It’s because the body of other wheelbases has a bug
the number plate on LMH has to be red, blue is for LMP2
I was able to disguise (or work around) those when making my TMCC26 entry, and even created a newer spin-off of it as a separate model, with a carbon-fiber body/chassis and a six-speed gearbox mated to a more powerful engine to set it apart, among other things - you can see them here.
But a width of nearly two meters is too wide, and it weighs almost 200 kilograms, which does not fit the CNR positioning
The final list of entries is as follows:
@MCzenman (1 GT)
@BannedByAndroid (1 GT)
@Oreology (1 LMH)
@Danicoptero (1 LMDh)
@Lazar (1 GT)
@TanksAreTryhards (1 LMH)
@the-chowi (2 GTs, 1 LMH)
@Tyhikastija (1 LMH)
@Kitami (2 GTs, 1 LMH)
@FrederikLenius (1 GT)
@KenShiro (1 LMH)
@Prium (1 GT)
@randomtuner (1 GT)
@Portalkat42 (1 GT)
@DrDoomD1scord (1 GT, 1 LMDh, 1 LMH)
@donutsnail (1 GT)
@VaporRossa (1 GT)
@RacingDukes (1 GT) [PENDING RESUB]
@Le_cacatoes (1 LMH) [PENDING RESUB]
@ldub0775 (1 GT) [PENDING PRESENTATION]
@04mmar (1 GT, 1 LMH) [PENDING PRESENTATION]
@KSIolajidebt (1 GT) [PENDING PRESENTATION]
Those pending a resub or presentation post have 24 hours from the time I publish this post to get whatever you need in.
Instabins coming soon 
2020 KINGS HUNTSMAN 097 GT3
In a momentous collaboration, King’s Automotive and Vengen Aeromotive combined their expertise to create the King’s Huntsman 097, a formidable GT3 car designed to dominate the track at the 2020 24 Hours of Le Mans. With a naturally aspirated 4.7L V8 engine at its heart, the Huntsman 097 promised to deliver an unparalleled blend of power, precision, and aerodynamic.
boring stuff
Vengen Aeromotive, renowned for their aerodynamic innovations, took charge of sculpting the Huntsman 097’s body to maximize its potential on the Le Mans circuit. Every line and curve of the GT3 car was carefully crafted to reduce drag and enhance downforce, allowing for enhanced stability and superior cornering capabilities. Vengen Aeromotive’s advanced wind tunnel testing and computational fluid dynamics simulations played a pivotal role in refining the car’s aerodynamic profile, enabling it to slice through the air with utmost efficiency. King’s Automotive’s commitment to precision engineering was evident in every aspect of the Huntsman 097. From the chassis to the suspension, meticulous attention to detail ensured optimal handling and control. The integration of cutting-edge technologies and lightweight materials contributed to the car’s nimble responsiveness, allowing drivers to extract the maximum potential from the Huntsman 097 during high-speed maneuvers and challenging corners. The result was a harmonious fusion of power and agility, offering drivers an unparalleled driving experience. The collaboration between King’s Automotive and Vengen Aeromotive, epitomized by the King’s Huntsman 097, left an indelible mark on the racing world. Their dedication to pushing boundaries and redefining performance in the GT3 category captured the imagination of motorsport enthusiasts worldwide. The Huntsman 097 became an emblem of innovation, inspiring future generations of automotive engineering and igniting a renewed passion for the pursuit of excellence in racing.
This shell still has a lot of bugs
The weight cannot be less than 970 kg, otherwise it will stall
The body is too low, it will deform
The larger of the NA1/NA2 NSX-esque body sets (with a 2.4m wheelbase) is indeed at least 2m wide (before adjusting rear wheel arch morphs), compared with 1.7m wide for the smaller of the two (2.4m wheelbase). In fact, in real life, the ACO won’t allow anything more than 2m wide, making the larger NSX body set even more difficult to justify.
The 24 hour grace period is now over and I have received the pending items from:
@Le_cacatoes
@ldub0775
@KSIolajidebt
@RacingDukes did not make any resubmission, so the file they initially sent in will be the one I use.
@04mmar did not post an updated presentation for their LMH, so that car will not receive any points for presentation on the judging poll (-10 points).
Anyways, that’s not the main point of this post.
Out of a total of 30 entries, only a whopping FIVE were without any issues. @the-chowi, @Portalkat42, @TanksAreTryhards, and @Tyhikastija can skip the next few posts until I release the poll.
Every other car broke at least one rule, which is technically a binnable offense. But it wouldn’t be much of a challenge if we ran with just 5 entries, would it?
So I decided to limit bins to just the cars that broke the dimensions regulations. Which left… 15 cars. Out of 30. 
“But isn’t that unfair to the 5 entries that did everything right?”
Well, here’s what I propose. All cars which broke a rule but aren’t binned under the dimensions regs have a 10% penalty (-5 points) as well as -1 point for every rule they broke. That means only the 5 “perfect” entries will have the potential to get the full 50 points, while the rest have to suffer penalties of up to -11 points off their final score.
So once again, what do you think? In another 24 hours I will close this poll and release the bins accordingly. See you then.
- Allow “minor” offenders to compete with strict penalties applied.
- BIN 'EM ALL
0 voters
BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS BINS
MAJOR OFFENDERS
Nº : 54
Concurrent / Competitor : @KenShiro
Modèle / Model : ISN Canopus
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
- Does not have rear indicators
- Has stickers for external battery kill switches but no switches
- Has stickers for external extinguisher switches but no switches
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 72
Concurrent / Competitor : @Rise_Comics
Modèle / Model : Platinum Centuritron LMH
Infraction / Offence :
- No presentation
- Exceeds the defined length limit (bodywork)
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
- Features active aero (cooling flaps)
- Does not have fuel connectors
- Does not have rear fender cutouts
- Does not have the required Duchemin tyres
- Does not have “Hyper Car” stickers
- “HY” hybrid stickers are incorrectly placed
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
MINOR OFFENDERS
Nº : 12
Concurrent / Competitor : @Oreology
Modèle / Model : Viettor Vurai
Infraction / Offence :
- Features active aero (cooling flaps)
- Does not have the required Duchemin tyres
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 7 points
Nº : 66
Concurrent / Competitor : @DrDoomD1scord
Modèle / Model : Tio Casuario LMH
Infraction / Offence :
- Model Year is set to 2018
- Engine Family Name does not follow the defined convention
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 7 points
Nº : 03
Concurrent / Competitor : @Kitami
Modèle / Model : Leisurely GSX VI
Infraction / Offence :
- Presentation does not mention hybrid system but car has “HY” stickers
- Has stickers for external battery kill switches but no switches, not mirrored
- Has stickers for external extinguisher switches but no switches, not mirrored
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 8 points
Nº : 46
Concurrent / Competitor : @04mmar
Modèle / Model : Nerruci 223P LMH
Infraction / Offence :
- No presentation
- External battery kill switches are incorrectly placed
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 16 points
Nº : 74
Concurrent / Competitor : @Le_cacatoes
Modèle / Model : Plume Moteurs P670 LMH
Infraction / Offence :
- Front tyre width ends with 5
- Rear tyre width ends with 5
- Features active aero (cooling flaps)
- Does not have indicators front and rear
- Does not have the required external battery kill switches
- Does not have the required external extinguisher switches
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 11 points
Nº : 16
Concurrent / Competitor : @the-chowi
Modèle / Model : Milano Fenice Sedici
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit by 1mm (rounded up)
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 6 points
MAJOR OFFENDERS
Nº : 12
Concurrent / Competitor : @Danicoptero
Modèle / Model : Tarske PX-6 LMDh
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined length limit (rear wing and bodywork)
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 7
Concurrent / Competitor : @DrDoomD1scord
Modèle / Model : Tio Cr2640 LMDh
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined length limit (rear wing)
- Engine Family Name does not follow the defined convention
- Engine Variant Year is set to 2012
- Does not have indicators front and rear
- External battery kill switches are not mirrored
- External extinguisher switches are not mirrored
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
MINOR OFFENDERS
MAJOR OFFENDERS
Nº : 14
Concurrent / Competitor : @BannedByAndroid
Modèle / Model : Vermillion AV-X/R LM-GTE
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
- Features active aero (cooling flaps)
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 63
Concurrent / Competitor : @RacingDukes
Modèle / Model : Gavril Phoenix GT3
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined length limit (bodywork)
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
- Engine Family Name does not follow the defined convention
- Does not have the required position indicators
- Does not have the required external battery kill switches
- Does not have the required external extinguisher switches
- Does not have the required Duchemin tyres
- Has “Hyper Car” stickers despite being a GT
- Has “HY” hybrid stickers despite being a GT
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 65
Concurrent / Competitor : @DrDoomD1scord
Modèle / Model : Tio Eagle GTE
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
- Engine Variant Year is set to 2016
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 75
Concurrent / Competitor : @MCzenman
Modèle / Model : Peregrine VTS GT3
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined length limit (rear wing)
- Model Year is set to 2012
- Engine Variant Year is set to 2012
- Features active aero (cooling flaps)
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 24
Concurrent / Competitor : @Kitami
Modèle / Model : Empir-Leisurly XM4
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
- Does not have the required external battery kill switches
- Does not have the required external extinguisher switches
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 36
Concurrent / Competitor : @04mmar
Modèle / Model : Nerruci 470LFZ RS/R GT3
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined length limit (rear wing)
- External battery kill switches are incorrectly placed
- External extinguisher switches are incorrectly placed
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 8
Concurrent / Competitor : @Lazar
Modèle / Model : EFI RS Komi
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 75
Concurrent / Competitor : @ldub0775
Modèle / Model : Shijiazhuang ZRX GT3RS
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
- Model Year is set to 2018
- Variant Year is set to 2018
- 4 seats
- Position lights are not coloured
- External battery kill switches are not mirrored
- External extinguisher switches are not mirrored
- Does not have the required Duchemin tyres
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
Nº : 15
Concurrent / Competitor : @VaporRossa
Modèle / Model : Maartens Varese RSV-3 Pro
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit (bodywork)
- Does not have the required rear rain light
- External battery kill switches are not mirrored
- External extinguisher switches are not mirrored
Décision / Decision :
BINNED
MINOR OFFENDERS
Nº : 95
Concurrent / Competitor : @Prium
Modèle / Model : Capital Cardinal GTS-LM
Infraction / Offence :
- 2+2 seats
- External extinguisher switches are incorrectly placed
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 7 points
Nº : 114
Concurrent / Competitor : @donutsnail
Modèle / Model : Turból jv8 GT3 Evo2020
Infraction / Offence :
- Position lights are orange instead of the required green
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 6 points
Nº : 37
Concurrent / Competitor : @KSIolajidebt
Modèle / Model : Kings Huntsman GT3
Infraction / Offence :
- Engine Family Name does not follow the defined convention
- 2 seats
- Does not have rear indicators
- Does not have position lights
- Does not have the required external battery kill switches
- Does not have the required external extinguisher switches
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 11 points
Nº : 04
Concurrent / Competitor : @randomtuner
Modèle / Model : Hosher Machete GT3
Infraction / Offence :
- Features active aero (cooling flaps)
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 6 points
Nº : 07
Concurrent / Competitor : @Kitami
Modèle / Model : Leisurely CNR4
Infraction / Offence :
- Does not have the required rear rain light
- Has stickers for external battery kill switches but no switches, not mirrored
- Has stickers for external extinguisher switches but no switches, not mirrored
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 8 points
Nº : 87
Concurrent / Competitor : @FrederikLenius
Modèle / Model : Lenius Faro GTE
Infraction / Offence :
- Exceeds the defined width limit by 1mm
- Position lights are orange instead of the required green
- External battery kill switches are not mirrored
- External extinguisher switches are not mirrored
Décision / Decision :
PENALTY - 9 points
by 0.66 mm, in a very inconsequential spot…
seems very minor compared to some of the minor offenders’ faults…
i’d argue that it should at least be considered a minor offender.
Yeah i get your frustration, mine was one millimeter as well.
I would like to suggest another penalty for breaking the dimension rule.
-1 point per millimeter over the limit (rounded up)
People who are over by a smidge can appeal the bin decision since the car might still be competitive. People who are way over should not bother appealing since the car would not be competitive to relieve the workload of checking the cars. Would there be support for this?
I know the people affected would probably support this, so im interested in what the people who aren’t, thinks?
Probably goes without saying but I support this. Would be a shame for our cars to be out of the running when some oversights that to me seem more glaring are still in competition…
If all the major offenders in the GT category were simply rejected as-is, we’d have only 10 entrants there, of which only five entrants were not subject to any penalties. Also, as things stand, regarding the other categories, LMDh will be completely absent (neither of the submissions in that class will be eligible) and three of the 10 LMH submissions will be ineligible.