JOC6F: Midlife Crisis Averted [Open for submissions]

Journey of Ownership 6F: Midlife Crisis Averted



1983:

Earl and Wendy’s son Henry, now 18 years old, has decided to study accounting at the University of British Columbia, leaving behind the wilderness and the hippy lifestyle of his parents, though he still intends to visit.

1985:

When his parents bought the RV, he accompanied them on their journey back home, where he was introduced to muscle car culture by way of a hopped-up Pontiac Trans-Am belonging to one of the neighbors. As he continued his studies, he was adamant that once he graduated and had a high-paying job, he himself would own one of those impressive machines.

2006:

Henry is now 41 years old and married to his wife Laurie, with whom he has a six year-old daughter. He works at an Important Financial Institution in the heart of Vancouver and has just received an important raise. Now, he wants to buy the muscle car that he had always promised himself, but with a wife and kid, he must also now think of other things, such as safety, space and practicality. After consulting with Laurie, they are looking to purchase a four-door muscle car which can offer a balance of real-life usability with coolness and fun.


Rules
  • This challenge will be run on the stable version of the game.
  • Model and family years: 2000-2006.
  • Trim and variant year: 2006.
  • Maximum price of $40,000.
  • Maximum techpool of $50 million. (The sum of the circled numbers)
  • No negative techpool.
  • No negative quality.
  • Allowed body styles:
  • Four-door sedans.
  • Five-door liftbacks (these will be classified as hatchbacks in-game, but the proportions must be those of a sedan in order to qualify, if in doubt please ask.) All bodies classified as hatchbacks will get a 10% penalty in the practicality stat due to their advantage over sedan and wagon bodies, in order to level the playing field.
  • Five-door station wagons.
  • Bodies from the Legacy Body Pack are banned.
  • Wheelbase between 2.75 and 3 meters, without rounding.
  • Five full seats only.
  • Six, eight and ten cylinder engines only.
  • Longitudinal, rear-wheel drive only.
  • No race parts, V16s or semi-slicks.
  • Unleaded Premium (95 RON) only.
  • WES9 emissions for SOHC and DOHC engines, WES8 for OHV engines.
  • Maximum loudness of 55.
  • Must be road-legal and Canada-spec (not too strict but it should have all the necessary lights, wipers, fuel cap, license plate size, etc.) if in doubt just ask.
  • Detailed interiors are appreciated but will not be judged.
  • ATS can be used within reasonable limits, if in doubt just ask.
  • The wheelbase can be tweaked with ATS, limited to only 5 centimetres either plus or minus (the total sum of both front and rear wheelbase offsets).

Priorities

:star: :star: :star: :star:

  • Design and quality of execution. Henry wants a car that looks the part.

:star: :star: :star:

  • Performance, will be calculated based on speed, acceleration and cornering Gs. Henry wants a proper muscle car experience.
  • Comfort. It should offer a comfortable ride for Henry and his family.
  • Drivability. Both Henry and Laurie should be able to drive it with no issue.

:star: :star:

  • Sportiness. The stat itself.
  • Practicality. It should have enough room for the small family and their things.
  • Service costs. It shouldn’t cost an arm and a leg every time it has to go to the dealership for a service.
  • Reliability. Since it’s going to be a daily driver, the car should be reliable.
  • Safety. While they don’t need the latest, greatest and most expensive safety tech, the family should be well-protected from any accidents.

:star:

  • Purchase cost. While they do have a budget limit, Henry doesn’t mind getting close to it or even meeting it.
  • Fuel economy. It is a muscle car and Henry knows it, he doesn’t mind filling up more often than usual.
  • Environmental resistance. The city of Vancouver has an official policy of salting the roads if winter conditions demand it, but since it’s not the most common occurence, it’s not that big of a deal.
  • Prestige. While Henry doesn’t really care about impressing his neighbours and coworkers, he still wants something nice that makes him feel successful.

Inspirations


Submissions
  • Model and family name: JOC6F - your forum username.
  • Trim and variant name: free.
  • Send your .car file via Forum DMs only.
  • Make a post with at least one picture of your car in this thread
  • Submissions open 2025-06-22T05:59:00Z, the rules can be discussed until then.
  • Submissions close 2025-07-13T05:59:00Z.

Changelog
  • Added wagons to the list of allowed bodies.
  • Increased techpool limit, clarified techpool rules.
  • Changed the priority level of the drivability stat.
  • Added liftbacks and cleaned up body style rules.
  • Added environmental resistance and prestige to the list of priorities.
  • Added practicality penalty to liftbacks.
  • Banned Legacy Bodies.
  • Restricted wheelbase tweaks with ATS.

Previous rounds:

JOC6A
JOC6B
JOC6C
JOC6D
JOC6E


2 Likes

Strictly sedans only? No muscle wagons?

3 Likes

good shout, i’m gonna say yes

Any chance we could have more techpool? 40 is low for this year and this segment

2 Likes

What would be more appropriate, 45 or 50?

$10m more in combined tech pool budget (for a $50m cap) would be the bare minimum amount that should be added.

Oh, and regarding the requirement for a 5-seat interior configuration, those seats should all be full-sized (2 up front and 3 more in the rear).

But with drivability a top priority, should manual transmissions be given a buff to compensate?

I’d just drop down drivability tbh. AWD may be banned but I still hate how every single challenge all of the top tier entries (yes including mine) have to have like 80 drivability with EPS and all that jazz just to be viable

2 Likes

I would suggest adding reliability somewhere in the priorities–I feel like that’s one that is pretty much always considered to varying degrees in a real-life purchasing decision, even if not always thoroughly researched.

I also decided that I am going to basically advocate in every contest from here on out that minor rule violations should be subject to a minor scoring penalty, or even forgiven, rather than an insta-bin. This is what I have generally adopted when judging, and it just feels awful being binned or binning someone else (in my opinion) because of something that could be fixed by the judge in about 2 seconds and a few clicks (e.g. clicking up emissions optimization, changing fuel type, changing trim year). That’s not to say I expect a host to substantially re-engineer a car to make it compliant, and some rule violations just make it impossible to fairly judge an entry, but I think that some degree of forgiveness is both fair and more fun.

Also, I’m excited to see Henry come back in the story!

2 Likes

To be specific, downgrading it to a 2-star priority would suffice.

Also, reliability could be a 2- or 3-star criterion, seeing that Henry’s next car will be his daily driver.

And prestige may have to be factored in as well - it could also be worth 2 stars, give or take.

alright, makes sense, i’ll drop it down one tier.

will do, thanks for suggesting

it would also take the participant the same 2 seconds.
the thing with instabins, at least in my view, is that reading the rules should be the minimum for entering a challenge, and if the rules were unclear, there is always the chance for clarification. if there were new mechanics or i decided to do something wacky with the rules, then sure, but considering there are no new mechanics or unconventional rules, i’ll keep instabins for this challenge.

1 Like

No hatch bodies? The Charger series has a particularly good one.

i think that just goes way beyond what is usually done for practical muscle cars, so i won’t allow them.

Hatch bodies are kinda uberbusted for a challenge that has practicality as a raw stat in it

AS OPPOSED TO STATION WAGONS FUNNY ENOUGH

I know not many others would care about this point, but their does exist 2 or 3 cars that I would think of as ‘FWD Muscle Sedans’, such as:

Ninth gen Chevrolet Impala SS/Sixth gen Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS

Pontiac Grand Prix GPX

Buick LaCrosse Super

I would probably be the only one who would make a FWD car for this, but I would like to if permitted.

3 Likes

what about liftback sedan bodies (somewhat) erroneously listed as hatchbacks?

I won’t have that. Liftbacks are proud members of the hatchback family, far as I’m concerned lol

It’s up to chowi, but note that they are all W-body GM cars. So that’s really one example, not four :rofl:

2 Likes

Yes to liftbacks, no to FWD cars as that’s not really what Henry is looking for.

2 Likes

And I’m in favor of keeping the ban on AWD - back in 2006, RWD was still favored for larger sports sedans.

I am being stubborn and pedantic and just making excuses for wanting to do something silly and asinine. :sweat_smile:

So… where does that leave these?