“…”
Everyone turned to Sandro, who was looking rather shell-shocked by now.
“What? Why is everyone looking at me?”
“You have anything to say about this one?” Lucia asked with a wry smile.
“Oh, I get it. You want me to go on another big rant about this design and how it is an insult to our brand and blah blah blah,” Sandro gestured. “No. I prefer not to speak, if I speak, I am in big trouble.”
He pulled out his phone and waved it at the others, who were curiously awaiting what he had in store next.
“I will just show you this video instead. No words from me.”
“I think that sums it up,” Pietro sighed. “Looks like a supercar crossed with a donk, of all things. A mid-engined supercar, just to rub salt in the wound. Even disregarding the questionable styling on display here, the Invicta has kept its traditional design formula for decades and it has always worked. That’s not gonna change now and it never will.”
OOC: This entry honestly just perplexes me, and it has me seriously questioning whether you actually read the brief for more than 5 seconds before banging out whatever idea you had in your head and sending it to my inbox.
First of all, I’d like to know what on earth compelled you to use a mid-engined body for this. Did you miss the first line of the rules, where it clearly states:
Must have a front longitudinal and RWD layout
Or did you not take notice of any of the pictures I provided in the “IRL Inspirations” tab? I thought that with all of the above, it was pretty clear what I was looking for.
You said:
Stupid engine configuration in a styling challenge!!!
when I instabinned your entry for the most egregious rule break I received.
Mid-engined cars and front-engined cars are usually styled very differently. And yours is definitely styled like a mid-engined car, with the general proportions of the body and the huge gaping vents at the rear. Again, if you looked at any of the reference pictures I provided, it’s pretty clear that this round is not about mid-engined cars.
The design also has nothing to suggest Pilati’s brand identity except for the front and rear badges. The grille is one of the most garish fixtures you can put on a car, and for extra measure you added a set of ugly BMW grilles in the middle.
The headlights don’t even have glass over them for some reason, and the taillights are vanilla fixtures that aren’t era appropriate at all. Maybe you thought sprinkling some LED lines around the place would make it modern enough, but contrary to belief, modern light design is more than just thin DRL lines out the wazoo with little rhyme or reason for their placement.
Also, I know using these LED line fixtures is probably one of the first things people would reach for to make DRL lines, but just having them bare on the body with no surrounds looks terrible. I highly suggest using MDHL, which has a huge selection of better-looking alternatives, and actually integrating them into the main light design, not just going off on some nearby body line.
I can definitely appreciate the use of at least some molding compared to other entries, but the difference between this and a design that I would say is “sculpted like a work of art” is that on the latter the molding works well to emphasise the lines of the body and the design features. Here, it’s just there for… IDK what. Maybe you can tell me.
My last complaint is this:
I have no idea why that singular piece of patchwork is just randomly placed on the side, and I have no idea what purpose it could even serve. Again, maybe you can tell me.
You mentioned keeping this design for your own purposes and just having some minor tweaks to it. You even “prepared for it” too. Maybe that’s why it looks totally out of place here? Either way, I suggest that you go back to the drawing board and completely overhaul this or just scrap it entirely.
I know you are perfectly capable of making some decent modern designs (especially some of your latest work), but this is just not it.
This design proposal will not be considered for the new Pilati Invicta.