beige, the AC vents, the tacked-on cupholders, etc. The interior is also chock-full of little details including, but not limited to, the ShART/STOP button, parking brake pedal, dome lights, speakers, etc. A very good effort with results that speak for themselves.
In terms of engineering, it is more good news. The Yamada has the highest drivability and among the lowest fuel consumption. The use of electric variable power steering isn’t very necessary but then the Yamada is one of the cheapest cars in the competition, tying with the FMC and losing only to the Faqqink. Yes my dark!
Saidenki Attra Fleet
@EnCR
Unlike other cars in the competition, the Attra has mixed head/block material, with an iron block and an AlSi head which is certainly more realistic than any full-cast iron engine. Engineering is good overall with the lowest service costs compared to other cars with automatic gearboxes.
In terms of exterior design, the Attra certainly has a European feel to it. While the rear side looks great with the sharp taillights and rear glass, the car looks almost too bland when viewed from the front quarter angle, as if it were missing something. That is not to say that the design is bad however, as it is still better-executed than most other entrants.
Mara Ekskurs 1.6 L
@AndiD
Last but not least is the Ekskurs. The engine, as with anything above 1.5l, is quite big for this segment. However, despite displacing 1.6l it is rather underpowered for its size. The engine could have also been tuned for 92 RON instead of 91. Other than that, the car is alright from an engineering standpoint.
The exterior design leaves much to be desired. The lines of the lower grille and running lights do not match up with the rest of the car, making them look quite awkward. The mirrors are also outdated, while the pieces making up the taillights don’t match up with each other.
…and now that you have read the reviews, it is time for the results.
Rankings
If it wasn’t obvious from the way I wrote its review, @variationofvariables and his Yamada X-Kreatif 1.2 i-NDi are the winner! Offering good performance (where it matters) and value for money, it is only right that a cabbie would choose the Yamada for work and personal duties.
2nd place - @mart1n2005
3rd place - @oppositelock
4th place - @EnCR
5th place - @Mikonp7
Thank you for participating. It was a pleasure to host this round, and I will be looking forward to the next round.
Spreaded Sheets
