abg7
10 January 2024 05:57
21
This is what you were referring to.
I just hope the next host chooses the right time to launch the next AGC - along with the right premise.
In fact, the fate of Mini Racers reminds me of this:
However due to an obvious lack of art assets the game development had grinded to a halt and was shelved as a stillborn project, never to see the light of day. Perhaps one day someone will dig around in the internet and find out about project CIRCUIT, and think “what if?”. Would it have actually made out to be a good game, or was there an obvious underlying reason that future game studios could perhaps learn from with its failure. Too much microtransactions perhaps? Or maybe too little? Was it internal conflict, maybe too ambitious, or did they simply run out of money? Regardless of that, one thing is for certain: we can probably blame the publisher for this.
That was for AGC16, but back then, it was an all-time low for AGC… Until now.
I wouldn’t go that far. Regardless we don’t need to contact discussing, as we are just rubbing salt in the wound at this point.
5 Likes
Please don’t let my tank give me hosting for next AGC.
oh ok, that makes sense. if the rankings get down to me, i pass.
i cannot host, so thats a pass for me
With no answer from @SoopeSpeed in 3 days, what does @shibusu say?
abg7
13 January 2024 12:20
30
We should wait for a response from both of them. If neither of them can host the next AGC, then we must contact the next highest placed finisher from 4th place on down, skipping over anyone who refuses to commit to hosting privileges for the next round as usual. Let’s hope it doesn’t get to the point where none of the entrants in AGC31 are available for hosting duties in AGC33, though.
I am willing to host, if @SoopeSpeed doesn’t take it up in 4-something days, I’ll try and put up a post.
3 Likes
you can host sorry I don’t check here often